Is Pat Robertson’s law school changing America?

One of the problems with public perceptions about crazed TV preacher Pat Robertson is that most perceive him as just a crazed TV preacher. He’ll go on his crazed daily television show (The 700 Club), offer crazed commentary just about everything, and then make crazed rationalizations for his lunacy. The media marvels at his madness, but generally overlooks the bigger problem: Robertson laid out an ambitious agenda years ago, and he’s succeeding.

Thanks to the prosecutor purge scandal, and former Alberto Gonzales aide Monica Goodling’s role in it, the public is learning about Robertson’s Regent University, which, as Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick noted over the weekend, is doing exactly what it set out to do.

Goodling is only one of 150 graduates of Regent University currently serving in this administration, as Regent’s Web site proclaims proudly, a huge number for a 29-year-old school. Regent estimates that “approximately one out of every six Regent alumni is employed in some form of government work.” And that’s precisely what its founder desired. The school’s motto is “Christian Leadership To Change the World,” and the world seems to be changing apace. Former Attorney General John Ashcroft teaches at Regent, and graduates have achieved senior positions in the Bush administration. The express goal is not only to tear down the wall between church and state in America (a “lie of the left,” according to Robertson) but also to enmesh the two.

The law school’s dean, Jeffrey A. Brauch, urges in his “vision” statement that students reflect upon “the critical role the Christian faith should play in our legal system.” Jason Eige (’99), senior assistant to Virginia Attorney General Bob McDonnell, puts it pithily in the alumni newsletter, Regent Remark: “Your Resume Is God’s Instrument.”

As Christopher Hayes explained in The American Prospect, more than two-thirds of Regent students identified themselves as Republicans, but the numbers aren’t as important as the school’s mission. As Hayes noted, “what students are taught at a place like Regent, or even Calvin and Wheaton, is to live out a Christ-centered existence in all facets of their lives. But what they learn is to become Republicans.”

Slate’s Lithwick suggests the more significant problem here is that these Regent grads left Robertson’s confines confused: “Goodling and her ilk somehow began to conflate God’s work with the president’s.” I think there’s some truth to that — Regent grads may be convinced that Bush is somehow God’s messenger on earth — but I suspect the problem is more practical than that.

Thanks to Robertson’s minions infiltrating Bush’s Justice Department, religious right activists are literally helping drive federal law enforcement, particularly when it comes to civil rights and picking U.S. Attorneys.

Because Goodling graduated from Regent in 1999 and has scant prosecutorial experience, her qualifications to evaluate the performance of US attorneys have come under fire. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, asked at a hearing: “Should we be concerned with the experience level of the people who are making these highly significant decisions?” […]

“It used to be that high-level DOJ jobs were generally reserved for the best of the legal profession,” wrote a contributor to The New Republic website . “. . . That a recent graduate of one of the very worst (and sketchiest) law schools with virtually no relevant experience could ascend to this position is a sure sign that there is something seriously wrong at the DOJ.” […]

Many of those who have Regent law degrees, including Goodling, joined the Department of Justice. Their path to employment was further eased in late 2002, when John Ashcroft , then attorney general, changed longstanding rules for hiring lawyers to fill vacancies in the career ranks. Previously, veteran civil servants screened applicants and recommended whom to hire, usually picking top students from elite schools.

In a recent Regent law school newsletter, a 2004 graduate described being interviewed for a job as a trial attorney at the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division in October 2003. Asked to name the Supreme Court decision from the past 20 years with which he most disagreed, he cited Lawrence v. Texas, the ruling striking down a law against sodomy because it violated gay people’s civil rights.

“When one of the interviewers agreed and said that decision in Lawrence was ‘maddening,’ I knew I correctly answered the question,” wrote the Regent graduate . The administration hired him for the Civil Rights Division’s housing section — the only employment offer he received after graduation, he said.

The graduate from Regent — which is ranked a “tier four” school by US News & World Report, the lowest score and essentially a tie for 136th place — was not the only lawyer with modest credentials to be hired by the Civil Rights Division after the administration imposed greater political control over career hiring.

And how is it, exactly, that all these Regent grads got plum jobs in the administration? It wasn’t a coincidence — Bush picked Kay Coles James, the dean of Regent’s government school, to be the director of the Office of Personnel Management — essentially the head of human resources for the executive branch

“We anticipate that many of our graduates are going to go and be change agents in society,” Regent Law School Dean Brauch said.

We’re already seeing the results.

Not only have these Ashcroft-recruited theocrats utterly discredited the Department of Justice, they’re on the way to doing it not just to their law school but to their whole movement, and not just in mainstream America but in the fundie community itself. I don’t have a link to any of them handy right now, but you’ve probably seen recent poll results and news stories tracking those trends (a number of them came out post-November).

So go on, Christianist Soldiers, you’ve made a good start on your self-demolition, go on and finish it. And take the rest of Bushism with you.

  • This is among the more insidious forms of damage done to the country the last six years—hundreds of qualified, experienced career professionals of all political stripes driven from their posts and replaced by unqualified hacks.

    Even if the next Administration were to clean house, you cannot bring back the people who have left.

    Makes me want to wretch.

  • Hopefully, this whole mess will tarnish the Regent law program for a long time (forever would be nice, but unrealistic.) Krusty’s Klown College has better name value than these guys.

    If I were a career prosecutor, I’d be pissed that some wet behind the years religoid with zero REAL WORLD experience was giving me orders. Goes to show that youth and enthusiasm don’t mean shit unless you have some wisdom.

  • Not much remarked upon, but crucially important to understanding our politics, is that this kind of patronage is a key input to the ongoing ties that bind the Christian Dominionists and the Republican Party; it’s a social promotion system that mints Generals for the Zombie Army. Public service be damned.

  • The Four Goals of Theocracy:

    To Legislate a Theocracy;
    To Administrate a Theocracy;
    To Adjudicate a Theocracy;
    To Enforce a Theocracy.

    The Reich had a tentative choke-hold on the first objective; they lost it in November ’06 before they could successfully revise the Constitution. They still hold the better ground on the second objective, and will continue to do so until their “Prophet” is removed from office. They’ve come close to gaining the third objective, but Roberts hasn’t exactly played ball on each and every whim that the wingnuts crave. DoJ and Rejent represent the fourth objective, and this is the most dangerous of them all. We’ve seen what can happen during a one-week recess of the Senate; what copuld happen the next time they recess? Federal bench vacancies can be filled—up to and including SCOTUS. Thousands of mid-level civil service positions can be given these “Bushlings;” these loyal-no-matter-the-cost tadpoles who have no business being handed the reins to the nation.

    It must start with the Congress. If they cannot end this “Maniacal Majesticism” of the Bush Kingship—or if they continue to demonstrate an unwillingness to do so, in the cute-but-corrupted name of “taking the higher road”—then the responsibility for defending both the Republic and the Constitution must once again fall to the People….

  • Irony abounds when Repbulican theorcrats condemn Islamic theocrats for brainwashing their young in madrasa schools .

    How is Regent Law School not a madrasa, ” a school for the training of spiritual and legal leaders”.

  • I’ve seen the standard Regent University application for admission. It includes an essay question that asks: “How will you use your degree from Regent to promote and spread God’s message?”

    My wife taught media studies at a state university here in Virginia. She was basically run out when the school hired a lunatic with a doctorate in media studies from Regent. He possessed no real world media experience, but boasted a PhD and that was good enough to get him quick tenure.

    The instant he got tenure, and not a moment before, he began teaching the evils of the MSM, abortion, non-christians, women’s rights, Iraq, liberals, etc. all under the thin veil of media instruction. The rest of the faculty was, of course, mortified but helpless thanks to his tenure. They finally exhaled when he quit abruptly, mid-term[!], to accept a position in a watchdog group in, you guessed it, the current administration.

    And seriously, the guy was a certified, foaming, raging, flailing, bat-shit loony ball. With a PhD from Regent.

  • “We anticipate that many of our graduates are going to go and be change agents in society,” Regent Law School Dean Brauch said.

    Garbled syntax aside (change agents?) in a way he’s gotten his wish. The Boyz n’ Grrlz from Regents will change the way the government hires administrators and perhaps even change the way the ABA certifies law schools.

  • Regent is turning out religious fanatics but the Bush administration is responsible for putting them in the DOJ.

  • I was recently asked to advise a foreign languages student who was thinking of relocating to Regent University. Here’s some of what I wrote to her:

    I looked at Regent’s webpage and didn’t like what I saw. No science classes. No language majors; there supposedly are minors in French, Mandarin and Spanish, but in the Languages and Literature course offerings I can find none of these. I’m interested in politics, as you know, and I noticed that this month’s speaker is Rudy Giuliani, the Republican candidate for President. In May the graduation speaker will be Mitt Romney, the Mormon running for President. When he was Governor of Massachusetts he was pro women’s rights and gay rights and gun control and stem cell research. Now that he’s running for the Republican nomination for president he’s turned 180° on all those issues. I also took a look at the page describing the faculty, and I found it very odd. There are a few department chairs, and all the rest are adjunct faculty. I’ve never seen such a disparity. Through my own schooling and teaching I’m used to universities with large numbers of full-time faculty throughout all the professorial ranks. I was not at all impressed with the section on the library; nowhere did it mention how extensive the holdings are; I’m suspicious. This did, however, leap out of the introductory page: “If you wish to visit our on campus Library please join us. We have an incredible Law Library and general library for Graduate and Undergraduate students. God’s blessing on you as you acquire knowledge and seek His purpose for your life.” Shudder.

    Though I’m no longer religious myself, I’m not opposed to religious universities as such. I spent four+ years at the University of San Francisco (Jesuit). I seriously entertained a sociology teaching position at Dominican College in San Rafael (just above San Francisco); my other department member would have been a nun who was willing to give up her chairmanship to me had I accepted. I was very tempted. In neither of those institutions did I ever get the sense that religion interfered with standard, professional course work. At Regent I’m not so sure.

    It’s hard to cope with the fact (which I had not heard before this TCR item) that our government has 150 of these mymidonic theocrats making important decisions for the rest of us. The audacity of the Bush Crime Family is truly staggering.

  • Whichever Democrat wins the presidency in 2008 one of the first priorities for him or her has to be to be to purge the federal government of anyone who was placed in their position by the Bush Misadministration since 2001. Incompetence and radical ideologies is what these morons all have in common with their fearless leader, Fuck Up-In-Chief, GW Bush.

  • Scary, if you didn’t know that at heart it’s a load of bunkum.

    Comment by Goldilocks — 4/9/2007 @ 11:24 am

    Sorry – I’m confused by this statement. What exactly is it that is a load of bunkum at heart? That religiously insane, inexperienced Republican’ts have been given top posts in government bureaucracies? Or that Putsch is putting religiously insane, inexperienced Republican’ts have been given top posts in government bureaucracies?

    Please explain what you intended to say here…

  • post-Ashcroft quesions for DOJ applicants:

    The Earth is:
    a. 4-5 billion years old.
    b. 100 million years old.
    c. 5,000 to 10,000 years old

    True / False “Separation of church and state” is not only illegal, but a terrible myth perpetuated by bestial devil-worshippers wanting only to destroy both Christianity and America.

    Civil rights apply to:
    a. all Americans.
    b. most Americans.
    c. rich white conservative evangelical Christian males.

    Islam is:
    a. one of the three Abrahamic religions.
    b. polytheistic.
    c. a bloody and barbaric heresy perpetuated by bestial devil-worshippers wanting only to destroy both Christianity and America.

  • 2Manchu, @16,

    It’s *not* post-Ashcroft; he *started* the “retooling” of DoJ by changing the hiring rules.

    Recently, as more and more became known about the purge and about the general state at DoJ, some commenters at some blogs were saying things like “who’d have thought that Ashcroft would look good in comparison (to Gonzales)”. But, reading over this weekend’s papers, I was starkly reminded that, of the two, Ashcroft was worse. Gonzales is like Bush — stupid. Ashcroft is like Cheney – evil.

  • “Whichever Democrat wins the presidency in 2008 one of the first priorities for him or her has to be to be to purge the federal government of anyone who was placed in their position by the Bush Misadministration since 2001.”

    Agreed, but experience with recovery from maladministration (in SDUSD) over the past couple of years demonstrates that it is a “long slog” to recover from an intensive focussed politicization of an Administration. The wealth of our Government is embodied in the expertise of the Civil Service Corp and regeneration of the corpse will require years and perhaps even decades, sadly.

  • They have done nothing to “Change society”. Americans seem be moving slightly leftward on many social issues/ (except gun control) They are fighting a losing battle. It should be noted some of the biggest losers in the last election were social conservatives.

    Putting ideology over competence is never a good idea, anyway

  • Oh, you hot-headed libs, go on with your jealous rant. Ignorance isn’t bliss, it’s just ignorance. The proof is in the pudding: when the elitist schools fell out of the political mainstream, so did the need for their grads to fill every high government post. Yes, the march is on (lotus), and has been on, to fill a political vacuum that rejected the inbred policies of the elites.

  • My Easter prayer is that some real justice can be restored to this nation. O George, what have you done? It is hard to recognize our country anymore. And other nations of the world can’t find us, it seems. The map of the world has been redrawn…. with axis powers, evil empires, and the devil behind every tree: and we have no real allies left. O tempus O mores….

  • Regent University has scrubbed from its web site any mention of its 150 graduates that work for the Bush administration.

    Google cache has a screen capture from April 6 2007 of a Regent University’s “facts” web page where they proudly boast “150 graduates serving in the Bush Administration”

    Their current “facts” page has that info removed: http://www.regent.edu/general/about_us/facts.cfm

    Hmmm. Isn’t Regent University proud of those graduates anymore?

  • something must be wrong with my eyes, because it does not seem to be removed from the regents facts page.

  • As a current Regent Law student I ask that people try to seperate Pat Robertson’s goals from the Law School’s. Most students of our school think the old man is a crazy cook. We dont support his ideas and are just as frustrated at the whole DOJ situation because of what it is doing to our job prospects.

    I chose Regent over a few Tier One schools becuase I wanted to go somewhere that my wife (I know, a married law student…it can be done) would not feel like a law widow. We also came here because when we visited the students were not as cut-throat and were more welcoming. As a student who is on a second career, I enjoyed this.

    Our student body (the law school I am speaking of…the rest of the schools are there own little worlds) is actually quite moderate. Our student body president is even a democrat (a moderate one, but not a right winger). Most of our student leaders are not right wing “mouth pieces”. We have said to ourselves constantly over the last few weeks how upsetting it is to see a former graduate (from a time when standards were much lower) act the way she did. Heck, now a days, she most likely would not have even gotten in here.

    All I ask is that you cut the current students some slack, or at least come talk to us to see our perspective and not label us all fundies.

    As far as us being a crap school. Our bar passage rate goes up every year (and for a young school it is pretty good). We have won the ABA national Moot Court and Negotiations Comps in the last year (beating out Ivy league tier one schools). We welcome speakers of different backgrounds to our law school. Our base LSAT and GPA are going up and up every year.

    Pat might have had a vision once upon a time for this school, but now its the students who will direct us. Now that more capable and thoughtful students come through, I believe Regent can be a good law school.

    Just please, before you bash us, get to know us. I know that it is the in thing to throw around charged comments, but realize there are real people that are being affected here.

    Thanks for your time

  • JStaight,

    The web site was not taken down or changed. Check again pls. You might have had issues because we had major power issues during this nasty weather bout the Northeast is experiencing.

  • Hello, as a staff writer for the Norfolk/Virginia Beach-based daily newspaper, The Virginian-Pilot, i’m trying to learn more about Regent’s law school, and encourage current or former students to drop me a line and share whatever you choose about the school and the education you’re getting, or got. Call me at 757 446 2417, or shoot me an email.
    Steve Vegh/The Virginian-Pilot, 150 W. Brambleton Ave., Norfolk, VA 23505

  • Regent University plays hide and seek with 150 Bush admin alumni — Now they’re here, now they’re not.

    As late as 6 April, 2007, Regent University’s “facts” web page proudly boasted that they had:
    “150 graduates serving in the Bush Administration.”

    Between April 6 and April 13, the University removed that statement from their web site and, for at least several days, (April 13-16) there was no statement listed at all about any Regent U. graduates working for the Bush administration.

    Sometime on April 16, a new statement appeared on their “facts” page:
    “150 students have served in the Bush administration.”
    http://www.regent.edu/general/about_us/facts.cfm

    Apparently, not all of the 150 are still “serving” Bush, but does this statement also mean that some of the 150 “students” never actually graduated from the U?

  • Comments are closed.