Unpacking the Bush gang’s alternate communications system

The LA Times’ Tom Hamburger takes a closer look at what I think is still one of the under-reported angles to the prosecutor purge scandal — the alternate communications system the White House set up for staffers.

When Karl Rove and his top deputies arrived at the White House in 2001, the Republican National Committee provided them with laptop computers and other communication devices to be used alongside their government-issued equipment.

The back-channel e-mail and paging system, paid for and maintained by the RNC, was designed to avoid charges that had vexed the Clinton White House — that federal resources were being used inappropriately for political campaign purposes.

Now, that dual computer system is creating new embarrassment and legal headaches for the White House, the Republican Party and Rove’s once-vaunted White House operation.

Democrats say evidence suggests the RNC e-mail system was used for political and government policy matters in violation of federal record preservation and disclosure rules.

As we’ve talked about before, this isn’t trivia. There’s reason to believe that the Bush gang used the alternate system to conceal some of their less-defensible conduct, knowing that communications through the White House system were archived (and could, in theory, be subpoenaed).

Hamburger notes that “some Republicans believe that the huge number of e-mails — many written hastily, with no thought that they might become public — may contain more detailed and unguarded inside information about the administration’s far-flung political activities than has previously been available.” He quotes one activist who acknowledged that there is “concern” about what the emails may contain.

But the real benefit of the article is seeing the White House’s defense for all of this — and noting how wrong it is.

White House officials said the system had been used appropriately and was modeled after one used by the Clinton White House political office in the late 1990s.

“The regular staffers who interface with political organizations have a separate e-mail account, and that’s entirely appropriate,” said White House spokesman Scott M. Stanzel. “The practice is followed to avoid inadvertent violations of the law.”

Stanzel said he did not know how many officials used the separate system. Another White House official called it “a handful.”

This is, at best, misleading. For one thing, Doug Sosnik, White House political director under Clinton, notes that the Clinton White House had a small number of separate computers and cellphones for campaign-related matters. That hardly compares to the RNC handing over laptops to key West Wing insiders in 2001.

But more importantly, we already know that the Bush gang’s operation was far more expansive. As Paul Kiel noted, Karl Rove’s deputy, Scott Jennings, used his RNC address to “communicate with the Justice Department’s Kyle Sampson about the U.S. attorney purge.”

For that matter, when Karl Rove sends emails, 95% of the time, he avoids his White House account and uses an RNC account. The White House public affairs office reportedly does the same thing.

There is, in other words, no big mystery here. Top staffers in the Bush White House, all of whom ostensibly have policy responsibilities and tasks, prefer the unaccountable, unarchived RNC system regardless of circumstances — and have done so from the outset of Bush’s presidency. There is no comparison between this and the separate computers Clinton aides used for the 1996 campaign.

Waxman is pressuring the RNC for access, but according to the LAT piece, the “RNC automatically purges some e-mails after 30 days.”

We may never know what those emails said, but we do know that the Bush gang’s excuse for using an alternate communications system doesn’t add up.

And, based on classical Republican logic from the criminal justice system, “If they weren’t doing anything wrong, then they wouldn’t have anything to hide.”

  • “unaccountable, uinarchived” my black ass.

    subpoena the cell phone provider network’s records. real simple.

  • As I understand it (from a litigator friend) purged e-mail is recoverable. Get a search warrant for the server(s).

  • Not sure what the backup procedure is for the servers that house the backend of the RNC’s e-mail system (e.g. M$ Exchange Server), but if it follows usual IT procedures, there will be a record of all the e-mails somewhere. Most places do nightly backups, which are then put on some sort of transportable media and sent to another location.

    So unless they purged those as well (perhaps), or have a clueless IT staff (with this gang, highly probable), simply deleting the e-mails out of one’s Outlook “Deleted” folder, or even off the server itself, doesn’t mean they’re gone forever.

    Hopefully, Waxman or his advisers are aware of this and will subpoena all those backups as well.

  • Cant wait for the obligatory

    “Clinton did it too defense”

    I am sure as this story gains traction Rove will attempt to destroy these records but wouldnt it be ironic if some of this backdoor emailing was caught and archived by the data mining operations institued by the Bush Admin under the Patriot Act…..sweet justice

    Subpeona time Dems………

  • I find it hard to believe that the RNC irretrievably purges their emails after 30 days. They must be archived or backed up somewhere. Is there some kind of cover up by the RNC in progress?

  • Top staffers in the Bush White House, all of whom ostensibly have policy responsibilities and tasks, prefer the unaccountable, unarchived RNC system regardless of circumstances…

    As for “unaccountable”, I thought the latest thinking ist that these communiques were even easier to subpeona as they can not be protected under Executive Privilege. is that no longer the the case?

    As for “unarchived”, this, too, may not be technically accurate. Although the emails may be purged, the method of deletion employed may actually leave the data still accessible. if they didn’t magnetically wipe the disk drives and then pulverize them into dust, the data may still be retrievable. Its not easy and its not cheap, but it can often be done.

  • Did the RNC boys thoughtfully provide a separate physical network? Definitely not as a private netowrk which would be a major security issue for the NSA and Secret Service. This means they went thru the physical WH network to get to the RNC servers which means there are some records on the WH servers even if they used a Virtual Private Network (VPN).

    Speaking of the NSA, I’m sure that they WOULD know, too, considering they’re probably listening in as well. For reasons of national security and all…

  • The other posters are absolutely correct, and in some cases it’s not even gone from the computer itself unless the hard disk is deliberately overwritten or destroyed. No matter how careful these guys thought they were being (and there’s some suggestion they weren’t particularly concerned, thinking the parallel communications universe would never be discovered), if they weren’t high-end tech weenies, much of the data is still resident in a recoverable form on the laptop’s hard drive.

    It’ll be interesting how many staffers inadvertently run their laptop through the trashmasher, spill a can of coke into the keyboard or knock it off the windowsill from the 14th floor over the next couple of days.

  • I think the larger point is that use of alternate systems was specifically to bypass presidential records acts. It should be a criminal offense.

  • Given what I’ve seen of the ReThuglicans’ understanding of the internons they think deleting a message is the same as purging their files.

    And if they are in fact trying to purge their files, I’d give good money to see them explain how this fits in with Goner’s attempt to force ISPs to hang on to all of their records for much longer than a month so the DoJ can “protect the children.”

    Speaking of the NSA, I’m sure that they WOULD know, too, considering they’re probably listening in as well. For reasons of national security and all…

    If not the NSA other intelligence/security agencies are certainly monitoring communications by people who are close to the pResident. I hope the CIA is involved because there’s no love lost there.

  • This just underscores why oversight is so important – by flipping over the rocks you get to see all the other turd (blossoms) that are under there that you didn’t even know about.

  • For that matter, when Karl Rove sends emails, 95% of the time, he avoids his White House account and uses an RNC account.

    Much as I’m happy when someone maligns Karl Rove, this doesn’t seem illegitimate at all. Karl Rove’s job is political advisor. His legitimate job is to be partisan, and he SHOULD be using an RNC account, not an official government one, for that. The only thing wrong with Karl Rove (other than his slimy tactics) is that this administration often puts partisan advantage (as advised by Rove) ahead of what’s best for the country.

  • all of this sounds like it might end up being the equivalent of nixon’s white house taping system. sooner or later, the dems will get ahold of copies of these emails, and i’m sure they will be veeeerrrrry interesting. of course, before everything blows up in their faces, we will hear that clinton did it too.

  • “RNC automatically purges some e-mails after 30 days.”

    OK. Fair enough. Which e-mails get ‘purged’? Who decides which e-mails to purge, and under what criteria are they purged or kept? The selective nature of the purges could turn into a bigger problem than the e-mails themselves, if they don’t have a damned good reason.

  • wahoofive,

    Much as I’m happy when someone maligns Karl Rove, this doesn’t seem illegitimate at all. Karl Rove’s job is political advisor.

    Then why is his official title Deputy Chief of Staff? Why is he being paid by US taxpayers?

  • They “purge” e-mails…are they really that stupid? Unless those e-mails never saw the light outside of the outside, there are now multiple copies of them floating around in the ether and enough of them will come to light to cause real damage. And of course somebody, somewhere, will have grabbed a backup or two; just for their retirement fund.

    Republicans: it’s always the coverup that get’s them in the end.

  • I wonder what Monica Goodling’s currrent frame of mind is. Did she quit because she saw herself being set up to be the next Lynndie England or to save the Admin? Do you think that she still has her laptop?

    The comparison to Nixon’s tapes is very apt. Someone has all this stuff in their laptop and is just waiting to be asked for it.

  • The back-channel e-mail and paging system, paid for and maintained by the RNC, was designed to avoid charges that had vexed the Clinton White House — that federal resources were being used inappropriately for political campaign purposes. — LATimes

    The cure’s side effects are likely to be worse than the original ailment… Delicious.

  • When I write emails at work, I always do so with the assumption that they could be subject to public scrunity at any time (I work for state government), and govern myself accordingly. I’ve seen no end of articles telling people to NEVER write anything in an email that they would have concerns about anyone else seeing. What in the world were these people thinking???

  • Comments are closed.