Politicizing everything that moves

The past couple of weeks, we’ve leaned about White House efforts to shamelessly politicize the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the General Services Administration, and the Office of the Surgeon General, agencies that no one ever really thought of as arms of a campaign machine.

Today, the Washington Post moves the ball forward even further. Karl Rove’s office, which reportedly isn’t supposed to be involved with foreign policy, apparently delivered detailed political briefings to diplomats and officials who help shape the administration’s international affairs.

White House aides have conducted at least half a dozen political briefings for the Bush administration’s top diplomats, including a PowerPoint presentation for ambassadors with senior adviser Karl Rove that named Democratic incumbents targeted for defeat in 2008 and a “general political briefing” at the Peace Corps headquarters after the 2002 midterm elections.

The briefings, mostly run by Rove’s deputies at the White House political affairs office, began in early 2001 and included detailed analyses for senior officials of the political landscape surrounding critical congressional and gubernatorial races, according to documents obtained by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

The documents show for the first time how the White House sought to ensure that even its appointees involved in foreign policy were kept attuned to the administration’s election goals. Such briefings occurred semi-regularly over the past six years for staffers dealing with domestic policy, White House officials have previously acknowledged.

When the Bush gang politicized, for example, the Faith-Based Office, at least there was a logical rationale behind it. The White House wanted to corrupt a federal agency to help Republicans, so it manipulated the office into intervening in specific political campaigns. It’s probably illegal, but at least it makes some sense — the Faith-Based Office had grants it could it distribute with political ends in mind.

But in this case, Rove wanted ambassadors, USAID officials, aides at the State Department, and even Peace Corps officials to know which GOP candidates needed their help.

It’s hardly a secret that the White House is run by inept and corrupt clowns, but this is just embarrassing.

On Jan. 4, just after the 2006 elections tossed the Republicans out of congressional power, Rove met at the White House with six U.S. ambassadors to key European missions and the consul general to Bermuda while the diplomats were in Washington for a State Department conference.

According to a department letter to the Senate panel, Rove explained the White House views on the electoral disaster while Sara M. Taylor, then the director of White House political affairs, showed a PowerPoint presentation that pinned most of the electoral blame on “corrupt” GOP lawmakers and “complacent incumbents.” One chart in Taylor’s presentation highlighted the GOP’s top 36 targets among House Democrats for the 2008 election.

In a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), the Foreign Relations Committee chairman, asked whether the briefings inappropriately politicized the diplomatic agencies or violated prohibitions against political work by most federal employees.

“I do not understand why ambassadors, in Washington on official duty, would be briefed by White House officials on which Democratic House members are considered top targets by the Republican party for defeat in 2008. Nor do I understand why department employees would need to be briefed on ‘key media markets’ in states that are ‘competitive’ for the president,” Biden wrote.

I’m going to assume Biden was being intentionally coy, because he’s certainly clever enough to know full well why these briefings were occurring. The Bush gang, which looks more and more like an organized crime family with each passing scandal, believes the levers of government are just tools to be exploited in the building of a Permanent Republican Majority. That laws are in place to prevent this is entirely irrelevant; Rove has federal agencies to exploit and can’t be bothered with pesky details like criminal behavior.

The Hatch Act strictly prohibits executive-branch employees from using their positions for political purposes. The White House defense for all of this is transparently ridiculous. A White House hack said the briefings were simply to offer foreign policy officials an “understanding of the political landscape.”

Ambassadors and Peace Corps officials? Why do they need a briefing from the White House on the political landscape?

The answer, of course, is that Rove’s office considers everything in the executive branch — literally, every office and every official — a partisan instrument to be exploited.

Can we extradite Rove to China?

  • And all of this is not impeachable… right?

    We are all such good little enablers.

  • And the communists lost?

    A novelist couldn’t write a better espionage novel villain about a former teenage outcast with a gay father communist agent who joins the right wing party and becomes the most powerful puppetmaster in the government while destroying the US from within by destroying its institutions by emulating communist politicization AND wiping out its military, economy and treasury thru disastrous wars while manipulating the same jackal power hungry authoritarian thugs and money hungry whores of the MSM to do his bidding against all enemies.

    If any writer wrote that they’d say the writer was over the top.

    With the exception of the communist agent part, that sums up Karl Rove. Is he the Manchurian Candidate? (half in jest, but considering what is going on, half very serious.)

  • Where is Patrick Fitzgerald? We need a guy like that to investigate the broad spectrum of Republican corruption throughout the entire government.

  • It’s just overwhelming. The corrupt practices of the WH or is it now considered the RNC WH? What penalty is there for this obvious criminal behavior? Is this just being noted for the record or will there be consequences? Look at what happened to Doan at GSA…just said, “bad dog, bad dog. You should be fired” and then …NOTHING.

  • Without even reading the story I knew this was Rove’s brainchild.

    Does this man not have a life? Not everything is or should be, about politics. I know he only cares about the GOP and not about a functioning government and foreign policy aparatus, but God, could he just please stop. Take up a non political hobby, go on an extended vacation, whatever.

    The GOP needs to purge itself of Rove and those that are like him before they bring the party down. Of course they won’t do that because most of them are short sighted and many have been aided by these guys.

  • …The Bush gang… looks more and more like an organized crime family with each passing scandal…

    How many scandals is that now?

    Is it a hundred yet?

    With each passing scandal, the Democratic leadership looks more and more like the witless pansies the Republicans always take them for. A Democrat would have been impeached (and convicted) several times over if they had done half of these things. At some point, the fault is not with the criminals, we know they’re criminals and they’re doing what criminals do. No, the fault is with the people who swore to uphold the law and keep the criminals in check.

    Pelosi and Reid ought to be ashamed. All of our “leadership” ought to be ashamed. They have very little time left to redeem themselves.

  • The organs of the State exist to serve the Party, because the Party is the vanguard of the Revolution.

    We’re ruled by Leninists.

  • I say again, just what the hell does it take? I wish an independent journalist/reporter/man on the street would ask the Democratic Leadership: what would it take for them to view impeachment as a moral imperative?

    Hurry up, Larry Flynt, and expose Dripping “Dick” Cheney — maybe that’ll be the tipping point.

  • With apologies to anyone who thinks it sacrilegious, but, Jesus Christ on a crutch. Is there any nook or cranny of government that Karl Rove has not oozed his way into for partisan purposes? I mean, at what point is this considered propagandizing and indoctrination, and how on earth was this allowed not only to happen in the first place, but to continue unabated? I just don’t get how this man was allowed to use the power of the White House, for God’s sake, to design and implement a program for furthering one party’s hold on power, with the goal of making that a permanent grip. He and his minions visited so many departments and agencies for this purpose that it is impossible for me to understand how it is that we are only recently learning about it. These people are like cockroaches that skitter into the woodwork as soon as you shine any light on them, and for all the ones we have seem, I expect there are hordes of them behind walls we are not getting access to.

    I would be lying if I said I would be unhappy to see Democrats in power in government, but as much as I think, overall, that Democrats would serve the nation’s interests better than Republicans would, what I want those Democrats – and all government employees –doing is the work of government, not political campaigning. The agencies and departments of the government should be concerned with serving the people, not working to make sure people of one party or another are elected or re-elected.

    Just when I think I cannot be more disgusted, it’s a new day, I turn on the TV, pick up the paper and go online to find something that turns my stomach all over again.

  • “The organs of the State exist to serve the Party, because the Party is the vanguard of the Revolution.

    We’re ruled by Leninists.”

    This may be truer than you thought. Recall statements made earlier by Republican partisans about redefining reality. Recall the fact that a great deal of the neo-conservatives had their roots from left or socialist principles, including a vanguard of a revolutionary elite.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

    “The forerunners of neoconservatism were generally liberals or socialists who strongly supported World War II, and who were influenced by the Depression-era ideas of former New Dealers, trade unionists, and Trotskyists, particularly those who followed the political ideas of Max Shachtman[citation needed]. A number of future neoconservatives such as Jeane Kirkpatrick were Shachtmanites in their youth; some were later involved with Social Democrats USA[citation needed].”

    Thus, it might be more accurate to portray neo-conservatives as revolutionary rightists and that is the paradigm we should be looking at; they are not just conventional Republicans, but revolutionaries that seek to remake the world according to their principles.

  • I would like to know why at the very least congress has not demanded an independent council? I mean really, if they are not going to impeach, they could at least get some serious independent investigations going.

    As for Turd Blossom, if he had not become a political operative, I’m sure he would have ben a serial killer.

  • …they are not just conventional Republicans, but revolutionaries that seek to remake the world according to their principles.

    It’s Popper’s The Open Society and Its Enemies come back, this time to America.

    Anyone pushing One Big Theory of Everything is the enemy of democracy, the common man, and all that is good in the world.

  • Gee, I don’t know who Bush has been appointing, but all the former ambassadors I’ve met were certainly smart enough to get all the ‘understanding of the political landscape’ they needed by reading the papers, and watching TV, just like the rest of us. They probably would have been insulted by such a briefing.

    Now that the evidence is out that these briefings have been delivered all over the government, when are the Hatch Act prosecutions scheduled?? I appreciate Senator Biden’s dry wit, but I’d appreciate seeing some jail sentences more.

  • I wonder about the reactions of these diplomats, Peace Corps officials and others when they realized what was going on. Did any of them say, Hey, this is wrong, my department isn’t supposed to be politicized. Did any of them walk out. Or is this another example, like the former Surgeon General, saying I didn’t like it four years ago but I’m only telling you now.
    Just wonderin.

  • The Bush gang, which looks more and more like an organized crime family with each passing scandal…

    I happened to catch some of the “Untouchables” this last weekend on cable. Capone and his men were able to run roughshod all over Chicago because the police were either on their parole or too scared to do anything.

    It wasn’t until Sean Connery’s character showed up and started kicking ass and taking names that things started happening.

    Where, oh where is our “Sean Connery”?

  • I can see Rove standing in the middle of his office, greedily inhaling nitrous oxide out of a clear plastic half-mask attached via a clear plastic tube to a small cylindrical metal tank. His eyes are wide open and wild looking. He then removes the mask from his nose and mouth and loudly yells, “I’ll politicize anything that moves!”

  • Comments are closed.