Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Bush told Dem leaders today that he will not negotiate with them on Iraq. Reid and Pelosi responded shortly thereafter: “The President is demanding that we renew his blank check for a war without end. Despite the fact that the President persists in trying to score political points at the expense of our troops, congressional Democrats have repeatedly reached out in the spirit of cooperation.”

* It’s true; they really have reached out repeatedly. Greg Sargent found several examples.

* I noted yesterday that respected law professor Walter F. Murphy had trouble getting a boarding pass, according to an American Airlines employee, because of his criticisms of the president. Ryan Singel makes a compelling argument that Murphy may have been singled out randomly. I wonder, though: why did the AA official tell Murphy that a lot of peace protestors get flagged for security reasons?

* We’ve all seen plenty of analysis about the media’s malpractice in the run-up to the war in Iraq, but Gary Kamiya’s piece in Salon today was particularly good. It’s a summary of the key institutional problems in the media’s coverage and complicity. It’s worth a look.

* Disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff may be getting out of jail earlier than he expected. Apparently, federal prosecutors have asked for a steep reduction in his sentence as a reward for his cooperation with investigators. In Miami, U.S. District Judge Paul Huck granted the request from prosecutors once they told him Abramoff’s cooperation in the investigations is fully completed.

* Apparently, political scientists at the University of Iowa found that Republicans voters in Iowa are more likely to be swayed by race and gender than Democratic voters. As Melissa said, “They probably spent lots of money interviewing 1,290 registered voters to come to this conclusion. I would have told them for free.”

* Barack Obama has not been to Libya.

* I guess the White House’s effort to smear lawmakers isn’t working yet. A new AP-Ipsos poll shows Congress’ approval rating inching up to 40% — its highest level in a year.

* Keep an eye on this one: “A U.S. House committee announced Tuesday it would hold hearings on misleading military statements that followed the friendly fire death of Pat Tillman in Afghanistan and the rescue of Pfc. Jessica Lynch in Iraq. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said an April 24 hearing would be part of its investigation into whether there was a strategy to mislead the public.”

* Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the chief deputy minority whip in the House, is unusually sleazy, even by House GOP standards. Faiz recommends action on this one, and I think he’s absolutely right.

* It’s good to see Hillary Clinton stepping up to defend Nancy Pelosi against the right-wing smear machine.

* On a related note, was Elliot Abrams pulling the strings on the manufactured controversy against Pelosi? Maybe.

* Congratulations to the White House and the Defense Department for “winning” the 2007 Jefferson Muzzle awards.

* How far out there is Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.)? In a debate today on global warming, even Newt Gingrich, representing the right, distanced himself from the unhinged senator.

* If there’s a legal showdown over executive privilege between Congress and the White House over the prosecutor purge scandal, Adam Cohen makes the case today that the Bush gang is on weak legal footing.

* Doonesbury is “reporting” this week from my adopted home state of Vermont. Ed alerted me to today’s piece, which is hilarious, no matter where you’re from. (For added context, several Vermont communities recently voted for a local measure supporting the impeachment of the president. It’s funny without the context, but I thought I’d mention it.)

* And finally, what’s the least important job at Fox News’ website? Apparently, it’s updating the list of Americans killed in Iraq — which has gone untouched for two months.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

I guess the White House’s effort to smear lawmakers isn’t working yet. A new AP-Ipsos poll shows Congress’ approval rating inching up to 40% — it’s highest level in a year.

It’s too bad our old friend JRS Jr doesn’t seem to post here anymore, since he had been complaining that CB wasn’t reporting on Congress’ approval rating. Although JRS Jr. was trying to make the claim that it was not improving from the days of the GOP majority. Oops.

And finally, what’s the least important job at Fox News’ website? Apparently, it’s updating the list of Americans killed in Iraq — which has gone untouched for two months.

Wow. That’s good to know that no American soldiers have died in the last two months. And that Bush didn’t beat Britney Spears in an informal poll for most foolish American. Because to otherwise it would be really embarassing.

Oh, wait.

  • Regarding yesterday’s proposal from the two blogging dimwits about a “Code of Conduct,” for blogging, Marty Kaplan at Huffington Post came up with a “Code of Conduct” for the MSM that is funny and serious at the same time:

    Makes you wonder what it would be like if the mainstream media voluntarily agreed to its own set of principles, accompanied by corresponding badges of approval.

    HE SAID/SHE SAID: Story contains pairs of contradictory quotes with no indication of which side is factual and which side is gaming the system via disinformation.

    DRUDGE MATCH: Story assigned because a GOP talking point planted in Drudge convinced an editor or producer that it had to be covered.

    LIES ‘R’ NOT US: No matter what outrageous falsehoods were uttered by a source in this story, the words “lie” or “liar” do not appear.

    FRAME GAME: Story uses terms like “slow bleed strategy,” “nuclear option,” “death tax,” “pro-life” etc. as though they were neutral descriptors rather than GOP coinages.

    [SIC] JOKE: Front groups like “Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse,” “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth,” “Americans for Sensible Estate Tax Solutions,” “Alliance for Better Medicare,” “The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition,” etc. are cited in this story without the use of [sic] after their names.

    FAKE THINK TANK: Story quotes the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute, the Progress and Freedom Foundation and other corporate-sponsored GOP meme factories as if they were legitimate scholarly research centers.

    FALSE EQUIVALENCE: Story “balances” an inflammatory Heritage Foundation press release with a dull Brookings Institution report, as though a centrist scholarly analysis were the lefty equivalent of a radical right-wing screed. On a talk show, Orrin Hatch is “balanced” by Joe Lieberman.

    ACCESS ALL AREAS: Story grants anonymity to an official source whose purpose is to defame a political opponent or selectively leak misleading classified information.

    SOME SAY: Attempts by operatives and apparachiks to plant defamatory stories are laundered as routine reporting on inside buzz, Beltway rumors and Georgetown dinner party anecdotes.

    THAT’S OLD NEWS: Previous inadequate reporting is used as a justification not to revisit an important story when significant new information surfaces.

    THAT’S ENTERTAINMENT: A high-stakes moral battle in the public sphere is covered as if it were a theatrical performance with no consequences for ordinary people and no stakes for American democracy.

    EYE CANDY ALERT: Because news is now a profit center in corporate conglomerates, this story about Anna Nicole Smith [Sanjaya, the Runaway Bride, etc.] is taking up valuable news-hole real estate that might otherwise be devoted to covering the occupation of the United States by an army of religious zealots and incompetent ideologues determined to destroy confidence in government, eradicate civil liberties, squelch dissent, transfer wealth from the middle to the top, establish an oil empire in the Middle East, and amuse the American population to death.

  • Re – the Abramoff sentence reduction – who is handling the investigation? Given the revelations of partisanship of the DOJ, how do we know that Gonzales, etc, aren’t leaning on the prosecutors to go easy on Abramoff, even if he hasn’t provided a lot of information?

    Similar to the recommendation of the reduction of the amount of money that tobacco companies were asking for, in the settlement, how much do we know is, or is not, being dictated to the prosecutors from the politicized DOJ?

  • Re: Gingrich

    Thankfully, some conservatives are waking up to the climate crisis. Finally. That said, Gingrich is still being a mucking foron…

    KERRY: …what would you say to Sen. Inhofe and to others in the Senate who are resisting even the science?…

    GINGRICH: My message I think is that the evidence is sufficient that we should move towards the most effective possible steps to reduce carbon-loading of the atmosphere.

    KERRY: And to it urgently — and now…

    GINGRICH: And do it urgently. Yes.

    If I can, let me explain partly why this is a very challenging thing to do if you’re a conservative. For most of the last 30 years, the environment has been a powerful emotional tool for bigger government and higher taxes

    So even though it may be the right thing to do, you end up fighting it because you don’t want big government and higher taxes…

    Got that? We liberals want bigger government and higher taxes, so we use the environment as an “emotional tool” to get them.

    Screw you, Gingrich. Taxes and “big government” are tools to save the environment from corporate tools like yourself. And for thirty years it has worked pretty well, no thanks to YOU. Go back in your political grave so I can piss on it.

  • From Cantor’s tantrum:

    The Speaker and many of her Democratic allies have become so drunk with grandiose visions of deposing Bush that they break bread with terrorists and enemies of the United States.

    Meanwhile it is A-OK for Veep Dick to scurry out to Saudi Arabia when King Abdullah snaps his fingers. I wonder what this dipshit expects to come of his wailing? The more he talks about it the more likely a reporter is to ask his opinion on the Republicans who went out there. Personally I look forward to watching this tapeworm try to squirm his way out of that one.

    Regarding yesterday’s proposal from the two blogging dimwits about a “Code of Conduct,” for blogging.

    Thanks to a mild case of dyslexia I read “Access All Areas” as “Access all Rears.”

  • Steppng up onto the Open Thread Soapbox…

    This manufactured outrage over Imus’ use of “‘ho’es” is really ticking me off. Not to excuse what he said or how the network has dealt with it — what he said was disgusting and in my opinion he deserves whatever comes his way, if not for this then for all the other stupid, bigoted things he allows his idiot minions to say on a regular basis.

    But are we supposed to believe that none of those so suddenly and so deeply offended ever heard rap? Ho, slut, bitch and much, much worse are all standard terms in the rap lexicon.

    Such degradation of females is so commonplace that it isn’t offensive even to young girls, white and black, who not only dance to, sing with and purchase such rap, but use the terms themselves to address each other — even their friends. Middle school boys from moderately affluent neighborhoods — black and white — think it’s fine to grab a girl’s bottom and ask, “when u gonna gimme some of that?” These kids have grown up in a different world and it’s been that way for some time.

    When our daughter started middle school, I tried to impress upon her that words have meaning — that she should abruptly turn away from anyone who called her those things. Some time later she came back and asked how she was supposed to go through the day not talking to half the school.

    My guess is that 2/3 of the Rutgers players have mp3s on their iPods using those very words. If adults weren’t aware of what passes for acceptable language among kids, where have they been? Why pretend to get all offended now when you’ve excused — and supported — degrading language and behavior for years?

  • I wonder, though: why did the AA official tell Murphy that a lot of peace protestors get flagged for security reasons?
    It wasn’t an “AA official,” it was the check-in clerk at the airline desk. No offense to check-in clerks, but are we really expected to believe that these relatively unskilled workers have any privileged access to the inner workings of national security? I rather doubt it. I tend to suspect that, if the comment was made at all, it was simply an instance of inflated self-importance that was taken too seriously by Professor Murphy.

  • So, my question is who hired the DOJ federal prosecutor to make a determination about Jack Abramoff? This wasn’t one of those Regent Law School grads selected by Monica Goodling was it? It seems to me that might be a problem. At least it might be a problem for some people….

  • But are we supposed to believe that none of those so suddenly and so deeply offended ever heard rap? Ho, slut, bitch and much, much worse are all standard terms in the rap lexicon

    Not that I really want to get into this debate (too late), but context is everything. The same insult you might find loving and funny from a friend might be incredibly offensive coming from a stranger. And due to cultural conflicts in the past, people should be particularly sensitive about the language they use regarding groups they don’t belong to. In the reverse situation, there are many complaints I could make against white people that would be considered offensive coming from a black person. But being a white person, people understand my opinions aren’t coming from a bigoted viewpoint and will hear them in a different way.

    Secondly, there’s a huge difference between the language a rapper uses and what we expect to see and hear from influential pundits. If Imus wants to put out a rap CD referring to women as bitches and hoes, that’s his business. But he shouldn’t expect to keep his prime spot in the media if he does. And I could be wrong, but I doubt that MSNBC has been trying to woo 50 Cent or Ludacris into their pundit line-up. Again, it’s a context thing. Some things are acceptable in some contexts which are offensive in others.

    And finally, this wasn’t just a case of Imus referring to a generic group of women as hoes. He was referring to a specific group of people he had never met, who had just recently been in the national spotlight. So it’s not just an issue of the language used being offensive, but these being specific insults to a group of people he referred to by name. Perhaps there are rappers who insult specific people they’ve never met or have any association with, but I doubt that would sell many records. And I suspect they’d sell even less records if it was from MC Imus.

  • I wonder, though: why did the AA official tell Murphy that a lot of peace protestors get flagged for security reasons? — CB

    Because he has a boring job and it’s fun to feed people’s paranoia? Or maybe it was April 1? Who knows?

    But, as I wrote last night, I think the really troubling aspect of the story is that the checker’s reasons — true or false — are entirely *believable* (vide Denver 3). That’s where Bush’s malAdmin has got us to.

  • I agree with ‘James Dillon’ in post #8

    Shortly after 9/11/01 I was on a business trip which had 2 plane switched each way. I got singled out on each segment for further inspection. After the 4th time I inquired about how this could still be considered to be random when I had been picked each time. The person at the counter informed me that I was ‘red flagged’ but she couldn’t tell me the reason as it was confidential. Although I considered it an annoyance to be picked out each time, I assumed it had something to do with being a foreign born national, and was willing to put up with it to a certain degree.

    By 2003 I suppose I was considered normal and didn’t get picked out any more than what would be considered random. Ever since it’s been ‘normalized’ I assume that is because we have become a little less paranoid. I haven’t changed any of my behavior, so there wasn’t really a reason to be ‘red flagged’ to begin with, but considering the circumstances I was willing to cut them some slack for the sake of security.

    At no time did I assume that my rights were being violated. Of course I would probably be singing a different tume if I was hauled to a separate room for ‘further questioning’ and missing flights each time.

  • My guess is that 2/3 of the Rutgers players have mp3s on their iPods using those very words.

    And you base this guess on…?

    Another question:

    If you learned that John Edward had a song on his Mp3 or a book that contained the word F^ggot would that change your opinion about mAnne Coulter’s comment?

  • But are we supposed to believe that none of those so suddenly and so deeply offended ever heard rap? Ho, slut, bitch and much, much worse are all standard terms in the rap lexicon

    This is really about MSM shock value. It is one of the main reasons that the MSM is finding it so dificult to deal with it. I mean if you can’t do shock what is bill O’Reilly et all going to be doing! How can we excite the sheeple!
    the basketball team (ladies) today had a great new conference, I thought it was interesting that somebody finally asked them what they thought.

  • With Harry Reid’s stem cell research bill headed to a Senate vote this week, Congressional Democrats and President Bush are on the brink of yet another confrontation. But while the White House is promising to repeat its 2006 veto, the ending can be different this time. All the Reid legislation needs is a name change – and a little help from Ronald Reagan. Call it the “Ronald Reagan Life Legacy Act”…

    For the details, see:
    “How to Override the Bush Stem Cell Veto.”

  • good suggestion about the “Ronald Reagan Life Legacy Act” Has anybody contacted Harry Reid on that one yet? 🙂

  • * Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the chief deputy minority whip in the House, is unusually sleazy, even by House GOP standards. Faiz recommends action on this one, and I think he’s absolutely right.

    Action recommended. Action taken. And what fun. The dodo’s getting called out left and right on his own blog.

    # burro Says: April 10th, 2007 at 11:15 pm

    We’re smoking you guys out Eric. You can put this kind of manufactured junk out there but the blowback is going to keep coming faster and faster. Ya’lls cover is blown on so many issues and the ability of RepubCo to control the message without being called out on the absurdity of the message is diminishing quickly.

    Go ahead. Put this fog of baloney out there. But just listen a little bit. Listen carefully to see how well it’s working. There’s more to the story than you put out there and a zillion people know it. This is petulant foot stamping on your part. This is not acknowledging reality. This is deep in Baghdad Bob territory and I am so glad to see it.

    Keep it coming Eric. Please, more half truths and baloney bombs. We are listening. We are listening sooo closely to what you are saying. The People of the United States are listening to Eric Cantor. Following what you say with great interest. What you have to say is insightful and informative in ways that you cannot imagine.

    Thank you. Please pick a new topic soon and let us know your thoughts on that as well. The People of the United States are waiting for your opinions and observations.

  • Steve, I know it’s pathetic, but this is my first official comments post on TCBR – after all these years. I’m nervous because I know that there are all of these ettiquete things that the infrequent poster doesn’t understand, and everybody gets all mad at you, and you slink away in shame and never post again, but…with that said, I’d like to use this as an open topic post, to submit a letter that I just wrote to the management of Air America Radio. It may not be the most important topic right now, but the letter was heartfelt, and it’s rare that I write anything other than music or a video script, so I’m taking advantage of that to post on my favorite blog.

    So……

    ————————-

    Dear Scott, David, and the Green Brothers (the new, proud owners of Air America Radio),

    Please don’t replace Sam Seder with this new guy. PLEASE????

    I was so happy and relieved when I heard that the Greens were rescuing AAR from the clutches of bad management and bankruptcy. Not only are they (or certainly Mark), known, nay, famous New York City liberals, but they are the landlord/owners of the very building that houses the company that I work for. Not only that, but their main office (for S. L. Green) are on my very floor, across the very hall from this company that I work for (Howard Schwartz Recording). I was sooo VERY proud. Someone had done right, for once.

    But imagine my dismay and disappointment as I begin to see things progress…

    First, it was Ed Shultz being shoved in on XM during Thom Hartman’s 12noon to 3pm slot…and don’t even get me started on AAR’s earlier, infuriating move from Sirius to XM, after I had just invested a not small sum of money in a Sirius system for my apartment and car, and an adapter and antenna for my house, not to mention the 2 year subscription, ALL BECAUSE OF AAR!!!

    See, I LOVED AAR. It was a miraculous presence on the airwaves of the good ol’ US of A. We progressives were starving for something like this – a liberal/progressive talk-radio station with facts, inquisitiveness, and, most welcomed, a sense of humour.

    We had Marc and Mark to wake up to in the morning with Morning Sedition; we had Liz Winstead, sleepy Chuck D and Rachel Maddow to shower and eat breakfast with; …I was always so-so with Al Franken, but I appreciated his presence and the star-power that helped allow AAR to even exist; Randi was like nothing I’d ever heard; I fell in love with Janeanne and Sam and their wonderfully funny AND insightful Majority Report, and then I would rock myself to sleep to the dulcet tones of Mike Malloy’s righteous anger and his wife, Cathy’s, funny, wacky impressions. My girlfriend and I would listen to AAR almost every waking hour that wasn’t taken up by either sleep (even then…we’d fall asleep to it), or work (…well, there too, we would listen when we could), or socializing (nope, that actually never included AAR). We would wake up at 5:30am on the Friday mornings that Morning Sedition would do their live shows from cafes and places like CBGBs, so that we could go hang out and join in the craziness and the coffee-buzz and the applause until we had to run off to work.

    …and now…I’m down to Sam Seder in the morning (without fail!!!), sometimes Rachel Maddow, when I can find the time in that chunk of the afternoon, and Ring Of Fire and Laura Flanders with their single shows on the weekends. Between the pathetic managment choices of the previous pack of idiots who ran AAR and now the equally nonsensical decisions (ahem, Sam Seder!!!!!) of the Green Bros, AAR has truly succeeded in changing me from their biggest fan and most ardent supporter, to, well, ohhhh, yawwwwwwnnnnnnnnn…huh?

    Sooooooo, Sam Seder is to be replaced by Lionel during the 9am to 12noon timeslot, while Sam is banished to some Godforsaken single shot show during the weekend.

    Uhhmmmmm…Lionel who???? Word-up to AAR management – I don’t give a SHIT about Lionel, and I most CERTAINLY don’t want him pushing out my Sam Seder. Sam Seder and Marc Maron allowed me to keep my sanity during the dark, horrible, lonely early/mid years of this long Bush Nightmare. Janeane and Rachel and Laura and The Pap Attack kept me breathing while I watched our Constitution get crapped on by Rummy-The-Poet, Abu Gonzales, Cheney-The-Shooter and Turdblossom. What has “Lionel” done for me?

    I don’t even know who the hell he IS! I’m guessing he’s another middle-of-the-roader, DLC-worshipping, triangulator who must appeal to that “not sure what I am, but I’m embarrassed by the word Liberal” American who also listens to that half-baked, Rush Limbaugh-sounding Ed Shultz, or worse yet, Alan Colmes or Paul Begala, and actually think that they’re the voice of reason for “left-leaning” America.

    Guys, GET A CLUE!!!! I’M your listener. I’M your demographic. I’m your DREAM customer with a ton of money to burn on your advertiser’s products (how come Arbitron doesn’t ever call ME). And you’re telling me to go fuck off. Really. Everybody I know who was a regular and/or obsessive listener to AAR during the “early” years has been steadily alienated, confused, bamboozled, and disappointed into leaving the ranks of the loyal listeners.

    That first lineup of talent that AAR had was AMAZING!!!! I don’t know if it was blind luck, but even the timeslots that everyone was in were laid out to fit each of their personalities perfectly (ok, except for sleepy-head Chuck D). AAR was great in spite of it’s craptastic management (h/t Janeane Garofalo). I don’t mean to imply that they all were happy with their timeslots, or that I’m unaware that some, like Janeane or Liz or, yes, Al, wanted out at some point, but from a traumatized, constitution-loving, atheist liberal’s perspective, it was created as if by devine intervention.

    Instead, we now have Ed Shultz, and the wicky-wacky, Polka-philic* “Lionel”…hmmmmmm, why am I picturing Steve Martin as the weather-man character in “L.A. Stories”… If I wanted that, I’d get up early and watch Katie Couric and Matt Lauer ruin American journalism, yet again.

    So, AAR, you’ve managed to push even ME out into the scrubby hinterlands of weekend AAR, and I’m sure you’ve got plans to get rid of me even THERE too. Hey, there’s always James Carville and Terry McAuliffe to replace Kennedy and Papantonio, and while your at it, dump Laura Flanders and give Joe Lieberman, Adam Nagourney or Judith Miller a weekend slot. Hey, isn’t Dennis Miller a wacky hoot?

    Ok, enough with the snark. I’m sorry. I’m just sad and frustrated and disappointed and I miss my radio friends…and I will especially miss Sam Seder. I wish you wouldn’t move him from that slot.

    Your abandoned friend, Glenn Navia

  • I wonder, though: why did the AA official tell Murphy that a lot of peace protestors get flagged for security reasons? — CB

    And then:

    No offense to check-in clerks, but are we really expected to believe that these relatively unskilled workers have any privileged access to the inner workings of national security?

    Also:

    Because he has a boring job and it’s fun to feed people’s paranoia?

    Ahem,

    Or maybe it’s because people notice things, even the poor, pitiable clerks you so cynically dismiss. Remember, these clerks are the people that red-flagged passengers were referred to AFTER they were turned back. The clerks would see who is being refused, they’d be having conversations, hearing speculations, noticing patterns.

    Sure the clerk was speculating, but I’m sure it wasn’t idle. You do know that your government DOES keep an eye on peace protesters, don’t you?

  • Re: Barack Obama has not been to Libya.

    Reporter Commandment Numero Uno: Thou shalt check thy damned facts

    It really is very simple. Person A makes statement about Person B. You must contact Person B and at least attempt to confirm. It doesn’t matter if it’s two seconds to deadline, it doesn’t matter if Person A is your dear old sainted granny. You must check. If you can’t get in touch with Person B either hold the story, leave the unconfirmed bit out or, but only if you must run the story, note you did not confirm the statement.

    That’s how it’s supposed to work. But I’m starting to think the average reporter is a guy who couldn’t pass the test for Apprentice Ditch Digger.

    tAi Old Fashioned

  • And you base this guess on…?

    Familiarity with that age group and some knowledge of popular culture, regardless of race. My point, which could have been made better, was that course language demeaning to women is pervasive among young people and, if not embraced, is frequently tolerated from sources. One could argue that a cultural observation cannot not be applied to specific individuals or small groups, and on that basis, without evidence. my guess would be unfair. It is possible that everyone now in an uproar has consistently rejected vulgar language demeaning to women regardless of the source and have a history of doing so. That’s not what I have heard, nor do I think it’s likely, but it is possible.

    If you learned that John Edward had a song on his Mp3 or a book that contained the word F^ggot would that change your opinion about mAnne Coulter’s comment?

    Good question and well stated. I characterized Imus’ comment as “disgusting” and one in a continuing series of bigoted remarks on his show, which is how I’d describe Coulters’ comment, so no difference there. Possession of “a” song or “a” book with one word or another isn’t indicative of anything. However, if Edwards were to encounter f^ggot or similar terms on a regular basis without reacting, and then become outraged over Coulter’s use, I’d have the same problem as I’m having with reaction to the Imus remark.

    Dr. Biobrain also raises several interesting points regarding context, what is acceptable in art versus what is acceptable in broadcasting. etc. It would appear that there can be no a consistent response in an area where there are different rules for different actors and different situations. Something to think about, anyway. Thanks.

  • About Eric Cantor’s attack on Pelosi, his conduct regarding comments on his website was even more sleazy than you’d expect. He invited people to comment on his site, then not only deleted comments of those who disagreed with him, but actively altered posts to make it seem people agreed with him…

    (Screen shots on my blog).

  • Glenn Navia,

    Let me be the first to warmly welcome you here! Hopefully you get to see this since I’m posting the next day. And yes, I think your post is fine. I hope to see more from you.

  • Comments are closed.