Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* This afternoon, based on no law that anyone can recognize, the White House ordered former WH Counsel Harriet Miers to disobey a congressional subpoena. Unlike Sara Taylor, who appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee but declined to answer some questions, Miers will not show up at all. Her successor, Fred Fielding, insisted that Miers has “absolute immunity.”

* Dems are extremely unhappy about the Miers announcement. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers issued a statement: “A congressional subpoena, such as the one issued to Ms. Miers, carries with it two obligations: the obligation to appear, and the obligation to testify and/or produce documents. Even if a witness intends to assert privilege in response to a subpoena, that intention to assert privilege does not obviate the obligation to appear.” Conyers, who urged Miers to “reconsider,” said the hearing will take place tomorrow morning, with an empty chair if necessary.

* Sara Taylor, during her appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee today, seemed confused about her loyalties. At one point she said, “I took an oath to the president, and I take that oath very seriously.” When Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy asked if perhaps she meant an “oath to the Constitution,” Taylor clarified — but still seemed confused.

* In a display that was embarrassing, even by his standards, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) referred to Senate Republicans who disapprove of Bush’s Iraq policy as “wimps.” Boehner, who did not serve in the military, is known for being particularly courageous when it’s other people whose lives are on the line.

* The Bush administration is using an official HHS website to tell Americans that abortions make women feel “sad,” and lead to substance-abuse problems.

* Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) still isn’t happy with Dick Cheney — Durbin’s Senate appropriations panel “refused to fund $4.8 million in the vice president’s budget until Cheney’s office complies with parts of an executive order governing its handling of classified information.”

* The White House unveiled a renovated press briefing room today, but according to the NYT, “[W]ith the White House press corps under attack from liberal bloggers as being too cozy with the Bush administration, some reporters say they feel a little bit queasy about attending.” That apparently didn’t stop the frivolity.

* Something about being in the Bush administration ruins people’s memories. It’s remarkable.

* NSA Stephen Hadley was on the Hill today; it didn’t go well: “Several Republican senators told President Bush’s top national security aide privately Wednesday that they did not want Bush to wait until September to change course in Iraq.” And if more than a handful of them actually vote the right way, I’ll be very impressed.

* John McCain seems to have finally stumbled upon the problem with his faltering presidential campaign: “gay sweaters.”

* On a related note, Tom Tancredo believes he’s responsible for McCain’s decline. (He’s xenophobic and suffering from delusions of grandeur.)

* No matter how reasonable the Iraq Study Group’s report may have appeared last fall, the panel’s recommendations have been “overtaken by events in Iraq.”

* Did Bush’s 2003 tax cuts for the wealthy boost the economy? Not so much.

* Apparently, Chicago, a solidly Democratic city, doesn’t need two newspapers, each with their own conservative editorial board. (The Sun-Times is glad to be free of Murdoch.)

* Bush is prepared to veto the Dems’ student-loan bill because it doesn’t waste nearly enough money on financial services companies.

* One has to assume David Vitter will not be the last noteworthy name from the DC Madam’s call list.

* Why does the Washington Post consider Medicare “radical“?

* And finally, during the Q&A portion of the president’s event in Cleveland yesterday, a 13-year-old girl asked Bush what his “next step with the immigration bill” will be. The president responded sarcastically, with a wry “yeah, thanks.” People in the audience laughed, leading the young girl to start crying. It’s been that kind of presidency, hey George?

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

And finally, during the Q&A portion of the president’s event in Cleveland yesterday, a 13-year-old girl asked Bush what his “next step with the immigration bill” will be.

Who’s going to get fired for letting the girl into the building and up to the microphone?

  • “I took an oath the president, and I take that oath very seriously.”

    What in hell is this, the Third Reich? We don’t take loyalty oaths to people in this country. Titles of nobility have been abolished.

  • I managed to get something into yesterday’s Seattle Post-Intelligencer which I haven’t seen mentioned in the mainstream media. Coincidentally, my letter was printed the day before the P-I ran the story on the Pope restating his belief that Protestants don’t have “real” churches and Orthodox do have “defective” ones. Here‘s the letter:

    Justices represent degrees of establishment thinking

    David Horsey’s Wednesday cartoon depicts a right-left, conservative-liberal Supreme Court split with Justice Anthony Kennedy swinging to the right. In fact, no one on the court comes even remotely close to being “left” or “liberal.” They all represent varying degrees of establishment thinking.

    If anything, the distinctive and disturbing split in the current court is that its five-member voting majority is, for the first time in history, Roman Catholic. That religion, which under President Kennedy was held in check by the First Amendment, has of late become extremely active in politics at all levels. That its professed tenets are at odds with what the overwhelming majority of Americans tell pollsters makes its dominance of the nation’s highest court troubling indeed.

    Ed Stephan
    Bellingham

  • I’m sure the little girl was just crying because she didn’t want to play softball.

  • What in hell is this, the Third Reich? We don’t take loyalty oaths to people in this country.

    The more the congress digs into this administration, the more is revealed about the Bush cult of personality. Like most who read the CBR and other leftish cites, I Just. Don’t. Get. It. What caused this to happen? 9/11? No, it started before then. Clenis hate? Maybe a contributing factor. Inadequate Daddy figures in their lives? I would argue that maybe it’s the opposite — Domineering Daddys. The need for a gawd on earth? No, that’s doubtful, because so many only answer to one gawd — Pat Robertson. A clever marketing campaign targeting gullible “conservative” religious people that was released at exactly the right time? Perfect. Thanks, Andy. A ner-do-well rich, legacy, dry-drunk, educated but not -educated, man with sadistic tendities has come close to be president of the US. [ohgood grief] Thank Gawd Cheney was there to mitigate the damage [/ohgoodgrief].

  • Sara Taylor, during her appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee today, seemed confused about her loyalties. At one point she said, “I took an oath the president, and I take that oath very seriously.” When Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy asked if perhaps she meant an “oath to the Constitution,” Taylor clarified — but still seemed confused.

    If anything was ever unpatriotic, this is it. And you’re right Swan, we’re living in the Fourth Reich.

    Now, everyday is the saddest day in the history of our Constitutional Republic. Where are our leaders?

    IMPEACH ALL NOW. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD AND COUNTRY.

  • Agree with Jkap**** Every day I live in fear of my president…of what he might do next. Why will they not Impeach already?

  • Here is a link to a searchable database of the “DC Madam” phone records:

    http://dcphonelist.com/

    This site will only tell you if the phone number you have entered is on the list. And it’s not complete – they claim 67% complete at this writing. When they have all the numbers in the database, perhaps they will be able to permit more advanced searches. I can’t wait! Happy hunting!

    In case there are any Publicans reading this: of course Democrats should be subject to equal scrutiny. But as CB pointed out earlier today, it is you guys who campaign on “family values” and act like Democrats are the party of immorality. Democrats realize that we are all flawed human beings, but we don’t like people telling us that they are “holier than thou.”

    It’s the hypocrisy, Stupid. Jesus (the real one) had some very unpleasant things to say about hypocrites.

  • On Saturday, Americans learned that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in 2005 cancelled a major U.S. raid into Pakistan designed to decapitate much of Al Qaeda’s senior leadership. Now, a new CIA assessment details the steep price the U.S. is paying for President Bush’s failure to enforce his mantra of “no safe havens.” U.S. intelligence analysts, the AP reports, have concluded Al Qaeda has “rebuilt its operating capability to a level not seen since just before the 2001 terrorist attacks.”

    That’s a damning assessment indeed for President Bush’s global war on terror. With the Bush Doctrine of no safe havens, preemptive war and democracy in tatters, the President remains focused on staying the course in Iraq at all costs. In Washington, House Minority Leader John Boehner calls Senate GOP rebels on Iraq “wimps” and Tony Snow slanders the press corps as “defeatist.” Meanwhile, Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff announces his “gut feeling” about the increased threat of terror attacks within the United States.

    Meanwhile, the resurgence of Al Qaeda on their watch continues unabated.

    For the disturbing details, see:
    “CIA: Resurgent Al Qaeda Now at Pre-9/11 Capability.”

  • yes, there is a dangerous cult of personality surrounding the boy king.
    but i’ve never understood how a cult of personality can develop around someone with so little personality! (and no, i’ve never bought into the whole “he’s someone i’d want to have a beer with” nonsense. he’s always struck me as someone i’d walk across the street to avoid if i saw him coming.)

  • with respect to blowing up the white house’s beaver dam of obstruction

    josh marshall has two posts up this p.m. which suggest to me a way forward.

    one is entitled “felony”;

    the other “what’s the white house hiding”.

    so,

    who to impeach first?

    why not fred fielding

    if he is abusing his position to obstruct a congressional investigation or

    if he is suborning a felony?

    the focus of impeachment would be very narrow – fielding’s advice and behavior.

    the laws and traditions have been in place.

    this should not require weeks and months of congressional prep.

    vote out a bill of impeachment from the house judiciary on fielding

    and see what happens.

    just the reporting out of a bill of impeachment might get old fred to thinking along the line of dr. johnson’s musing.

    democratic congressmen would do well to keep in mind that one thing americans dislike intensely about democratic politicians is they will not fight.

  • Re Miers’ refusal to obey the subpoena and “House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers issued a statement” :

    I’d much prefer that he “issued” a couple of beefy members of the Senate police (guards, whatever) to enforce the subpoena and bring her in, properly shackled. The time for playing nice was over, like, yesterday.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Sara Taylor probably never admired the Constitution (always supposing she’d read it), but we know she admires the B(r)ush Trimmer. So it’s not suprising the minor details of who or what she swore the oath to slipped her busy mind.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    * Did Bush’s 2003 tax cuts for the wealthy boost the economy? Not so much.

    If you skim the cream off the milk, no amount of churning will turn the remainder into butter. Ask any (old-style) farmwife.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    […] the Sun-Times […] Eventually, she added, the paper will list the board members — and disclose who wrote what editorial.

    Now that one I like. Bugs the heck out of me to read all those anonymous editorials in NYT and WaPo. If you have enough convictions to put them on paper, then have enough courage to stand by them, by putting your name to them.

  • One more thing (apologies for being “Proustian”; usually, I try to limit myself to a single posting on any thread):

    * The White House unveiled a renovated press briefing room today,

    I understand that the main difference between the old press briefing room and the new one is that the seats in the new one are wider (reflecting the American slide into obesity). So now the press “corpse” will not only be cozy but comfortable as well. Could catch a nap or two, too, without missing a thing.

  • Obviously Aunt Harriet swore an oath to the boy king too…

    Loyalty!
    Top to bottom.
    Near right to the far right.
    And under every damp stone.
    It is all about Loyalty!

    The only government that runs on time when Loyalty matters most is one that derserves to be hung by a lampost.

    Yeah : )
    You can quote me on that last one…

  • Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) added another plaque to his wall of shame during House hearings today looking into President Bush’s commutation of the Scooter Libby’s sentence. Ever eager to defend the President and the flagging hopes of the Republican Party, Issa accused outed CIA agent Valerie Plame of perjury.

    For the details, see:
    “Issa Accuses Valerie Plame of Perjury.”

  • Ed @3 – congrats on your letter. Pope’s sure makin’ a lot of new friends, isn’t he?
    …………..

    Conyers and Sanchez, responding to the decision by Miers not to even appear tomorrow, have raised the possibility of an inherent contempt citation; maybe they do read the blogs…
    …………………..

    Listening to Issa in the HJC hearing today, I was surprised Joe Wilson was able to keep himself from leaping over the table to punch his lights out. What a contempible piece of work Issa is. Contemptible and not particularly bright, which seems to describe quite a few members of the GOP these days. All this time and these people still cling to the lies as tightly as ever…

  • The Bush administration is using an official HHS website to tell Americans that abortions make women feel “sad,” and lead to substance-abuse problems.

    According to the last item it should be “George W. Bush makes women feel sad.”

    Hell, he makes me sad. And nearly blind with anger.

    Also: I fucking hate John McCain, but I loooove watching his campaign dissolve.

    Also: I would pay good money to see Chuck Hagel beat the shit out of Boneher.

  • Best. Net Neutrality. Essay. Ever.

    I can’t decide who is smarter:

    1) Deep internet philosophers like Weinberger and Isenberg.
    2) Deep science fiction writers like Brin & Bedford & Robinson.

    Maybe it is a tie?!

  • Can someone tell me with the carrier Enterprise going to the Persian Gulf to join the other ships near Iran, will that mean the Navy force will be larger than what we had present at the start of Bush’s War in Iraq?, seriously.

    Say hello to the man that takes credit for discovering the ‘Iranian threat.’

    Which happens to be the same charming man that said

    “I am not advocating an Israeli preemptive military action against Iran, and I am aware of all of its possible repercussions,” Sneh stressed. “I consider it a last resort. But even the last resort is sometimes the only resort.”

    Why is dropping bombs preferred to even trying to talk to them?

    But hey, I bet he’s a real hoot at a party.

    I think we had really better worry about what our Misleader is liable to do before he is finally evicted from the White House.

  • Re making the little girl cry, remember how the Republicans tried to defend Bush’s amazing paralysis during the “Pet Goat” episode on 9/11, by claiming that Bush sat frozen in his seat because he didn’t want to distress the children by a precipitate departure?

  • Comments are closed.