About those RNC email accounts…

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has been “investigating whether White House officials violated the Presidential Records Act by using e-mail accounts maintained by the Republican National Committee and the Bush Cheney ’04 campaign for official White House communications.” Today, House investigators released an interim staff report with a summary of the evidence the Committee has received to date.

I think the operative word here is “busted.”

* “The number of White House officials given RNC e-mail accounts is higher than previously disclosed.” The White House initially said only a “handful of officials” used private, unaccountable RNC email addresses. Then the Bush gang conceded that, over the course of the last six years, 50 officials used the accounts. The Oversight Committee has no found “at least 88 White House officials” who took advantage of RNC email, including Karl Rove, Andrew Card, Ken Mehlman, and “many other officials in the Office of Political Affairs, the Office of Communications, and the Office of the Vice President.”

* “White House officials made extensive use of their RNC e-mail accounts.” According to the emails preserved by the RNC, Rove used his private, unaccountable email address over 140,000 times. Sara Taylor had over 66,000 emails, while Scott Jennings had over 35,000 emails. “These e-mail accounts were used by White House officials for official purposes, such as communicating with federal agencies about federal appointments and policies.”

* “There has been extensive destruction of the e-mails of White House officials by the RNC.” On the one hand, the RNC didn’t preserve any emails for 51 of the 88 White House officials who used RNC email accounts, including Ken Mehlman, the former RNC chairman, who used his account for official WH business on a “daily” basis. On the other hand, for the accounts the RNC did preserve, there are large gaps. “The RNC has preserved only 130 e-mails sent to Mr. Rove during President Bush’s first term and no e-mails sent by Mr. Rove prior to November 2003. For many other White House officials, the RNC has no e-mails from before the fall of 2006.”

* Alberto Gonzales may have known about all of this. According to former Rove aide Susan Ralston, the White House Counsel’s office, then run by Gonzales, knew about Rove’s use of RNC emails. “There is no evidence, however, that White House Counsel Gonzales initiated any action to ensure the preservation of the e-mail records that were destroyed by the RNC.”

The House Oversight Committee investigators have several recommendations about how best to proceed.

First, the records of federal agencies should be examined to assess whether they may contain some of the White House e-mails that have been destroyed by the RNC. The Committee has already written to 25 federal agencies to inquire about the e-mail records they may have retained from White House officials who used RNC and Bush Cheney ’04 e-mail accounts. Preliminary responses from the agencies indicate that they may have preserved official communications that were destroyed by the RNC.

Second, the Committee should investigate what former White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales knew about the use of political e-mail accounts by White House officials. If Susan Ralston’s testimony to the Committee is accurate, there is evidence that Mr. Gonzales or counsels working in his office knew in 2001 that Karl Rove was using his RNC e-mail account to communicate about official business, but took no action to preserve Mr. Rove’s official communications.

Third, the Committee may need to issue compulsory process to obtain the cooperation of the Bush Cheney ’04 campaign. The campaign has informed the Committee that it provided e-mail accounts to 11 White House officials, but the campaign has unjustifiably refused to provide the Committee with basic information about these accounts, such as the identity of the White House officials and the number of e-mails that have been preserved.

The full report is online (.pdf). If this interim staff report is any indication, Waxman is just getting warmed up.

[Expletive] these mother [expletive] ReThug international criminals. Alberto Gonzales is a [expletive] lying sack-of-[expletive], “Dick” Cheney can suck my left [expletive], and George DUBYA Bush is a mother [expletive] [expletive] [expletive] [expletive], son-of-a-[expletive], [expletive] and I hope he [expletive] burns in [expletive] hell!

IMPEACH! [EXPLETIVE]!

  • I know I am stupid but…

    How can you possibly claim any kind of executive privilege for an RNC email account? If it would be part of your official White House duties then wouldn’t it have to be on a White House email account?

  • Carpetbagger – what part of “above the law” don’t you understand? The rules are for plebians, not for the administration. They talk directly to God.

  • I may be stupider than neil wilson, so I’ll need someone else to validate my intuition: This is the flipside of the old “Al Gore uses the wrong phone for political fundraising” scandal, isn’t it? Except this time, they’re using the political (and therefore unaccountable) channel for official business, instead of vice versa.

  • Once these clowns are out of office, they will be exposed as the biggest criminal enterprise in the history of the US.

    I would assume that Bush and Rove could be charged criminally after they are out of office. Since impeachment seems to be off of the table, maybe they could be sent to the big house after.

  • I think it is interesting that in the new Seymour Hersch article on Abu Ghraib, General Taguba related that he finally came to understand that his Army now operates like a Mafia Family.

    The stain of corruption from the Bush Mafia spreads and spreads…

    JKap: your opinion of these @#$^%$#@#$@@!!!s is entirely accurate.

  • This demonstrates that the RNC is a criminal organization. Their records should be seized. They need to be treated like the criminals they are.
    Of course Gonzales knew about this, about the illegal use of RNC accounts for official business. They are all in this up to their eyeballs.
    Right now the WH players are scrambling to get rid of all incriminating emails. Later there will be large lapses, time periods unaccounted for and we know why. Each day that goes by that they still have the emails in their possession is another chance they have of purging incriminating evidence. We already know this administration believes they are above the law and have been circumventing it at every opportunity. Destroying files means nothing to them as does lying and obstruction.
    The corruption of this administration is overwhelming and rampant and they refuse to be held accountable for their actions and truly believe they will not be held accountable, that they can prevent it. After all, they virtually own the DoJ.

  • Every day I keep wondering at what point do the Republicans stop supporting the policies of this president. What does Bush have to do to make the Republicans in government say enough is enough? Bloomberg and Arnold, to their credit, are rebelling. But wouldn’t it be cathartic if they both came right out and said that the leader of the nation and their party is not leading either in a viable direction?

  • Busted?
    The operative word?

    lol…

    These guys could get
    blowjobs (erstwhile operative word)
    from tortured (erstwhile operative word)
    male interns (erstwhile operative word)
    and it wouldn’t matter…

  • You know, I bet the folks at the RNC thought they were geniuses for deleting the emails off their servers. I wonder if they had all the backups destroyed (assuming they backed their files up every night — or at least week).

    Too bad the ones they sent are saved on the recipients’ servers and backups. And why Waxman and Co. haven’t snagged those files puzzles me a bit — seems like the easiest end-run around the administration’s stonewalling.

  • What takes the Mafia down best? The same thing that takes Scooter Libby down. It’s never the murder conviction; it’s being convicted of the crimes that take place while covering tracks. It’s tax evasion, a la Capone, that takes down criminals and so it will be with the Bushies.

  • Wouldn’t it be ironic if, instead of a permanant Republican Majority, Karl Rove was responsible for the de-legitimizing, decertification and destruction of the Republican party as a legal entity.

    That would be a hoot!

  • BushCo planned on running amok from the beginning. Remember those executive orders about keeping presidential papers sealed? Now this. Isn’t the legal term “intent?” And when are we going to see someone held accountable?

  • Re: True @ #11
    And we spent how much money investigating a blow job?

    That would be approximately $40M spent on the Clinton-Lewinsky affair. To contrast, approximately $15M was spent on the 9/11 Commission.

    It is obvious where our corporate government’s priorities are.

  • I had the same thought as Gorp, except that he just posted “RICO” while I was getting long-winded about it off-line. However, it merits elaboration.

    I was against RICO when it was passed, and I’ve been against the way hard-line (mostly Republican) prosecutors have kept pushing its boundaries because it has seemed to allow the government to seize property and jail people without having to prove as much as they would without RICO. However, I’m ready to rethink things. I’m still dubious about the political possibility of impeaching Bush. Nonetheless, Tom keeps pointing out that this administration is best thought of as the Bush crime family, and I think they are making Tom’s case for him. Therefore, I think it’s time to embrace RICO and see if some of its astounding pliability can’t be put to use to prosecute Bush, Cheney, Rove, & their gang.

    RICO was particularly designed to make it possible to go after criminals who have so successfully organized themselves that they’ve made it virtually impossible to go after them through normal channels. If that doesn’t describe the Bush administration, I don’t know what does. I’m in no way a lawyer, so I will defer to other people’s expertise, but I note that RICO covers threats and acts (particularly patterns of behavior) involving bribery, theft, fraud, and obstruction of justice.

    Interestingly, RICO also covers slavery, which might be of interest in regard to reports of US contractors trafficking foreign workers into Iraq, confiscating their passports, and coercing their labor ( http://www.unknownnews.org/0604250423slavesinIraq.html ). (“Two memos obtained by the Tribune indicate that Casey’s office concluded that the practice of confiscating passports from such workers was both widespread on American bases and in violation of the U.S. trafficking laws.”) It’s not that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and others actually got their hands dirty with this stuff, but that’s the beauty of RICO: if they set up the system to function that way (which they clearly did), they are totally culpable under RICO.

    RICO has the added advantage that if people try to dismiss the investigations as being just political attacks, the answer is, no, RICO is not in the slightest political – it’s purely and simply a matter of going after organized crime.

  • Comments are closed.