Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* This should be interesting: “Former Deputy Attorney General James Comey is scheduled to appear before the House Judiciary Committee at a hearing Thursday next week to testify about his involvement in the plan to fire certain U.S. attorneys.”

* Jonathan Schwarz raises a very good point: when Oprah has James Frey on, and he’s exposed as having been wrong, she invites him back to humiliate him. When Oprah had two war supporters on in 2002, and they’re wrong, they’re not invited back. There’s an accountability disconnect.

* New Hampshire lawmakers approved a broad new civil unions bill today, which Gov. John Lynch (D) has promised to sign. After it’s law, New England will be the first region to have every state granting a measure of legal rights to same-sex couples.

* Today, Dana Perino repeated the same dumb argument Bush and Krauthammer like so much: “Last November, the American people voted for a change in strategy in Iraq – and the President listened. Tonight, the House of Representatives voted for failure in Iraq – and the President will veto its bill.” I wonder if these guys ever get tired of being wrong.

* Keith Olbermann’s latest “special comment” (video, text) takes on Rudy Giuliani’s claim that electing a Democrat would put Americans’ lives in danger. He didn’t pull any punches — and he delivered one hell of a response. “Even to grant that that formula — whether posed by Republican or Democrat — is somehow not the most base, the most indefensible, the most un-American electioneering in our history — even if it is somehow acceptable to assign “casualties” to one party and “safety” to the other — even if we have become so profane in our thinking that it is part of our political vocabulary to view counter-terror as one party’s property and the other’s liability, on what imaginary track record does Mr. Giuliani base his boast?”

* Speaking of Olbermann, he seems to take an enormous amount of pleasure making Bill O’Reilly look ridiculous. It isn’t tough, but it is entertaining.

* ABC reported yesterday, “President Bush hopes someone is held responsible for the U.S. military’s mishandling of information about the death of former football star Pat Tillman in Afghanistan.” You know, Bush is the president — he can hold someone responsible.

* A missing $200,000 here, an unreported $200,000 there, and pretty soon we’re talking about real money.

* Glenn Greenwald talked to Pulitzer Prize winner David Savage of the Boston Globe about political reporting. “I’ll just mention one principle in particular which is important when writing about complex legal or policy matters: avoiding the easy route of ‘he said, she said’ reporting, which does no favors to readers who don’t have the time to become specialists in the subject themselves,” Savage said. “Sometimes government officials, seeking to ‘muddy the coverage’ (in the words of a DOJ spokeswoman’s internal email that was recently turned over to a congressional committee looking into the US attorneys firings), put out misleading talking points that are intended to distract reporters and the public from the real story. In such a case, one must go beyond simply quoting the government official and give readers the information they need in order not to be misled.”

* Dan Froomkin does a nice job today explaining how and why to “keep an eye on those benchmarks” in Iraq.

* Guess which presidential candidate said, “If the President of the United States cannot say, ‘Here is what we are fighting for in ________, that more Americans may perish in service to the goals, and here is why it is worth that price,’ then, Mr. President, we have no right — no right — to ask Americans to risk their lives in any further misadventures in ________.” If you said John McCain, when Clinton was president, you’re right.

* I suppose anyone can slip up, but I’d feel a little better about our Secretary of State if she stopped referring to the Russians as “Soviets.” It’s been over a decade now, Condi, and you’re supposed to be an expert. (thanks to G.C. for the heads-up)

* If you missed Bill Moyers’ “Buying the War” last night on PBS, you can see the whole thing online. It’s really worth watching.

* Here’s a really interesting project: posting all presidential debate footage online, without copyright restrictions, as a means of political accountability. The DNC is open to the idea, the RNC isn’t. What a surprise.

* And on a related note, just a reminder, the very first debate of the presidential campaign season will be held tonight at South Carolina State University. All eight Democratic candidates are scheduled to appear at the event, which will be moderated by NBC’s Brian Williams and will be shown on MSNBC from 7-8:30 p.m. (eastern). I’ll offer full team coverage — which is to say, a bunch of posts with good comments from you guys — tomorrow.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Jonathan Schwarz raises a very good point: when Oprah has James Frey on, and he’s exposed as having been wrong, she invites him back to humiliate him. When Oprah had two war supporters on in 2002, and they’re wrong, they’re not invited back. There’s an accountability disconnect.

I’m willing to initially give Oprah the benefit of the doubt here. I didn’t see the second Frey interview but I strongly suspect that it went far differently than most right-wing dissembling, which as I mentioned yesterday was just beyond painful to watch. See my comments from yesterday’s quick hit about John McCain going back to The Daily Show and how combative he was. It was just a plainly frustrating interview. I’d bet the Frey interview went a little differently in such a way as to make it more worthwhile to watch, especially to anyone who felt cheated by him.

Ok, I’ve kept silent about it long enough, but what on earth is wrong with the style sheets on this blog? I get disappearing blocks of text all the time now, on Firefox and on IE6, and I can’t figure out what it’s attributable to.

  • I caught most of Moyer’s special last night and while it was good, it was telling how low key it seemed given that the subject was media complicity in selling a war under false pretenses. As if, ‘we can finally whisper about what happened but we can’t talk about it too loudly or show the appropriate outrage.’

    More disappointing was that, unless I missed something, it didn’t address the fact that the media is STILL carrying the administration’s water.

  • ***Guess which president said, “If the President of the United States cannot say….***

    And then you refer to Mccain? As PRESIDENT?!

    CB—if McCain gets elected president because of this, we are going to have you fed to a herd of ravenous prairie dogs….

  • File this under holy-f***ing-shit-that-dude’s-crazy…

    Speaking to [a pro-Cheney audience], [Utah] State Attorney General Mark Shurtleff praised Cheney for giving “40 years of service to this country.” Shurtleff said those like [sic] who question the administration’s leadership, particularly in Iraq, don’t understand the direness of the situation. “We are at war with an enemy who wants to kill you, who wants to kill your woman [sic] and your children,” Shurtleff said. “They hope we give in so they can continue with their plans to come here and kill all of us.”
    http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_5757201

    WTF?

    This guy is an Attorney General?

  • “Comey’s list of USAS to be fired had one name on it”.

    That’s not right – Comey’s list had only one name in common with Sampson’s list – Kevin Ryan – but his list had other names on it as well. It seems he developed a list USAS that really did have some performance-related issues, but I guess they were mostly “loyal Bushies”, and so were not fired. (Funny how “loyal Bushies” and incompetance so often overlap).

  • And then you refer to Mccain? As PRESIDENT?!

    Oops. I meant presidential candidate. It’s corrected.

    if McCain gets elected president because of this…

    Good thing I’m not a superstitious person….

  • That’s not right – Comey’s list had only one name in common with Sampson’s list – Kevin Ryan – but his list had other names on it as well.

    Good point, CK. Thanks for clarifying.

  • I suppose anyone can slip up, but I’d feel a little better about our Secretary of State if she stopped referring to the Russians as “Soviets.” It’s been over a decade now, Condi, and you’re supposed to be an expert.

    Berlin Wall fell 18 years ago November. USSR came to an end 16 years ago this August. That’sa pretty serious length of time. But them “Bush’s Mammy” is too busy taking care of her little boy to keep track of details.

  • Great point about Oprah. Here’s where you can e-mail her with a show idea:

    http://www.oprah.com/email/reach/email_showideas.jhtml

    And here’s the idea to pitch:

    When you had James Frey on, and he was shown to be a liar, you brought him back on and humiliated him. In 2002, as reported by Bill Moyers, you brought supporters of the invasion of Iraq on, and when they were questioned, humiliated the questioner. Now that the supporters are known liars, why not bring them on the show and humiliate them like Frey? If you had all the integrity you say you do, you would do this.

    This fits the 2,000-character maximum. Copy and paste. Send it in to that scumsucking cretin, and see what she does. Ms. I’m-So-Wonderful needs a kick in her broad posterior.

  • Em, I believe it’s actually Charlie Savage who won the Pulitzer. I’m sure there are some fine people named David Savage, though.

  • Oprah screws up? Say it it ain’t so! Going back to her 2000 interview of George W. and Laura Bush, Oprah is a shameless enabler of Bush–and a disgrace to blacks and woman everywhere. WTF! Just ask SCOTUS.

  • In re., tonights debate:

    Zell Miller called, he wants his shrill back! Hahahahah, I LOVE Mike Gravel! Dems need to keep him in for as long as possible not just for the humor kick, but because that man knows how to stay on topic. Man oh man, Reps could take some pages from his books. All of them looked and sounded good. I can’t wait for the Republican debate next week, those folks are gonna sound stupid and incompetent.

  • Yeah the days of the Soviets vs. our current paranoia about loose bands of Arabs wishing evil upon us … good times.

    Note to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad: copy the following statement and replace all references to Russia or Soviet with U.S., replace any reference to interceptor with Iranian nuke, replace any reference to Eastern Europe with Middle East. THIS is diplomacy baby. To paraphrase our buddy George Tenet, it’s your “slam dunk” reply to the U.S.

    “The idea that somehow 10 interceptors and a few radars in Eastern Europe are going to threaten the Soviet strategic deterrent is purely ludicrous, and everybody knows it,” Ms. Rice said before a meeting of NATO foreign ministers expected to focus on the missile-defense dispute.

    “The Russians have thousands of warheads,” Ms. Rice said. “The idea that you can somehow stop the Soviet strategic nuclear deterrent with a few interceptors just doesn’t make sense.”

  • the very first debate of the presidential campaign season will be held tonight at South Carolina State University.

    It is far too fucking early for this sort of thing.

    There, I said it.

    The Dem candidates, especially the ones in who are currently in office, should let The Deciderator stay center stage for as long as possible. The man is a concrete albatross to his entire party and smart ReThugs (not McCainiac) love anything that distracts us from teh suck in the White House.

    I’d like to see an entire week of paparazzi level coverage devoted solely to what ShrubBuster and His Merrie Enablers are doing. There would be a big cauldron of tar and a few barrells of feathers on the White House lawn before Wednesday.

    I’d be the one selling the wooden rails and rotten eggs.

  • Moyers’ program underlines one of my favorite quotes of all time:

    “How is the world ruled and how do wars start? Diplomats tell lies to journalists and then believe what they read.”

    Karl Kraus, 1874-1936

    Res Ipsa Loquitur

  • “There would be a big cauldron of tar and a few barrells (sic) of feathers on the White House lawn before Wednesday.”

    There. See? I’m not the only one who expects pitchforks and torches in Lafayette Park.

    It won’t happen, though. The ability of the American electorate to sit on our collective duff will far outstrip the outrage of the few fully conscious observers among us.

  • Olbermann was great as usual in his Special Comment. I didn’t quite get the Robespierre comparison to Guiliani, (my lack of knowledge on French ‘histoire’ is apparent), but overall it was dead on.

  • The Bill Moyers show had a snip from Oprah and Quanbar (right hand to Chalabi). There was a woman in the audience who was generally confused and worried about the reasons for the war and wanted an honest explanation. Oprah’s “OK, but Ok. You have a right to your opinion” comment was so damn obnoxious and dismissive I was revolted. It doesn’t come across in the written transcript you have to watch it. She should stick to the warm/fuzzy show topics, international relations and affiliated topics are beyone her.

  • “I suppose anyone can slip up, but I’d feel a little better about our Secretary of State if she stopped referring to the Russians as “Soviets.” It’s been over a decade now, Condi, and you’re supposed to be an expert.”

    Her expertise on Russia apparently ends with the collapse of the Soviet Union

    It’s like asking an expert on Roman history a question about modern Italy.

  • I find Ms. Rice’s mistake entirely understandable.

    The Russians are back to acting like Soviets now that they are under Pooty-Poot.

    Same junk, different, smaller empire.

  • Nothing wrong with Oprah. She told the antiwar woman she had a right to her opinion. In fact she followed up with half a dozen antiwar shows. Michael Moore even endorsed Oprah for president in his book because she had him on the day before the war and was the ONLY mainstream media to question the war.

  • Comments are closed.