Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* John Rizzo, Bush’s nominee to become the CIA’s general counsel, appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee for a confirmation hearing. Rizzo, who had signed on the infamous Bybee memo in 2002 that cleared the way for torture in U.S. interrogations, did not back away from his previous policy positions under questioning from skeptical senators.

* The White House loses the fear factor, Part I: “The change, say GOP operatives, is the absence of fear about being perceived as something less than an ardent Bush backer. ‘What’s the penalty now, Karl being mad at you?’ Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio asked with a laugh, referring to Bush political adviser Karl Rove. ‘Who cares? Even his former chief strategist (Matthew Dowd) walked away from him and pissed all over him.'”

* The White House loses the fear factor, Part II: “Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS), on whether Karl Rove still holds the same stature among Republicans that he once enjoyed: ‘Certainly not. Obviously, I’m not a fan.'”

* After years of work at the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, weakening voting rights for African-American voters, Hans von Spakovsky told senators last week that he was just a small cog in a machine, who barely had any power at all. Those who worked with him directly know better.

* I probably should have taken the time to tear apart Richard Cohen’s ridiculous column on the Plame scandal today, but I just didn’t get to it. Unfortunately for Cohen, Glenn Greenwald found the time. (I also loved this line from Avedon: “Question: How can you tell the difference between Richard Cohen and a GOP political operative? Answer: You really can’t, anymore. Today’s column comes straight off the RNC talking points.”)

* I never get tired of stories making fun of Conservapedia.

* The Politico did a feature item on me today – complete with a picture. (publius referred to “Big Media Benen” today, which caught me a little off guard….)

* My friend Scout Prime has an important piece on FEMA authorizing overbilling for private insurance companies through the National Flood Insurance Program.

* CNN is making a fuss today about Larry King’s new podcasts. That’s fine, I suppose, but Larry King is also the guy who recently said he didn’t know what the Internet is. “I’ve never done it, never gone searching…. I wouldn’t love it. What do you punch little buttons and things?”

* I have no idea why the media automatically awards the “pro-family” label to Republican presidential candidates, but when the media gives Dems equal treatment, I’ll feel much better about the news coverage. I have a hunch I’ll be waiting a long while.

* Gallup: “A new Gallup Poll will only reinforce those who claim that while the rich get richer most Americans don’t feel they are sharing in the growth in our economy. The stock market may be climbing and the unemployment remains relatively low, but 7 in 10 Americans believe the economy is getting worse — the most negative reading in nearly six years.”

* What do Ted Stevens, Bolivian cocaine and Halliburton have in common? Take a look at Michael Scherer’s story on how the Alaskan Inupiat Eskimos got a no-bid contract in South America from the U.S. government.

* Speaking of Stevens, his corruption scandal is getting more intense.

* Here’s a great Q&A on the U.S. Attorney purge scandal.

* I will never, ever, understand the mentality of a man who believes gay people, even members of his own family, deserve to die. The minds reels.

* I think the Pentagon is going to need more than ABC’s Geoff Morrell to help with public relations. As James Joyner put it, “Frankly, I’m not sure hiring Walter Cronkite could accomplish that at this point.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

The South Carolina state treasurer–who is also chairing the Giuliani campaign in SC–has been indicted for cocaine distribution.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070619/ap_on_re_us/treasurer_indicted

  • Yo, way cool, Steve!! Picture and everything. You’re headed for the big time now, by golly. 🙂

  • Conservapedia!

    How can we distinguish the “authorized” nonsense written there from the nonsense posted with intent to vandalize? Some of their stuff sounds like it came from The Onion.

  • Great going on the recognition!!! You certainly deserve it.

    Now back to irony: to use the Bush strategy, we are all getting richer. The debt is larger, the government is bigger. Since we are all citizens, we all get to appreciate how much bigger things are now. If it worked for Iraq, it should work for the economy.

  • Good story, Steve. I’m not sure I’m willing to register with The Politico to leave a comment over there though.

    Hey, we share a birthday May 15. Best. Day. Ever.

    When asked your biggest gaffe you should have said, you were just guilty of overworking and doing too much to insure that our political discourse moves forward. That’s the only mea culpa to give out.

    I was reading Sullivan today and he’s almost unreadable with his short little hints at stories and stuff. Reading CB I’ve gotten used to substance.

  • I’m really glad you’re getting the props you deserve, Steve. You’re one of the good guys. And it’s nice being able to put a face on a name/voice. Congrats. Now that you’re “big media”, please don’t become “big media”, if you know what I mean, … and I think you do.

  • That Conservapedia article was softball. It implied that its critics were largely vandals. And didn’t even mention baraminology. I’d expect better from a homeschooled teenager.

  • Lott has been sticking it to Bush and Rove ever since they backed his ouster as Majority Leader.

  • Re: Conservapedia: Didn’t know until now it was the product of one of Phyliss Schlafly’s spawn. Obviously, not her gay, right wing son. I guess lunacy doesn’t skip generations.

  • Sounds like Hans von Spakovsky was, you know, “only following orders.” When he said he was just a cog in the larger machine did he give a smart little click with his boot-heels?

  • Big Media Benen? Nah – You’ll always be the Carpetborg to me – Resistance is indeed futile.

    I got a real laugh out of some of Sclhafly comments, but the winner had to be “..unbiased, from a conservative perspective” They have no clue how stupid they sound. It’s like saying, ‘It’s not too wet, for being underwater.’

  • re: conservipedia,

    I found the line at the end to be truly scary:

    The girl, who is home-schooled, wrote an article for Conservapedia on Irish dancing and uses the site to research papers. But the biggest lesson she’s taken away as a young conservative is: “There are people who want to destroy us.”

    How they managed to make that leap is beyond me. These are truly scary people.

  • CB – congrats on the nice write-up. Funny, the main reason I tell people to check out this site is because it’s informative, not simply “Bush sucks!” (although he does). This is my one-stop shopping for political news!

    PS – Great soft lighting/fuzziness in the picture – I thought for a second you might be a love interest of Captain Kirk’s…..

  • bloomberg may not be a viable candidate. tweety hasn’t told us how he smells.

  • Mainstream Democrat, although he’s not “a reflexive partisan” and will criticize fellow Dems when they’re wrong. “On the ideological spectrum of contemporary American politics, if Dennis Kucinich is 100 and James Inhofe is 0, I’m probably about an 80.”

    Hi kid (my goodness, you’re sooo young!). Your not being a “reflexive partisan” is one of the main reasons I come here to read (also because of the quality of commenters you seem to attract). It’s refreshing, even if I am — probably — a bit to the left of you.

  • I have to agree with Edo about being disturbed somewhat by the teenaged girl’s line. Another generation of half wits out to do unto us as they imagined “we” “did” to them. What they don’t get is that facts are facts whether or not we like it and don’t care what we BELIEVE. But then again, when they view the following thru a Hollywood prism like the previous article about 24 then I’m not surprised.

    Nice article about you CB. Congrats.

  • Mainstream Democrat, although he’s not “a reflexive partisan” and will criticize fellow Dems when they’re wrong. “On the ideological spectrum of contemporary American politics, if Dennis Kucinich is 100 and James Inhofe is 0, I’m probably about an 80.

    Hey, CB, breaka one-nine, come back now, ya here? Way to score corporate MSM notoriety, good buddy.

    In your exclusive interview with Politburo, I mean Politico.com, you describe an ideological spectrum of contemporary American politics.

    Well, my question is what about the other political spectrum in this country, say if Alex Jones is a 100 and the Flush Rimjaughb/B.O. Gang Bang is -1? I’m probably about a 99.5.

    It’s clear that the Bush Administration is “above the law,” like J Flowers talked about yesterday. In fact, President George W. Bush is accountable to absolutely no one and there is no consequence for any of his wrong-doing. It’s all a pretense, all a charade, all a very elaborate act, by both the Democrats and Republicans. To borrow the ReThug tactic of using a sports analogy, the Democrats are like the Washington Generals and the ReThugs are like the Harlem Globetrotters (and I’m sure that analogy makes those pompous-ass white males very uncomfortable).

    What I am getting at is that Democrats are demonstrably complicit in this cabal. They are dragging their feet in their Constitutional duty to act on the most egregious abuses of the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Code by this or any administration.

    I can be a proud “Secular Progressive” as Sweet Willie O’Reilly would like me to be. But I don’t have to buy into the party-line, and not notice the abuses of the Democrats. I refuse to accept the view that the whole Iraq Capitulation Act boiled down to “politics.” The Democrats capitulated (see Globetrotter analogy), even having the mandate of the people. I mean, how egregious does it get? 70% wasn’t enough. Would 90% be enough? Just what the hell does it take?

  • Conservipedia:

    A hike in minimum wage is referred to as “a controversial manoeuvre that increases the incentive for young people to drop out of school.”

    Crikey, that’s better than even I can do when on I put on a fake troll costume…

  • That’s a mighty fine circle of spotlight shining on all your hard work Mr. CB. That Politico place is like Disneyland. Rather too much I think but I did register to write a comment concurring with their wisdom and good taste in recognizing your talents and impact. But they wanted me to jump through too many hoops so I could have a political profile and that in itself was pointless and offensive. My political profile is seeker of intelligence, rationality and honesty. I already find those things at TCR and profiles aren’t required.

    Kudos to Ms. CB for sitting you down in front of the keyboard and encouraging you to get to work. She knew this insanity was going to need a dose of common sense.

  • Nice picture, CB. But as politically astute people we can’t tell how manly your are from just a headshot. We have to see more. Shoulders. We have to see shoulders. Are we talking 737 or Piper Cub?

  • Steve —

    The article was fine. It’s about as good as you’re going to expect from the Politico.the only thing that I would’ve said differently would’ve been about mistakes — you have the luxury of writing about things that you know. For the most part, you don’t write about things that are questionable. It is the advantage of being a blogger. You can truly be right about everything because you choose what to write about.as far as I know, you don’t appoint people to other blogs or any other positions in government. You don’t have to compromise on legislation. Finally, you don’t have an editor to rewrite or softened your words or your viewpoint, therefore, you can collect the blogger of fact, you can be right about everything.

  • The Politico did a feature item on me today – complete with a picture. (publius referred to “Big Media Benen” today, which caught me a little off guard….)

    Oh well, in modern American politics, you have no chance. You look like an overly-intelligent wonk, and it’s obvious no one will ever fly a 767 off your shoulders without the prior installation of a steam catapult. (All of which you should take as a Good Thing)

    Remember, they spelled your name right. All publicity is good publicity so long as they do that.

  • The South Carolina state treasurer–who is also chairing the Giuliani campaign in SC–has been indicted for cocaine distribution.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070619/ap_on_re_us/treasurer_indicted

    Comment by Jacquie (@1)

    So I went to the link and found this little gem:
    The millionaire is accused of buying less than 500 grams of the drug […]

    Is this a case of “bamboozle the reader”? Few people know how much “less than 500grams” is, so they assume it’s a negligible amount… something you’d snort at one sitting, maybe. “They are hounding the guy for political reasons” cannot be far behind.

    Why not say a “pound” (450+g), which is a measure most Americans understand? I may be feeling particularly disenchanted at the moment, regarding Americans and their understanding of measures other than those used here, but I just had a message from someone who — ever so gently — tried to correct my misapprehension that 15:00 was the same as 3PM; she was certain-sure it was 5…

  • Comments are closed.