{"id":8690,"date":"2006-10-07T10:49:30","date_gmt":"2006-10-07T14:49:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8690.html"},"modified":"2006-10-07T10:49:30","modified_gmt":"2006-10-07T14:49:30","slug":"nrcc-still-wants-foleys-money","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/nrcc-still-wants-foleys-money\/","title":{"rendered":"NRCC still wants Foley&#8217;s money"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Republicans nationwide have been donating funds from Mark Foley to charity at a blazing speed, apparently seeing no upside to having contributions from a scandalous sexual predator. Go figure.<\/p>\n<p>But the National Republican Congressional Committee, whose chairman, Rep. Tom Reynolds (R-N.Y.), is up to his ears in this mess, continues to have one principle that stands above all else: greed.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this week, the NRCC <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8628.html\">said<\/a> it hoped to get some or all of the $2.7 million Foley has left in his campaign account. Yesterday, the NRCC added that, unlike GOP candidates everywhere, it will keep the money Foley <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/news\/politics\/story\/459276p-386465c.html\">already contributed<\/a> to the committee.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Mark Foley may be an embarrassment to the Republicans, but they still like his money.<\/p>\n<p>The National Republican Congressional Committee intends to spend the $100,000 the former Florida legislator gave this summer &#8211; before his sordid e-mail exchanges with male teenage congressional pages turned him into a grand old pariah.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re going to do with it what we do with other donations &#8211; use it to help elect Republicans,&#8221; said NRCC spokesman Carl Forti.<\/p>\n<p>Asked whether the committee would consider returning the money, Forti replied, &#8220;Nope.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure the NRCC has thought this one through.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nDems appear anxious to localize the Foley scandal as much as possible. It&#8217;s a challenge, but they&#8217;re going for it. If, however, the NRCC keeps Foley&#8217;s $100,000, and starts distributing it to key House races, it offers Dems a chance to talk about &#8220;Foley money&#8221; all the time.<\/p>\n<p>But, the NRCC will say, the $100,000 went into a larger general fund, from which the committee is drawing. There&#8217;s no way to say GOP candidate X is getting money from Foley, because it&#8217;s all too indirect.<\/p>\n<p>But, the Dems will say, that&#8217;s the beauty of the argument. So long as the NRCC is keeping money they know came from a disgraced sexual predator, <i>all<\/i> of the NRCC&#8217;s money becomes suspect. <em>Every<\/em> race the campaign committee invests in offers Dems an opportunity.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Foley gave money to the NRCC, and now NRCC is giving money to candidate X. Contact candidate X today and tell him he shouldn&#8217;t be taking money from a disgraced sexual predator.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sure, it&#8217;s hardball, but if the shoe was on the other foot, would the NRCC hesitate?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Republicans nationwide have been donating funds from Mark Foley to charity at a blazing speed, apparently seeing no upside to having contributions from a scandalous sexual predator. Go figure. But the National Republican Congressional Committee, whose chairman, Rep. Tom Reynolds (R-N.Y.), is up to his ears in this mess, continues to have one principle that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8690"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8690\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}