When it comes to foreign policy, former NYC Mayor [tag]Rudy Giuliani[/tag] recently told a supportive audience, “It’s something that I think I know, I think I know as well as anybody else who’s running for president, probably better than a lot.”
Yesterday, Giuliani was even more confident in his background.
Rudy Giuliani said yesterday that his days as mayor of New York’s melting pot and his globetrotting as a security consultant give him more knowledge of the world than anyone else running for President (emphasis added).
“I’ve probably been in foreign lands more than any other candidate for President in the last five to six years,” he said during a morning stop in New Hampshire. […]
Giuliani argued that his eight years as mayor as well as what he said were more than 90 foreign trips during his time as a private business consultant had taught him the ways of the world.
If Giuliani wants to argue, as other candidates have, that foreign policy experience isn’t necessarily a prerequisite for a presidential candidate, that’s fine. Barack Obama has argued, persuasively, that Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld brought more foreign policy experience to their offices than anyone in a long while — and it didn’t seem to matter.
And if Giuliani wants to argue that a lack of foreign policy experience need not be a political hindrance, that’s fine, too. In the last four presidential elections, the losing presidential candidate arguably had a more extensive background in foreign policy than the winner. Americans look for sound judgment, not necessarily on-the-job experience.
But for Giuliani to argue, with a straight face, that he has more knowledge of the world than anyone else running for president is truly ridiculous.
As Jonathan Chait recently explained, “The normal rule in American politics is that if you run for president and your experience comes at the state level, most people will assume that foreign policy is your weak point…. One would presume that this applies even more to presidential candidates whose highest office reached is mayor. And yet we have the strange case of Rudolph Giuliani … [who] has somehow built a record as a foreign policy guru despite having no experience beyond the municipal level.”
Giuliani helped lead a diverse city? That’s true, but being around people from other countries does not make one an expert in foreign policy. Giuliani has traveled to a variety of countries? That’s also true, but I have a relative who’s visited more countries than I can remember, but (with all due respect to the person I’m thinking of) this doesn’t make her a policy professional when it comes to international affairs.
Look, Joe Biden has served on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for three decades. Bill Richardson was the ambassador to the United Nations and has traveled the world meeting with heads of state, resolving diplomatic crises. Chris Dodd has been a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and received the Edmund S. Muskie Distinguished Public Service Award in recognition of his leadership in foreign policy. John Edwards served on the Senate Intelligence Committee and wrote a detailed report last year on relations with Russia, while both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have served on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and traveled abroad on fact-finding missions.
Rudy Giuliani cut a few business deals with international companies and was mayor of a city with thousands of immigrants. That’s not foreign policy experience.
National Review’s Rich Lowry noted yesterday that when Giuliani responds to voters’ questions, “his answers on foreign policy and military affairs aren’t deeply informed.” Of course not.
As Anonymous Liberal put it:
If Giuliani is serious about this whole presidential thing, it might be worth his while to actually study these issues a little and get to a point where he can talk about them without always sounding like he’s trying to recall some memorized talking point. His image as the 9/11 mayor is only going to get him so far. If you put him on stage with Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama right now, he would be reduced to a stammering fool in short order.
Indeed. Misplaced arrogance is never pretty, but in a presidential candidate, it’s a recipe for disaster.