Pace out as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

Well, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has demonstrated a willingness to shake things up a bit.

MSNBC reports, “Pentagon sources are telling NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski that Defense Secretary Gates has replaced Gen. Peter Pace as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with Adm. Mike Mullen. He is currently the Navy’s chief naval officer.”

Pace’s recent tenure has been marked by more political controversies than military ones. Just a few weeks ago, for example, Pace seemed unsure how many U.S. troops had died in Iraq, which raised eyebrows around Washington.

Shortly before this, Pace showed questionable judgment writing a letter to Judge Reggie Walton, praising Scooter Libby. “He impressed me as a team player when addressing issues and with his selfless approach to wide-ranging responsibilities,” Pace said, adding, “From my perspective dealing with Mr. Libby on national security issues, he served the United States Government extremely well.” (It seemed like an odd compliment given Libby’s crime — lying about leaking the name of a covert CIA agent.)

And in March, Pace argued that gays should be excluded from military service because the Armed Forces “should not condone immoral acts.”

For that matter, his rhetoric on Iraq hasn’t been reassuring, either.

During a White House meeting last week, a group of governors asked President Bush and Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about their backup plan for Iraq. What would the administration do if its new strategy didn’t work?

The conclusion they took away, the governors later said, was that there is no Plan B. “I’m a Marine,” Pace told them, “and Marines don’t talk about failure. They talk about victory.”

Pace had a simple way of summarizing the administration’s position, Gov. Phil Bredesen (D-Tenn.) recalled. “Plan B was to make Plan A work.”

Apparently, it’ll soon be someone else’s job to make Plan A work.

I used to like Pace. He was willing to publicly contradict Rumsfeld which was more than anyone else in the adminstration was willing to do. However, recently he seems to have drunk some of the Kool-Aid too.

But, maybe the reason I like Pace at all was that we both graduated from the same high school.

  • Given how many Marines I know who considered Pace a disgrace to the Corps for his political shenanigans (even some who I know held those positions themselves), this is good riddance ot bad rubbish.

    Of course, what is Mullen like? In the Age of Bush, getting an officer above O-6 who has an IQ above room temperature seems to be a major miracle.

  • If the following is indicative of the way Mullen thinks, it is clear he has no clue as to the nature of what is going on. Unless and until our leaders, both civil and military, understand the real reasons behind the issues involving the Middle East and Jihad, we will reamin bogged down in never ending and unhelpful war. Although with this group that may be the goal.

    http://thinkprogress.org/2007/06/08/mullen-generational/

  • So, maybe they’re replacing an increasingly loose cannon with someone who will more reliably support the WH line come September…

    Meanwhile, Petraeus is calling the progress in Anbar province “breathtaking;” all I could think about was the Seinfeld eisode (“Shrinkage”) where the doctor referred to the apparently hideous “Baby” as “breathtaking.”

    Of course, “breathtaking” could also refer to the hundreds who are no longer breathing.

  • A Navy man is head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with 2 carrier groups in close proximity to Iran.
    Probably just a coincidence.

  • BuzzMon, my initial reaction was similar: wasn’t it just a few months ago a Navy man was put in charge of CentCom — just as those two carrier groups arrived?

    Either that or the Navy brass are the only ones not tainted by public support for BushCo’s failed policies (hey, give ’em time!)

  • Glad they choose someone who favors the “long war.” I’d hate to get one of those “short war” sissies in there.

  • It’s grimly amusing how all these idiots go on and on about ‘victory’ and yet none them could possibly tell you what it is.

  • Apparently, it’ll soon be someone else’s job to make Plan A work.

    No, it’ll be someone else’s job to make Plan C work, Plan C being to rough up Iran. Why else appoint the Navy’s chief officer? [Plan C = Plan Sea]

  • Apparently, it’ll soon be someone else’s job to make Plan A work.

    No, it’ll be someone else’s job to make Plan C work, Plan C being to rough up Iran. Why else appoint the Navy’s chief officer? [Plan C = Plan Sea, see.]

  • I’m also in agrement with Buzzmon on this, even though he forgot to mention the Bonhomme Richard’s accompanying those two carriers—and the fully-equipped Marine Expeditionary Force that’s aboard her. and no matter how many stars he’s got on his collar, a “Jarhead General” won’t know diddly-squat about submarines….

  • Isn’t anyone even concerned that the Bush administration is doing everything in its power to avoid anyone in the administration testify in front of Congress? Pace, Miers, Rove, etc.

    What is the administration afraid of? What is it hiding?

    These questions need to be answered.

  • At this rate, we’ll burn through the entire alphabet of alliterative JCS chairmen. Once we get through Janet Jackson, Erik Estrada, Danny DeVito, and Alan Alda, who’s next?

  • Comments are closed.