Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* A bill to give the U.S. taxpayers who live in the District of Columbia a voting representative in the House of Representatives had majority support in the Senate today, but it wasn’t enough to overcome GOP obstructionist tactics. The bill’s 57-vote majority was three short of the total needed to end a Republican filibuster. Taxation without representation continues.

* The Federal Reserve cut the target on a key short-term interest rate by half of a percentage point today. Wall Street responded very favorably to the news, with the Dow Jones finishing up over 300 points.

* In related news, “The number of foreclosure filings reported in the U.S. last month more than doubled versus August 2006 and jumped 36 percent from July, a trend that signals many homeowners are increasingly unable to make timely payments on their mortgages or sell their homes amid a national housing slump.”

* U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose, who’s long been one of Bush’s more controversial prosecutors, is now under investigation from the Office of Special Counsel. There’s evidence that alleges that she “mishandled classified information, decided to fire the subordinate who called it to her attention, retaliated against others in the office who crossed her, and made racist remarks about one employee.”

* Marine Gen. Peter Pace, the outgoing Joint Chiefs chairman: “One of the mistakes I made in my assumptions going in was that the Iraqi people and the Iraqi army would welcome liberation, that the Iraqi army, given the opportunity, would stand together for the Iraqi people and be available to them to help serve the new nation.” That would be the army Cheney disbanded, right?

* Why is that the Defense Department’s civilian casualty figures and Gen. Petraeus’ figures don’t match? Inquiring minds want to know.

* When conservatives attack — each other: “Larry Klayman, the conservative lawyer best known for repeatedly taking the Clinton administration to court in the 1990s, sued supporters of the Bush administration yesterday, claiming they appropriated the name ‘Freedom’s Watch’ for use in a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign in support of the Iraq war.”

* When a contractor admits to bribing a U.S. senator, it should probably be a bigger deal. “[I]t’s not every day that a witness admits in open court to having bribed a sitting U.S. Senator, which is exactly what happened last Friday, when former VECO executive Bill Allen admitted that among the bad acts he had pleaded guilty to was renovation work done on Stevens’ Alaska home. Stevens is not commenting.”

* By arming both sides of a civil war, Bush is creating the conditions for some even more catastrophic bloodshed.

* This may come as a shock, but Fox News’ coverage of Gen. Petraeus’ testimony was heavily slanted in support of the administration’s policy. Who could’ve guessed?

* Richard Cohen’s column today was so dumb, I couldn’t even bring myself to write about it. Thankfully, Steve M. showed more patience and highlighted the column’s inanity.

* Every time CNN (or any network, for that matter) contrasts “anti-war protestors and troop supporters,” it hurts just a little more.

* The White House said Solicitor General Paul Clement would serve as Acting Attorney General pending confirmation of a permanent AG. That’s apparently no longer the case — Peter Keisler, “a hard-line movement conservative,” will now be taking over. That’s not necessarily a good thing.

* MoveOn’s hard-hitting new Giuliani ad, which lambastes the former mayor for blowing off the Iraq Study Group, is going national. Good.

* Reps. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) have all agreed to take the food stamp challenge.

* Ding dong, TimesSelect is dead.

* Thirteen House Republicans “have been served with subpoenas from defense attorneys representing Brent Wilkes, the former defense contractor charged with bribing imprisoned ex-Rep. Duke Cunningham (R-Calif.). None of the lawmakers will comply with the subpoena.”

* Quote of the Day, from Jonathan Zasloff: “If Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, and John McCain can’t stand up to Tavis Smiley, than how can they stand up to the terrorists?”

* Robert Samuelson doesn’t know what he’s talking about. I knew that, but it’s good to get the occasional reminder.

* And finally, in highly amusing television-rating news, the president’s prime-time speech on Iraq last week drew lower ratings on some networks than Sen. Jack Reed’s Democratic response. Tony Snow recently claimed, “My sense is that the American people want to hear what the President has to say.” Apparently, we’ve heard enough.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

“One of the mistakes I made in my assumptions going in was that the Iraqi people and the Iraqi army would welcome liberation… — Gen. Pace

Assumptions? You went in with assumptions? The thought of familiarizing yourself with the history of the region never occurred to you?

(Good riddance TimesSelect. I never knew ye!)

  • Those who voted against giving DC representation include Hagel (wow what a moderate!), Smith, Sununu, and Warner, so there will definitely be 60 votes for this in about a year.

    Hang in there, DC.

  • None of the lawmakers will comply with the subpoena.

    So much for the rule of law, eh? Are they claiming they are part of the executive branch? What’s going on here?

  • re: DOJ. The point of the latest kabuki was not Mukasey at all. The point is having Keisler stonewalling Dems’ document requests. If that delays Mukasey’s appointment, all the better.

  • what a wonderful day today is the feds cut interest rates the stock market goes up everyone will invest their 401s then wall street will collect thier commission and then the big shots in boardrooms all over america will sell their stocks and guess who loses their 401s

  • “One of the mistakes I made in my assumptions going in was that the Iraqi people and the Iraqi army would welcome liberation.”

    And then he sobbed: “Damn them for hoarding their flowers, candies and ponies!”

    Imagine. The Iraqi people had the nerve to get upset over an invasion predicated on the invaders’ insistence that they had nuclear-tipped nerve gas Anthrax bombs hidden in every tool shed.

    Yep, blaming them for this big old clusterfuck will really improve their opinion of their “liberators.”

    And since this is an open thread: What goes in the Green Zone, is pretty much stuck in the Green Zone.

  • A bill to give the U.S. taxpayers who live in the District of Columbia a voting representative in the House of Representatives had majority support in the Senate today, but it wasn’t enough to overcome GOP obstructionist tactics.

    Wow, those people in Washington, DC don’t have any representative in Congress. It’s like they’re not even Americans. And there are a lot of liberals there, too.

    U.S. Attorney Rachel Paulose, who’s long been one of Bush’s more controversial prosecutors, is now under investigation from the Office of Special Counsel. There’s evidence that alleges that she “mishandled classified information, decided to fire the subordinate who called it to her attention, retaliated against others in the office who crossed her, and made racist remarks about one employee.”

    No…

    Marine Gen. Peter Pace, the outgoing Joint Chiefs chairman: “One of the mistakes I made in my assumptions going in was that the Iraqi people and the Iraqi army would welcome liberation, that the Iraqi army, given the opportunity, would stand together for the Iraqi people and be available to them to help serve the new nation.” That would be the army Cheney disbanded, right?

    I get the impression (and I think I wrote something to this effect here before) that a lot of the recent military support for the surge has to do with just these guys’ egos- this is their profession, and this could be their only chance in their lives to be involved in a big war. They want to make it work and don’t want to be remembered as responsible for a military f***-up.

  • Putting 1 and 1 together:

    I like to think I coined the Betrayus© bastardization thing…
    Although… no doubt someone somewhere beat me to the punch.

    Still… lets understand that this analysis (from an earlier CB post):

    Fred Barnes, The Weekly Standard: “For Democrats, Petraeus Week was a wrenching ordeal. The New York Times ad by MoveOn.org trashing Petraeus as a liar backfired badly. The prospect of a return engagement by Petraeus can only fill Democrats with a feeling of dread.”

    is dead dumb drunk wrong:

    “Most Americans continue to want troops to start coming home from Iraq, and most say the plan President Bush announced last week for troop reductions doesn’t go far enough, according to a CBS News poll released Monday.”

    The right tried to make an issue of MoveOn’s ad.
    Some lefty bloggers and commenters trembled:
    Too strident! Too shrill! It’s a distraction! I want my Mommy!

    How about instead: Too damn correct?

    I’d like to put 1 and 1 together here and suggest that progressives stop worrying about telling the truth in vociferous tones.
    Quit your quavering you querulous Quislings!

    Listen:
    You have to push back against these wingnuts with all the might you can muster.
    Use everything you got…
    Bush, Cheney, McCain, and the folks that rewrote “God Bless America” don’t give an ass pimple about splitting the hairs of truth.
    They are like the zombies in “The Night of the Living Dead.”
    Are you going to make nice with zombies?
    Are you going to convince zombies with logic?
    Like hell you are…

    You’ve got to fight them with all the emotional ammo you can find.
    You’ve got to question their patriotism, denigrate their lies, and defame their character.

    General Betrayus© is pretty darn emotional.
    It has hard-hitting-cheney-shut-the-fuck-up kind of power.
    It hits the zombies like a bullet to the forehead.
    And that’s okay.

    Because Betrayus IS a liar…

    So don’t get timid…
    Shrill it… like it is!

  • Paulose, the “grandiose” AG queen whose self serving personality is naturally inclined to demean co-workers to feel superior is also self destructive and finally she will be held accountable for her actions. It was bound to happen sooner or later because no one can stand to work with her.

    Brent Wilkes’ subpoenas were a warning… he knows where the bodies are buried.

  • Comment #11****Yeah, I said the same thing. I remember posting that title 6mos ago when I kept writing that “we already know now what we will know then”. What else could a general Betrayus say…that the policy is a miserable failure?” I also remember seeing the term used by others at about the same time. That is why I wondered why so many acted outraged at move ons use of the term…I thought don’t these guys ever read the blogs because General Betrayus had been around for quite awhile before it came out in move ons ad.

  • Credit where credit’s due, the new MoveOn spot is pretty damned good I think. Not a bad attempt at all at salvaging something from the smoking wreckage of that asinine “Betray Us” ad. Of course Patraeus and the Republicans who love him still got off a lot easier than they should have thanks to their ham-handedness, but making Giuliani bleed a little for overreaching on the slapback could go a ways toward mitigating some of the damage done by the Times ad. Nice save.

  • CB, good call on putting those two disjointed pieces of economic news side by side.

    The stock market is not an accurate reflection of the economy. Investors and banks are living in a fantasy land where they ignore serious warning signs over a simple rate cut (which only helps them and not anyone else.) From what I read, 1929 was a lot like this year with a lot of roller coaster ups and downs till it pancaked. I’m curious as to see what will happen to the NYSE in Oct (as it seems to traditionally happen.)

  • * Thirteen House Republicans “have been served with subpoenas from defense attorneys representing Brent Wilkes, the former defense contractor charged with bribing imprisoned ex-Rep. Duke Cunningham (R-Calif.). None of the lawmakers will comply with the subpoena.”
    *******************************************************

    HOw is that possible? What if a normal, regular American, under the SAME laws, in a land where ALL men are created equal, did the same thing?
    Where are the lines of Rethugli-CONS yelling from the mountain tops: “Rule of Law, Rule of Law” and demanding accountability from these accused who stand thumbing their noses at the laws of our great land? Where are they?? Where?!

    NOt that I disagree, I’d be in the line too. But where the hell are they now that it’s Repiglickers and not a Dem in the spotlight? Let us not forget the number one rule of being a Repig, ‘Rank hypocrisy!”

  • Comments are closed.