{"id":9380,"date":"2006-12-19T09:45:36","date_gmt":"2006-12-19T14:45:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/9380.html"},"modified":"2006-12-19T09:45:36","modified_gmt":"2006-12-19T14:45:36","slug":"sam-brownbacks-obstructionism-the-final-chapter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/sam-brownbacks-obstructionism-the-final-chapter\/","title":{"rendered":"Sam Brownback&#8217;s obstructionism &#8212; the final chapter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been following Sen. Sam Brownback&#8217;s (R-Kan.) obstructionist tactics of a Bush judicial nominee with great interest, in large part because it&#8217;s such a breathtaking example of Republican lunacy. I&#8217;m pleased to report that Brownback has finally dropped his objections, but not before one last ridiculous move.<\/p>\n<p>First, a little background. The president nominated Michigan Court of Appeals Judge Janet T. Neff to be a US District judge. Brownback &#8212; who, up until quite recently, insisted that every judicial nominee, without exception, deserves an up-or-down vote &#8212; learned that Neff was on hand for a public ceremony in which two lesbians pledged their commitment to one another in Massachusetts. (One of the women was the daughter of a family who had lived next door to Neff for 26 years.) It was not a marriage ceremony and, despite some rumors to the contrary, Judge Neff did not officiate.<\/p>\n<p>No matter. Brownback blocked her nomination from receiving an up-or-down vote, effectively arguing that being friends with a gay neighbor for more than two decades <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/10\/16\/AR2006101601201.html\">necessarily disqualifies<\/a> a person for the federal bench, even if you&#8217;re nominated by the Bush White House.<\/p>\n<p>Brownback now believes that he&#8217;ll probably vote against the Neff nomination, but he has finally agreed to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/12\/19\/washington\/19judge.html?ex=1324184400&#038;en=a1762694445b51c3&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">allow a vote<\/a> on her nomination. But it&#8217;s worth noting that before Brownback graciously allowed the process to move forward, he proposed what he said was a compromise: he&#8217;d allow a floor vote on her nomination if Neff agreed to recuse herself from all cases involving same-sex unions. Brownback was blazing a new trail &#8212; no senator in American history had ever suggested that a nominee agree in advance to remove herself from deciding a whole category of cases.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Charles Fried, a Harvard Law School professor and leading conservative scholar, said Mr. Brownback&#8217;s actions were improper. &#8220;First of all, people go to parties for all sorts of reasons,&#8221; Professor Fried said, and how one would rule on a case should not be inferred from that private activity.<\/p>\n<p>Further, he said, &#8220;It would be inappropriate for the judge to recuse herself from any such case because it is a judge&#8217;s duty to sit on cases&#8221; unless there is a clear conflict of interest&#8230;. &#8220;For her to agree to any such restriction in this case would be wrong,&#8221; said Professor Fried, who has been both a judge and the solicitor general of the United States.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Keep in mind, Brownback&#8217;s obstructionism wasn&#8217;t limited to just Neff.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe NYT reported that Neff&#8217;s nomination was &#8220;included in a package of more than a dozen nominees whose confirmation had been agreed upon by both Democrats and Republicans. Mr. Brownback&#8217;s objections held up the whole roster of nominees.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>With this in mind, I&#8217;d like to remind my friends on the right about what baseless &#8220;obstructionism&#8221; is all about. Remember, no domestic issue has riled Republicans in the Senate more than judicial nominees. The fact that Senate Democrats would <i>dare<\/i> to do exactly what they did when Clinton was president, and block some of the president&#8217;s more controversial would-be judges, was, as far as the Senate GOP was concerned, a genuine threat to democracy.<\/p>\n<p><i>Every<\/i> nominee, Republicans said, deserve an up-or-down vote. No exceptions could be tolerated without tearing at the fabric of our system of government. Senate Republicans felt so strongly about this that they were prepared to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.samefacts.com\/archives\/_\/2005\/05\/cheating_ii.php\">cheat<\/a> and re-write the chamber&#8217;s rules in order to prohibit judicial nominees from ever being blocked again.<\/p>\n<p>And yet, here&#8217;s Brownback, blocking <i>more than a dozen<\/i> of the president&#8217;s judicial nominees &#8212; all of whom enjoy bi-partisan support &#8212; because one of them was friends with a gay neighbor.<\/p>\n<p>This breathtakingly stupid incident is worth remembering the next time Republican start whining about &#8220;obstructionism.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been following Sen. Sam Brownback&#8217;s (R-Kan.) obstructionist tactics of a Bush judicial nominee with great interest, in large part because it&#8217;s such a breathtaking example of Republican lunacy. I&#8217;m pleased to report that Brownback has finally dropped his objections, but not before one last ridiculous move. First, a little background. The president nominated Michigan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9380"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9380\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}