In early 2003, literally just a few weeks before the president would launch a war with Iraq, Bush met with TV preacher Pat Robertson to discuss the conflict. The president reportedly told the televangelist that he believed there’d be minimal casualties, and soon after, began the invasion.
With this background in mind, I was not at all encouraged to see that Bush is now discussing Iran with James Dobson. (thanks to Bob for the tip)
“I was invited to go to Washington DC to meet with President Bush in the White House along with 12 or 13 other leaders of the pro-family movement,” Dobson disclosed on his radio program Monday. “And the topic of the discussion that day was Iraq, Iran and international terrorism. And we were together for 90 minutes and it was very enlightening and in some ways disturbing too.” […]
Later in his broadcast, during a discussion about Iran with author and self-proclaimed “prophecy expert” Joel Rosenberg, Dobson drew a parallel between current Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad and Adolf Hitler.
“The world looked at Hitler and just didn’t believe him and tried to appease him the way we’re hearing in Washington today,” Dobson remarked. “You know, the President seems to me does understand this, as I told you from that meeting I had with him the other day, but even there it feels like somebody ought to be standing up and saying, ‘We are being threatened and we are going to meet this with force — whatever’s necessary.'”
Dobson continued, “Some of our listeners might not like that but I tell you, if we didn’t stand up to Hitler, we’d be speaking German today.”
Oh my.
First, the fact that Bush is talking about a possible confrontation with Iran at all is discomforting, to put it mildly. The administration is supposed to be showing renewed signs of interest in diplomacy when it comes to Iran; for the president to turn around and start talking about looming dangers isn’t a good sign.
“I heard about this danger [from Iran] not only at the White House but from other pro-family leaders that I met during that week in Washington,” [Dobson] said. “Many people in a position to know are talking about the possibility of losing a city to nuclear or biological or chemical attack. And if we can lose one we can lose ten.
“If we can lose ten we can lose a hundred,” he added, “especially if North Korea and Russia and China pile on.”
Second, I guess it’s too much to ask, but how about some scrutiny on the White House over the fact that the president is meeting with a nut like Dobson to discuss foreign policy in the first place?