Bush tells Katrina victims, ‘You exist’

After leaving Gulf Coast, post-Katrina, recovery out of the State of the Union altogether this year, the president was in New Orleans yesterday for a series of photo-ops. His remarks to a local charter school were especially enlightening.

“I thank you all for giving me a chance to come. There’s nothing more illustrative of the issues that this community faces than to think that that blue line represented water and destruction. And yet, we’re now dry, we’re on dry land, recovering. And so I’ve come back to New Orleans, Louisiana, to remind people that the federal government still knows you exist, still knows you have issues, and wants to work with your leadership to address those issues.” (emphasis added)

I’m sure it was reassuring to the children and their parents to know that the president still believes they “exist,” but some of the audience should be forgiven if they remain skeptical.

Eighteen months after the storm hit, approximately 110,000 Katrina victims still live in trailers or receive rental assistance. “More than half of Orleans Parish’s public schools and nearly 70 percent of its child-care centers remain closed while the limited hospital emergency rooms are ‘saturated’ with patients.” Only 17 percent of New Orleans’s public schools have reopened.

Looking back at the speech Bush delivered in Jackson Square in September 2005, this wasn’t supposed to happen.

Update: Moreover, this is the kind of thing the White House should know to avoid.

One thing Bush likes to do in the Gulf Coast is hand out American flags to families rebuilding their houses. Long before he shows up, Bush’s advance team scouts the non-hostile property owners in a neighborhood, and later, the president drops by and gives the family a flag. The White House thinks this makes for good pictures — and maybe it did, a month after the storm. But a year and half later, with the region still a mess and so many people displaced, it seems a little tone-deaf to be handing out flags — politically, it does invite comparisons to what Bush isn’t doing in the region.

You think?

As has been pointed out elsewhere, the concern isn’t whether the government knows they exist, it’s whether or not they give a damn.

  • Attaturk had a great post up last night about the visit, with pictures of all the “regular folks” Bush met with — stunningly, all those folks were white. (Rising Hegemon is blocked here at work, so no linky … sorry).

    I guess while handing out American flags, the Bush folks realized that most of the African American community down there may have very well stabbed him in the eye with the things …

  • Knowing his tendency to mis-speak, he was probably trying to say:
    “And so I’ve come back to New Orleans, Louisiana, to remind people that the federal government still exists, even though it may not actually do anything.”

  • On the “Thursday Mini-Report” post this is what I wrote:

    I didn’t get to hear Wolf Blizter’s report on the pResident’s visit to NOLA, but when I saw he was at some family’s house, I wondered how long and how hard they had to search before the found someone willing to let him in the door. While I am sure there are still some people in my old stomping grounds, that wouldn’t mind the pResident, it would still have been difficult even in the Lakeview area (if he was in the city proper itself) which looks to be where he went.

    Sad to know I was not too far off base.

  • Unholy Moses (#2),

    The photo you link to, of George Walker Bush holding up a small American flag, bore a stunning resemblance (in my twisted mind anyway) to George Rouault’s “The Old King“.

    Both look thoroughly confused and stunned by objects which they grasp, but of which they have no understanding whatever — the old king by the flower he’s holding, the Shrub by the flag he’s holding. Both want to appear powerful; neither has a clue about much of anything.

  • Photo-ops, that is the only thing President George W. Bush excels at. He is adept at preplanned speechwriter-prepared–not extemporaneous–rhetoric without corresponding constructive action that would actually solve real-life problems of his countrymen and women nor does he have any clue to resolving any worldwide conflicts.

  • Ed–
    Truly oustanding! And quite true, sadly enough.

    I look forward to the day when our nation’s leader has a clue of what it really means to be a patriot.

  • I look forward to the day when our nation’s leader has a clue of what it really means to be a patriot.

    Comment by Unholy Moses — 3/2/2007 @ 2:10 pm

    [sigh] I’d settle for an SOB with a clue … about anything.

  • Jesseaw(#7),

    IMHO I don’t think Bush is good at photo ops, at best he gets a gentleman’s C, but he’s getting an F- at just about everything else so photo-ops tend to stand out.

  • I’d settle for an SOB with a clue … about anything.

    Well, I did see a squirrel on the way to work today that may be qualified. My guess is that, even in it’s rather … svelte state, it would probably have more of a clue.

    Which, in the end, will be Bush’s legacy – setting the bar so incredibly low that damn near anyone else looks great in comparison. Nixon would be so proud …

  • Glen (#10), on reflection, I agree with your assessment of George W. Bush’s capabilities or lack thereof. It’s just that in comparison to his other blunders, his photo ops do stand out. He certainly shows a strong callousness trait in all his actions to the detriment of those he’s supposed to serve.

  • Jesseaw (#12), I certainly agree with you there. I’ve often thought that everybody Bush really supports left NOLA in their Lear jet before Katrina (i.e. the mega rich), and everyone else is going to get meaningless photo-ops. It continues to amaze me how many people still support Bush despite every realization that Bush will never support them.

  • Comments are closed.