‘The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio’

I knew talk radio in this country skewed heavily to the far-right, but I had no idea it was this bad.

While progressive talk is making inroads on commercial stations, right-wing talk reigns supreme on America’s airwaves. Some key findings:

* In the spring of 2007, of the 257 news/talk stations owned by the top five commercial station owners, 91 percent of the total weekday talk radio programming was conservative, and only 9 percent was progressive.

* Each weekday, 2,570 hours and 15 minutes of conservative talk are broadcast on these stations compared to 254 hours of progressive talk — 10 times as much conservative talk as progressive talk.

* 76 percent of the news/talk programming in the top 10 radio markets is conservative, while 24 percent is progressive.

That’s astounding. America embraces progressive ideas on almost every issue of national significance, but according to this report (.pdf), prepared by the Center for American Progress and Free Press, progressive ideas have practically been wiped from the radio dials.

Indeed, even in cities in which the left dominates politically, conservatives still dominate talk-radio. In DC, there’s twice as much conservative talk-radio than liberal. In Los Angeles and San Francisco, it’s slightly worse.

Supply and demand suggests something is wrong here.

I suppose the natural response from the right is that the market is working. People prefer conservative radio to liberal radio, so broadcasters are just giving American audiences what they want.

But the report suggests otherwise.

Although talk radio audiences tend to be more male, middle-aged, and conservative, research by Pew indicates that this audience is not monolithic — 43 percent of regular talk radio listeners identify as conservative, while 23 percent identify as liberal and 30 percent as moderate. The ideological breakdown of the country as a whole during this same period was very similar — 36 percent conservative, 21 percent liberal, and 35 percent moderate. It is difficult to argue that the existing audience for talk radio is only interested in hearing one side of public debates given the diversity of the existing and potential audience.

More importantly, even in markets where progressive talk is considered a success by the industry standards of ratings and revenue, licensees will often broadcast conservative talk on three or four stations compared to one station for progressive talk. For example, in Portland, OR, where progressive talk on KPOJ AM 620 competes effectively with conservative talk on KEX AM 1190, station owners also broadcast conservative talk on KXL AM 750 and KPAM AM 860. Although there is a clear demand and proven success of progressive talk in this market, station owners still elect to stack the airwaves with one-sided broadcasting.

As our data shows, the norm under the existing market structure is for radio station licensees to broadcast only conservative talk, a pattern that holds true for more than 90 percent of the stations examined (236 stations out of 257). In Ohio, for example, there are 10 radio markets. In eight of those markets, there is not a single hour of progressive talk. In the two markets that do broadcast a total of six hours of progressive talk (Al Sharpton on two urban talk stations), those hours compete against 52 hours of conservative talk. Clear Channel Communications, the ownership group that has committed the largest number of stations to the progressive format, recently cancelled the only three progressive talk stations in the state of Ohio. When 91 percent of the talk radio programming broadcast each weekday is solely conservative — despite a diversity of opinions among radio audiences and the proven success of progressive shows — the market solution has clearly failed to meet audience demand. Even greater deregulation and consolidation of radio station ownership is therefore not likely to meet audience desires or serve the public interest in any meaningful way.

So, what should happen next? CAP and Free Press recommend, among other things that “national radio ownership not be allowed to exceed 5 percent of the total number of AM and FM broadcast stations, and local ownership should not exceed more than 10 percent of the total commercial radio stations in a given market.”

Sounds like that would be a good start.

My only recommendation off hand is to take Rush Limpbaugh out and shoot him. Discuss.

  • I miss listening to Rachel Maddow on the way to work, Al Franken and Thom Hartman on my lunch break and Randi Rhodes on the drive home.

    Now the only thing that keeps me going at this desperately shitty, boring job is the Carpetbagger Report, and I’ve been leaning on it more heavily since Air America Radio folded in Burlington.

    As a result, I’ve been told I’m getting laid off at the end of the year, unless I start blogging less and working more.

    Damn you Conservative Talk Radio!

  • Haik – I take it you’ve already tried streaming Air America from their website so you could listen at work and it was blocked or didn’t work for some reason?

    And then there’s XM Radio – which is how I get my AAR fix while driving…

  • It’s the same in Boston. Even our sports radio is full of rightwingers. Oh well, we still know how to vote. No Romney jokes please!

  • Here in Omaha, you have three stations that have a talk-radio format. All three have nothing but conservative shows.

    Ironically, the most popular talk show in the city is on an FM rock station, Todd ‘n Tyler on Z-92, and they are extremely anti-Bush and anti-Republican.

  • It just goes to prove that conservative talk show hosts are nothing more than sheep herders.

  • In a sense, I find this oddly reassuring. Even though the talk radio market is 90% conservative, the conservative U.S. population is far, far less. It suggests to me that conservative ideas are nowhere near as popular as the right-wing pundits like to believe – even with the freedom to broadcast them pretty much uncontested, they can’t convince more than a minority of people to believe in them. It also suggests that, with a little fairness on the air, radical conservatives could be dumped into the dustbin of history.

  • And on the radio it’s not just the official “conservative” talk radio. There are all these social wingnuts that pump out misogynistic crap and people like Dr. Laura and Dr. Phil with the same wingnut angle on things. So much of it is just judgmental and angry.

  • Well if 90% of talk radio programming is “conservative” (right-wing crazies is usually a better term) but only 45% of radio listeners identify themselves as such, I would have to conclude that whatever they’re spending all that time talking about must not be very convincing.

  • I stream AAR at home sometimes Anne #3, but streaming is a big no no at work, and I can’t afford satellite radio.

    When I get fired for being hooked on Carpetbagger all day, I guess I’ll just be forced to sue Steve Benen, because of course as a liberal, I refuse to take personal responsibility for my own problems.

    All well.

    (It’s a joke people. Laugh a little! I mean it’s Friday after all…What? it’s only Wednesday? Ahhoooaaaahhh.)

  • Conservative Talk Radio a more effective format.

    The wingnuts have a pack mentality and need to told what to think and why.

    So some angry 50 odd year old white guy ranting on the radio works for them. Their minds were all ready made up and after listening to the angry fellow on the radio, they now know why they were right all along.

    Libs don’t need that, the creativity of the internet works better for us.

    Wingnuts got talk radio. Libs will take literature, music, poetry, comedy, etc.

    Looks like we come out ahead here.

  • You’ve heard of TV-BE-GONE?

    Someone needs to invent a RUSS-BE-GONE.

    I walked into a doctor’s office and heard that jackass pontificating like he was a Pope on pep-pills…
    I walked out…
    Got a new doctor right fast…
    Damn straight.

    But would have been nice if I could have made Russ STFU before I left…

    I want a RUSS-BE-GONE!
    Hurry someone… there is millions to be made….

  • Ok, so 90% of talk radio is conservative. My question: how many people actually listen to talk radio anyway? Perhaps they are unconvincing and hardly anyone (in absolute numbers) is listening anyway. Radio is not the most dynamic of media and there are other things one can do when stuck in traffic. (No off-color conotations intended but you are all free-thinking people… :-))

  • What happens when you add in religious programming to the mix? I’ve heard lots of very conservative religious programming, but never any that espoused a socially liberal POV – so, in fact, when you add in the relgious nuts to the wingnuts it is even more one-sided than the study shows.

  • I think Dr. Phil is pretty good. I don’t get the impression that he’s conservative. But I’ve never sat down and watched his show for a long time.

    I think a lot of people listen to talk radio. You either listen to music or to talk radio in your car, or you listen to nothing, and for a lot of people, music every day isn’t what they want.

  • Textbook of example of how “markets” are skewed when a small group of owners with strong political inclinations determine what choices will pervade in the market. This isn’t what Adam Smith had envisioned. The radio market has limited competition in its sector of the media sphere, which is directly responsible for the burgeoning liberal blogosphere. Like a true liberal, I prefer the openness of the internet over the limited viewpoints found on radio, TV and a great many newspapers.

  • I doubt if the radio owners care if progressives want more progressive talk radio, because the owners know who the easy marks are (the wingnuts).

    Anyone who can believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old can be sold a large amount of useless crap.

    And that’s what the media wants to do.

    So I guess the lesson to progressives is… Buy More Crap! 🙂

  • Luckily we have an NPR news station in my area that my radio stays tuned to most of the time I’m not listening to CDs. There used to be an Air America station I could get too, but it changed to a Spanish music station a while back. (I blame illegal immigration. Yes, I’m kidding.)

    Funny thing though, when we did have AA I had to secretly admit I didn’t really like listening to a fair amount of their programming all that much. Certainly there was some good stuff to be had there but frankly, some of it I found to be as myopic, thinly reasoned, ideologically dogmatic and reflexively partisan as most of what you get from Savage or Limbaugh or any of the other bloviators of the extreme right. It occurs to me that part of that lopsidedness in air play could just be due to the whole angry ranting format tending to appeal less to thinking people to than it does to what passes for “conservatives” these days.

  • So I guess the lesson to progressives is… Buy More Crap!

    Ha ha! Racerx, you are so right! Smart guys like you will win out in the end!

  • “Indeed, even in cities in which the left dominates politically, conservatives still dominate talk-radio. In DC, there’s twice as much conservative talk-radio than liberal. In Los Angeles and San Francisco, it’s slightly worse.”

    I can’t speak to LA, but San Francisco has KGO. It leans center-left (and that’s true center, not some wing nut calling himself center). It’s been the number one radio station in the Bay Area for over 25 years, in fact KGO started the whole talk radio genre. For the most part the hosts on KGO aren’t syndicated, they deal with local issues as well as national issues, but unless you take KGO into account, you don’t get the whole picture of the Bay Area radio market. Yeah Air America get’s their butts kicked here, yeah there are two established and now a third right wing stations, but not get even close to KGO in listenership. Just look at the ratings. Last I looked KGO was around a 4.5 share and the next closest talker was just above a 2.0. Air America was in the 1.0 area.

    Point is, San Francisco is not slightly worse, the report is simply ignoring the biggest liberal station in the Bay Area. In fact because of the diversity of opinions and views I hear on KGO, I’d say we are head and shoulders above the rest of the country in terms of talk radio.

  • I try very hard to find balance on the radio. I like listening to talk radio but I don’t listen to ANY Rush or Bill – just NPR/PBS. But even this is lacking what I’m interested in. All the news is depressing and one way – no real discussion – just facts (BBC and NewsHour) The only source of balnced info is on the web. This blog especially finds interesting stuff and allows comments I can relate to and agree with most people – it’s thinking and discussing – not arguing.

    I don’t want to hear people yelling and cutting people off, I want to hear it from a neutral place of understanding. There doesn’t need to be a black and a white – gray is where all the interesting information comes from – the only agenda is finding out the whys, whats and wheres.

  • Having just watched “All The President’s Men” again on PBS […] it struck me once again that the only reason Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment was because of the Washington Post. If not for that independent voice he would have finished out his term and retired without any penalty for his crimes.

    The Republicans learned their lesson from that have spent the intervening decades buying up every media outlet they could, be it newspaper, TV or radio station. That there should be so much conservative talk on the airwaves shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone.

    The problem for us now is how do we dismantle what took so much time and money to be put together? Anti-monopoly legislation is probably the most efficient way.

    May success come swiftly!

  • As I said before, seems like we have the comedy shows and they have talk radio. Maybe comedy is a better venue for irony, and talk radio a better venue for resentment….

  • What interests me is that on most issues Americans remain liberal (health care, a woman’s right to choose, Iraq) despite right wing talk radio saturation. This disconnect parallels the disconnect between the Bush administration and the American public. One way to analyze this is as follows: rightwing talk radio helps keep the country from moving even further to the left. Demonize Michael Moore rather than address the problem of the failed, for-profit health care system. Although Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, et al. can be considered clowns and entertainers–although, I don’t find the abuse they heap on their ideological opponents entertaining–they enjoy unprecedented support not only from the radio networks but also from right wing politicians and officials, including the Vice President and Secretary of State, who allow themselves to be “interviewed” on their programs. What is truly amazing is that these days, government figures feel safe only when they are talking to Bozo the Clown.

  • Is it really true that there are no other options than biased-right and biased-left? There’s not a single non-partisan talk show in the whole country?

  • Radio? What’s that?

    I suspect that this is largely a self-fulfilling bias. You air nothing but conservative talk radio, you end up with nothing but conservatives listening, because you just drove away everyone else.

    The Clear-Channel-ization of the radio spectrum has pretty much turned radio into a wasteland of right-wing hate radio and bland countryrockhop top 5 hits radio.

    I haven’t listened to the radio in years; there’s nothing of value on it.

  • “Well if 90% of talk radio programming is “conservative” (right-wing crazies is usually a better term) but only 45% of radio listeners identify themselves as such, I would have to conclude that whatever they’re spending all that time talking about must not be very convincing.”

    This is very odd for a group of people who pride themselves as independent thinkers. Your product, allegedly conservative, pulls 90% of the market, 45% of which is conservative and yet the commenter says your product must not be convincing. Obvious, much? Isn’t the answer: Your product is so good it pulls in even moderates and liberals, right? They find something compelling in what you’re selling right?

    Better question is the OP’s last paragraph: So, what should happen next? CAP and Free Press recommend, among other things that “national radio ownership not be allowed to exceed 5 percent of the total number of AM and FM broadcast stations, and local ownership should not exceed more than 10 percent of the total commercial radio stations in a given market.”

    National ownership is 5% of AM and FM stations; local ownership is 10% of total commercial radio stations; who would own the remainder? John Podesta (president and CEO of CAP, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podesta) and George Soros (financier, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_American_Progress) or maybe the people who are currently screwing up Iraq (http://www.usa.gov/)?

  • Perhaps the reason few left-wing talk shows exit on the radio is because they are unsuccessful in attracting and retaining listeners. Radio is market driven and there is a market for conservative talk radio … which brings in the listerners AND the ratings. Why would a business owner want to provide entertainment that consistently LOSES money? That just doesn’t make any sense.

  • Well, after perusing this load of shit, I can certainly see which side of the aisle wants to abridge freedom of speech…

    Give me a break. You have ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, ITN, BBC, and every university in the USA and yet you can’t stand the competition from puny talk radio. This is because your vapid, collectivist, tired, tried-and-failed, Maoist, controlling, nanny-state ideas can only work when every other voice is shouted down and suppressed.

    How about we revive the “fairness doctrine” for tenured university professors? I hear the numbers are upwards of 90% “progressive”, so maybe we need some “report” to come out telling us how to “fix” it with more goverment nanny-state intervention.

    Or the mind-numbed robots the professors are turning out could just learn to think and care for themselves and quit trying to control everyone else’s life.

  • Comments are closed.