Monday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* If you missed it over the weekend, seven Democratic presidential candidates met at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, on Saturday for a forum on health-care policy. The event was sponsored by Service Employees International Union and the Center for American Progress Action Fund. (Republican candidates were invited, but none attended.) More coverage here.

* Responding to the notion that he’s appealing for votes based on sympathy, John Edwards told Katie Couric last night, “Do not vote for us because you feel some sympathy or compassion for us. That would be an enormous mistake. The vote for the presidency is far too important for any of those things to influence it.”

* Former Sen. John Breaux (D) is interested in running for governor this year, but will wait for an opinion from the state attorney general’s office on whether he meets all the legal requirements (specifically, on the issue of residency). The AP added, “The Democratic former senator is considered a strong possible contender in the Oct. 20 primary, and other potential Democratic candidates are waiting in the wings, saying they won’t run if Breaux does.”

* The WaPo ran a front-page item today noting that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is mulling over an independent, self-financed 2008 presidential bid. According to the Post, Bloomberg “has told confidants that he will not decide until early next year, when it has become clear whom Democrats and Republicans will nominate.”

* The law firm Rick Santorum has joined is filled with lawyers who contributed to his opponent. The Politico reported, “The law firm’s employees contributed $19,950 to Casey’s campaign, compared to $8,150 to Santorum’s, according to a center analysis of candidate filings with the Federal Election Commission.” (thanks to SKNM for the tip)

* Hillary Clinton appeared today at a Good Morning America town-hall meeting, where she said she’d support a firm deadline to withdraw American troops from Iraq by the end of August 2008, as last week’s House bill mandates.

I have a feeling that a Republican wouldn’t get asked (accused) the same way Edwards is about his decision.

Actually if the past is an indicator McCain, Giuliani and Newt would all divorce their wives and get younger richer ones if this happened to them.

The Edwards really are a two-fer. They’re in the race together.

  • So Hillary is in favor of a firm deadline, but she’s sponsoring a watered-down deadline?

    I’d support a firm deadline for Hillary to withdraw her head from her derriere.

  • Dale, good point. I wish Edwards would have pointed out to Hatie Whoric that she did not stop working when her husband had cancer and was being treated for cancer.

  • Former Sen. John Breaux (D) is interested in running for governor this year…

    This is in Lousiana, right?

  • I’m not happy with Edwards’ “we”, but other than that, he’s obviously right.

  • nancy,

    I’m not happy with Edwards’ “us”…

    would you mind elaborating on this? thanks in advance.

  • I mean only that I’m not actually voting for Elizabeth.

    Yeah, yeah… I know that the family comes with the candidate, but I am of the belief that a great candidate might be married/related to someone who sucks. Conversely, they may be married/related to someone who’s terrific. Either way, the spouse/brother/sister/mother, etc. isn’t running.

    So I am not voting for “them”. I am either voting for him or I’m not.

  • The guy who put the voodoo in voodoo economics, David Stockman who was Ronnie Reagan’s budget director, is under indictment for securities fraud – http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070326/reagan_aide.html?.v=9 . That’s why we need to prosecute these crooks before they get into the private sector: their morals don’t get any better if they got away with criminal activity while working in government

  • In their coverage of the health-care forum, both the Post and the Times focused on the proposals of the front-runner candidates. I think they’d better serve the public if they concentrated on the merits of specific plans, rather than continuing to marginalize candidates whose ideas are arguably the most worth listening to.

    Besides healthcare, I’m thinking of Kucinich’s 12-point plan for ending the war in Iraq that’s similar to what former Senator George McGovern and William Polk have proposed. These are the only plans I’m familiar with whose steps acknowledge our nation’s moral culpability for the Iraq disaster. The fact that each has been largely ignored indicates just how impoverished the discussion of national issues is in the present political and media environment.

  • nancy,

    Yeah, yeah… I know that the family comes with the candidate, but I am of the belief that a great candidate might be married/related to someone who sucks.

    Thanks for the clarfication.

  • Regarding the health care event, I reviewed the various proposals and concluded in a post that this shows that, regardless of how much conservatives throw out the bromide, Democrats oppose Socialized Medicine.

    http://liberalvaluesblog.com/?p=1288

    If interested in Medicare for all, check out the comments where I’ve been debating a hosital administrator who has a number of quite specious arguments against Medicare. (Or maybe you shouldn’t listen to me as the guy claims any physician who defends Medicare must have Stockholm Syndrome.)

  • Ron (#13),
    Thanks for the link to your website and the very informative discussion of health-care proposals taking place there.

  • Comments are closed.