{"id":8809,"date":"2006-10-19T15:43:11","date_gmt":"2006-10-19T19:43:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8809.html"},"modified":"2006-10-19T15:43:11","modified_gmt":"2006-10-19T19:43:11","slug":"for-mccain-it-depends-on-what-the-meaning-of-marriage-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/for-mccain-it-depends-on-what-the-meaning-of-marriage-is\/","title":{"rendered":"For McCain, it depends on what the meaning of &#8216;marriage&#8217; is"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I never fully understood exactly why Bill Clinton was labeled a &#8220;waffler&#8221; during &#8217;92 campaign, but the criticism stuck. I always found it relatively encouraging that Clinton could find merit in competing ideas, and could appreciate a certain diversity of thought before deciding on a course of action, but his &#8220;waffling&#8221; became a key criticism.<\/p>\n<p>But if you thought Clinton straddled the fence on controversial policies, wait until you hear how John McCain described <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/15330717\/\">his position<\/a> on gay marriage on MSNBC&#8217;s &#8220;Hardball&#8221; last night.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>MATTHEWS: But in so many cases in the last president election &#8212; the gay marriage issue was used effectively to rally the Christian conservatives to the polls, and it helped bring about the majorities in states like Ohio. You&#8217;re saying that your party has never taken a position adversarial to gay marriage and issues like that?<\/p>\n<p>MCCAIN: On the issue of gay marriage, I do believe, and I think it&#8217;s a correct policy that the sanctity of heterosexual marriage, a marriage between man and woman, should have a unique status. But I&#8217;m not for depriving any other group of Americans from having rights. But I do believe that there is something that is unique between marriage between a man and a woman, and I believe it should be protected.<\/p>\n<p>MATTHEWS: Should there be &#8212; should gay marriage be allowed?<\/p>\n<p>MCCAIN: I think that gay marriage should be allowed, if there&#8217;s a ceremony kind of thing, if you want to call it that. I don&#8217;t have any problem with that, but I do believe in preserving the sanctity of a union between man and woman.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Isn&#8217;t this at least as bad as &#8220;I didn&#8217;t inhale&#8221;?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThere&#8217;s simply no coherence to McCain&#8217;s approach. McCain says he wants marriage between a man and a woman to be protected and to have a unique status. He also says gay marriage should be &#8220;allowed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We should &#8220;preserve the sanctity&#8221; of a traditional marriage, and we should also allow gay-marriage &#8220;ceremonies.&#8221; The policy should be limited to &#8220;heterosexual marriage,&#8221; but McCain is opposed to &#8220;depriving&#8221; others of their rights.<\/p>\n<p>I almost get the impression that McCain&#8217;s policy is gay marriage should be allowed, just so long as it&#8217;s not gay marriage.<\/p>\n<p>And just to further highlight the problem here, McCain voted against the constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage in the Senate, but <a href=\"http:\/\/www.azconservative.org\/McCain_PMA.htm\">supports<\/a> the far more right-wing &#8220;Protect Marriage Arizona Amendment,&#8221; which is on the state ballot this year.<\/p>\n<p>A new &#8220;waffler&#8221; is born&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I never fully understood exactly why Bill Clinton was labeled a &#8220;waffler&#8221; during &#8217;92 campaign, but the criticism stuck. I always found it relatively encouraging that Clinton could find merit in competing ideas, and could appreciate a certain diversity of thought before deciding on a course of action, but his &#8220;waffling&#8221; became a key criticism. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8809"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8809\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}