McCain scrambling to dampen faith flap

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has never been known as a particularly religious politician, and his relationship with the GOP’s religious-right base has varied between awkward and chilly. Anxious to make up ground with this key Republican constituency, McCain probably thought it’d be a great idea to sit down for a brief chat with BeliefNet, a leading ecumenical religious website. They’d ask a few softballs, he’d mention how great religion is, and he’d score a few points with the faithful. What could possibly go wrong?

Over the course of four straightforward questions, McCain managed to make four controversial comments:

* He said the “number one issue people should make [in the] selection of the President of the United States is, ‘Will this person carry on in the Judeo Christian principled tradition that has made this nation the greatest experiment in the history of mankind?'”

* He said he admires “the Islam,” before saying that the U.S. “was founded primarily on Christian principles,” and concluding — “in all candor” — that he would only want a president “who has a solid grounding in my faith.” He also described ascribing to his Christian beliefs as a “qualification to lead.” (At the bottom of the transcript, BeliefNet added, “McCain contacted Beliefnet after the interview to clarify his remarks: ‘I would vote for a Muslim if he or she was the candidate best able to lead the country and defend our political values.'”)

* Despite the fact that the U.S. Constitution is an entirely secular document, McCain said, “I would probably have to say yes, that the Constitution established the United States of America as a Christian nation.”

* Asked why he recently started identifying himself as a Baptist, after decades of having been identified as an Episcopalian, McCain said, “[It was] one comment on the bus after hours.”

All of this paints a picture of a presidential candidate who knows very little about religion, and even less about the Constitution. Yesterday, the McCain campaign did its level best to make the burgeoning controversy go away as quickly as possible, trying to explain what the senator actually meant by his remarks.

The old adage “if you’re explaining, you’re losing” comes to mind.

As you’d imagine, McCain’s comments weren’t particularly popular with religious minorities, who don’t think of the United States Constitution as establishing a “Christian nation.” Rabbi Perry Berkowitz, president of the American Jewish Heritage Organization said McCain’s comments were “very dangerous and mistaken,” adding, “America is not a Christian nation. It is a multiethnic, multifaith, and multicultural nation, and that is its glory.” McCain, Berkowitz said, “should be called on it and told he is wrong, wrong, wrong.”

Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, added, “That kind of attitude goes against the American tradition of religious pluralism and inclusion.” Hooper recommended that McCain meet with Muslim leaders this week, though it’s unclear if the senator would accept an invitation.

The campaign is scrambling a bit. The New York Sun reports today that McCain’s team is “moving swiftly to stamp out a potential political firestorm.”

Yesterday, his campaign took a step further, issuing a statement from its chief spokeswoman that sought to explain and clarify his remarks, but without retracting them.

“The senator did not intend to assert that members of one religious faith or another have a greater claim to American citizenship over another,” the spokeswoman, Jill Hazelbaker, said. “Read in context, his interview with beliefnet makes clear that people of all faiths are entitled to all the rights protected by the Constitution, including the right to practice their religion freely.”

She continued: “He also observed that the values protected by the Constitution, by which he meant values such as respect for human life and dignity, are rooted in the Judeo-Christian tradition. That is all he intended to say to the question, America is a Christian nation, and it is hardly a controversial claim.”

I have a hunch this isn’t going to help. The statement is filled with non-sequiturs and misdirection, intentionally steering clear of McCain’s controversial comments. The campaign isn’t clarifying the senator’s remarks; it’s trying to change the subject.

As for the notion that the Constitution established what McCain described as a “Christian nation” because is respects “human life and dignity,” that’s about the weakest spin I’ve ever heard. For one thing, the Constitution is rather silent on these issues. For another, respect for “human life and dignity” are hardly principles that are unique to Christianity.

We’ll see if this story goes anywhere — the major news outlets haven’t expressed any interest thus far — but it’s clear McCain made a mistake that he hopes reporters will ignore.

The whole issue makes me sick. Using God for politics is lower than lowest. Beware the ones who mix politics and religion…they are bad news.
Our country ought to be better than this, our forefathers were smart enough to advocate separation of church and state. These idiots don’t know any better. Pity people are stupid enough to vote for them.

  • McCain once again proves that the worst thing that ever happened to him was when his ejection seat worked. Had that not happened, he’d be an Unquestioned Hero with his name on a wall. The Navy was right that under normal circumstances he didn’t have the right stuff to get past Lieutenant Commander.

  • As an agnostic American, I am deeply offended that McCain suggests that the Constitution respects human life and dignity. I hate human life and think all people should be dragged through fresh cow dung on a regular basis while wearing their best clothes; and that includes little kids and puppies. What’s next? That he’ll agree with the blogger from Redstate who pointed out that American conservatives think human beings have value and that America is a great country?

    It’s obvious that conservatives are vastly different from the rest of us. And if they ever mention that they like babies and apple pie, I think I’ll vomit. Down with anti-evil bigots! Up with evil!!

  • It was a huge mistake and shows how little McCain really understands about the constitution, or about moral principles… but clearly demonstrates his desperation and political pandering for support. When will he stop embarrassing himself and accept that he should withdraw his campaign. I think he as gathered all the pity the American public had left to give him. Time to get out…of the senate also…too much has been revealed showing he is no longer a maverick, a straight talker or a straight shooter. I think it was all the pandering to gain power that led him to reveal his true self and he’s past being a credible government representative…much less president.

  • “The old adage ‘if you’re explaining, you’re losing’ comes to mind.”

    I think this should read “McCain’s losing his mind if he’s explaining.”

    If McCain is such an idiot when speaking with a religious website, just imagine how brilliant he will be when dealing with an international incident. This entire nation should be laughing at this guy like Hillary until he finally gets that he’s an utter joke on the face of American politics.

  • Does he know the meaning of the word “ecumenical”? Had he even looked at the website before the interview? Talk about the wrong audience for the comments he made…..

  • ***btw*** McCains laugh?,,,Bush’s laugh?…Graham’s laugh? (whoops, I forgot Graham doesn’t have a laugh)….and the press has the nerve to run down Hillary’s laugh? That’s worse than the kettle calling the pot black…that’s the kettle helping to paint the pot blacker.

  • ***The old adage “if you’re explaining, you’re losing” comes to mind.***

    Yes, it does—but in Rampstrike’s case, it should be “If you’re explaining, and you don’t even know how to explain, then you’re regurgitated monkey chow.”

  • McCain is ignorant. The majority of Americans are ignorant. The author of the constitution (Thomas Jefferson) never ever claimed his work was “founded primarily on Christian principles”. He was a student of all man made religions. T. Jefferson was a brilliant thinker, and I recall reading that he owned a copy of the Koran.

    Cultianity was one of many influences on him when he wrote the constitution. I agree with Ira N. Forman, executive director of The National Jewish Democratic Council, “Someone running for president ought to understand the Constitution a little better. Nowhere does it say the United States is a ‘Christian’ nation. How can we trust someone to uphold the Constitution who doesn’t even know what is in it?”

    Alas, if McCain is right and I, Ira, and T. Jefferson are wrong, I and T. Jefferson would like to remind the ignorant cultianity Americans that T. Jefferson desired American to progress and evolve. To remain ignorant like McCain and most Americans will cause America to become barbarous country controlled by an elite few, and the rest of just marionette puppets to be played with.

    Thomas Jefferson Memorial:

    I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.

  • Why are the Christians always the ones apologizing? Do the muslims apologize when sharia is enacted thereby depriving religious minorities of their rights? Do the jews apologize because Israel procliams that it is a Jewish state. I am glad that America has room for everyone but I amn tired of always ceding ground. If people want respect, they need to practice respect. When Saudi Arabia and Isreal grant complete freedom to their minorities, then we should sit down and talk.

  • As a new question on the citizenship test asks: “Who wrote the Constitution”…answer: Mr. Jefferson, a self-described athiest – so how is it the religious right in this country feels the ability to highjack a document written to eliminate religious tyranny? The plurality allows a small fringe element to frame the election issues and determine the outcome…when will the electorate take back elections.

    And another thing, why must we know endure 18 months of campaigning and fund raising…why can’t we embrace a European process: 6 weeks of campaign, vote, done.

  • The old adage “if you’re explaining, you’re losing” comes to mind.– CB

    Live and learn 🙂 Never heard that one but “[he] who excuses himself, accuses himself” is an old favourite.

    And, regarding the “clarification”
    “The senator did not intend to assert that members of one religious faith or another have a greater claim to American citizenship over another,” the spokeswoman, Jill Hazelbaker, said.

    When the black regime took Poland over from the red one, something similar was written into its “new! improved!” constitution. But, at the same time, protection for the “national religion” (Catholicism) had also been written in. The net result is that everyone of a different religion (or no religion) is, automatically, granted fewer protections — a second-class citizen. Sounds to me like McCainiac is advocating for just that.

  • Doesn’t some huge percentage of the population really believe that the Constitution establishes the USA as a christian nation?

    I blame that fucking pledge. Get “under god” out of the blasted thing!

    No wonder everyone thinks that this is a christian nation. They’ve been indoctrinated since childhood that it is, with that stinking pledge.

  • Comments are closed.