Friday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, announced yesterday that he no longer shares the president’s vision for a democracy in Iraq. “You’ve got a culture where democracy is not part of, ‘Let’s go there,’ ” Hoekstra said. “It was a stretch.” He insists U.S. troops should stay indefinitely, but only to create a stable Iraq, not to create a free Iraq.

* I’ve never been entirely clear on why Barack Obama’s position on attacking terrorists in Pakistan was so controversial, but the AP notes that newly uncovered “rules of engagement” show the “U.S. military gave elite units broad authority more than three years ago to pursue suspected terrorists into Pakistan, with no mention of telling the Pakistanis in advance.” In other words, the media and political world freaked out because Obama expressed his support for existing U.S. policy. Odd.

* If you haven’t heard about Matt Stoller and Open Left’s “Bush Dog” campaign, it’s garnering an increasing amount of attention.

* Congrats to Cenk Uygur of the Young Turks for launching his new “Meet the Bloggers” show, patterned after “Meet the Press.” Today was the inaugural episode, featuring a great panel: Joan McCarter, John Amato, and Lane Hudson.

* Another top Justice Department official has announced his resignation: Wan Kim, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. Kim wasn’t nearly as controversial as some of his more ridiculous colleagues, but as Paul Kiel noted, “[T]he Division continued in the direction set by the prior Bush years under Kim’s direction, often pursuing causes favored by conservatives (such as religious discrimination and human trafficking) to the detriment of the Division’s traditional emphasis (such as protecting African-Americans from discrimination).”

* The WaPo had an interesting front-page item today, highlighting the Bush administration’s effort to have U.S. businesses purchase more Iraqi products. It’s a bit of a tough sell (literally and figuratively) given that Iraq isn’t producing a lot of goods right now. Bush has tapped an official to oversee the project who is currently under investigation by the Pentagon’s Inspector General for “erratic behavior, public drunkenness, mismanagement, waste of funds and sexual harassment.”

* Mark Foley’s reputation will never recover, but he’s not going to jail: “Former Rep. Mark Foley, the Florida Republican who resigned his seat last fall after it was revealed he sent sexually explicit e-mails to underage House pages, is unlikely to face criminal charges for his behavior, Scripps Howard News Service reports. The news agency reports federal investigators have been unable to gather enough evidence to prove Foley, 52, intended to ‘seduce, solicit, lure, entice, or attempt to seduce a child,’ with his inappropriate contacts.”

* Roger Stone can explain those awful calls from his phone to Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s father: someone broke into his house, and made the call using some sort of replication of his voice. His alibi: he was at a play the same time as the call. (The play happened to be off that night.)

* Score one for common-sense budgeting: “Millions of dollars later, Congress has effectively killed a military plane program the Pentagon repeatedly rejected, and which never had a successful flight. The $63 million Congress poured into the DP2 program over 20 years was not requested by the Department of Defense. Instead, it was mandated through obscure provisions in bills known as ‘earmarks.’ Most of those earmarks for the DP2 were inserted by Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., in whose district the plane was designed and built, in prototype.”

* With all the awful news coming out of Iraq about security and political reconciliation, let’s also not overlook the genuine refugee crisis. The U.N. migration office has labeled it the “worst human displacement in Iraq’s modern history” — and given the country’s modern history, that’s very discouraging.

* NYT: “The Bush administration is set to issue a regulation on Friday that would enshrine the coal mining practice of mountaintop removal. The technique involves blasting off the tops of mountains and dumping the rubble into valleys and streams. It has been used in Appalachian coal country for 20 years under a cloud of legal and regulatory confusion. The new rule would allow the practice to continue and expand, providing only that mine operators minimize the debris and cause the least environmental harm, although those terms are not clearly defined and to some extent merely restate existing law.”

* I knew some teenager would crack the iPhone eventually.

* Edwards vs. Coulter, Round III.

* Media Matters is launching a worthwhile pushback against Rush Limbaugh’s assertion that only black people care about the crisis in Darfur.

* Paul Krugman: “[I]f you look at the political successes of the G.O.P. since it was taken over by movement conservatives, they had very little to do with public opposition to taxes, moral values, perceived strength on national security, or any of the other explanations usually offered. To an almost embarrassing extent, they all come down to just five words: southern whites starting voting Republican.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

* The WaPo had an interesting front-page item today, highlighting the Bush administration’s effort to have U.S. business purchase more Iraqi products. It’s a bit of a tough sell (literally and figuratively) given that Iraq isn’t producing a lot of goods right now. Bush has tapped an official to oversee the project who is currently under investigation by the Pentagon’s Inspector General for “erratic behavior, public drunkenness, mismanagement, waste of funds and sexual harassment.”

How you say? Cowboy diplomacy? (Apologies to actual cowboys)

Roger Stone can explain those awful calls from his phone to Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s grandfather: someone broke into his house, and made the call using some sort of replication of his voice. His alibi: he was at a play the same time as the call. (The play happened to be off that night.)

The repubs are so used to lying that they no longer check to see if their lies make sense.

  • Bush has tapped an official to oversee the project who is currently under investigation by the Pentagon’s Inspector General for “erratic behavior, public drunkenness, mismanagement, waste of funds and sexual harassment.”

    Sounds like a perfect, textbook, upstanding, Right Wing Republican to me. No wonder he got the job.

  • The Bush Blue Dog article gives hope that the more we can point out exactly which Democrats are actually Republicans in disguise, the better chance we have of getting rid of them. They are the ones who are destroying the unity of the Democratic party by voting with the republicans on all the major issues. It’s like calling Lieberman a Democrat.

    I hope the same process will happen with the Senators, though there are less of them who are overly conservative and they stick out unlike the newbees in the House.

    We have interfered in Iraq far too long. Bush will not leave until he is forced to leave. Only the senate can force him to withdraw. Bush will hold the troops hostage to blackmail congress for the funding to continue policing or refereeing a civil war, “forcing” them to fight and die for his mistakes.

  • ~~~~~~~~

    In other words, the media and political world freaked out because Obama expressed his support for existing U.S. policy.

    This is both true and false.

    True: It is existing US policy.
    False: That Bush-Cheney would get bin Laden if they thought they could.

    Ergo the real US policy is just this:

    Osama bin Laden has more value to Bush-Cheney alive than dead.

    Sorry. But yes, I really believe that.
    And no, I don’t believe any of that poppycock about 9/11 buildings falling because of secretly placed explosives. That’s UFOs in Area 51 voodoo Harry-Potter crap…

    But I do believe that Bush-Cheney realized early on that having a credible overt enemy-wolf was in there best political interests. Especially one that drools Christian blood.

    That’s why they haven’t pursued bin Laden to the ends of the earth.

    I suspect that history will eventually prove me right.
    It may take 10-20 years for the truth to leak out…
    But out it will leak…

    And this post will long be forgotten.
    Fair enough.
    I’ve been right in the past often enough to not give a damn…

  • Time to place your bets.

    1. How long before some fRight Winger claims this proves military abuse of prisoners isn’t that different from basic training?

    In one incident, Sgt. Jerrod M. Glass allegedly ordered a recruit to jump head-first into a trash can and then pushed him further into the container, according to court documents cited in The San Diego Union-Tribune. He is also accused of striking recruits with a tent pole and a heavy flashlight.

    2. How long before some fRight Winger claims this fellow is lucky to be in the US and has a lot of gall to complain about being locked up for a measly eight days?

    The Justice Department has apologized and paid $250,000 to an Iraqi refugee wrongly detained in 2003 when he stepped off an Amtrak train in Montana to stretch his legs, according to a settlement agreement released Thursday.

    Background:

    U.S. customs agents rushed up and demanded to know where he was from. “Iraq,” Habeeb replied.

    Habeeb, who is Muslim, showed officials his immigration papers, which indicated he was a refugee. But the agents insisted he had to comply with a “special registration” and arrested him.

  • Since it’s an open thread, I thought I’d give a heads-up that another school is about to join Liberty and Regent in churning out right-wing lawyers.

    School Promises Army Of Conservative Christian Lawyers

    (Baton Rouge, Louisiana) Louisiana College plans to establish a law school with a “biblical worldview” that aims to train defenders of conservative Christian values.

    Louisiana College, a 1,000-student school in Pineville, expects to hire a law dean next year and enroll up to 40 students in 2009, eventually building enough capacity to enroll 300 students. The school will seek accreditation from the American Bar Association.

    Just what we need.

  • Re: ROTFL @ #5

    You’re really going out on a limb there. Osama bin Laden the boogeyman? Who would have thunk it?

    By the way, the NIST “considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse” of World Trade Center 7 is poppycock (although, the collapse of World Trade Center 7 was omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report).

    But we all rest assured, our Dear Leaders. Dick&Bush, gave a full, truthful, and accurate account of the events surrounding 9/11 to the 9/11 Commission, although their testimony was given together, in private, not under oath, and without transcript. And we all know that the 9/11 Commission was adequately funded to conduct an extensive investigation and “prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.” However, we spend 27 times more each day on the U.S. Military Occupation of Iraq and Dick’s Private Empire ($400M) than was allocated for the entire 9/11 Commission ($15M).

    I know, this is all UFOs in Area 51 voodoo Harry-Potter crap to you and not empirical facts. So much for the “Reality-Based” Community. So much of our foreign and domestic policy have been and continue to be based on the aftermath of the events of 9/11 –but this is the level of discourse on the subject. Pfff.

  • ~~~~~~~~~~

    Danny Thomas you are now #2.
    John Stewart has superseded you:

    Best. Spit-take. Ever.

    @JoeKap:
    Going out on the limb in this regard:
    Predicting that Bush-Cheney deliberated and decided that Osama was better left alive.
    In other words: Malfeasance not incompetence.
    You and I may sense this depravity… but we are but 2 out of a every million.
    It is a very thin limb…

  • Re: ROTFL @ #9

    It’s not much of a stretch when you consider Bush’s remarks of September 13, 2001:

    “The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him.”

    Then, of December 28, 2001 (required reading):

    MARGARET WARNER: President Bush is on vacation at his ranch in Texas, but he was briefed on the Afghan campaign today by Commanding General Tommy Franks, who just returned from the region. Afterwards, the two met outside with reporters. The President was asked about whether he’d seen the latest bin laden videotapes. He was also asked about leaked reports that the administration’s military tribunals would require a unanimous verdict for the death penalty.

    PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: I didn’t watch it all. I saw snippets of it on TV. You know, who knows when it was made. Secondly, he is not escaping us. I mean, this is a guy who three months ago was in control of a country. Now he’s maybe in control of a cave. He’s on the run. Listen, a while ago I said to the American people our objective is more than bin Laden. But one of the things for certain is we’re going to get him running and keep him running and bring him to justice. And that’s what’s happening. He’s on the run, if he’s running at all. So we don’t know whether he’s in a cave with the door shut or in a cave with a door open. We just don’t know. There’s all kinds of reports and all kind of speculation. But one thing we know is that he’s not in charge of Afghanistan anymore. He’s not in charge of the… He’s not the parasite that invaded the host, the Taliban. That — we know that for certain. We also know that we’re on the hunt, and he knows we’re on the hunt. And I like our position better than his. In terms of whether or not the tribunals will be able to render the justice necessary, that… You know, I spoke to the Secretary of Defense today about the story in the newspaper. Evidently, somebody in our government wanted to show off to his or her family in between Christmas and New Year’s by leaking information in the press that he or she thought would be helpful to the government. The truth of the matter is, the Secretary of Defense hadn’t even seen the report that was on the front page of America’s newspapers. So my answer to the question, Scott, is I know that the leaked report is preliminary; that they’re still in discussions about how best to bring justice. One thing is for certain: That whatever the procedures are for the military tribunals, our system will be more fair than the system of bin Laden and the Taliban. That is for certain. The prisoners that we capture will be given a heck of a lot better chance in court than those citizens of ours who were in the World Trade Center or in the Pentagon were given by Mr. bin Laden.

    And finally his remarks of March 13, 2002:

    “You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him [bin Laden], Kelly, to be honest with you. […] I’ll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him.”

    So, what happened in the meantime that took bin Laden from number one priority to of little concern? Do you think that they could not locate him? Look at the consumer technology of Google Earth. Now imagine the technology available to our government. A marked man on kidney dialysis in a cave cannot out-smart the U.S. Corporate Military Industrial Government

    He’s either dead or the Bush Laden Crime Family has intentionally let him survive and manipulated his legend as a boogeyman (or both).

  • Comments are closed.