‘I didn’t vote for him, but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job’

Here’s a good way to celebrate the 4th: watch Keith Olbermann’s special comment on the state of the White House.

Transcript below.

Finally tonight, as promised, a Special Comment on what is, in everything but name, George Bush’s pardon of Scooter Libby.

“I didn’t vote for him,” an American once said, “But he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.” That — on this eve of the Fourth of July — is the essence of this democracy, in 17 words. And that is what President Bush threw away yesterday in commuting the sentence of Lewis “Scooter” Libby.

The man who said those 17 words — improbably enough — was the actor John Wayne. And Wayne, an ultra-conservative, said them when he learned of the hair’s-breadth election of John F. Kennedy instead of his personal favorite, Richard Nixon, in 1960.

“I didn’t vote for him but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.” The sentiment was doubtlessly expressed earlier. But there is something especially appropriate about hearing it, now, in Wayne’s voice: The crisp matter-of-fact acknowledgment that we have survived, even though for nearly two centuries now, our commander in chief has also served, simultaneously, as the head of one political party and often the scourge of all others.

We as citizens must, at some point, ignore a president’s partisanship. Not that we may prosper as a nation, not that we may achieve, not that we may lead the world, but merely that we may function.

But just as essential to the 17 words of John Wayne is an implicit trust, a sacred trust: that the president for whom so many did not vote can in turn suspend his political self long enough, and for matters imperative enough, to conduct himself solely for the benefit of the entire republic.

Our generation’s willingness to state “We didn’t vote for him, but he’s our president, and we hope he does a good job” was tested in the crucible of history, and earlier than most.

And in circumstances more tragic and threatening. And we did that with which history tasked us. We enveloped our president in 2001. And those who did not believe he should have been elected — indeed those who did not believe he had been elected — willingly lowered their voices and assented to the sacred oath of nonpartisanship.

And George W. Bush took our assent, and reconfigured it, and honed it, and shaped it to a razor-sharp point and stabbed this nation in the back with it.

Were there any remaining lingering doubt otherwise, or any remaining lingering hope, it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the prison sentence of one of his own staffers.

Did so even before the appeals process was complete. Did so without as much as a courtesy consultation with the Department of Justice. Did so despite what James Madison — at the Constitutional Convention — said about impeaching any president who pardoned or sheltered those who had committed crimes “advised by” that president.

Did so without the slightest concern that even the most detached of citizens must look at the chain of events and wonder: To what degree was Mr. Libby told, “Break the law however you wish — the president will keep you out of prison”?

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that fundamental compact between yourself and the majority of this nation’s citizens, the ones who did not cast votes for you.

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the president of the United States. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the president of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party.

And this is too important a time, Sir, to have a commander in chief who puts party over nation. This has been, of course, the gathering legacy of this administration. Few of its decisions have escaped the stain of politics. The extraordinary Karl Rove has spoken of “a permanent Republican majority,” as if such a thing — or a permanent Democratic majority — is not antithetical to that upon which rests our country, our history, our revolution, our freedoms.

Yet our democracy has survived shrewder men than Karl Rove. And it has survived the frequent stain of politics upon the fabric of government. But this administration, with ever-increasing insistence and almost theocratic zealotry, has turned that stain into a massive oil spill.

The protection of the environment is turned over to those of one political party who will financially benefit from the rape of the environment.

The protections of the Constitution are turned over to those of one political party who believe those protections unnecessary and extravagant and quaint.

The enforcement of the laws is turned over to those of one political party who will swear beforehand that they will not enforce those laws.

The choice between war and peace is turned over to those of one political party who stand to gain vast wealth by ensuring that there is never peace, but only war.

And now, when just one cooked book gets corrected by an honest auditor, when just one trampling of the inherent and inviolable fairness of government is rejected by an impartial judge, when just one wild-eyed partisan is stopped by the figure of blind justice, this president decides that he, and not the law, must prevail.

I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war. I accuse you of fabricating in the minds of your own people a false implied link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11. I accuse you of firing the generals who told you that the plans for Iraq were disastrously insufficient. I accuse you of causing in Iraq the needless deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons, and sisters and daughters, and friends and neighbors. I accuse you of subverting the Constitution, not in some misguided but sincerely motivated struggle to combat terrorists, but to stifle dissent. I accuse you of fomenting fear among your own people, of creating the very terror you claim to have fought. I accuse you of exploiting that unreasoning fear, the natural fear of your own people who just want to live their lives in peace, as a political tool to slander your critics and libel your opponents. I accuse you of handing part of this republic over to a vice president who is without conscience and letting him run roughshod over it.

And I accuse you now, Mr. Bush, of giving, through that vice president, carte blanche to Mr. Libby to help defame Ambassador Joseph Wilson by any means necessary, to lie to grand juries and special counsel and before a court, in order to protect the mechanisms and particulars of that defamation with your guarantee that Libby would never see prison and, in so doing, as Ambassador Wilson himself phrased it here last night, of becoming an accessory to the obstruction of justice.

When President Nixon ordered the firing of the Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the infamous “Saturday Night Massacre” on October 20th, 1973, Cox initially responded tersely, and ominously.

“Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men is now for Congress and, ultimately, the American people.”

President Nixon did not understand how he had crystallized the issue of Watergate for the American people. It had been about the obscure meaning behind an attempt to break in to a rival party’s headquarters, and the labyrinthine effort to cover up that break-in and the related crimes.

And in one night, Nixon transformed it. Watergate — instantaneously — became a simpler issue: a president overruling the inexorable march of the law, insisting — in a way that resonated viscerally with millions who had not previously understood — that he was the law.

Not the Constitution. Not the Congress. Not the courts. Just him. Just, Mr. Bush, as you did, yesterday.

The twists and turns of Plamegate, of your precise and intricate lies that sent us into this bottomless pit of Iraq; your lies upon the lies to discredit Joe Wilson; your lies upon the lies upon the lies to throw the sand at the “referee” of prosecutor Fitzgerald’s analogy, these are complex and often painful to follow and too much, perhaps, for the average citizen.

But when other citizens render a verdict against your man, Mr. Bush, and then you spit in the faces of those jurors and that judge and the judges who were yet to hear the appeal, the average citizen understands that, Sir.

It’s the fixed ballgame and the rigged casino and the prearranged lottery all rolled into one, and it stinks.

And they know it.

Nixon’s mistake, the last and most fatal of them, the firing of Archibald Cox, was enough to cost him the presidency. And in the end, even Richard Nixon could say he could not put this nation through an impeachment. It was far too late for it to matter then, but as the decades unfold, that single final gesture of nonpartisanship, of acknowledged responsibility not to self, not to party, not to “base,” but to country, echoes loudly into history.

Even Richard Nixon knew it was time to resign. Would that you could say that, Mr. Bush. And that you could say it for Mr. Cheney. You both crossed the Rubicon yesterday. Which one of you chose the route no longer matters. Which is the ventriloquist, and which the dummy, is irrelevant. But that you have twisted the machinery of government into nothing more than a tawdry machine of politics is the only fact that remains relevant.

It is nearly July Fourth, Mr. Bush, the commemoration of the moment we Americans decided that rather than live under a king who made up the laws, or erased them, or ignored them — or commuted the sentences of those rightly convicted under them — we would force our independence and regain our sacred freedoms.

We of this time — and our leaders in Congress, of both parties — must now live up to those standards which echo through our history. Pressure, negotiate, impeach: get you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who are now perilous to our democracy, away from its helm.

And for you, Mr. Bush, and for Mr. Cheney, there is a lesser task. You need merely achieve a very low threshold indeed. Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed on August 9th, 1974.

Resign.

And give us someone — anyone — about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, “I didn’t vote for him, but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”

Great speech, but all it does is make the chimp smirk. Dr. Kervorkian is out of jail now. Bush and Cheney should make an appointment.

  • This was as much a challenge to the Congress as it was a reprimand to Bush and Cheney.
    What makes the whole matter so much more difficult is that you can’t believe or rely on a single thing coming from the corporate media about this whole affair. They push an agenda and ignore, leave out, mis lead, and just plain lie about anything to the contrary.
    Each day we live in fear of our president.

  • Olbermann is a fine speech writer and an inspiring orator, and I’m glad and grateful that he’s not afraid to speak the words most of the citizens of this country are thinking. People like him are (were?) vital to our democracy.

    However, like Dale, I’ve learned that Bush, Cheney and the current administration don’t pay the slightest bit of attention to the people of this nation. Olbermann’s words should shame these dishonest men deeply, but they don’t. They have no honor and no respect for any of us.

    What a terrible thing they’ve done to America. It’s Independence Day, but it’s more clear than ever that the American dream that came alive that day in 1776 is dying — and in fact, may have breathed its last yesterday when Bush commuted the just and fair prison sentence of his henchman Lewis Libby.

    I find nothing to celebrate this year.

  • I heartily agree with all the comments so far. This latest Bush atrocity against our democracy sickens me to the core. Here’s an interesting snippet from a piece by Glenn Greenwald that is further illuminating about the dimensions of this outrage and how we got here:

    “The Plame investigation was urged by the Bush CIA and commenced by the Bush DOJ, Libby’s conviction pursued by a Bush-appointed federal prosecutor, his jail sentence imposed by a Bush-appointed “tough-on-crime” federal judge, all pursuant to harsh and merciless criminal laws urged on by the “tough-on-crime/no-mercy” GOP. Lewis Libby was sent to prison by the system constructed and desired by the very Republican movement protesting his plight.

    But our political discourse and media institutions are so broken and corrupt that Bush followers (and their media enablers) feel free to make the completely-backwards and fact-free claim that the Libby prosecution was driven by “partisan” and “political” motives — as though it was a mirror image of the Clinton persecution driven by Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, and a purely partisan Republican prosecutor — because they know that there is no such thing as a claim too false to be passed on without real objection by our vapid, drooling press corps.”

    Happy 4th of July. It’s time to rid ourselves of arrogant, grasping royalty again.

  • Wren,

    I’m not celebrating this year. No picnic, no flags, no fireworks, no parades, no wearing of red, white and blue. In fact, I’m doing my best to ignore the fact that today is any kind of “holiday” at all.

    It’s not that I don’t love my country — in fact, I love it too much to celebrate. I am in mourning for the constitution and for our country today.

    (It feels very similar to the year I couldn’t celebrate New Year’s because a good friend’s body — only 17 years old — had been found murdered a few days before.)

    Maybe next year I will feel able to celebrate the Fourth of July again. I certainly hope so — for all our sakes.

  • We have forgotten what America was like on September 10, 2001. September 11 was the day America as we once knew it died, and its body will not be resurrected anytime soon.

    Virtually the entire nation knows that Bush is a petty tyrant and what he has done to our country. Congress knows it too. We don’t have to fight the greatest army on earth to gain our independence from this George, or struggle a second time to create a form of government that has been the world’s gold standard.

    We only need to act under the provisions of our own laws. But we’re unwilling to do it. That’s how far we’ve come since September 10, 2001.

  • I am of the opinion Conyers should replace Pelosi. Maybe that would impeachment back on her table.

  • Wow – Wren, Frak and Alibubba – thank you for your words. I, too, feel like putting on a black armband every time I see the flag today. I wholeheartedly agree that Bush/Cheney/Rove are operating this country and taking exactly the steps that they want to take, public opinion/best for the nation be damned.

    The man will not resign because he simply doesn’t care what anyone else thinks about him.

    I truly respect Olbermann for his comments and sincerely hope that the Dem establishment finally grasps the depth of anger (and patriotism) out there towards this man’s actions.

  • Olbermann said that well, but I fear that the majority of Americans are no longer surprised or distressed by the idea of a president being a law unto himself.

    That goose seems to have been pretty thoroughly cooked, not just by the present administration and six years of complaisant Republican politicians, but by the words and deeds of a much longer succession of republicans, going back to Reagan and his relatively corrupt administration (with special notice of Caspar Weinberger and Ollie North and a tip of the hat to Bush I’s pardons) and to Rush Limbaugh and his ilk.

  • It’s “funny” how Olbermann’s “I accuse you”, mirrors (right is left and left is right) Zola’s “J’accuse”. Zola was protesting the wrongful conviction and imprisonment (on Devil’s Island, yet!) of a Jew. Olbermann is protesting the wrongful non-imprisonment of a rightfully convicted Jew…

    Let’s just hope that the *mirrored* parallels continue and that Olbermann, instead of having to flee his country one step ahead of the vengeful law, will be lauded as a hero — the last of the Mohicans with a pair.

  • I just checked TVNewser and Countdown’s second quarter ratings are up 72% from Q2 of last year, including a 54% increase in the coveted 25-54 y/o demographic. Somebody must be listening.

  • Is there any way to charge the Bush Adminstration as an organized crime operation under RICO and then threaten Republicancer congressmen with being charged as accessories if they don’t vote for impeachment or that may be too much of a Republicancer type plan? Sorry about that. What we need in both Chambers of Congress is leadership that will stop worrying about “bipartisanship” and be aggressive against the Shrub misadministration. Bipartisanship got us into the f__king mess we are in. If the Shrub puppet and his puppetmaster are allowed to reign unfettered none of us should be surprised if we are in 3 wars by the next election.

    Some of my problems with Clinton were his pushing of NAFTA and he was one of several presidents that took money from Social Security and used it to balance the budget. I fear Hillary will do the same. The mental dwarf in the White House now has fought most of his wars on credit and taken more money from Social Security funds than all the others all while talking about how he has reduced the Deficit. The Republicancers will have achieved another one of their wet dreams by eliminating Social Security because if anyone actually believes there will be money left to pay their S.S. retirement, I suggest they keep the boxes from any refrigerators they buy in the future because it may become their address later on. Our military will be completely broken. For 3 wars, we will have to institute a draft and rebuild or replace the equipment they need and this will happen just as $hrub is finally evicted from the White House. Of course that means more money for defense contractors too. No downsides for the Republicancers here. I propose that children of Republicancers have a higher rating for the draft so they will be sent first and be put in the more hazardous mililtary specialties. It’s only fitting, for supporting our Misleader in his crimes. After a while, being stupid stops being a good excuse. Do we need another 58,000 dead to recognize a lost cause in Bush’s War in Iraq. It’s time to quit playing nice and stop the Dumbcider. Shrub has been a worse attack on our Democracy than Bin Laden could ever have dreamed of.

  • I am of the opinion Conyers should replace Pelosi. — tko, @9

    Hell, no! Conyers (and Waxman) are doing *brilliantly* where they’re at. And nothing would please me better than to have Pelosi (rather than Hilly) as the first female President of USA. Like, later this month. OK… September. At the latest.

    Hey, isn’t July 4th the day for dreams?

  • Libra @ 16, I agree entirely on Conyers and Waxman and have no problem with Pelosi as president. I just feel she should be more aggressive. Does anyone here feel safe with $hrub as our President?

  • Libra, What do you think about replacing Reid with Feingold? We can threaten to deport Lieberman if he doesn’t vote with the Dems as he promised in exchange for retaining his committee chair.

  • November 18, 1777: William Pitt, Earl of Chatham; Spoken in the House of Lords, London, England:

    My lords, this ruinous and ignominious situation, where we can not act with success, nor suffer with honor, calls upon us to remonstrate in the strongest and loudest language of truth, to rescue the ear of majesty from the delusions which surround it.

    The desperate state of our arms abroad is in part known.

    No man thinks more highly of them than I do. I love and honor the English troops. I know their virtues and their valor.

    I know they can achieve any thing except impossibilities; and I know that the conquest of English America is an impossibility.

    You can not, I venture to say it, you can not conquer America.

    Your armies in the last war effected every thing that could be effected; and what was it? It cost a numerous army, under the command of a most able general (Lord Amherst), now a noble lord in this House, a long and laborious campaign, to expel five thousand Frenchmen from French America.

    My lords, you can not conquer America.

    What is your present situation there?

    We do not know the worst; but we know that in three campaigns we have done nothing and suffered much.

    Besides the sufferings, perhaps total loss of the Northern force, the best appointed army that ever took the field, commanded by Sir William Howe, has retired from the American lines.

    As to conquest, therefore, my lords, I repeat, it is impossible.

    You may swell every expense and every effort still more extravagantly; pile and accumulate every assistance you can buy or borrow; traffic and barter with every little pitiful German prince that sells and sends his subjects to the shambles of a foreign prince; your efforts are for ever vain and impotent—doubly so from this mercenary aid on which you rely; for it irritates, to an incurable resentment, the minds of your enemies, to overrun them with the mercenary sons of rapine and plunder, devoting them and their possessions to the rapacity of hireling cruelty!

    If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my arms — never — never — never.

  • Being a blogger is like The Onion headline, Guy with Large Penis Unsure How to Get the Word Out. I was thinking as I read Keith Olbermann’s excellent call for a Bush/Cheney resignation that it was a wonderful speech that had the blogosphere buzzing. Oh how I would like to write a piece that good. Then I realized that it wouldn’t be read. The fate of a blogger is a certain anonymity. We’ll always be unsure about how to get the word out.

  • Libra, What do you think about replacing Reid with Feingold? — tko, @18

    In the “July 4th is for dreaming” vein? 3xYES 🙂 Feingold seems to have one extra of what Reid’s short one.

    Re Lieberman. I wouldn’t threaten deportation (not even sure it would be possible) but voluntary emigration (to Baghdad, by preference but, if he insists on Gaza Strip…) should be encouraged by any available means.

    Re Pelosi (your posting @17). Yeah, she’s a tad too timid for my taste too. But she’s also very level-headed and, while timid, not easily intimidated (vide trip to Syria, vide postings on the Gavel). And, as cat-herder, she’s doing a decent-enough job

  • It appears Incurious George can’t make anybody happy these days. I am pretty much speechless after reading this. Between the displeasure with Bush the Dumber and the hatred for Moslems in it, I also sense fear that Shrub won’t attack Iran. All I can suggest is maybe it’s time to try negotiations with your enemies. At least start talking to them. I sincerely hope after $hrub is dragged kicking and screaming from the White House in January ’09, that the next president actually has a foreign policy instead of spreading hypocrisy, I mean democracy.

  • Message to Dem leaders in Congress, excluding Conyers and Waxman. Maybe what you are lacking is courage to try in defiance of odds. Here’s what it looks like. Dem Leaders, we’re not asking that much of you and I shouldn’t have to use China as an example if there was more of it here.

  • Wow – Keith Olberman – I LOVE YOU!!!! Thank you for giving a voice to all of us who feel exactly like you do.

    His ventriloquist/dummy anology was spot on – no need to think too hard about who is who.

    Unfortunately, Bush is too arrogant to ever resign and Cheney is evil incarnate.

    I hope that someone picks up the ball and continues to carry it so that Keith isn’t a voice in the wilderness. (I also hope that I get a pony for my birthday, but that ain’t going to happen.)

  • Impeachment? I’m beginning to hope that these two will be willing to give up power on 1-20-09! I’ve always scoffed at conspiracy buffs. Nixon couldn’t cover up a break-in job and Clinton couldn’t cover up a blow job. I’ve always believed there are too many leaks, both from people too honest to be quiet and people too anxious for the limelight to get away with anything, but Cheney may have finally figured the system! He’s scary! His old company Halliburton has always been deep into Middle East oil and politics. We have to believe into Middle East intrigue, too, yet he was fooled by Saddam Hussein? Everything including 9-11 has played into his hands, where immense power, never seen before, has been concentrated into his office. He already seems to have a shadow government in place. Where would we be if something happens to Bush, elevating Cheney to the presidency? I can already hear the rationale, coming from the corner of his mouth, that Cheney would put on how we can’t afford to change leadership with our country so under attack. These are perilous times, but the threat doesn’t come from a cave in Afghanistan. It comes from the hideout at the Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C. We need to hope that our armed services remember their pledge is to the Constitution of the United States and not these individuals who would subvert it. Indeed!! Who DO subvert it!!

  • Apologies to Keith for mispelling his last name – I guess I was so excited I couldn’t type.

  • Comments are closed.