Over the weekend, Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney delivered the commencement address at Regent University, the fourth-tier college created by TV preacher Pat Robertson. There are a couple of angles to the story — what Romney said and to whom he said it.
First, there’s what Romney told Regent’s graduating class.
“There is no work more important to America’s future than the work that is done within the four walls of the American home,” Romney said. He also criticized people who choose not to get married because they enjoy the single life.
“It seems that Europe leads Americans in this way of thinking,” Romney told the crowd of more than 5,000. “In France, for instance, I’m told that marriage is now frequently contracted in seven-year terms where either party may move on when their term is up. How shallow and how different from the Europe of the past.”
One of Romney’s shortcomings as a candidate is his lack of foreign policy experience. Publicly stating that French couples get married in “seven-year terms” is not a good way to demonstrate familiarity with cultural norms in Europe.
Put simply, Romney doesn’t know what he’s talking about. There was a recent French comedy that kind of fits the description the former governor was talking about, but it was just a movie — a fictional movie.
Keep in mind, this wasn’t an off-hand comment in an interview. Romney offered this assessment of France’s cultural norms in a prepared text. In other words, Romney didn’t just slip up; he meant to repeat an obviously nonsensical observation. (Is it possible that Republican primary voters will be more impressed with a candidate who doesn’t know anything about France?)
So, over the course of three days, Romney has publicly demonstrated that he doesn’t know anything about terrorist groups and is equally ignorant about a European ally. Any other foreign policy matters you’d like to flub, governor?
As for Romney’s audience, the GOP candidate commended Pat Robertson for building a faith-based college, and said Regent was an example of Robertson’s dedication to strengthening “education, fellowship and advancement.”
Is that so? Regular readers may recall a few of Brother Robertson’s more colorful public remarks, but Nico reminds us of some the radical televangelist’s recent tirades.
Robertson on the vote in Dover, PA in support of evolution science: “I’d like to say to the good citizens of Dover: if there is a disaster in your area, don’t turn to God, you just rejected Him from your city.”
Robertson on September 11: Two days after the terrorist attacks, Mr. Robertson held a conversation with Jerry Falwell on Mr. Robertson’s TV show “The 700 Club.” Mr. Falwell laid blame for the attack at the feet of “the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians,” not to mention the A.C.L.U. and People for the American Way. “Well, I totally concur,” said Mr. Robertson.
Robertson on Islam: “I believe it’s motivated by demonic power. It is satanic and it’s time we recognize what we’re dealing with. … [T]he goal of Islam, ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, is world domination. ”
Robertson on former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s stroke: Robertson suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s recent stroke was the result of Sharon’s policy, which he claimed is “dividing God’s land.”
Robertson on assassinating Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez: “I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it.”
The list (.pdf) of Robertson gems goes on and on, but I’d add that he also recently said that the terrorists of Sept. 11 were just “a few bearded-terrorists who fly into buildings” and that federal judges who fail to share his worldview are a greater threat to the fabric of America than terrorism today, Nazis during WWII, and the Civil War in the 19th century. In 2003, Robertson told his television audience that the U.S. State Department deserves to be hit with a nuclear bomb.
Romney’s support for this nut appears to have gone largely unnoticed. I’m curious, if a top-tier Democratic candidate had publicly appeared with and praised a radical extremist who blamed 9/11 on Americans, would it be a non-story?