Digby noted that CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux told viewers this morning that Bush’s yet-to-be-delivered comments today at Virginia Tech are comparable to the president’s remarks at Ground Zero, a few days after 9/11.:
“You may recall that what was called the ‘bull-horn moment’ when the president shortly after 9/11 stood on that pile of rubble and called out and really united the country at that moment, firefighters and others who recognized that that was a very significant moment for the country,” Malveaux said. “This is again one of those moments.”
Is it really? Consider Digby’s take.
I think it’s appropriate for the president to appear there today, it’s in nearby Virginia, and it’s a national tragedy. But the only slightly political dimension you can find in this is guns, which have been taken off the table as a political issue, (although gun owners have achieved their agenda so thoroughly that they now seem to be lobbying to actually require people to be armed at all times and shoot first and ask questions later.) I suppose that there will undoubtedly be some immigrant bashing too.
But from what we know now, we seem to be dealing with a crazy man and there’s nothing the president can say about that or do about that other than speak for the people as its leader and express our sorrow. For Malveaux to evoke Bush’s famous bullhorn moment is fluffing of the highest order. (She seems to have developed some sort of Stockholm Syndrome lately, so it’s not surprising.)
I don’t have any problem with the president attending services today at Virginia Tech. It seems entirely, unquestionably appropriate. Indeed, it would appear that the White House has learned a valuable lesson after Bush avoided New Orleans after Katrina.
But can we wait until we actually hear the president’s remarks before praising their historic significance?