Sampson suggests Gonzales lied — a lot

Update: It looks like Senate Republicans have shut down this afternoon’s hearing. More soon. Second Update: The GOP’s complaint has been withdrawn and the hearing is back on.

So far, much of Kyle Sampson testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee seems focused on debunking comments from Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales wrongly stated he was not involved in discussions about the firings of federal prosecutors, his former chief of staff told the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday.

“I don’t think the attorney general’s statement that he was not involved in any discussions of U.S. attorney removals was accurate,” testified Kyle Sampson, who quit this month as Gonzales’ top aide. “I remember discussing with him this process of asking certain U.S. attorneys to resign.”

Sampson said Gonzales attended a crucial meeting on the firings Nov. 27, 10 days before they were carried out.

Indeed, Gonzales forcefully insisted two weeks ago, “I was not involved in seeing any memos, was not involved in any discussions about what was going on…. I never saw documents. We never had a discussion about where things stood.” Today, Sampson explained that none of this was true. Gonzales was not only at the Nov. 27 meeting, he was, according to Sampson, involved in “as many as five” discussions on the matter.

Sampson went on to say that Gonzales’ comments blaming him for withholding information from senior Justice Department officials was also a lie.

An exchange with Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stood out.

In a press conference on March 13, 2007…Gonzales specifically faulted his chief of staff Kyle Sampson for not properly informing Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General William Moschella prior to their testimonies before Congress. Gonzales said:

“I regret the fact that information was inadequately shared with individuals within the department of Justice and that consequently information was shared with the Congress that was incomplete. But the charge for the chief of staff here was to drive this process and the mistake that occurred here was that information that he had was not shared with individuals within the department who was then going to be providing testimony and information to the Congress.”

In their testimonies, McNulty and Moschella attempted to downplay White House involvement or coordination in the attorney firings.

Today, under questioning from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Sampson said, under oath, that he “shared information with anyone who wanted it.” Specifically, Sampson said he did share information with McNulty and Moschella prior to their testimonies before Congress. Schumer responded: “So the Attorney General’s statement is wrong, is false. How could it not be?” Sampson froze. Ultimately, he acknowledged Gonzales’s statement is “not accurate.”

I’ll have more later, but for now, Sampson is making Gonzales look pretty bad — and there’s no one on the Committee willing to stand up for him.

Looks like there are going to be a LOT of bodies stuck to the undercarriage of the 5.15 bus to political oblivion.

I call shotgun.

  • It’s going to be very interesting to hear Goodling testify under oath with immunity. She won’t be immune from perjury while testifying. Messiah College and Regents Law might well be the choices of someone who wouldn’t lie to begin with as well as being radical christian neocon hotbeds. The ultra conservatives are feeling more and more betrayed by the Bushies.

    Can we get back to taking care of the veterans now?

  • Gonzales is the guy who wrote the torture memo; he is a little weasel, yes man. I think it is a grade B miracle that part of the ugly truth is actually coming out. What’s the matter with Congress? How could they have confirmed the little half wit in the first place? The man wrote a memo that said it was OK for the United States of America to use torture!

    When historians try to write the story of this administration and the attempted overthrow of all that we value as Americans, they will look at Alberto Gonzales and shake their heads. Gonzales is a stooge and an enabler, but the real enablers are the Republicans and Democrats in the last Congress who were afraid to ask questions.

  • But… Clinton fired 93 prosecutors! Therefore if Gonzales lied gave “incomplete” information, it doesn’t really matter! He’s just the attorney general.

    And besides this is just an overblown personnel matter. Any bets on whether Gonzales is still AG by the time he testifies?

    More popcorn on aisle 7.

  • To Gonzo: (in Frank G. Robinson voice)
    “Where’s your George Bush now?”

    Gonzo is so oblivious to the fact that guys like Bush will be more than happy to throw the token minority friend under the bus to protect his ass that I would like a photo of Gonzo’s face when Bush fires him to save his “Brain” Rove from the assforking he so richly deserves.

  • And then we need to take his e-mails and hang Karl Rove Jr. on his own petard, the lying little fuckwit. Make him testify about what he really said back then.

  • Oops. Edward it is. I screwed up.

    I’m gonna smack my head with a Frank Robinson baseball bat.

  • I say we render Alberto and beat the truth out of him.

    Comment by chrenson

    How about rendering Alberto and making him into bars of soap that could be used to wash out RepubCo’s foul mouths.

  • It took a little digging with google to find Former Dan’s movie reference. In Cecil B. DeMille’s epic The Ten Commandments, Edward G. Robinson’s character (“Dathan”) says to Moses (played by Charlton Heston)–I think–“where’s your Messiah now”?

  • Rendering Abu into a big vat of oil would be nice. It’ll give us something to boil Rove in….

  • The daunting ailment that has plagued those in the service of the White House continued to take its toll on the President’s minions. Today, members of a congressional investigative committee continued their efforts to find the source of the ailment as it seems to be highly contagious. The most recent strains seem to be far more pervasive yet determining its origin continues to remain elusive. Senator Chuck Schumer closed his questioning by offering the hypothesis that the ailment was a virulent form of lying.

    Many within the media stepped in to immediately offer the public a layman’s interpretation of the symptoms as well as analysis of the ongoing implications if a cure for the ailment could not be administered soon. The White House continued to downplay the seriousness of the ailment as it sought to allay the growing fears within the American public that the disease might soon decimate the bulk of their elected officials. A growing number of pundits continued to suggest that the President is in denial as to the severity of the ailment and what it might do to the Republican Party.

    See a tongue-in-cheek visual spoofing an upcoming episode of Saturday Night Live featuring a guest appearance by “The President’s Prevaricators”…here:

    http://www.thoughttheater.com

  • Comments are closed.