Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* As if today’s headlines weren’t discouraging enough: “The Bush administration is quietly on track to nearly double the number of combat troops in Iraq this year, an analysis of Pentagon deployment orders showed Monday. The little-noticed second surge, designed to reinforce U.S. troops in Iraq, is being executed by sending more combat brigades and extending tours of duty for troops already there.” (Kevin Drum makes a compelling case that this may not be quite the outrage that it might seem to be at first blush.)

* On a related note, NPR reported yesterday that the administration is considering a “lily pad” strategy that would maintain a strong U.S. military presence in Iraq for several decades. As NPR explained, “[W]hat it essentially envisions is a series of military installations around Iraq, maybe five or six of them, a total of maybe 30-40 thousand U.S. troops in Iraq for a long period of time, lasting, maybe a few decades…. And that will enable the U.S. military to maintain a presence in the country.”

* Lt. Gen. William Boykin, about whom I’ve written on more than a few occasions, has finally resigned. Good.

* The Des Moines Register had a really good editorial about Alberto Gonzales and the various Justice Department scandals: “If he will not resign, and if the president will not fire him, Congress should begin proceedings to impeach him. That should be just the beginning of the work of Congress, however. Based on new details that emerged before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, more questions must be asked of Bush administration officials, including whether President Bush personally – and in contradiction of the advice of his attorney general and the Justice Department’s top legal adviser – directed spying on American citizens in violation of the law. Congress should follow that thread wherever it leads.” (thanks for the heads up, D.B.)

* On a related note, the chances of getting a no-confidence resolution through the Senate this week are looking pretty slim. GOP obstructionism will probably push it back until June. The measure now has seven Republican supporters.

* How bad is the Pentagon’s bureaucracy? This bad: “The Marine Corps waited over a year before acting on a ‘priority 1 urgent’ request to send blast-resistant vehicles to Iraq, DANGER ROOM has learned. According to a Marine Corps document provided to DANGER ROOM, the request for over 1,000 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles came in February, 2005. A formal call to fulfill that order did not emerge until November, 2006. ‘There is an immediate need for an MRAP vehicle capability to increase survivability and mobility of Marines operating in a hazardous fire area against known threats,’ the 2005 ‘universal need statement’ notes.”

* Gary Kamiya had an interesting explanation for why Bush hasn’t been impeached yet: “The truth is that Bush’s high crimes and misdemeanors, far from being too small, are too great. What has saved Bush is the fact that his lies were, literally, a matter of life and death. They were about war. And they were sanctified by 9/11. Bush tapped into a deep American strain of fearful, reflexive bellicosity, which Congress and the media went along with for a long time and which has remained largely unexamined to this day. Congress, the media and most of the American people have yet to turn decisively against Bush because to do so would be to turn against some part of themselves.”

* Paul Cameron, one of the nation’s leading anti-gay activists, was quoted by the San Francisco Chronicle without telling the reader what a giant nut he is.

* On a related note, it’s not enough for the military to discriminate against gays, the military also has to punish those who think it’s wrong to discriminate against gays.

* As much as I appreciate Chuck Hagel’s wisdom on Iraq, it’s really important to remember how conservative he is.

* Bush hit all-time lows in approval ratings in the latest Rasmussen and American Research Group polls.

* Food Stamp Challenge has wrapped up. The WaPo article on it is quite good.

* Sometimes, the jokes just write themselves: “On the May 18 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, while discussing May 17 Senate negotiations on a comprehensive immigration bill, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly asserted: ‘Now, the far right, the hard right, somehow believes that, in the United States of America, the federal government at some point is gonna form federal squads to go in and grab people where they live or where they work and throw them out of the country. These are the talk show nuts who are telling you that they’re gonna nuke Tehran.'” Yes, O’Reilly refers to others as “talk show nuts.”

* And finally, as awful as we know Duke Cunningham to be, he can still get … ickier: “What repelled Wilkes — and others invited to the parties — was both the water Cunningham put in the hot tub and the congressman’s penchant for using it while naked, even if everybody else at the party was clothed.” Read the rest, but not on a whole stomach.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Gary Kamiya’s observation about the inability of many Americans to look in the mirror and realize (admit) that following (trusting) Bush was wrong is a something that I’ve felt to be the case for a long time. Depending on your mindset, admitting a mistake is either a sign of weakness or a sign of strength. The mirror can be very unforgiving for many.

  • Regarding the new surge, I’m just wondering where they’re going to find still more combat brigades when the last surge supposedly strained our force capability to the breaking point already.

    I can just see it now: Battalions of vicious, heavily armed clerk-typists unleashed on the bewildered enemy.

    Yeah, that’ll work. 🙁

  • But that mirror can also be quite empowering, sknm. It offers the individual the chance to “look him/herself square in the eye, accept that a mistake was made—and then gather the audacious courage to FIX the mistake.”

    If the self-recriminations are what’s in the way of setting things on an even keel again, then maybe it’s time to tell people to set those self-recriminations aside. They are nothing more than water under the bridge, and can be revisited at any time—and, given the massive problems faced by the Republic at this moment, there may yet be “a better time” to revisit those self-incriminations. The criminal trials of the Bu$h administration would be a good place for people to stand up and bear witness against the monsters in the WH….

  • More pleading from another immunity seeker, courtesy of Raw Story…
    Former Rove aide pleads the Fifth…

    Susan Ralston, the former executive assistant to top White House adviser Karl Rove, invoked her rights against self-incrimination while she was being asked to answer questions by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform…

    “The subjects this morning that she will be unable to testify to…are the subjects of the relationship between Jack Abramoff and his associates and White House officials, including Ms. Ralston, and the subject of the use by White House officials of political e-mail accounts at the RNC,” Ralston’s lawyer, Bradford Berenson said, during the May 10 deposition. “She has material, useful information about both of those subjects.”

    According to Waxman’s memo, which was sent to Oversight Committee members, Ralston is seeking immunity from prosecution.

  • How much clearer does it have to be that we have no intention of withdrawing from Iraq? What’s worse is that the Dems are buying into it, and that will be the death knell of our democratic republic if for no other reason than it will bankrupt us more than we already are. But there are many other reasons.

  • If recent headlines are any guide, we already have Federal squads (aka FBI and DHS) raiding factories and tossing people out of the country.

  • On the lily pads with troops: This is what PNAC set out to accomplish, to establish a good foothold in th ME from which to operate in the future and it’s exactly why the ME does not trust us. We set up bases uninvited in their countries. That’s not suspicious because America is very trustworthy.

    The Dems don’t want to impeach Bush/Cheney because, as my Senator emailed me, it would take up all their time and energy with very little chance for success in removing them from office.
    When I voted I wanted 2 things: 1. Stop funding the occupation and bring our troops home.
    2. Impeach Bush/Cheney/Rice/Gonzales etc and try them for war crimes and crimes against the constitution.
    This was what was most important and everything else should be put on the back burner till these 2 things were accomplished whatever it took. Now, we’ve got corruption run rampant and the new scary presidential directive that would put control of the government in Bush’s hand in case of a national emergency and congress just giving a blank check to Bush to continue the ‘splurge’ getting more kids killed. Do these representatives just forget or ignore what we ask them to do? Everyone I know is so angry, frustrated and just feel betrayed by a yahoo cowboy self proclaimed dictator and an inept cowardly congress too afraid to stop him while they still can. Is it so easy for them to spill the blood of others for their own gain? I’m convinced that even if we knew exactly how to solve all our problems there would be a huge debate on whether it’s such a good idea to solve all our problems. It seems the courageous and the brave have just thrown up their hands in disgust and have gone off to be alone.

  • Re: Cunningham – filet mignon “very well done”??? Talk about a pig with “all his taste in his mouth.”

    I remember in 1984 when he was “the last American Ace still on active duty” and he came to that year’s convention of the American Fighter Aces Association, and those guys – his peers – went out of their way to avoid him when he came barging in on Saturday night, it said everything about him you wanted to know.

  • It’s amazing and depressing to return (from a couple weeks in Tuscany) to all this. bjobotts nailed what irks me most: “an inept cowardly congress too afraid to stop him while they still can”.

    When I left I had hopes that the Democrats might accomplish something. Since they’ve been in office the US death rate has risen, from 2.2 per day to about 3.0, with no sign of any letup. In over a half-century as a political junkie, I’ve never been so cynical about politicians of all stripes.

    I’m ready to spend more time in my vegetable garden.

  • And that will enable the U.S. military to maintain a presence in the country

    I would offer a suggestion:

    Ditch the current 10 active Army division titles (1st Infantry Division, 101st Airborne Division, etc), and just label them Legios I through X.

    I think it would be a more accurate description of what the US military is becoming.

    “As much as I appreciate Chuck Hagel’s wisdom on Iraq, it’s really important to remember how conservative he is.”

    Welcome to Nebraska, CB.

  • I ask again, “Why should the American public believe that the Dumbocrats will have the courage to take on the real enemies of our Country when they do NOT have the gonads to take on the Bully Bush?”

    A complete surrender on ending the abomination in Iraq! No more MEANINGLESS votes!!! Passing a toothless bill on Iraq funding… Passing (or not) votes of no confidence for Gonzo.

    When you know that Gonzo committed PERJURY in front of Congress… When you know that Bush LIED to lead our country into war…
    When you know that Bush has SHREDDED the constitution…
    When you know that Bush has VIOLATED LAWS…

    Meaningless votes are not the answer. Show some balls. IMPEACH!
    Impeach Bush…
    Impeach Cheney…
    Impeach Gonzales…
    Impeach Rice…
    It is time for the Dumbocrats to act like they love our country more than their desire to pretend that acting like cowards will get them more political power in 2008!!!

  • When I voted I wanted 2 things: 1. Stop funding the occupation and bring our troops home.
    2. Impeach Bush/Cheney/Rice/Gonzales etc and try them for war crimes and crimes against the constitution. — bjobotts, @7

    Me too. I also wanted a serious reform re: ethics but, like you say, that could wait, till the other two got taken care of. I’m both discouraged about the future and disgusted with the Dem “leadership”. As of last night (when the first rumours of the Dem’s Capitulation Supplemental began to circulate), I’ve been replying to all in the same way: “At the moment, the only Dem I feel like supporting is Waxman, who’s doing his job. As far as the rest of you are concerned, I’m not sure you deserve my vote, much less my money. Ask me again in a year’s time.”

    Re doubling of the splurge: we know where they’re going to get the human component from — stop-loss tactics, extensions, sending half-prepared forces (does anyone know whether this new travesty of the bill caves in on *that* point, also?), etc. But, where are they going to get the equipment from, if it takes over a year to even get a request registered, never mind fulfilled? Are they planning to send them out with sharpened sticks?

    Re “lily pads”: You have to hand it to Repubes when it comes to bizarre names for everything they do. Lily pads??? Staffed with bullfrogs or Cinderellas?

  • The “Lily pad strategy” sounds uncomfortably close to the “strategic hamlet strategy.”

  • Lilypads? Probably something along the lines of firebases in ‘Nam?I guess they’re not intelligent enough to remember things like Khe Sahn and Tet. Bu$h and Cheney are old enough to have heard the stories, though. Stupid idiots….

  • 2Manchu, I gotta ask an actual Nebraskan – Bruning seems like a bright, young, personable guy from the more urban part of the state (I’ve actually met him in passing and would never have predicted he’d end up a far right elected official). Yet here he is, running to Hagel’s right. Is that really who he is or is that all electoral strategy? He just seems like someone who should be more enlightened that his stances suggest. What gives?

  • Lilypads? Probably something along the lines of firebases in ‘Nam?I guess they’re not intelligent enough to remember things like Khe Sahn and Tet. Bu$h and Cheney are old enough to have heard the stories, though. Stupid idiots….

    Hell, you can go back a little farther than that, too. Meet your new colonial masters, the same as the old colonial masters.

    Yeah, they’re gonna love that.

  • I’m *STILL* surprised about how little even the most up to date people i’ve spoken with even KNOW about the PNAC. It seems so outlandish and tin foil hat like when you first talk to people about it, but yet it is right there, on the internet for all to see…..

  • zeitgeist,

    Sorry for the late reply.

    It’s a strategy. He’s playing on what he perceives as the state’s unquestionable support for the Iraq war and cracking down on illegal immigration.

    I think if the opinion in the state on those two issues falls more in line with the rest of the country, he will change his strategy to adapt to this change. That’s not a knock on the guy, that’s just how politicians survive here in the “heartland” (see Ben Nelson).

  • Comments are closed.