A federal judge dismissed former CIA operative Valerie Plame’s lawsuit against members of the Bush administration Thursday, eliminating one of the last courtroom remnants of the leak scandal.
Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, had accused Vice President Dick Cheney and others of conspiring to leak her identity in 2003. Plame said that violated her privacy rights and was illegal retribution for her husband’s criticism of the administration.
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds and said he would not express an opinion on the constitutional arguments. Bates dismissed the case against all defendants: Cheney, White House political adviser Karl Rove, former White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.
Plame’s attorneys had said the lawsuit would be an uphill battle. Public officials are normally immune from such lawsuits filed in connection with their jobs.
I’m still getting the details — I have not yet read the dismissal — but apparently the decision wasn’t based on the merits of Plame’s claim, but rather procedural issues regarding jurisdiction. (In other words, if you hear/see a conservative say, “Plame’s case was thrown out because it was baseless,” that’s wrong.)
One more thing to keep in mind: Bates was named to the federal bench by — you guessed it — George W. Bush. Better yet, Bates was a prosecutor on Ken Starr’s Whitewater team, and in 2002, ruled in Dick Cheney’s favor in keeping his energy-task force secret.
It’s awful to have lost faith in the integrity of parts of the federal judicial system, isn’t it?