The video is making the rounds today, and for good reason; it’s an odd exchange.
Bill O’Reilly: But do you understand what the New York Times wants, and the far-left want? They want to break down the white, Christian, male power structure, which you’re a part, and so am I, and they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically break down the structure that we have. In that regard, Pat Buchanan is right. So I say you’ve got to cap it with a number.
John McCain: In America today we’ve got a very strong economy and low unemployment, so we need addition farm workers, including by the way agriculture, but there may come a time where we have an economic downturn, and we don’t need so many.
[crosstalk]
O’Reilly: But in this bill, you guys have got to cap it. Because estimation is 12 million, there may be 20 [million]. You don’t know, I don’t know. You’ve got to cap it.
McCain: We do, we do. I agree with you.
Now, I’ve seen some suggestions that McCain implicitly endorsed O’Reilly’s race-based tirade when he said, “I agree with you.” I’m afraid that’s a stretch — I’m the last guy to defend McCain, but he simply endorsed some kind of cap on eligible immigrants. (That said, McCain also didn’t raise objections to O’Reilly’s xenophobia, either.)
But more to the point, O’Reilly’s concern for maintaining the “white, Christian, male power structure” struck me as about as offensive as what got Don Imus fired.
Think about it — if a KKK official appeared on Fox News, wouldn’t you expect him to make similar comments? And isn’t it more than a little disconcerting when O’Reilly’s rhetoric and racist rhetoric is one and the same?
And at the risk of getting too deep into the weeds here, O’Reilly’s argument seems to miss a few pertinent details, not the least of which is the fact that most Mexican immigrants are Christian.
Indeed, O’Reilly’s point isn’t an economic or security one; it’s based entirely on race and ethnicity. He seems to suggest that immigration would be perfectly acceptable to him, if immigrants helped him maintain the “white, Christian, male power structure.”
I’d be surprised if O’Reilly actually faced consequences for these comments — if he wasn’t punished for encouraging al Qaeda to strike an American city, he won’t be punished for this — but his comments nevertheless struck me as over the top, even by O’Reilly’s very low standards.