Bush on education: ‘Childrens do learn’

Of all the many entertaining Bushisms, perhaps the quintessential presidential malapropism came in 2000, when George W. Bush explained his philosophy on education with a simple, four-word question: “Is our children learning?”

Yesterday, at an event in NYC to discuss advances students have made in the National Assessment of Education Progress, the president answered his classic question with a classic answer.

“As yesterday’s positive report card shows,” Bush said, “childrens do learn when standards are high and results are measured.”

The official transcript distributed by the White House cleaned up his grammatical infelicity, printing the statement without the S on “children.”

The edited transcript notwithstanding, Bush really did explain, at an event on education and student progress, that “childrens do learn.” Here’s a video of Bush’s comments; the remark came at the 8:40 mark.

I know conservatives tend to roll their eyes when Bush critics mention gaffes like these, but c’mon. This is hilarious.

Of course, the WaPo’s Peter Baker — after getting in a shot: “Subject-verb agreement actually is taught at Andover, Yale and Harvard, the president’s alma maters” — notes that yesterday’s event was more than just a photo-op for a presidential goof.

His latest misstatement masked a serious issue, of course. As Bush’s first-term No Child Left Behind law comes up for reauthorization, many in Congress are attacking it from both the left and the right. The president is trying to preserve what he sees as one of his most significant domestic achievements, an effort to increase accountability through rigorous standardized testing. The latest report card released by the National Assessment of Educational Progress gave him some ammunition.

“The No Child Left Behind Act is working,” Bush said with first lady Laura Bush, Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg (I) and Schools Chancellor Joel Klein at his side. “I say that because the nation’s report card says it’s working. Scores are improving, in some instances hitting all-time highs.”

Bush said that lawmakers should pay attention and not mess with success. “My call to the Congress is: Don’t water down this good law,” he said. “Don’t go backwards when it comes to educational excellence. Don’t roll back accountability. We’ve come too far to turn back.” […]

But some scholars do not credit the education law. NAEP scores, for example, rose in some states and fell in others, and the general upward trend began well before No Child Left Behind. “My general view of this is that the president has been serially dishonest in claiming that No Child is accomplishing its mission,” said Bruce Fuller, a professor of education and public policy at the University of California at Berkeley.

It wouldn’t be the first time.

Maybe childrens do learn, but Dubya don’t.

  • Don’t water down this good law

    It’s amazing- he’s asking them not to improve the law so it will be easier for people to claim that what he did didn’t need to be fixed.

  • Like he says, he’s the “Educator-In-Chief.” No wonder high-school seniors can’t find North America on a map.

  • Can you imagine the mocking in the rightwing blogosphere if Obama saidthet “childrens do learning”

  • I think there is really something wrong with W’s mind (and not in a snarky way.) I’ve seen clips of the guy being interviewed in the 1990s and he’s not the babbling halfwit he is today. In fact, he almost sounds articulate.

  • Dan, I’ve seen those clips too. The difference in Bush, then and now, is shocking. There’s definitely something physically wrong with his brain.

  • JKap said: No wonder high-school seniors can’t find North America on a map.

    Nowwwww…let’s be fair. Miss Teen South Carolina explained that one weeks ago. There’s a map shortage.

    You think maps and grammar are bad? How about this canary-in-a-coal mine moment:
    I saw 2 biology students looking at a plastic skull that they had taken
    apart for examination…as I walked by I said, “Wow, poor Yorick had
    himself a bad day!”

    They looked at me like I was speaking Swahili. No comprehension at
    all…

  • Bush’s opinion of education is best summed up with this popular remark: “Bush: I called upon a fellow named Dr. Mark McClellan to join me in this effort. He’s here. That’s him right there. He is a — (applause.) He’s a PhD, see — I’m a C student. (Laughter.) Look who’s the President and who’s the advisor. (Laughter and applause.)”

    An early compiler of Bushisms noted that Bush’s faux pas come when he is talking about something he doesn’t believe in, hence the inordinate number of gaffes when Bush speaks about education. What does Bush really think about education? It’s for suckers, because priviliged spoiled kids end up ruling the world anyway

  • Here’s an idea—break NCLB into several key components, where the entire act won’t function without any one of those key components. Tie one component to each and every spending bill before Congress right now, and then send them up to the WH one at a time. Then—dare Bush to break out the veto pen.

    Tie a piece of NCLB to spending fot Iraq—with a timetable.

    Tie another piece to S-CHIP.

    Tie an additional piece to each of the domestic spending packages—and include a clause in each and every bill that, should the president alter the provision of a bill/law with a “signing statement,” then that law is, by default, struck down—and all funds for it stop.

    It is time to clip this lame duck’s wings, rip out his pompous feathers, and stick him in a political meat grinder. Soylent Green keeps coming to mind….

  • In other words, childrens need mah plan so they can grow up to be C- students lahk me, and then they can be a stupid prezidint too.

  • I agree with Former Dan. I, too, have seen tapes of Bush in the 90’s as governor of Texas and he sounds, actually, quite articulate. I wonder if he’s had a mini-stroke.

  • Given the many fine educators this country, why would anyone listen to George Bush’s thoughts on the subject?

  • My wife teaches in the Houston Independent School District. The teachers hate NCLB and refer to it as “regurgitation, not education”.
    That about sums it up.

  • They teach subject-verb agreement at Harvard?? Shouldn’t anyone accepted to Harvard already know that? (Actually, now that I’m going back to college myself, I’m not so surprised….)

    BTW, anything to say about Hillary Clinton’s forced laughter? I hadn’t seen anything about it until The Daily Show on Tuesday. In some cases, laughter was exactly the right response to the ludicrous questions she was given. But Jon Stewart highilghted some other instances that were just plain weird — and at least as worthy of comment as Giuliani’s cellphone “interruption” at the NRA.

  • Regarding Bush’s misspeak: people who drink heavily for 20-30 years always have some degree of brain damage and deterioration. One of the results is large and small strokes along with brain shrinkage, and most of us know what the damage from strokes in the brain can cause to a person’s speech and emotional control.

    Nobody outside his accustomed circle really knows if Bush has stopped drinking, but even if we assume he’s sober all the time, we might understand why Bush’s speech and thought processes have deteriorated so much over the past ten-twelve years, given his admitted history.

    I really am led to wonder if there’s something about Republicanism that attracts leaders who are a bit short on brain power, either naturally or through abuse.

  • It never ceases to amaze me how deluded Bush is and how he has no insight or understanding about himself or his situation. He still doesn’t realize that no one in this world would would have given him a second glance but for him being the son of a President. We know he is somehow giving himself credit for something good( I can’t imagine what ) and looking forward to his C- place in History.

  • Comments are closed.