Friday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* There’s no such thing as the Petraeus report, but there is a new White House report: “The White House told Congress Friday that Iraqi leaders gained little new ground on key military and political goals, a discouraging assessment a day after President Bush announced that progress justifies keeping a large U.S. military presence there. The report underscored the difficulty of Bush’s argument that continued American sacrifice was creating space for Iraqi leaders to make gains on tamping down the sectarian fighting that leaves Iraq persistently fractured and violent.”

* Not only is Sen. Ted Stevens’ (R-Alaska) career in jeopardy, but so is his standing as a free man: “Former VECO Corp. CEO Bill Allen admitted Friday to using company funds to pay some of the construction costs associated with Sen. Ted Stevens’ (R-Alaska) home remodeling project as well as using a small number of company employees to do the work.” Stevens’ office doesn’t know how to respond.

* Every network that covered the president’s speech last night also showed viewers the Democratic response from Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) — except one. Care to guess?

* Speaking of the White House address last night: “All networks shared the same pool video of Bush from the Oval Office. Perhaps in an effort to make its coverage look distinctive, CNN pulled a very questionable stunt during the speech. Bush made reference to a brave soldier, Brandon Stout, who died while serving in Iraq, and CNN, having received a copy of the text in advance, obligingly inserted a photo of Stout into the picture, moving Bush slightly to the left, as it were. But it’s not the job of news organizations to help politicians, even presidents, embellish their speeches or assist them in making a point.”

* Disgusting: “A Michigan lawyer who sexually attacked a 21-year-old woman at a Young Republicans convention here said Thursday that he disgraced himself, his family and his political party. Michael Flory, 33, of Jackson, Mich., told a Cuyahoga County Common Pleas judge that his humiliation and self-destruction should be punishment enough for his guilty plea to a sexual- battery charge. Judge Peter Corrigan couldn’t have disagreed more.” Good.

* According to Sen. John Inhofe (R-Okla.), when Sen. John Warner (R-Va.) recommends bringing 5,000 troops home by Christmas, he’s awful; when Bush says the same thing, he’s wise.

* CREW: “Congress in the midst of debating legislation to re-authorize the controversial “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) program. A three-month long investigation by CREW raises serious questions about the use of NCLB funds to pay for products sold by Neil Bush, the younger brother of President George Bush.”

* I suppose it’s possible to read a less complimentary review of Mark Penn’s new book than Ezra Klein’s take, but I can’t see how.

* Spencer Ackerman apparently spent quite a bit of time this afternoon trying to figure out which 36 countries Bush was referring to as part of the Multi-National Forces Iraq. He seems to have put the picture together, but it hardly helps Bush’s case.

* On a related note, one of the 36 is Iceland, which is pulling its one person from Iraq as of October 1. Not one percent, mind you, one guy.

* Elizabeth Edwards has been fairly aggressive on the campaign trail the last several months, but I was a little surprised to see her direct her criticism towards MoveOn.org.

* There’s been some talk in The Hill and elsewhere about a new Rasmussen poll supporting the Bush/Petraeus policy for Iraq. The poll’s question is very misleading, which makes the results rather useless.

* Kudos to Bush’s science advisor for ignoring his boss’ agenda: “In an interview with the BBC, Professor John Marburger, Bush’s chief science adviser, said it was an ‘unequivocal’ fact that climate change is man-made and that greenhouse gases emitted by human activity are to blame. Marburger said he ‘strongly agrees’ with the IPCC reports and ‘supports its conclusions.'”

* NYT: “Douglas A. Macgregor, a retired Army colonel and a critic of the Bush administration’s handling of Iraq called General Petraeus’s testimony ‘another deceitful attempt on the part of the generals and their political masters to extend our stay in the country long enough until Bush leaves office.'” Maybe Giuliani should try and smear Col. Macgregor, too?

* And finally, the caption on Fred Thompson’s high-school yearbook photo: “The lazier a man is, the more he plans to do tomorrow.” So true, so true.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Zombie alert!
Today’s column from Washington Post Writers’ Group Kathleen Parker contains this zombie:

The U.S. has suffered no terrorist attacks since 2001

Not quite. The anthrax attacks soon after 9/11 were pretty terrifying to the nation, and claimed quite a few lives. Sounds like a “terrorist attack” to me. (And they were never solved.)

  • Every network that covered the president’s speech last night also showed viewers the Democratic response from Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) — except one. Care to guess?

    I guess we live in a one-party state, huh?

  • There’s been some talk in The Hill and elsewhere about a new Rasmussen poll supporting the Bush/Petraeus policy for Iraq. The poll’s question is very misleading,

    For all you non-clickers out there, the poll only gave an “unsure” option, and “favor”/”oppose” options for responding to Petraeus’ “plan” to withdraw 30,000 troops but leave 130,000 troops in place; according to Media Matters,

    “When other options are provided [in other polls they quote from], polls show strong support for a greater withdrawal.” A Fox news poll that provided an option for whether respondents favor pulling out immediately showed 22% support for that option.

  • *** * Every network that covered the president’s speech last night also showed viewers the Democratic response from Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) — except one. Care to guess?***

    Allow me to correct the mis-statement. Every network that covered the president’s speech last night also showed viewers the Democratic response from Sen. Jack reed (D-R.I.).

    Period.

    FraudNews does not constitute ” a network.” They are a semi-quasi-network-esque tabloid. They are the armpit/rectal orifice/ cowpie of pretentious blithering blah masquerading as a “network.”

    If FraudNews is a network, then Ho Chi Mihn was a capitalistic neoconservative ReThuglican, and Josef Stalin was Prescott Bush’s sexual partner.

    Any comments from our “resident” right-wing panderers?

  • Every network that covered the president’s speech last night also showed viewers the Democratic response from Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) — except one. Care to guess?

    Now that’s what I call Fair and Balanced. Did they air the response of “Osama bin Laden” instead?

  • Perhaps there is an opportunity here. The more Democrats shun Fox, the more Fox will expose itself as the propaganda organ that it is. By responding to Democratic contempt with ever more clearly far from ‘fair and balanced’ reporting, Fox may discredit itself to most Americans.

  • CB wrote: “Stevens’ office doesn’t know how to respond.”

    If nobody else will say it, I will. Stevens responds with an emphatic, “NO!!!!”

    meander said: “The anthrax attacks soon after 9/11 were pretty terrifying to the nation, and claimed quite a few lives. Sounds like a “terrorist attack” to me. (And they were never solved.)”

    The DC sniper(s) was also after 9/11, wasn’t it? As I recall, the ‘plan’ was motivated by Islamic Jihad. However, they apparently didn’t kill enough people and weren’t dirty furriners, so they don’t count.

    This seems like the typical myopia that we usually hear from the Bush administration: the only relevant threat and fear comes from Al Qaeda, and nothing else matters. This is exactly the attitude that could lead to another devastating attack, by someone who Bush doesn’t consider a threat.

  • Please delete if this is a duplicate – I got a screen that said “oops – copy your comment and try again”

    I was just thanking you for noting the Michael Flory case. Here’s a first-person account which might explain why the area GOP folks, whom you’d expect where involved intimately with the event held in Cleveland in July 2006, have been 100% silent on the entire episode, from occurrance through sentencing.

    Also – I’d commented that in Spotlight, there’s a lot of info for the Plain Dealer that should be updated. I wanted to link to Spotlight from my blog but wanted to check on how much it’s being used and how accurate the rest of it – or is it in need of an update. Thanks.

  • Comments are closed.