Friday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* Washington Times: “The Republican National Committee, hit by a grass-roots donors’ rebellion over President Bush’s immigration policy, has fired all 65 of its telephone solicitors, The Washington Times has learned. Faced with an estimated 40 percent falloff in small-donor contributions and aging phone-bank equipment that the RNC said would cost too much to update, Anne Hathaway, the committee’s chief of staff, summoned the solicitations staff and told them they were out of work, effective immediately.” Several of the sacked solicitors said donations had dropped off considerably due to Bush’s immigration policy.

* One of Rudy Giuliani’s principal talking points on the stump is that he, unlike his GOP rivals, can compete in the Northeast. The claim was undercut a bit yesterday, when a Siena College poll found that he trailed both of the Dems’ top two candidates, in his home state, by double digits. In New York, Clinton leads Giuliani 52% to 39%, while Obama leads the former mayor 50% to 40%.

* Speaking of Giuliani, the Huffington Post’s Tom Edsall (congrats on the new gig, Tom) explores the growing conservative network that has come together to defeat Giuliani’s presidential aspirations. “The early success of Rudy Giuliani’s presidential bid has provoked a groundswell of opposition from disparate forces including conservative Catholics, remnants of Pat Buchanan’s presidential campaigns and regional political operatives seeking to break into the Republican firmament.”

* John Edwards ran into a little trouble yesterday when he told an interviewer that he had read the classified October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate before voting to authorize force in Iraq. Edwards, before yesterday, has maintained that he never read the report, but had been briefed on it. Campaign aides later said the former senator misunderstood the question.

* Chris Dodd unveiled his third (!) television ad of the campaign season yesterday, with a new spot emphasizing his concern about global warming.

* And Wesley Clark appears to have missed the boat when it comes to launching a presidential campaign, but he’s still involved, speaking regularly with other candidates. “I haven’t said I won’t run,” Clark told Politico.com. “I think about running every single day.”

Several of the sacked solicitors said donations had dropped off considerably due to Bush’s immigration policy.

Maybe maybe we’re going to be lucky and for once in his entire life Drug-Addled Viagra-Fueled Moron Boy (aka Rush Limbaugh) is right when he says the immigration bill is the Kill The Republican Party Act (or words to that effect). Could it happen to a better bunch of white supremacist haters?

  • I’m surprised at you. Ben Smith from Politico now is the arbiter of who can and can’t run for President? Say it isn’t so!

  • I love The Clark, but he missed his moment. Though he’s head and shoulders more qualified for the presidency than anyone else out there, it’s pretty much impossible to see how he could get in and compete at this point.

    Somewhere in my disloyal Democrat head, I cherish the possibility of a Bloomberg/Clark independent ticket of radical stealth progressivism and superlative competence, destroying the Hillary/Vilsack corporatist Dem and Thompson/Pawlenty Republican schlock. But Clark is probably too tied to the Democratic Party now even to contemplate something like that.

  • a grass-roots donors’ rebellion over President Bush’s immigration policy

    Of course our illustrious Democratic leadership will look at that gift horse, and say to themselves… “Hey, let’s make a deal with Bush so that we can get hit by that same freight train”

    Idiots.

  • It seems to me that Bush’s last round of global warming rhetoric (even if it turns out just to be a subterfuge to permit additional inaction) will piss off his hard-core supporters even more than the immigration bill.

  • It’s not too late for Clark to run, though it’s interesting that he’s talking to the Democratic candidates.

    Thanks for the update.

  • Can you say “PhoneBot”?

    “Hi. This is Karl Rove. The Democrats are at it again and we need your help to stop the socialist Hilary-lovers. To donate $50 press 1, for $500, press 2, if this call has reached you in error and you have the full $2300 legal limit, press 3 and we’ll send one of our complementary hookers right over for your check.”

  • Mark my words: Hillary will name Clark as her running mate. Early, if Obama gets any stronger. Clark’s been tight with the Clintons for years.

  • Personally, I go where Clark goes. Clark’s assessment of the 2004 Dem field was accurate – he saw Dean as ‘un-sale-able’ and Kerry as bland…in the eyes of the electorate. Clarks strategic sense for his own campaign was way off-kilter, however. Skipping Iowa? Posing on the front page of a gay magazine just before some Southern primaries? Stumbling over the (rotten and poorly understood) resolution to authorize force? These are things a seasoned aide-de-campe could have mulled over for the primary campaign, but alas, the moment is past for him…all the voters will prolly remember is that he is a failed ’04 candidate and that there was some (dishonest) talking point about Clark starting WWIII.

    I guess the military life didn’t properly prepare him for the sharp-elbow tactics of Presidential politics. I mean, what normal person would have thought that **Dem activists** would have attacked Clark for voting for Richard Nixon or Ronald Reagan 20-30 years ago?

  • Senator Christopher Dodd’s voting record on environmental issues can be found at: Senator Christopher Dodd’s Voting Record

    Senator Christopher Dodd’s history of speeches on global climate change can be found at: Senator Christopher Dodd’s Record of Speeches

    Senator Christopher Dodd’s ratings from special interest groups on environmental issues can be found at: Senator Christopher Dodd’s Interest Group Ratings

    For more information on Senator Christopher Dodd’s position on global climate change please visit Project Vote Smart or call our hotline at 1-888-VOTE-SMART.

  • Comments are closed.