Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* There’s been some confusion about Libby’s post-commutation probation. The law says probation is supposed to begin after a prison sentence ends; Bush Law says Libby should be on probation in lieu of a prison sentence. Judge Walton was unclear whether to follow actual law or the White House’s version, so today, the White House told Walton that Libby should be considered on probation, effective “immediately.”

* Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) is apparently getting a little nervous about the federal investigation into his dealings with Veco, an Alaskan oil-services company. “The worst thing about this investigation is that it does change your life in terms of employment potential,” Stevens told the AP. “It doesn’t matter what anyone says, it does shake you up. If this is still hanging around a year from November, it could cause me some trouble.”

* There are five key Democratic war-related amendments on tap in the Senate, each of which will be considered as part of the debate on the defense authorization bill, which is now being debated. Spencer Ackerman put together a terrific summary detailing each measure, including their chances for passage.

* A week after half the staff of the National Hurricane Center signed a petition calling for his ouster, NHC Director Bill Proenza has left his position. The petition said the center’s “effective functioning” is at stake as the Atlantic hurricane season heads toward its peak. Proenza is reportedly still employed with the center, but the nature of his new position is unclear.

* WSJ: “As the Bush administration pushes ahead with North Korea disarmament talks, U.S. strategists also are beginning to study possible ways to formally end more than 50 years of Cold War hostilities between Washington and Pyongyang. Senior U.S. officials say they are exploring how to implement a peace accord to officially end the 1950-53 Korean War. They say the U.S. hopes to start discussions with North Korea as soon as year end.”

* Joe Conason explains why, if the GOP were really prepared to embrace the Iraq Study Group’s recommendations, it would mark a “radical break from Bush’s policies.”

* GOP state lawmakers forced a partial government shutdown today in Pennsylvania.

* ABC: “Already stretched thin by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army is having a hard time finding new recruits. ABC News has learned the Army missed its recruiting goal in June for the second month in a row. It’s the first time in more than two years that the Army has missed recruiting goals for two consecutive months. The figures are especially worrisome because the summer is traditionally the peak recruiting season.”

* Right-wing attacks on the Live Earth concerts were not just wrong; they were pathetic.

* He’ll probably skate by, but the fact that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is facing a contentious no-confidence vote in the Iraqi parliament suggests the political stability in Iraq is getting worse, too.

* Sean Wilentz explains that Dick Cheney’s performance as a House member during the Iran-Contra scandal told us quite a bit about what was to come.

* One in four senior positions at the Department of Homeland Security are unfilled? Seriously?

* Ari Melber explains what “OpenLeft,” a new project from Matt Stoller, Chris Bowers, and Mike Lux, has in store for the political world.

* Nicholas Kristof explains how Bush has “turned away” from Darfur. “For years, Mr. Bush’s aides have discussed whether he should give a prime-time speech on Darfur to ratchet up the pressure; he still hasn’t. Laura Bush just completed a four-nation swing through Africa, but she didn’t include a visit to any of the areas affected by the Darfur crisis.”

* Colin Powell, five-and-a-half years too late, insisted that he spent two-and-a-half hours trying to talk Bush out of invading Iraq in 2003. Nice try, general.

* And finally, for a while, Crawford, Texas, was enjoying the fruits of high tourism, as visitors wanted to check out the president’s hometown. When Bush lost the nation’s trust, tourists stopped visiting. “In 2004, gross retail sales in Crawford totaled $2.6 million. They fell to $2 million in 2006, down by more than 20 percent.” Residents say that “the president’s sagging popularity is at least partly to blame for the slump in visitors.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Ted “The Internet is a series of tubes” Stevens is about 106 years old. Why is he worried about his job prospects? Prison I could see him worry about, but employment? Retire already.

  • “* Colin Powell, five-and-a-half years too late, insisted that he spent two-and-a-half hours trying to talk Bush out of invading Iraq in 2003. Nice try, general.”

    Another Profile in Closing Barn Doors After the Horses Have Left.

    I agree, CB. Just too damned late.

    Does Colin have another book to sell? Harsh, but he failed at the moment of truth and what he helped bring on destroyed not only his reputation but the lives of millions of people so I could care less about his feelings.

  • Two contrarian jingoes for fun:

    Instead of it’s the economy, stupid: it’s the Constitution, stupid.

    Instead of Support the Troops: Support Our Democracy.

  • Judge Walton was unclear whether to follow actual law or the White House’s version, so today, the White House told Walton that Libby should be considered on probation, effective “immediately.”

    Not really: Fielding sent a letter to Fitzgerald with a cc to Walton (follow the link in the USAToday story, you’ll notice that Freddie can’t avoid the P word).

    The White House isn’t a party to the case (or so they say). Remember in his original order, Walton only suggested that both parties ask the White House for input if they wanted. I’m not sure what Walton will make of this letter; the words “butt wipe” come to mind.

    In other words, Libby’s team didn’t ask the White House for an opinion. Fielding had to stick his nose in by writing to Fitzgerald and sending a copy to the judge. Why didn’t he also cc: Libby’s lawyers? Hmmm.

    A week after half the staff of the National Hurricane Center signed a petition calling for his ouster, NHC Director Bill Proenza has left his position.

    Would this also work at the DoJ?

  • Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said the posturing [about issuing contempt citations] was a waste of time and money and a distraction from the questions at hand: Who ordered the firings, why, and whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales should continue to serve or be fired.

    Specter, a former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the Democrats’ threat of taking the standoff to court on a contempt citation was spurious because the prosecutor who would consider it is a Bush appointee.

    “On a case like this, does anyone believe the U.S. attorney is going to bring a criminal contempt citation against anyone?” Specter said in a telephone interview. “The U.S. attorney works for the president and it’s a discretionary matter what the U.S. attorney does.”

    Unbelievable. Specter is basically saying that the AG is corrupt. Shouldn’t the AG have to recuse himself here much as Ashcroft did in the Libby investigation?

  • Having left my home state of PA many years ago (after college), I can’t say that I keep up with the politics there, but from what little I’ve read about their budget impasse, I’m not ready to blame it on the Republicans just yet. Corruption and underhanded maneuvering in PA politics hasn’t been news in centuries and from what I remember, it was as prevalent on one side of the aisle as the other. Anyone from PA care to illuminate?

  • “…ABC News has learned the Army missed its recruiting goal in June for the second month in a row. It’s the first time in more than two years that the Army has missed recruiting goals for two consecutive months. The figures are especially worrisome because the summer is traditionally the peak recruiting season.”

    The part the story leaves out is that this is after lowering their recruiting goals two years ago, then adding over a thousand new recruiters and lowering the bar on personnel standards last year to continue to meet the reduced targets.

  • * […] five key Democratic war-related amendments on tap in the Senate […] Spencer Ackerman […] summary — CB

    I’m still old-fashioned enough to prefer print to screen, so have printed it off for later “digesting”. But I think that, in non-legislative arena, we need to start yelling:
    “Bring them all home for Christmas”
    (or some version of it)

    Yeah, I know; not gonna happen, because it’s unrealistic and probably literally impossible; it’s easier to start a war than to shut it down. But the realistic possibility of it happening is not the point. The point is to set the bar high, so you have some room to dicker, to haggle. So, maybe, they’re all home by April Fool’s Day (end of March seems to be one of the bruited dates anyway).

    But it would fit on a bumper sticker. And the mention of Christmas should appeal to the “Christian values” voters. With luck, it would give Limbo a conniption fit too — *Dems*, bringing Christmas into equation, instead of making a war on it? I don’t see a downside.

  • Homer at #7: I think Specter is talking about the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, who is a Bush appointee.

    As for Specter, I think he’s still pushing for doing it the president’s way, to see what they get out of a closed-door, no-transcript, not-under-oath “conversation,” and if necessary, going to the next level. Right, Arlen – the WH is going to play this one fair, and everyone will be happy…

    The NBC report I saw tonight said that the recruiting goals would have fallen far shorter, but they are now taking recruits who would have been ineligible before – those with felony records, as well as those with physical problems. We simply do not have the force strength to continue much longer – and I saw where Brownback thinks we should send more troops if what we have already sent cannot get the job done. Question: has anyone noticed that it doesn’t seem to matter how many troops we send?

    Marcy Wheeler at The Next Hurrah had the pdf of Fitzgerald’s memorandum to Walton on the question of whether the commutation of Libby’s prison time would eliminate the supervised release portion of Walton’s sentence. One of Fitzgerald’s arguments is that the day Libby was processed is considered a “day of detention,” and thus supervised release would attach to Libby. Fitzgerald also noted that Bush’s commutation specifically left intact both the supervised release, the fine and the community service, and Fitzgerald argues that this would also allow the supervised release to attach.

    Sorry, but Cindy Sheehan needs to come to grips with reality. For one, she can’t beat Pelosi, and two, does she think beating Pelosi would make her Speaker of the House? Sheehan needs to connect with the family she still has, and get some serious grief counseling. I have nothing but sympathy for her loss, and applaud her dedication to her mission, but she needs help.

  • OK, now all the rest, in one “omnium gatherum” bag:

    Edward Copeland, @1: My thoughts, precisely 🙂
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    […] the White House told Walton that Libby should be considered on probation, effective “immediately.”

    Glad the WH was able to straighten *that* question out for Walton. What a mine of legal wisdom the WH is! Truly amazing! And what does it say about all those half-brains at DoJ who didn’t know it/couldn’t write those same laws for themselves?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    * A week after half the staff of the National Hurricane Center signed a petition calling for his ouster, NHC Director Bill Proenza has left his position.

    I’m a little unclear on that one. The guy objected to using a piece of equipment which is past “due date” and operating on life support. Such complaining is *bad*? Asking for a better tool (even if it’s only one of many) is bad??? Since when? It’s not as if he were some political appointee, whose life experience is mostly in stock-brokering; his been a meteorolgist for over 35yrs, so, presumably, he knows what he’s talking about. Are we supposed to cheer that a professional had been removed, however democratically? Does Bush’s mal-admin have too many professionals in their ranks?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    * Ari Melber explains what “OpenLeft,” a new project from Matt Stoller, Chris Bowers, and Mike Lux, has in store for political world.

    Steve, all I got from that link was “please donate now, because we have to pay more for postage”. Beep52, @10, thanks for the YouTube link; even though accurate (and therefore depressing), it’s still funny at the same time.

  • Sorry, but Cindy Sheehan needs to come to grips with reality. For one, she can’t beat Pelosi…

    Yet another omniscient commentator here at TCR that can see into the future (as well as only buying into the message of candidates blessed by Big Corporate Media). And Cindy Sheehan needs to come to grips with reality? Sorry, but I thought that “progressive” meant having an open mind among other things, but I guess, to some, that means only if the message is approved by the DNC. Pfff.

    Hit me with some excuses for not impeaching, Anne. I feel like listening to some worthless excuses. Political calculation, ReThugs’ fault, 67-vote excrement, etc.

    By the way, since you and Tom Cleaver can see into the future, can you look into your crystal ball and tell me if King George will actually leave office peaceably on 1/20/2009? Because, if not, I’d really have to consider moving to Canada (especially after having seen SICKO). But what am I thinking anyway. How could I expect Canadian sovereignty if King George sells out American sovereignty wholesale.

  • Nicholas Kristof explains how Bush has “turned away” from Darfur. “For years, Mr. Bush’s aides have discussed whether he should give a prime-time speech on Darfur to ratchet up the pressure; he still hasn’t. Laura Bush just completed a four-nation swing through Africa, but she didn’t include a visit to any of the areas affected by the Darfur crisis.”

    If there’s any place where violence could be used for a good cause, it’s Darfur. Get rid of all the bad guys, and don’t leave any of their weapons in country for people to loot. Get them right away after an operation and melt them down.

  • Right-wing attacks on the Live Earth concerts were not just wrong; they were pathetic.

    If right-wingers had to list their priorities besides pursuing Al Qaeda, hassling liberals would definitely be on there, and if they had to rank them, in their heart of hearts, hassling liberals would definitely rank first, relative to pursuing Al Qaeda.

  • Sorry, but Cindy Sheehan needs to come to grips with reality… Anne @ 13, JKap @ 16

    At the risk of pulling a Frist Diagnosis, her behavior has for some time resembled that of folks I’ve known who’ve had extraordinary difficulty working through grief. Channeling a tragedy into something positive can be therapeutic unless channeling itself becomes so stressful — or such an obsession — that it creates its own problems.

    In Sheehan’s case, I got the sense that there were people driving her beyond what she was emotionally ready for — exploiting her to further their agendas with little regard for her health. I could be wrong, but even if I am, the constant media attention and shameless skewering from the right by themselves would have created a terribly stressful and potentially unhealthy situation.

    Personally, I was relieved to hear she was withdrawing from the spotlight and returning to a private life where she might stand a chance of working things out in the comfort of family and friends. Her latest announcement seems to indicate that didn’t happen. Like Anne, I think she needs help.

  • JKap – I wish I had that crystal ball, and perhaps I was too matter-of-fact in saying that Sheehan could not beat Pelosi, but if you want to get a sense of where Sheehan is, and what she believes, you should go read her diary at dkos. I was kind of shocked to see Sheehan refer to the Democratic party as the party of slavery, as well as the party of warmongers.

    I think Sheehan is like a lot of us who are more frustrated than we have ever been, and more impatient for real action on so many issues. What upsets me, as a mother, is knowing that Sheehan has living children from whom she has been apart while on this quest for answers. And while she will never be able to bring her son back, and might never make sense of his death, she also has lost time with the children she has – time that she will never get back.

    The woman has been used and abused by both sides and I was happy that she had made the decision to step out of the spotlight, to go back to her family. Maybe her grief won’t allow her to; I don’t know.

    I don’t have any special knowledge about the woman, other than what she, herself, has said and written, but I do believe she needs help with her grief, help putting her family back together.

    As for the rest of what you said, I’m just hoping – like everyone else – that Bush actually leaves office.

    All the excuses for not impeaching are pretty much worthless at this point, don’t you think? Given the refusal on the part of both the president and the vice-president to adhere to anything resembling the rule of law, I think there is no other option.

  • Sorry, but Cindy Sheehan needs to come to grips with reality. For one, she can’t beat Pelosi…

    I don’t live in California but if Sheehan were running in my district I would have the same questions for her that I would for any prospective politician. You know the little things like their background in business, prior public service, education, life experience…. Being at the front of one issue wouldn’t be enough to make me vote for a person. Then again, if that was how I selected candidates I guess that I would be a Republican

  • was kind of shocked to see Sheehan refer to the Democratic party as the party of slavery, as well as the party of warmongers.

    Why were you shocked? Vietnam War for starters, Democrats and the other major party continue to support bombing and killing innocent people all over the world. If you find that shocking you have been living in a cave!
    Get over it and realize that both major parties have and are currently using the War on Terror for political purposes and could care less about J6P and his family, just how many Democrats now in office state or Federal have any children in Iraq, probablycould count them on one hand. Enough said.

  • Yet another omniscient commentator here at TCR that can see into the future (as well as only buying into the message of candidates blessed by Big Corporate Media). And Cindy Sheehan needs to come to grips with reality? Sorry, but I thought that “progressive” meant having an open mind among other things[…] — JKap. @16

    Does that mean, JKap, that you don’t consider yourself “progressive”? You’re not only a one-tone bell, you personally attack everyone whose opinion doesn’t march in total lockstep with yours. While I have bitten my tongue many times about some of Tom Cleaver’s postings (the object of one of your rants earlier), Anne’s one of the most objective, level-headed as well as literate commenters on this list; your sneer was really uncalled for.

    I suggest a new “handle” for you, instead of JKap: Cato the Elder (of the “Delenda est Carthago” fame)

  • Does anyone know if there is anything to prevent Congress from passing a law establishing term limits on Supreme Court justices instead of lifetime appointments? It’s the only way I know to correct the tainted court we have now.

  • Comments are closed.