Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* TPMM: “Despite the administration’s statements that a U.S. attorney would not be permitted to enforce a contempt citation from Congress, the House Judiciary Committee will vote Wednesday on whether to cite Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten with statutory contempt, according to a senior committee aide.”

* How might things go in the House Judiciary Committee tomorrow? Chairman Conyers issued a statement: “I’ve allowed the White House and Ms. Miers every opportunity to cooperate with this investigation, either voluntarily or under subpoena. It is still my hope that they will reconsider this hard-line position, and cooperate with our investigation so that we can get to the bottom of this matter.”

* Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) sure is a rabble-rouser, isn’t he? “One of the Senate’s most liberal members said Sunday that he would ‘shortly’ propose two censure resolutions against President Bush and his administration.” One of the potential complications: Feingold’s effort will be rather broad, encompassing Iraq-related misconduct, torture, warrantless searches, and the purge of U.S. Attorneys. On Meet the Press yesterday, Feingold characterized his effort as “moderate,” because it falls well short of impeachment.

* Mike McConnell, the Director of National Intelligence, wouldn’t say what techniques are and aren’t included in the president’s new interrogation guidelines, but he did concede, “I would not want a U.S. citizen to go through the process.”

* As part of the same interview, McConnell was asked if “policy makers [i.e., White House officials] hyped the intelligence” on Iraq before the war. McConnell would only say, “That’s a judgment that I think the American people will have to make.” That’s a far cry from “no.”

* Fred Barnes believes there will be more U.S. troops in Iraq in December 2007 than there were in January 2007. Given that Barnes generally can’t speak while Karl Rove is drinking water, one should probably assume this reflects the White House’s thinking on troop deployments in Iraq.

* Bob Novak seems a little confused about who to blame for the new 60-vote threshold to pass anything in the Senate.

* On a related note, Kevin has one of those posts I wish I’d written, explaining why Republicans are filibustering so much, instead of just letting Bush veto bills the GOP doesn’t like.

* Rifts between Bush and Cheney are exceedingly rare, and never publicized, but if asked, the VP was prepared to say last December that he “absolutely” disagreed with the president’s decision to fire Donald Rumsfeld. He was not asked, however, so he never said anything.

* David Broder managed to go an entire column today without criticizing Dems in some kind of pox-on-both-your-houses assessment of Washington. It was a very pleasant surprise.

* The WaPo’s Walter Pincus explained today that a new White House executive order titled, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq,” is intended to focus on freezing assets of those committing acts of violence in Iraq. Some of the language, however, is uncomfortably broad, and some are wondering if the E.O. could apply to Americans.

* A Democratic bill to expand S-CHIP to provide more access to health insurance for millions of middle-class kids has so much support, some believe Dems may have enough votes to override a Bush veto.

* AP: “Frustrated by delays in health care, a coalition of injured Iraq war veterans is accusing VA Secretary Jim Nicholson of breaking the law by denying them disability pay and mental health treatment.”

* Some odd right-winger has launched a new effort for conservatives to boycott products, services, and people who have even a tangential connection to Democratic politics.

* And finally, a quote of the day from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ken.): “I think we do agree this is the last chance for the Iraqis to get it right. But we ought to give one of our finest, if not our very finest, general a chance to see if he can succeed in the next few months.” He made the comment six months ago today.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

on Iraq before the war. McConnell would only say, “That’s a judgment that I think the American people will have to make.”

Yeah, but what does it matter, since the deed’s already done.

Remember that white whale from Moby Dick, the one Captain Ahab is so intent on chasing? Eventually the Reoublicans are going to have to realize- you’re a danger to yourselves.

That’s how badly their policies turn out– that’s where they’re teking us as a nation.

  • …Bob Novak seems a little confused…

    Now there’s a newsflash!

    Mitch McConnell is obviously confused about what the word “few” means. But of course Mitch McConnell is also confused about whether dollar bills themselves have first amentment rights.

  • “David Broder managed to go an entire column today without criticizing Dems in some kind of pox-on-both-your-houses assessment of Washington. It was a very pleasant surprise.”

    I would disagree with that. Broder includes an unfair statement/position that all administrations politicize their departments (Clinton did it!!). Broder then writes: “The current HUD secretary, Alphonso Jackson, is the least conspicuous member of a less-than-notable Cabinet — a man who pleases the president by giving absolutely no visibility to urban issues.”
    Isn’t this the same Alphonso Jackson who wanted to turn the entire contracting system in HUD into a fundraising arm for George W. Bush?

    http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2006/05/08/story1.html

    Seems to me that what Jackson did for Bush is far, far worse (and in violation of a few laws) than what Gore may have been doing, and is far more politicization than what Clinton ever might have done.

  • “I think we do agree this is the last chance for the Iraqis to get it right. But we ought to give one of our finest, if not our very finest, general a chance to see if he can succeed in the next few months.”

    And I am sure that in September, the good doc will be telling us to wait till November, then in November wait till January, then in January wait till March, then in March wait till May, then in May wait till July…

    I wonder what he’s going to do when all 22 Republican Senators up for re-election lose.

  • Some odd right-winger has launched a new effort for conservatives to boycott products, services, and people who have even a tangential connection to Democratic politics.

    For all the oddness, it’s economic pressure. I’ve many times considered and try to do the same, only in reverse. http://www.buyblue.com tries to be a helpful resource but it isn’t so much helpful as it highlights how many critical industries are dominated by GOP-supporting corporations. Food production, food and general goods distribution, oil, and almost every chain is dominated by them. The only real choice any hardcore Democratic supporter has is to buy local, as much as possible.

  • Oops. Buyblue.org, and it looks like they’ve closed up shop. 🙁

    For what I can remember, the bookstore chains were blue, Starbucks is “blue,” Winco (if in your area) doesn’t donate to anybody, AND it’s 80% employee-owned, so I’m proud to get my groceries there, Citgo was the only gas station chain that wasn’t completely beholden to the GOP, and Subway, Sonic, and Arbys were the only fast food chains that didn’t donate mostly to the GOP. No tech store chains were very “blue”, although you’re far better off buying from Apple instead of from Microsoft, and that is true on many levels 😛

  • As the WaPo’s Walter Pincus explained today that a new White House executive order titled, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq,” is intended to focus on freezing assets of those committing acts of violence in Iraq. Some of the language, however, is uncomfortably broad, and some are wondering if the E.O. could apply to Americans.

    Read it today, along with associated orders. Reminiscent of Executive Order 51 and the broad brownshirt stroke that “The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.” As if King George would know Constitutional Government if it bit him in the face.

  • “I would not want a U.S. citizen to go through the process.”

    Let’s hope that doesn’t mean, “…But I would be delighted to see foreigners go through it.”

    Jeez. Even movie villains are bound to say, “It pains me to have to do this, but you’ve brought it on yourself.”

  • “I would not want a U.S. citizen to go through the process.”

    I thought that Jose Padilla did go and has gone through that process. Whoops! Too late!

    “But we ought to give one of our finest, if not our very finest, general a chance to see if he can succeed in the next few months.”

    Rumsfeld fired all those fine generals years ago. Too bad.

  • On Thursday morning, July 19th, the beloved GOP talking point “up or down vote” was officially declared dead. Its demise was little noticed in the aftermath of the Senate Republicans’ successful all-night filibuster to block the Reed-Levin bill seeking to begin U.S. troop withdrawals from Iraq. “Up or down vote” was killed by a desperate Republican Party trying to obstruct Democratic accomplishments at any cost in advance of the 2008 elections. And so far, the GOP seems to be getting away with the crime.

    For the details, see:
    “Up or Down Vote: Death of a GOP Talking Point.”

  • Cindy Sheehan arrested at Congress

    The People are being arrested for civil disobedience, but lawbreakers like Harriet Miers can scoff at Congressional subpoenas. Some “justice.”

    I’m sure the benevolent Democratic candidates had a lot to say about this at tonight’s “debate.”

    Our Constitutional Republic is destroyed, it just hasn’t been announced yet.

  • “”Citgo was the only gas station chain that wasn’t completely beholden to the GOP””

    Well, if you would rather buy from Hugo Chavez (Venezuela owns Citgo) go right ahead.

  • Indeed it would be nice to get an updated list of companies that support ‘progressive’ causes. I’d rather pay a little extra at a business that supports what I believe in than to buy at a Walmart, save a few dollars, and indirectly help out the GOP.

    If anybody has any ideas of where such lists are available, please post. Thanks

  • I agree with JKap. Our constitutional republic is destroyed unless the Bush/Cheney/Gonzales people are impeached, the patriot act rescinded, and the balance of power restored. I listened to the candidates tonight, and there was no discussion of our civil rights, restoration of balance of powers, or impeachment.
    The Bush administration needs impeachment NOW.
    Call your congress people and demand it today!
    A good website on the issue:
    http://www.afterdowningstreet.org

  • If you are buying building supplies, buy from Lowes rather than Home Depot. The Home Depot guys are actively trying to buy state judiciaries to make them compatible with corporate goals. Lowes supports the Repubs to a smaller degree.

  • Comments are closed.