Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Awful news out of Iraq from Reuters: “At least 175 people were killed when three suicide bombers driving fuel tankers attacked a town, home to an ancient minority sect, in northern Iraq on Tuesday in one of the worst single incidents in the four-year-old war. Iraqi army Captain Mohammad al-Jaad said at least another 200 people were wounded in the bombings in separate Yazidi neighborhoods in the town of Kahtaniya, west of Mosul.”

* Gen. George Casey, the former top commander in Iraq and now the Army Chief of Staff, at the National Press Club today: “Right now, there’s so much residual mistrust left over from the time under Saddam Hussein that they’re not quite ready to go forward. But they have an educated population, they have oil wells, they have water, they have some of the most fertile land I’ve ever seen. In a decade or so, this will be a remarkable country, if we stick with it.” Yes, he really did say “a decade or so.” Ready for another 20 Friedman Units?

* Dennis Hastert, the longest-serving Republican House Speaker in the chamber’s history, is calling it quits: “After less than a year as a rank-and-file House member, former Speaker J. Dennis Hastert is expected to call an end to a political career that made him the longest serving Republican Speaker in the history of the House of Representatives. Several Illinois newspapers, including the Aurora Beacon News and the Chicago Tribune, reported Tuesday that the Illinois Republican has scheduled a Friday announcement…. [H]e is expected to announce that he will not run for a 12th term in 2008, according to Republican sources.” Hastert will be best remembered for his work on … or maybe his leadership during … or perhaps his commitment to … well, I’m sure he’ll be remembered for something; I just don’t know what.

* Following the blogs’ lead, the New York Post picked up on Chris Matthews’ creepy on-air treatment of CNBC anchor Erin Burnett today, quoting Matthews as saying “he was only fooling around with Burnett because the camera lens had already made her appear closer than usual.” The article then quoted Matthews saying, “It was this weird fishbowl look . . . I was just kidding around.” I don’t think that counts as an apology.

* Last week, Rudy Giuliani committed what should have been a humiliating gaffe when he insisted that he was one of the 9/11 rescue workers who had spent as much time at Ground Zero, if not more, than the clean-up and recovery teams who spent 40 hours a week there for a year. Greg Sargent raised a great question: what kind of coverage did Giuliani’s obvious lie generate among the political pundits? The answer: not much.

* No one can accuse Pat Leahy of failing to try: “Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), at the urging of the panel’s ranking member, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), on Tuesday requested a meeting with President Bush to hammer out a deal that would allow key White House aides to testify before the panel on the firing of several U.S. attorneys. Leahy indicated that this is a last-ditch effort, saying that his previous efforts to get the White House to cooperate have failed to yield results.” This one could fail, too, but Leahy’s is taking his due diligence seriously.

* Reuters: “Lobby groups must ensure they get their facts straight, Britain’s advertising watchdog has warned after finding that the Save Darfur Coalition could not substantiate its claim of 400,000 deaths in the Sudanese region. Made up from dozens of faith-based and advocacy organisations and backed by celebrities such as Mia Farrow and George Clooney, the US-based Save Darfur Coalition has been credited with drawing international attention to the situation in Sudan’s war-torn west. But Britain’s Advertising Standards Authority said in a ruling last week that recent adverts saying that 400,000 people had died in violence that the coalition blames on the Sudanese government went too far.”

* I don’t think prominent neoconservative Victor Davis Hanson knows what a “paper tiger” is.

* Right-wing personality John Gibson mocked Jon Stewart today on his radio show. If we’re really lucky, Stewart will respond on The Daily Show.

* Arianna Huffington think the media is neglecting a vital part of the Utah mine collapse story.

* NYT: “Five reporters must testify about their law enforcement sources in a former Army scientist’s lawsuit against the Justice Department, a federal judge in Washington ruled yesterday. The suit, filed by Steven J. Hatfill, a bioterrorism expert, contends that the government violated the federal Privacy Act by providing journalists with information about him in the F.B.I.’s investigation of the deadly anthrax mailings in 2001.”

* New man-crush for Chris Matthews: “On the August 13 edition of MSNBC’s Hardball, during an interview with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, host Chris Matthews said: ‘Let me ask you about Mitt Romney. You know, I watched him on the today show this morning. He looks like a million bucks. Everything is perfect. Everything about him is perfect.’ As examples, Matthews cited Romney’s ‘look,’ his ‘manner,’ and his ‘shirt.'”

* And finally, the “macaca” story broke exactly one year ago today. And with it, the YouTube era was born.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Awful news out of Iraq

Don’t think of it as “awful news,” CB. Think of it as “glimmers of progress.” Think of all those people that were not killed or maimed. Turn that frown upside-down.

  • Like John Gibbons has any right to goof on any other human being. I guess he’s sore from all the reamings he got from Stephen Colbert for goofing on his war on X-mas, his war on logic, his war on sanity, his war on birth control, his war on latinos and his war on himself.

  • Following the blogs’ lead, the New York Post picked up on Chris Matthews’ creepy on-air treatment of CNBC anchor Erin Burnett today, quoting Matthews as saying “he was only fooling around with Burnett because the camera lens had already made her appear closer than usual.” The article then quoted Matthews saying, “It was this weird fishbowl look . . . I was just kidding around.” I don’t think that counts as an apology.

    You know, if someone wanted my opinion, I’d say he was being a dick, but it was far from anything indisputable. That’s why I thought the comments about sexual harassment and her suing him were dumb- what, is it sexual harassment every time there’s one incident between two people of one of them telling the other that s/he looked good? At the least it was poor judgment and at the most, it was disrespectful. What I thought was dumb was how Burnett played along with it- she ended up smiling, like she thought he was flirting with her and was flattered. My second guess would be that she thought he was being a dick and was going to let him have it, but held back- but that would only be my second guess. It’s interesting how many comments yesterday jumped the gun and started talking about her suing him after she acted like that.

  • Swan – I would probably say that Matthews was being a buffoon. I don’t think he was being intentionally offensive. I was actually more offended by it than my wife was. Matthews talks so flippin’ fast that his buffoonery comes and goes and you might have missed it.

  • * Awful news out of Iraq from Reuters: “At least 175 people were killed when three suicide bombers driving fuel tankers attacked a town

    The good news is that fuel delivery is improving.

  • I’m confused. What happened to questions and investigations of Dennis Hastert passing cash around on the House floor? Isn’t he one of the main subjects of the suppressed, classified, gagged by AG Ashcroft and Gonzales, testimony of whistle blower Sibil Edmonds concerning money laundering from major drug sales and the sale of state secrets involving the State Dept.

    Testimony so damaging that when it was heard by Ashcroft it immediately became classified and a gag order was placed on Edmonds.
    Perhaps we are yet to learn what Hastert will be most remembered for, I mean besides the obvious authoritarian bigot who spent years trying to prove that government doesn’t work.

  • Swan, people smile for a lot of reasons in different situations. To me it looked like she was initially confused (by his “move closer to the camera” idiocy) and then uncomfortable. I’m not going to assume she must have liked it just because she didn’t call out a highly paid media star on his own national TV show.

  • Since the thread is open. . .

    Many here lament that no candidates are running on the issue of saving/restoring our Constitution. Its a legitimate gripe.

    So just t oreassure everyone that this issue is getting attention, however below the radar, I share a story from the Iowa State Fair. It was on NPR’s All Things Considered this evening, but I can’t find a clip on their website.

    The fair has a “soapbox,” and politicians can scedhule time to come speak. Either yesterday or today, Sen. Chris Dodd took his turn. He told the crowd that if elected, he would have three priorities:

    1) Education – affordable and accessible to all (and he gave various specifics)
    2) National Service – expanding Americorps, Peace Corps, etc.

    then he launched into how for 25 years he’s carried a small copy of the Constitution in his pocket, how he loves that document and how his other top priority, would be

    3) Preserving and protecting our Constitution and turning around the hundreds of tears this administration has put in it, and in the protections it provides us.

    JKap, we can now offer you a Democratic alternative to Ron Paul.

  • KC, in a world full of dickhead predators, it’s important to know how to act– it’s kind of like how all those guys believe that not complaining about something is the same as consenting to something, so, even if you shouldn’t really have to complain, it’s just smarter to learn to always complain to someone whenever you feel pushed around by anybody, as soon as possible. So why should you make something that’s already ambiguous more ambiguous can make it worse? I’m not blaming her for what happened- because nothing really happened. I’m just saying that the ambiguity can tend to show it.

    It’s kind of like calling something a “borderline stalking.” Translation: “It wasn’t stalking, but I’m calling it stalking.” There are some things you just don’t accuse people of, unless they definitely did it. Like no one talks about “bordeline” murder.

  • I wrote:

    So why should you make something that’s already ambiguous more ambiguous can make it worse?

    Oops– shoulda been: So why should you make something that’s already ambiguous more ambiguous when making it more ambiguous can make it worse?

    Ugh…

  • Arianna Huffington think the media is neglecting a vital part of the Utah mine collapse story.

    Arianna Huffington is right. Everyone is letting Murray write the story, when all it takes is 10 seconds of the clip of him lecturing Feinstein during a hearing to see where this guy is coming from. There’s the angle of him personally, of methods employed within the mine and MISHA oversight (or lack thereof).

    My sense is that reporters are hesitant to get to those aspects until the fate of the miners is known, and that afterwards, they’ll get into the rest of the story. Of course, my theory holds only so long as no blonde bimbo disappears, shaves her head, get’s caught shoplifting, speeding, sans-panties…

  • Right now, there’s so much residual mistrust left over from the time under Saddam Hussein that they’re not quite ready to go forward.

    Oh yes, that’s the problem. “Residual mistrust,” caused by Hussein. The unjustified invasion, occupying forces, lack of basic services, never ending fear that you’ll be snatched and tortured by your neighbors (or foreign soldiers) along with a god-damned civil war have NOTHING to do with the fact people are … did he really say “not quite ready to go forward”? He did.

    But they have an educated population, they have oil wells, they have water, they have some of the most fertile land I’ve ever seen.

    Well gee, sounds like it was a paradise. What happened to it? Oh yes, some coke-snorting evil shit of a bastard decided the war in Afghanistan wasn’t exciting enough and it was time to frag the cradle of civilization. Care to comment General?

    It also appears Casey hasn’t seen the stats on the number of refugees pouring out of Iraq. Apparently he expects the Educated Population to squat in camps in Syria, Jordan etc for the next two decades and then march back to work the minute we give the all clear. Is he by chance any relation to Barbara Bush?

    Dumb. Mother. Fucker.

    Hastert will be best remembered for …

    I’m hoping FoleyGate, particularly his conspiracy theory moment on Flush Limpbags.

    Gods, he’s like a caricature of the GOP. A fat, bloated, gibbering moron who spends half his time braying nonsens and the other half lumbering around looking for something big enough to cover his ass.

  • I guess that without Tom DeLay’s arm so far up his fat ass, Hastert couldn’t stand up on his own.

    (I’m sorry… it’s just very rare that such a metaphor works so well both literally and figuratively.)

  • Greg Sargent raised a great question: what kind of coverage did Giuliani’s obvious lie generate among the political pundits? The answer: not much. — CB

    You can always count on NYT’s Krugman, bless his liberal heart. He nailed both Mittler *and* Giulia yesterday. True, a bit later than the blogs did, but…

  • Victor Davis Hanson – Card carrying member in the Cult of WarLuv, (via Wikipedia):

    According to Hanson, Western values such as political freedom, capitalism, individualism, democracy, scientific inquiry, rationalism, and open debate form an especially lethal combination when applied to warfare. Non-Western societies can win the occasional victory when warring against a society with these Western values, writes Hanson, but the “Western way of war” will prevail in the long run. Hanson emphasizes that Western warfare is not necessarily more (or less) moral than war as practiced by other cultures; his argument is simply that the “Western way of war” is unequalled in its devastation and decisiveness.

    _____________________________________

    True or False…Victor David Hanson has served in the military and experienced war firsthand in his lifetime. You know the answer. But he is a military historian. A scholar I think they call it. Bravely fighting his superior war from behind a podium.

  • I wonder if Hastert’s leaving Congress has anything to do with that swami-guru-‘vangee fellow that visited his house a while back? It’s hard to imagine “Shamu Dennis” as having a soul, though….

  • his argument is simply that the “Western way of war” is unequalled in its devastation and decisiveness.

    So what is his excuse for Mess’o’potamia? Uh…uh…the soldiers have jet lag and aren’t able to mount a proper Western Way of War!

    I guess this military historian would also tell us that Sun-Tzu was originally from a small village in Germany but he moved to China to write the Art of War:

    “The Art of War is one of the oldest books on military strategy in the world. It is also one of the most famous studies of strategy and has had a huge influence on Eastern and Western military planning, business tactics, and beyond.”

    So the Western Way of War is based on the Eastern Way of War but the Western Way of War is still better because…?

    The world is full of sad, sad men.

    GeekNote: If you haven’t, check out the Art of War. You can find copies online and it will give you some insight into why little Georgie’s Most Excellent Iraqi Adventure was fucked from the start.

  • If I had to guess, and based on the breadth of his ass, I’d say Dennis Hastert will be remembered for mowing through the dessert table with the focused determination of an A-10 Thunderbolt. That, and the ability to smell a calorie the way a pig sniffs out subterranean truffles.

    I know, that’s just mean. Let he among you who is without sin cast the first stone.

  • Thanks, zeitgeist @ #10

    I’m not familiar with Chris Dodd although I had seen some positive things about him. Your post makes me want to know more, which I will find out in due time.

    Too bad the “more competitive candidates” didn’t stump on preserving and protecting our Constitution — I for one would be very excited to see that advent.

    All power to the people!

  • Comments are closed.