‘Fixing’ FISA

On top of everything else that’s going on this week, the Senate is practically rushing through an overhaul of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), at the president’s behest.

Under pressure from President Bush, Democratic leaders in Congress are scrambling to pass legislation this week to expand the government’s electronic wiretapping powers.

Democratic leaders have expressed a new willingness to work with the White House to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to make it easier for the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on some purely foreign telephone calls and e-mail. Such a step now requires court approval.

“We hope our Republican counterparts will work together with us to fix the problem, rather than try again to gain partisan political advantage at the expense of our national security,” Harry Reid said in a statement Monday night.

That sounds fine, but there’s reason for some skepticism — and for the Senate to take its time on this one. The NYT reported that “Democrats appear to be worried that if they block such legislation, the White House will depict them as being weak on terrorism.”

First of all, the notion that lawmakers have to fear yet another ridiculous White House smear should hardly be a motivating factor. Second of all, every time Dems have rushed through national-security legislation at Bush’s behest, they’ve regretted it later.

In this case, we’re dealing with a particularly egregious problem. The White House has already conceded that it’s blowing off existing law, it won’t disclose to Congress the extent of its legally dubious surveillance efforts, and Congress is ready to hand over more power?

Here’s an idea: maybe Bush can start following the law before Congress starts amending it?

There’s some disagreement between Congress and the administration over the details. Consider this gem:

One obstacle to a deal this week is a disagreement between Democrats and the White House over how to audit the wiretapping of the foreign-to-foreign calls going through switches in the United States.

The Democrats have proposed that the eavesdropping be reviewed by the secret FISA court to make sure that it has not ensnared any Americans.

The administration has proposed that the attorney general perform the review.

Yes, Democrats want some kind of judicial oversight, while Bush wants Alberto Gonzales to ensure there are no abuses.

For more, the ACLU has put together a very helpful “Myth vs Fact” sheet, and McJoan and Jeralyn both have excellent posts on the subject.

Stay tuned.

as far as i’m concerned, until bush starts following the existing law and stops stonewalling everything this congress is trying to do, this legislation should be DOA. period.

  • I don’t think there should be one legislative response to this until the adnministration adequately discloses to the appropriate members of Congress what programs and activities they are currently using and engaging in, and what their current procedures are – and documentation for those procedures should be a must.

    I don’t understand why any member of Congress, regardless of party affiliation, would accept the word of an administration that has shown itself to view the truth as being whatever they have to say to get what they want.

    There’s too much playing fast-and-loose with privacy rights to give these people any more leeway.

  • The Democrats must craft the narrowest bill. If the Democrats give Bush nothing, the White House will go on the PR attack while they are out of town; if they produce something, Bush–of course–will complain that the bill isn’t enough. But, something is better than nothing, and after the August recess, Bush can ask for more if he wants more.

  • …the notion that lawmakers have to fear yet another ridiculous White House smear should hardly be a motivating factor…

    Indeed, but they’ve proven more than they’ve disproven the fact that they’re still afraid of being smeared. They better wise up, and fast.

    I sure hope this is a head-fake trap by Reid, and that he’s not seriously going to give a bunch of admitted criminals any more “benefit of the doubt”.

  • By all means, give more power to an administration that’s abused power at every turn.

    Bush screws the Democrats again, wipes his dick on the Constitution and then exits with, “Thanks, girls, I’ll be back!”

  • What if Harry writes into this law explicit checks and balances?

    Tougher ones even than FISA?

    Could we get Republicans to veto/filibuster a security AND civil rights??? Amendments could deliver the Dems a beautiful two-fer. Be careful what you ask for Dubya….

    OR, he can sign it with a signing statement and take his chances in the impeachment trial (assuming it could happen)

  • Maybe Harry Reid is pulling a reverse Specter: Support the White House, but then when it’s time to enact legislation, vote AGAINST the White House.

    .

  • The right is going to blame the next attack on Democrats regardless, so Dems might as well do the right thing. Write in some real protections — with real oversight — or tell the WH to shove it.

  • Reid and the Dem leadership sure as hell better not rush anything through with respect to FISA, or anything else that this Administration wants to do with respect to anything even remotely related to or affecting civil liberties. I could not care less that they’re getting ‘pressure from the White House.’

    As stated above, this had better be a head fake; if the Dems cave on this, I have to say I’ve had about enough of this country. It is the few true patriots within the Democratic side (e.g., Feingold, Webb) that keep hope alive in this American for a return to liberty, such that we can begin to repair what these criminals have done. We’re already set back a decade or more on our national progress, this grand democratic experiment. I am not of a mind to wait much longer.

  • Perhaps if Mr. Bush would like Congress to do something, he might suggest his good friend Harriet show up for her damn appearance.

    Harry Reid’s response to Bush’s proposal should have been a loud belly laugh. We have documentation that they’ve been abusing national security letters, the AG won’t come clean on wiretapping or any of the other scandals at the DOJ, al Qaeda is thriving in Pakistan, and Bush wants us to think the problem is in the FISA law? Come on! It’s ridiculous.

  • Exhibit A in the Annals of Rushed Security Legislation We Now Regret: the Patriot Act renewal, perhaps now better described as the Prosecutor Politicization Enabling Act. That’s the bill that contained the Specter-inserted clause allowing ‘temporary’ U.S. Attorneys to retain office w/o confirmation … ever. Hey — what could happen, eh?

    Any lawmaker who offers to approve White House language on FISA — a part of the US Code the administration conspicuously ignored until, oh, last week — deserves a complimentary pair of Bad Idea Jeans™.

  • If I didn’t know already that Bush was delusional, this proves it. Whether or not he has faith in Fredo is beside the point. Fredo is up sh**s creek with no paddle and to think, even on lots of drugs or in the reality on the other side of the looking glass, that Congress is going to say “OK” when Fredo is the AG is freakin’ insane. Seriously. Does Bush not get that the GOP no longer runs Congress. Sure they can put the break on things they don’t like and accuse the Democrats of being obstructionists, but they would have to be the ones to put this on the table, and I just can’t see the Democrats letting that proposal go anywhere. I can see them laugh, of course, but that proposal is DOA.

  • I respectfully suggest that the Democrats see themselves being handed a rare opportunity – an enormous usurpation of citizens rights that can be blamed entirely on Bush (rightly so), but which will hand equally enormous power to his Democratic successor. As much as the Democrats may squeal about Bush’s unprecedented wielding of executive power, there’s not a one of them who doesn’t think that’s exactly what a president needs.

  • WHAT IS MISSING THAT JOSH MARSHALL SPEAKS OF IN TRYING TO DETERMINE WHAT PROGRAM ASHCROFT WAS TO SIGN OFF ON WHILE HE WAS SEDATED…..

    They wanted Ashcroft sedated because they knew he would never sign off on THIS program. They planned on being able to send everyone out of the room calling it “top secret” just to get a signature which they knew they could later justify.

    No one is telling those even cleared to hear about this program, which is so illegal, so corrupt and so un-American the mere thought of someone trying to do it would send the nation into an outrage.

    The program was not just to wire-tap and eavesdrop on Americans but to also round up dissenters and those suspected of cooperating with or emboldening 9/11 terrorists, plus those of Muslim dissent and putting them in FEMA camps which were already operational.
    Think I’m crazy…Name one other thing Ashcroft would NOT have signed off on…anything.
    Look at half the people they held for years at Gitmo who were completely innocent.
    During the years in question, 2002-2005, during the early part the federal government began building, working on, and readying FEMA camps across the US.
    The patriot act was already in place and all they needed was the signature of the AG.
    Why do you think Mueller gets that funny smile on his face talking about the hospital visit? What would make Comey so fearful he would not go to the WH for a meeting alone??? This is the only thing that would make the upper echelon of the DoJ threaten to resign. No one would sign off on a program like this because it would lead to the end of our Democracy no matter what assurances the WH were to give about only rounding up Muslims and suspected terrorist sympathizers.
    I wish congress would try to get someone to deny it, that that wasn’t the program. It’s the missing link Josh Marshall was looking for. The missing piece of the puzzle so damaging as to cause such an uproar and still explain why currently no one will talk about it. Just saying…

  • as far as i’m concerned, until bush and the rest of the Republican’ts start following the existing law and stop stonewalling everything this congress is trying to do, any Republican’t requested legislation should be DOA. period.

    Fixed.

  • Comments are closed.