Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* This ought to be interesting: “Harry Reid just spoke on the Senate floor, revealing that he’ll allow a vote this week on the Feingold-Reid amendment, which would cut off funding for the war by March 31, 2008. This is a big deal for war opponents — it’s the first vote in the Senate on a measure of this kind. ‘This is a vote that folks have been clamoring for for some time now,’ enthuses a staffer who works for a Senator favoring the approach.” I think everyone would agree it’s a long-shot, but at a minimum, it forces everyone in the chamber to take a stand.

* CNN: “Expressing dismay over the Republican Party’s trajectory, Sen. Chuck Hagel said Sunday that an independent presidential bid would be good for the nation. And Hagel, R-Nebraska, did not rule out the possibility that he might be the one to do it, perhaps in alliance with New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg.” Hagel said on Face the Nation, “I am not happy with the Republican Party today.” (If the GOP thinks it’ll be tough to win with one Republican facing one Democrat, imagine two Republicans facing one Democrat…)

* Former CIA Director George Tenet has agreed to testify before Henry Waxman’s House Oversight Committee, on the issue of hyped pre-war intelligence. It’s bound to be entertaining — mark your calendars for June 19.

* For all the talk on the right about largely non-existent “voter fraud,” I find it rather amusing that a real instance of voter fraud appears to have occurred with Rep. Patrick McHenry’s (R-N.C.) former field coordinator, who allegedly voted illegally for McHenry in 2004.

* Sebastian Mallaby does quite a number on the Wolfowitz/World Bank scandal in his column today: “The scandal over his girlfriend’s pay is the final nail in Wolfowitz’s anti-corruption efforts. It has created a situation in which the bank can’t publicize its new anti-corruption manual, ‘The Many Faces of Corruption,’ because doing so would invite ridicule. Things have reached the point where anyone who believes in Wolfowitz’s anti-corruption agenda should be rooting for his departure. Surely even Wolfowitz himself can see that?”

* First the Pentagon pulled the troops’ blogs. Now the Pentagon is pulling their YouTube and MySpace access, too.

* The story about Rudy Giuliani snubbing those low-income family farmers is finally starting to catch on. The AP picked up on the controversy, as has ABC News’ website.

* Muckraker: “On her last day in the Civil Rights Division’s voting rights section, an African-American 33-year veteran of the Justice Department wanted to send her colleagues a message: ‘I leave with fond memories of the Voting Section I once knew,’ she wrote, ‘and I am gladly escaping the ‘Plantation’ it has become. For my colleagues still under the ‘whip’, hold on – ‘The Times They are A Changing.'”

* Read Kevin Drum on Pakistan.

* Those Alaskan lawmakers just can’t help themselves: “Another Bridge, Another Part of Nowhere.”

* Media Matters’ latest report on the Sunday-morning shows: “Not only are the Sunday morning talk shows on the broadcast networks dominated by conservative opinion and commentary, the four programs — NBC’s Meet the Press, ABC’s This Week, CBS’ Face the Nation, and Fox Broadcasting Co.’s Fox News Sunday — feature guest lists that are overwhelmingly white and overwhelmingly male. And the top-rated Sunday show — Meet the Press — shows the least diversity of all. The NBC program is the most male and nearly the most white (Face the Nation beats it out by 1 percentage point), and it has the highest proportion of white males to all other guests.”

* In April, the Bush administration resettled exactly one Iraqi refugee in the United States. Not 100, just one. “The total since the fiscal year started Oct. 1 is 69. At this rate, far from resettling 7,000, the State Department will be lucky to match last year’s total of 202.”

* Remember when CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux suggested Nancy Pelosi is “on her way to becoming the most controversial” House Speaker in history? That hasn’t exactly happened.

* And finally, Frank Rich seems to believe corruption has ruined the Republican brand: “Wrongdoing of this magnitude does not happen by accident, but it is not necessarily instigated by a Watergate-style criminal conspiracy. When corruption is this pervasive, it can also be a byproduct of a governing philosophy. That’s the case here. That Bush-Rove style of governance, the common denominator of all the administration scandals, is the Frankenstein creature that stalks the G.O.P. as it faces 2008. It has become the Republican brand and will remain so, even after this president goes, until courageous Republicans disown it and eradicate it.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Banning use of YouTube and MySpace by the military personnel should really help the morale of soldiers. Almost as much as lengthening their tour of service from 12 to 15 months.

What are the consequences expected from capping a kettle?

  • It has created a situation in which the bank can’t publicize its new anti-corruption manual, ‘The Many Faces of Corruption,’

    They could smack several shots of Wolfie’s phiz on the cover to let everyone know they know they have a problem.

    Frank Rich seems to believe corruption has ruined the Republican brand

    Are these baboons living in a time warp or what? I swear, every time some ReFuglican punkdick fans his brow and says “Oh mah, it ceahtainly is sleazy in heah,” I rethink my belief that there is no reason to run a bastard over with a steamroller just because he’s a big stinking moron.

    “There are understandable security concerns,” Bacon said, and “a legitimate fear, but eventually they have to figure out how to do it.

    “The real issue is, does the president care about this problem?” he said. “Until this is a top-level government concern, not much is going to happen.”

    Two coherent thoughts out of all the swearing:
    1. Fuck our self-inflicted security concerns. The people of Iraq are not a security concern. Why can’t this shithead say there are now some bad people in Iraq because we opened up the gates for them and a lot of other people who aren’t being friendly just want us the fuck out. But because we’ve made the country such a pit of chaos that we can’t be sure who is who in the zoo. Gee, people go missing and show up full of nail holes. And their wallets are missing! We can’t let anyone in now! Shit, refugees from Axis countries in WWII got better treatment, provided they weren’t too (ahem) different. Can you say Racism boys and girls?

    2. Did Mr. Bacon just [gasp!] Blame the pResident? Looks like his fat is in the fire.

    ‘I leave with fond memories of the Voting Section I once knew,’ she wrote, ‘and I am gladly escaping the ‘Plantation’ it has become. For my colleagues still under the ‘whip’, hold on – ‘The Times They are A Changing.’”

    This has got to be the funniest thing I’ve read all month.

  • The million dollar question for Tenet is…

    after the IAEA showed that the Bush nuclear bomb program allegations turned out to be a fraud (the Niger docs), hype based on INC scammers and other fluff that should have been beneath this great nation….

    how much detail did he share with Bush, Cheney and Rice about the complete and utter collapse of the nuclear mushroom cloud talking point?

    I know, I know, there are a dozen other good questions to ask Tenet, but the nuclear report pretty definitively eviscerated that very serious allegation **2 weeks before** the invasion.

    Did GWB show any comprehension that he was wrong on a major justification for war; did he suppress that new knowledge; did he make a concerted effort to initiate the invasion in the knowledge that the Bush credibility was about to take a serious hit if the media had properly digested the significance of that report?

    The Bush apologists always complain that it was ‘faulty intel’ which caused GWB to invade, however in this instance, we know for fact that the ‘faulty intel’ was rebutted, debunked and essentially thrashed before the invasion. There may be other less definitive issues, but this one really was a ‘slam dunk’ against the President’s case.

  • Lying thieving incompetent Republican scum. It’s the meme for the 21st century!

    (I’ll consider being cynical about the Democrats once the Republican party is no longer a threat to the nation.)

  • This could be the beginning of the Bu$hylvanian collapse. If the Feingold went through, and a majority of the House signed on, how would the PresiDunce stop it? Answer—he can’t. This won’t be a “veto-susceptible bill,” as I understand it; it’ll be a point-blank directive, from the Congress to the Congress, to terminate all funding for the Bu$h Follies—effective March 31 2008.

    Stut it down, Harry—shut it down ASAP!!!

  • Yes, I’ve got something to add (sorry for the redundancy from earlier posts). Congressman Kucinich may need to amend his Articles of Impeachment :

    May 14, 2007

    WMR has received additional credible information on the patronage of Vice President Dick Cheney, while he was President and CEO of Halliburton in the mid to late 1990s, of the DC Madam’s escort service. We can also report that Cheney’s involvement in the DC Madam saga has now attracted the attention of the so-called “mainstream media.”

    US Attorney for Maryland, Thomas DiBiagio .. was fired, along with a number of other US attorneys, after George W. Bush’s re-election for political reasons. One of DiBiagio’s public corruption targets was the staff of then-Republican Maryland Governor Bob Ehrlich, some of whom had engaged the services of Madam Palfrey’s escorts. [emphasis added]

    Visit Wayne Madsen Report.

  • “Another Bridge, Another Part of Nowhere.”

    This is misleading, in that the Kink Arm bridge was always paired together with the Gravina Island bridge. It’s just that the Gravina project drew most of the attention. So it’s not a case of “Here they go again…” because it’s the same bridge.

  • Hillary and/or Obama versus Hagel and/or Thompson, Bloomberg and Gingrich. I’m not one who thinks the Republicans (or at least conservatives) are automatically doomed to be swept from the White House in 2008. A candidate who doesn’t look and sound like Bush is all they need — especially one who vows to get out of Iraq. I think Americans have come to despise Bush more than they have come to love Democrats. And I still think a presidential nomination of either Hillary or Obama will keep Democrats out of the WH for at least four more years.

  • Looks like the global warming has brought us an accelerated cycle of seasons… It’s now fall in springtime, with the individuals in the Bu$h admin dropping down like leaves. Too many to mention, so go and visit Think Progress today, after 5PM… 🙂

  • Comments are closed.