Eschewing email (and accountability)

I mentioned this in passing earlier, and hope you’ll forgive the redundancy, but the fact that White House officials are largely giving up on their email accounts is of growing significance.

Over the last week or so, we’ve learned that White House deputy political director J. Scott Jennings communicated with Justice Department officials about the appointment of a controversial U.S. Attorney through a private email account registered to the RNC. When Karl Rove sends emails, 95% of the time, he avoids his White House account and uses an RNC account. The White House public affairs office reportedly does the same thing. The president has decided not to use email at all because, as he put it, he’s concerned about “different record requests that could happen to a president.”

Now, it’s apparently become standard practice in the West Wing.

The growing controversy over the firing of federal prosecutors and what administration officials knew about it is renewing concerns among Bush aides over the less-than-secret aspect of E-emails. Those concerns were elevated this week when a House chairman asked that all aides retain their E-mails.

But just a week after E-mails in the U.S. attorneys case became a main focus of congressional Democrats probing the firings, several aides said that they stopped using the White House system except for purely professional correspondence.

“We just got a bit lazy,” said one aide. “We knew E-mails could be subpoenaed. We saw that with the Clintons but I don’t think anybody saw that we were doing anything wrong.”

But the release of White House emails to the Democrats and the expanded request for more from Rep. Henry Waxman has iced the system. At least two aides said that they have subsequently bought their own private E-mail system through a cellular phone or Blackberry server. When asked how he communicated, one aide pulled out a new personal cellphone and said, “texting.”

It’s hardly a secret that the Bush gang has an inordinate fondness for secrecy, but this is ridiculous. More importantly, this may go well beyond just White House aides obsessing over privacy.

First, there’s still the Presidential Records Act to consider. The PRA mandates thorough record-keeping, which Rove & Co. apparently hope to avoid. The law isn’t supposed to be optional.

Second, as Josh Marshall noted, these White House methods may be “too clever by half.”

If the president’s aides were using RNC emails or emails from other Republican political committees, they can’t have even the vaguest claim to shielding those communications behind executive privilege.

And third, as Laura Rozen explained, there are security concerns to consider. Rozen noted earlier this week that the White House is a huge electronic surveillance target and by announcing that they’re not using their official email accounts anymore, foreign intelligence agencies might “become curious about the 95% of the government’s business that Karl is lobbing outside the system.” Rozen added today:

A reader who has a security role at a federal agency writes, “On the issue of using outside/unofficial e-mail address from official sites, the CIO at [redacted] has expressly forbade the practice for security reasons as it is all too easy to put sensitive information in an e-mail. … Needless to say, hearing that the WH does not mandate that practice and lets [Rove] do 95% of his e-mailing from a blackberry, presumably with access to an unofficial address, is quite shocking. Still find it absolutely amazing that his clearance has not been revoked.”

Stay tuned.

“Still find it absolutely amazing that his clearance has not been revoked.”

Ok, how about now?

  • I think we’re getting back to an original question I had some months ago about separation of powers, since this is where I think this is heading. Let’s say these e-mails are not covered by executive privledge, and let’s say Bush doesn’t hand them over anyway, so it goes to the Supreme Court, and they say hand them over, and Bush says, “Nah.” What’s next? A Constitutional Crisis. Okay. So it’s a Constitutional Crisis. What’s next?

  • “We just got a bit lazy,” said one aide. “We knew E-mails could be subpoenaed. We saw that with the Clintons but I don’t think anybody saw that we were doing anything wrong.

    The entire problem with “movement conservatism” in a nutshell. They’re so convinced of their righteousness they fail to see their participation in a criminal conspiracy.

  • In fact, as a follup to my last, it has nothing to do with “getting a bit lazy.” These conspirators operated on evading the system because they could be subpeonaed because it fits their criminals’ mentality.

  • This could lead to such a huge security breach, I can’t believe they’re this stupid.

    I only worked in IT for not quite two years, but I can assure you that it’s stunningly easy to snag packets as they’re sent to a wireless device (phone, Crackberry). Using internal systems is a much, much better way to send messages of a sensitive nature.

    Sure, they could encrypt messages a number of different ways (public/private keys, etc.) but while many of those ways make it damn near impossible to decipher a message, it’s not 100% impossible. And considering how mind-blowingly inept this administration is at … well, pretty much everything, they’d probably screw it up at some point.

    Also, by using an outside vendor’s system, there is a chance that vendor could be compromised — whether internally through an employee that works at said vendor, someone hacking into the system, etc.

    Of course, if they weren’t doing so many things of questionable legality, this wouldn’t even be an issue.

    Idiots. All of them.

  • I saw a fantastic bumper sticker yesterday and it seems to be a fitting commentary for a story such as this. It was pictographic but basically it said (Nixon) – (brain) = (Bush)

  • The upside of all this is that even if the Bushies destroy all their internal communications, we’ll probably eventually be able to get full copies from the Chinese or the Israelis or somebody.

  • reminds me of the mafia boss played by paul sorvino in “goodfellas.” he only gave verbal orders to selected people for exactly the same reasons.

  • If all of their emails are on RNC servers, they can’t possibly argue that the firings are “not political”.

  • memekiller–just on this issue only, my guess is that the records of these emails are instead held by third party commercial service providers, and it would be those service providers who would be subpoenaed to turn over the records after a Supreme Court decision. No third party service provider or its officers are going to be willing to run the risk of going to jail for W at this stage.

  • What’s next? We find out they were having chats using AOL Instant Messenger? Is Karl writing a workplace blog we haven’t heard about?

    I’ve worked in corporations where this level of insecurity in electronic communication would get you fired, even if no secrets were leaked. And despite the CEO’s ego, there we didn’t deal with, like, the fate of the entire world.

    The aptness of the phrase “Mayberry Machiavellis” is revealed again.

    It’ll be fun to see Henry Waxman get the guy who runs the RNC servers up in front of Congress to talk about security.

    Maybe by then someone will explain to me how, if you know about governmental records law, and you know your email is subject to subpoena, because you work in the friggin’ White House, how taking action to avoid that is merely ‘a bit lazy’ and not ‘a lot criminal’.

  • Years ago I almost got one freshly minted MBA twit fired for asking me to forward sensitive email to her webmail account. “Oh, I do it to all my mail!”. This was in a major corporation which *owned* that particular webmail service too. I just cc’d her boss when I replied that I was uncomfortable doing that…

    This is seriously appalling – and shows that those aides are typical careerist pointy-hairs who have no clue about anything.

  • Hey, aren’t these the same people who say (on a regular basis):
    “If you are not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.”
    ???

  • If it looks like a criminal conspiracy, and smells like a criminal conspiracy; chances are it’s a criminal conspiracy. Once this information gets out to the public, and it will. These guys are really going to start feeling the heat.

  • This is pretty stupid and is actually very risky if we are concerned about national security. Once again, incompetence and political position trumps caution and common sense. These people are dangerous. I wonder what national secrets they have cavalierly mentioned in passing with an unsecured e-mail system. If they don’t bring down the republic in the next twenty-two months, it will be because of the grace of God.

  • Read that Kos diary that BinGA suggests fer sher — though it may be above your techie-level (was for me) — it’s crossposted at ePluribus Media too, and the comments both places are invaluable. Another must-read: http://www.trustme.com/story.php?title=secret-White-House-comunication-system. Plenty of plain English there, and it’ll curl your hair to the roots.

    As a cyber-savvier friend puts it: It’s a crazy nest of computer tech stuff, but the salient point is: there appears to be a shadow system of network communication being run inside the WH by longtime Bushies. The company hosting this shadow network also has access to those networks that support, say, the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. …

    There’s so many directions this could go. Since McConnell’s wife is the official “owner” of the biz, I’d like to see how many gov’t contracts they got and under what (false) pretenses, kind of like a version of Wilkes’ fake network. There’s also a reference in the comments to a 2004 server breach on the Dem Senate side. Then there’s the interesting Shia Muslim connection with the only other domain on the server [that’d be the Aga Khan IV]. That’s just the tip of the iceberg. ePluribus has been working on untangling this for two years, and the comments there are also wild.

    For that Dem server-breach in ’04, see http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/01/22/infiltration_of_files_seen_as_extensive.

    Computerese-literate or not, you’ll see this is HUGE.

  • Lotus, that’s a damning article. I remember when that story broke. I don’t recall, however, whether there was any significant legal follow-up. Did anyone ever get prosecuted?

  • They didn’t think they were doing anything wrong seems to be the excuse they may be attached to a good bit of what the Bush administration is doing.

    Of course I would find it more than just a little amusing if it actually makes it easier to subpoena that precisely because it wasn’t on a .gov email address. Hoited by their own petard.

    Of course since 95% of Rove’s work likely was really was for RNC business and not official government business I guess it would make sense that it was done from an RNC account.

  • Comments are closed.