Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The Jena Six controversy hasn’t generated enough national attention thus far, but this is hard to ignore: “Thousands of protesters clogged the tiny town of Jena, Louisiana, Thursday to show their indignation over what they consider unjust, unequal punishments meted out in two racially charged incidents. They swarmed over the grounds of Jena High School, surrounding the stump of the tree from which nooses hung in early August 2006, about three months before six black teens known as the ‘Jena 6’ were accused of beating a white classmate.”

* On a related note, the House Judiciary Committee will hold hearings and a forum on the controversy.

* Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), Rudy Giuliani’s homeland security advisor, is continuing to take heat for telling a reporter this week that there are “too many mosques” in the United States. The DNC blasted King today, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations has also repudiated the lawmaker. “We call on Republican leaders and other people of conscience to repudiate Representative King’s bigoted remarks and to support the civil and religious rights of all Americans,” said CAIR official Corey Saylor.

* I received several emails today asking why Obama didn’t vote on John Cornyn’s anti-MoveOn amendment today. The senator released a statement this afternoon: “The focus of the United States Senate should be on ending this war, not on criticizing newspaper advertisements. This amendment was a stunt designed only to score cheap political points while what we should be doing is focusing on the deadly serious challenge we face in Iraq. It’s precisely this kind of political game-playing that makes most Americans cynical about Washington’s ability to solve America’s problems. By not casting a vote, I registered my protest against this empty politics. I registered my views on the ad itself the day it appeared. All of us respect the service of General Petraeus and all of our brave men and women in uniform. The way to honor that service is to give them a mission that is responsible, not to vote on amendments like the Cornyn amendment while we continue to pursue the wrong policy in Iraq.”

* As I recall, when the United Arab Emirates sought to purchase a number of U.S. ports, there was quite a collective freak-out. Will there be a similar reaction if Dubai takes significant ownership of the NASDAQ stock exchange?

* House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) responded to the “small price” flap by sitting down with — who else? — Fox News today. Boehner insists he was responding to a question about financial costs. The video shows otherwise.

* Howard Kurtz really ought to feel embarrassed about this: “On CNN’s Reliable Sources, Howard Kurtz repeated a pattern in which he suggests that the media skew coverage against Republicans by asking — regarding scrutiny of Rudy Giuliani’s actions related to 9-11 — ‘Why all the press scrutiny of the mayor’s performance that day?’ and ‘Is there any possibility that he’s being kind of Swiftboated here?'”

* Number of times Bush said “in other words” during his 35-minute press conference: Nine.

* Bob Novak is apparently among the conservatives unhappy with Michael Mukasey’s nomination to be Attorney General. Today, Novak described Mukasey as “unqualified and ill-equipped for the daunting task of rehabilitating the Justice Department.”

* Maybe Circuit City shouldn’t have laid off all of their best and most knowledgeable employees.

* Conservatives who whine that symbolic resolutions are “meaningless,” probably don’t realize how hypocritical they appeared today. They irony is usually lost on this crowd.

* O’Reilly is selling, “Don’t taze me, bro” bumper stickers. Seriously.

* “Staying in Iraq: $25 Billion per Year … Forever

* The secret lobbying campaign your phone company doesn’t want you to know about.

* Tim Grieve: “One day after voting to block consideration of a measure that might have helped hasten the end of the war in Iraq, Republican Sens. Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts have written a letter to the Department of Veterans Affairs urging full funding for a new cemetery at Fort Riley in Kansas. The reason: With an influx of casualties from Iraq, the existing cemetery at Fort Riley is now full. Well, not entirely full: A spokesman for the facility tells Reuters that bodies can be buried on top of other bodies if family members want to share plots.”

* And finally, the Quote of the Day, by way of Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.): “It is a sad day in the Senate when we spend hours debating an ad while our young people are dying in Iraq. Now that the Senate has twice voted on this ad, it is time to move on and vote to end the war.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

His vote might have helped to defeat the stupid measure, the dems were short 4 votes. He was too busy raising money for his campaign…I am sick of double-talk. Who the hell is he to abstain? He is being paid plenty to represent his area of the USA.
All incumbants need to be replaced. His answer speaks volumes why that is necessary. Who is he to decide to not do his job, then claim he is “speaking?” The opposite is true.

  • Will there be a similar reaction if Dubai takes significant ownership of the NASDAQ stock exchange?

    Oh God.

    As long as there’s a profit to be made…

  • Chris Dodd would make an excellent VP.

    Yeah, right.

    Number of times Bush said “in other words” during his 35-minute press conference: Nine.

    So it was a saying his attention was drawn to recently, and he felt frazzled or tired today, so he said it a lot. Big deal.

  • Marilyn:

    Obama’s vote would not have made a whit of difference. We needed 4 additional republicans to vote Yea. Even if Obama voted, the Dems come up short. Plus, Warner, who voted for the bill last time it couldn’t get past cloture, voted Nay this time. And, by the way, the measure was “defeated” in the procedural sense. So, I’m not sure what your point is. We wanted to PASS the measure.

  • Here’s the next way congress will sell us down the river:

    Sept. 20, 2007 – The nation’s biggest telecommunications companies, working closely with the White House, have mounted a secretive lobbying campaign to get Congress to quickly approve a measure wiping out all private lawsuits against them for assisting the U.S. intelligence community’s warrantless surveillance programs

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20884696/site/newsweek/

    Let me guess, the Democrats will do it. They’ll vote for a piece of shit like this because they think we’ll support them no matter what.

  • Will there be a similar reaction if Dubai takes significant ownership of the NASDAQ stock exchange?

    What do we expect when we ship our money overseas by the bale to buy oil and cheap crap? Get used to it: we’re going to see more and more foreign nations buying pieces of our country with our own money.

  • Marilyn @ #1

    I think you’re mistaken about which vote Obama missed. As TPM described, on the vote Obama missed:

    The GOP-introduced resolution condemning MoveOn just passed by a huge margin, 72-25. Roughly half the Democrats in the Senate supported it.

    linky

    I’m not sure what vote it is you’re talking about that the Dems were only 4 votes away from, but Obama voted on every other measure today, voting “yea” on the Boxer and Feinstein measures.

  • Obama’s statement got it exactly right. Why did the Senate waste time on this? Forget the hypocrisy, it’s not even an election year.

  • When is Boehner gonna’ admit he was too damn drunk to even remember what he said or was even talking about. He was in Irag wandering around inside the green zone blurting out “When you gonna stand up and take ‘em on…come on, I’m here now…let’s stand up and take ‘em on”. Even in the green zone is easy to make a drunken ass out of your self…but it such a small sacrifice…no wait, I was just kidding…I mean…ah, I was talking about such a small amount to pay…money wise you know…too much money …er I mean not enough…doesn’t seem like…er not as much as we are getting back..I mean it won’t matter…the sacrifice…in money I mean. Oh hell with it…tell ‘em what I mean.

    Could the guy be any bigger of a jerk off. Why the hell was he even in Iraq, No matter what he saw he’d come back saying the same damn thing. Hoope tax payers don’t have to pay for these trips..waste of money.

    Good move by the senate today to increase donations to moveon.org. I sent my campaign fund donation to my Dem senator who voted with the republicans to move on.org. One organization out of the many sucking up the Petraeus PR pony show who showed dissent and made people aware of just what was really happening here gets condemned for it and accused of being far left. I’m not far left and I support their action. Told my senator that everytime she votes with republicans I will donate to a real democrat or organization unafraid to tell the truth. McCaskill is one of those 25 republicans in Democrats clothing, voting republican on all the main issues I am beginning to wonder if she really is all that bright or if we were just so desperate to replace a republican we would have voted for anybody.

    Senator “yea Bush screw the troops” Graham should have been forced to filibuster for blocking a majority vote to give the soldiers a much needed rest. The majority said yes but Graham said screw the majority,” I’d rather burn the senate down than go against the president, not one soldier is allowed to leave or even sit down, I’ll make sure of that.” Now who says Graham supports the troops again?

  • As I recall, when the United Arab Emirates sought to purchase a number of U.S. ports, there was quite a collective freak-out. Will there be a similar reaction if Dubai takes significant ownership of the NASDAQ stock exchange?

    Makes about as much sense as outsourcing our port security or selling infrastructure to foreign anationals. American Sovereignty ain’t what it used to be.

    This is some fucked up, repugnant shit.

  • Let me guess, the Democrats will do it. They’ll vote for a piece of shit like this because they think we’ll support them no matter what.

    Sadly, I agree with Racerx.
    When have the Dems demonstrated ANY willingness to stand on principle and block legislation that might be thrown in their face as “hurting national security.”

    “Oh no, the Republicans will call us names if we don’t help them out on this one…! We’d better just go along with this and we’ll stand by our convictions some other time when it’s easier…”

  • Once again the racism of the Left is exposed as they rally to let would-be murders walk free!

    Stop destroying the U.S.A., you idiot Leftists!

  • Dandy from Idiot-In-Chief’s “press conference”:

    Q Sir, Israeli opposition leader Netanyahu has now spoken openly about Israel’s bombing raid on a target in Syria earlier in the month. I wonder if you could tell us what the target was, whether you supported this bombing raid, and what do you think it does to change the dynamic in an already hot region in terms of Syria and Iran and the dispute with Israel and whether the U.S. could be drawn into any of this?

    THE PRESIDENT: I’m not going to comment on the matter. Would you like another question?

    Q Did you support it?

    THE PRESIDENT: I’m not going to comment on the matter.

    Q Can you comment about your concerns that come out of it at all, about for the region?

    THE PRESIDENT: No. Saying I’m not going to comment on the matter means I’m not going to comment on the matter. You’re welcome to ask another question, if you’d like to, on a different subject.

    Great feeling when the Dear Leader of the Free World can’t tell us what, if any, his position is on foreign policy.

  • Would a bumper sticker that reads:

    “Fill in the Blank: _ill Bill”…with O’Rielly’s face on it…be considered over the top?

    I could probably sell a couple billion of those things….

  • I notice that the knuckle-dragging ur-fascists are back.

    Three points on their idiocy. One, what they really hate is… us. Progressives. The people who reject hatred of peoples based on their faith, or skin tone, or nationality, who reject simplistic thinking and love our country for what’s best, not worst, about it.

    Two, what they venerate is violence, which is their only metric for strength. Big booms! Fiery wreckage! PsheeaawwwPCCCHPHT!! Think Eric Cartman (maybe the perfect symbol of the American right) in spasms of delight. Of course, like Cartman–and Cheney, and the rest of the violence fetishists in this idiot-filled government–they prefer their violence televised, not live.

    Three, though their bleatings here make an eyesore, I’m glad that Steve hasn’t deleted any of it. We should never forget that a big difference, maybe the crucial difference, between their America and ours is that we welcome the battle of ideas.

    Of course, it helps that we actually *have* ideas.

  • All that said, in any dispute between Israel, a socialist democracy founded on the highest principles of western civilization, and Syria, a fascist thugocracy run by a family of despots, Israel deserves a big, big benefit of the doubt.

  • dajafi,

    10 years ago, I’d probably agree with you. However, since the Lebabnon mess, not so much. Different Israel now.

  • I think it’s worth deleting, and it’s probably put there in the hopes of stirring up divisions (it’s pretty obvious). Some of us may support attacks on Iran and Syria, and some of us may feel bad about stuff like that. We unite on most other issues, but here are these people to try to provoke comments (whether they be one way or the other) about these divisive issues. These are basically assaults and CB is a little flacid for not deleting them- it could be good for all of us.

  • On September 20th, 2007 at 9:52 pm, dajafi said:
    All that said, in any dispute between Israel, a socialist democracy founded on the highest principles of western civilization, and Syria, a fascist thugocracy run by a family of despots, Israel deserves a big, big benefit of the doubt.

    ——–

    Yeah, that’s right, motherf*cker. And don’t you forget it!

  • dajafi,
    I laugh that most Leftists that hate Israel don’t realize that Israel is a Socialist state!
    They support Fascist states like Syria and Iran!
    Go figure!
    Whatever happened to Socialist Brotherhood!

  • “A spokesman for the facility tells Reuters that bodies can be buried on top of other bodies if family members want to share plots.”

    We had an expression for that in the Army: mass graves.

  • Yeah, I have something to add. Thanks to the charisma and effervescent wit of Preznit Bush, our Defense Minister, Peter McKay (Yeah, I know: who???) is now parroting his lines. He suggested today, after a meeting with Robert Gates, that we could not withdraw from Afghanistan because the Taliban “will follow us home”.

    I suppose, on reflection, that in a country where a handful of walnuts and a few cups of yogurt might be supper for your family, such a luxury as an atlas might be hard to come by. That notwithstanding, the Taliban did quite a few road trips when they were being courted for pipeline business. Believe me, they know how to find Canada without following Canadian soldiers, the same as al Qaeda were well aware of the United States’ precise location long before Bush became president. In fact, if I were a war lieutenant in either organization, I’d choose a time when pretty much the whole military was out of the country (hint – like now, in both cases) to strike, if that was indeed either organization’s intent.

    Do those of us who are not invertebrates a favour, and stop that “they’ll follow us home” nonsense, as if al Qaeda and the Taliban were some sort of homeless puppies. They know where we live. They’ve always known. Just because you were a C student, George, and couldn’t be sent to find lettuce in a garden salad, don’t assume everyone is as allergic to education.

  • Marilyn,

    Obama is my Senator, and represented me quite well. Sounds like he knows what priorities are.

  • Ugh. That these troglodytes agree with me almost makes me wonder if I’m wrong.

    Funny, Rodan, as I think that Christianity often, as you so profoundly put it, “sucks.”

    Or rather, the faith is fine, in some instances positively beautiful and moving. But the truculent jackasses who root for it like a sports team… well, they suck.

    Same is true of Islam, Judaism (the faith I was born into), and just about any other creed you’d care to name. The religion is pretty much neutral; the people are saints, devils and every gradation in between.

    But as a knuckle-dragging righty ur-fascist, I wouldn’t expect you to grok much of that.

  • Also, the next “leftist” I meet who supports Syria or Iran will be the first. (We hate those governments for the same reason we deplore Bush/Cheney Republicanism: they’re absolutist regimes with a fundamental contempt for their own citizens.)

    I’d like all their heads on pikes, frankly. I think most of my fellow progressives here probably feel the same. We just see other considerations besides revenge, bloodlust and self-aggrandizement–the Holy Trinity of modern pseudo-conservatism.

  • Comments are closed.