Fred Thompson takes another break

Woody Allen once said, “90 percent of life is just showing up.” For Fred Thompson, that appears to be too much to ask.

Mitt Romney was in Michigan, Colorado, Arizona and Nevada and then went back to Michigan. Rudy Giuliani visited Florida, Michigan, South Carolina, Alabama, Washington and New Hampshire. John McCain went from Michigan to Iowa to New Hampshire.

But where was Fred, as in Fred Thompson?

Besides participating in his first presidential debate in Michigan last Tuesday, Thompson was missing from the campaign trail. The former Tennessee senator and star of NBC’s “Law & Order” was scheduled to be in New Hampshire this weekend, but canceled.

New Hampshire voters noticed. “He’s a late entry. That will probably hurt him,” said Geri Gormley, of Bow, who visited with McCain but remains uncommitted. “We’re grass roots. Candidates come up and pick our brains, one on one. We had (Barack) Obama’s staff come to our door today. That’s good strategy.”

Thompson had arranged to be in Manchester last Friday for a fundraising breakfast with the mayor, but on Thursday afternoon, the campaign cancelled, citing “scheduling conflicts for the senator.”

It’s not that Thompson is completely invisible — he’ll be on Fox News tonight — he just doesn’t seem willing to actually go out and campaign. He claims he wants to be president, but he doesn’t seem to actually like talking to voters.

If there’s any logic behind this campaign strategy, it’s hiding well. It’s almost as if Thompson thinks he’s above this sort of thing.

Keep in mind, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen Thompson simply disappear from the campaign trail. From a report a week after Thompson announced his campaign:

Since Thursday morning, when the tour began, Mr. Thompson has made no more than three campaign stops a day, with long stretches in between. In recent spins through Iowa, he kept a similarly relaxed schedule. Mitt Romney, by comparison, often does six town-hall-style forums a day when in Iowa.

A spokesman for Mr. Thompson said the driving distances in Florida were a factor, and that he would add more impromptu stops later in the campaign.

Next week, his schedule has no public events at all….

Look, I’m not in the habit of giving Republican candidates advice, but I know that running for president is really difficult. Thompson’s competitors are working their tails off, and have been for months. Thompson not only started late, he seems to enjoy taking constant mini-vacations.

It’s a multi-faceted screw-up, which will probably cost Thompson the GOP nomination. By refusing to actually campaign for the job, Thompson a) comes across as a snob; b) reinforces fears that he’s exceedingly lazy; and c) contributes to his gaffe problem, because he doesn’t get any practice answering questions.

Maybe the guy slowly realized that he doesn’t want to be president anyway. That’s the only logical explanation.

i’d say for the republicans he’s the ideal candidate. does he like cutting brush too?

  • The rest of the GOP field is so damaged, maybe he thinks he dosn’t have to campaign. He’s not a Morman, he’s not a pro-abortion cross-dresser. What’s the expression? “Better to be silent and thought to be an idiot, than to say something and remove all doubt.”

  • Thursday afternoon, the campaign cancelled, citing “scheduling conflicts for the senator.”

    I understand the courtesy of addressing former senators as “Senator So and So.” but is this phrasing proper? Fred Thompson is not a sitting senator.

    Thompson may be in this for the sole purpose of dropping out and endorsing someone else at an opportune moment. That would explain why his candidacy seems so phoney.

  • Maybe the guy slowly realized that he doesn’t want to be president anyway.

    Bingo. He’s only in because it seemed he could just pick up the nomination without trying too hard. If it’s going to be a real race, he’s not really up for it.

    And prezidentin’ is hard work. (Junior can tell him all about that.) So maybe it’s best if he just heads back to the hoosgaw.

  • I wonder if his strategy is to say as little as possible and be seen as little as possible in order to allow voters to project their own desires onto the blank screen that is Fred Thompson. The less he says, the less he can be criticized, and the more voters can assume he agrees with them. Call it the “Being There” campaign strategy.

  • Hollywood Fred was convinced by someone that he’d just have to show up and act like a president. The rest of the GOP field was so weak that he’d sweep in and be the “savior” candidate. He wouldn’t have to do any real work, just gladhand a bit, make some presidential sounding speeches and the GOP voters would be so grateful to have a “real candidate” that he’d sail right into the nomination.

    Except it didn’t work. Someone forgot to tell ol’ Hollywood that he needed to find religion before he could be the nominee. And they needed to hire a WGA writer to do his speeches for him instead of whatever scab they picked up off the street. And on top of all that, Hollywood isn’t very good at improv – one of the acting skills a candidate really should have if he wants to pull of the “presidential look.”

  • It’s not as if he manages to wow the voters with his command of the facts or inspire them to action with his charismatic personality when he does show up – and worse, he doesn’t seem to care, really. It makes no sense to me, and shows, I think, that he is really out of touch with most voters, who are looking for someone with more “there” there, more interest in the issues, less willingness to just skate along with a minimum of work.

    What happens to his leftover campaign contributions? Assuming he sinks in the primaries, of course.

  • The other potential answer is that he realizes being out in public ain’t exactly going to HELP matters any. He’s not articulate without a script or more-talented people around him to spur him to be better, and it’s too late in his personal game to get better at extemporaneous speaking. These long stretches of nothing might not help, but they don’t hurt as much as him being out there where everyone can see that the man they so badly wanted to call Emperor has no clothes.

  • To be fair to Thompson…
    I’d wager the majority of people worthy of being president probably wouldn’t want to talk with voters either.

    “Candidate” is a very different job from “public official”.
    Sad thing is to be the latter at ANY level, you must be rather good at teh former though it bears almost no relation to your performance at the latter.

    That said, Thompson ain’t one of these people I’m talking about.
    I just bring it up because it’s a crying shame that all the glad-handing slicky boys who would excel at selling used cars seem to win a disproportionate share of seats then promptly put their hand shaking to good use with lobbyists. We could use a bunch of gruff, ornery curmudgeonly hardasses in office. Can we, as a country, get over this “share a beer with the guy” B.S.?

  • ” [H]e doesn’t seem to actually like talking to voters.” That’s the first good thing I’ve heard about him.

  • Has anyone considered the possibility that Fred might be too sick to actually campaign? As I recall, he has said that he is in remission for a certain type of cancer.

    He does look rather thin from what I’ve seen — very different from his appearance ten years ago or so.

  • He’s using the Pappy O’Daniel strategy:
    “I’ll press your flesh, you dimwitted sumbitch! You don’t tell your pappy how to court the electorate. We ain’t one-at-a-timin’ here. We’re MASS communicating!”
    But with less animation. After all, he’s not as good an actor as Charles Durning.

  • I agree with Lloyd George – I think he’s sick. I don’t know why he hasn’t withdrawn. He looks awful – too thin, and like he’s draggin’.

  • Can we PLEASE stop calling him a “star of Law & Order.” He’s not a “star.” In fact, I bet before he entered the race, 90% of Americans had no idea who the hell he was.

    He’s a bit player on the program, much like he’s a bit player in the campaign — a guy whose skills weren’t really needed before his arrival, and whose skills are so weak that they wouldn’t be missed if he disappeared tomorrow.

    Sorry … just a peeve of mine. Thanks.

  • Fred took some fairly outspoken stands against Amnesty, open borders, sanctuary cities,
    earlier on. That appeals to a lot of independents as well as conservatives, They were the folks that really rallied for him this summer. Since then under the influence of perhaps
    Spencer Abraham and others he steers clear of this issue that separates him from Giuliani, McCain & Huckabee in the top tier and just below. He does seem to want to stay off the
    record on as many issues apossible, since according to Rasmussen, he is seen as the most conservative candidate that has a real shot at the nomination. I think if he had seemed committed to securing the borders and expelling a few million of the 20+ million illegals, he would have had a great pitch to fight Hillary for the independent voters! It seems highly unlikely now!

  • UnAware Fred seems to be unaware that the decision to “run for President” includes the verbal caveat of “having to run.” And every time the heat starts to turn up a notch or three, he does run—for the nearest exit. The guy reminds me of the cowardly lion in the original Wizard of OZ—spooked by the menacing image of a fire-breathing Wizard, the lion takes off down the grand hall—and flings himself through an unsuspecting window.

    Run, Fred—RUN!!! The unsuspecting window is that-a-way….

  • This morning, Bob McCarty Writes learned that officials with the Republican Party have issued an Amber Alert for Fred Thompson. A GOP spokesperson made the announcement and confirmed an Associated Press report that the former U.S. senator from Tennessee was missing from the campaign trail and had canceled at least one scheduled event in New Hampshire over the weekend. Later in the day, we obtained a copy of a video tape — http://youtube.com/watch?v=GSKjUVn84JU — containing an urgent plea for citizens of New Hampshire to be on the lookout for the former Tennessee senator and star of Law and Order star. Anyone who sees the former Law and Order actor is asked to contact the Republican Party Headquarters in Washington, D.C., toll-free at the number below: 1-888-FIND-FRED (888-346-3733)

  • Fred Thompson on the issues:

    “National Security

    The first responsibility of government is to protect the American people, the homeland, and our way of life. Today we face the urgent threat of radical Islamic terrorists. Al Qaeda is committed to attacking us here at home, and wants to use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to kill millions. We must never give them that opportunity. We must defeat the terrorists abroad, and that begins in Iraq and Afghanistan ; the central fronts in this global war. We must show the world we have the will to fight and win. A weakened America – or an America that appears weaker – will only encourage further attacks. We must persevere. As Commander-in-Chief, the president must ensure the United States has the means to achieve victory. Presidential leadership requires talking to the American people about these stakes, mapping out a clear vision for success, and devising a comprehensive strategy for achieving it. I am committed to: A larger, more capable, and more modern military that can defeat terrorists, deter adversaries, and defend the U.S. and our interests. A missile defense system that can protect the U.S. and our allies from long-range ballistic missiles. An enhanced intelligence community, with robust human-intelligence capabilities, focused on terrorism and proliferation. A robust approach to homeland security that will protect our nation from terrorists and WMD, regardless of where they come from. A strengthened system of global alliances to better combat terrorists, proliferators, and traditional threats to our interests. A judicial system that deals with the realities of terrorists and unlawful enemy combatants.

    Federal Budget and Spending/Budgetary Reform

    In a few short years—not a generation from now—a fiscal tsunami that could imperil our security and economic prosperity will hit our nation and place an unfair burden of debt on our children and grandchildren. The tens of trillions of dollars in debt that will be accumulated over the next few decades will do immense harm to our economy. This burden is now estimated at $170,000 per person and $440,000 per family. Time is running out to address this looming crisis. We need market-based approaches to reform that guarantee benefits for those who need them and embrace personal responsibility and cost-effectiveness without raising taxes. Given the scope and urgency of this problem, and the burden it will place on our children, reform is not only an economic necessity, it is a moral imperative that requires action now. I am committed to: Opening the government’s fiscal books on this looming crisis for all to see and understand. Working with individuals of all political persuasions to develop a comprehensive solution to the pending fiscal crisis. Leading and making the hard choices necessary, to include cutting wasteful government spending, to safeguard our security, promote our prosperity, and protect our children and grandchildren from fiscal calamity.

    Tax Reform

    The U.S. tax code is broken and a burden on U.S. taxpayers and businesses, large and small. Today’s tax code is particularly hostile to savings and investment, and it shows. To make matters worse, its complexity is a drag on our productivity and economic growth. Moreover, taxpayers spend billions of dollars and untold hours each year filling out complicated tax returns, just so they can send more money to Washington, much of it for wasteful programs and the pet projects of special interests. We need lower taxes, and we need to let taxpayers keep more of their hard-earned dollars—they know best where and how to spend them. And we need to make the system simpler and fairer for all. To ensure America’s long term prosperity and economic security, I am committed to: Fundamental tax reform built on the principles of simplicity, fairness, and growth. A new tax code that gets the government out of our citizens’ pocketbooks, while enhancing U.S. competitiveness abroad. Dissolution of the IRS as we know it.

    Healthcare

    Americans have the best healthcare in the world. Some, however, choose not be insured; others cannot afford it. Every American should be able to get health insurance coverage that is affordable, fully accessible, and portable. Coverage should meet their individual needs and put them in control. Those who propose a one-size-fits-all Washington-controlled program ignore the cost, inefficiency, and inadequate care that such a system offers. Access to affordable, portable health care can be made available for all Americans without imposing new mandates or raising taxes. Current government programs must also be streamlined and improved so that those who truly need help can get the health care they need. I am committed to a healthcare system that: Realigns programs and creates a system around individual consumers and patients by providing more information and more opportunities to choose affordable health care options that best meet their needs and those of their families. Improves the individual health of all Americans by shifting to a system that promotes cost-effective prevention, chronic-care management, and personal responsibility Modernizes delivery and administration of care by encouraging the widespread use of clinical best practices, medical information technology, and other innovations. Increases competition and consumer choice while streamlining regulations through free-market solutions that benefit individuals and reduce costs for employers. Promotes and speeds medical research and life-sciences innovation.

    Government Effectiveness

    Our government is outdated, inefficient, and wasteful. It is often unable to perform even the most basic tasks our citizens expect. It is no longer enough just to want limited government; the American people deserve more effective government.

    Given today’s challenges, we cannot afford—and shouldn’t accept—anything less than a nimble, effective, and efficient government that is able to focus its resources on the important issues facing our country. It must be able act on behalf of the American people and our national interests in a timely manner. The key to competent government is strong, committed leadership from the top.
    The key to good government is good people who are well-managed and put the national interest first. I am committed to: Attracting and rewarding the best Americans to serve in government and ensuring they have the authority and resources needed to get the job done. Fixing government accounting so tax dollars are properly spent and the American people know exactly what they are being spent on. Improving government performance by making agencies accountable for accomplishing their missions on time and within budget.
    Ensuring information technology systems are secure and that they give our government the capacity and effectiveness to get the job done.

    Building Strong Families

    Strong families are the bedrock of our nation and our culture. They are built around the sanctity of life and the institution of marriage, which is the union of a man and a woman. To counter coarseness in today’s culture that oftentimes victimizes our children and undermines the traditional values parents want to instill, we must not only protect but strengthen the institutions of family and marriage. I am committed to: Using the Presidency to encourage policies that promote a culture of life, strengthen the institution of marriage and traditional families, and advance freedom of religion. Returning authority to the levels of government closest to families and communities—the states—and then protecting states from further intrusion by the federal government, the judiciary, and other states. Combating the spread of obscenity over TV and other media by making sure parents can better exercise their responsibilities.

    Immigration

    The United States is a nation of immigrants. Throughout our history, legal immigrants have brought energy, ideas, strength, and diversity to our country, our economy, and our culture. This must continue. But in the post-9/11 world, immigration is more of a national security issue. A government that cannot secure its borders and determine who may enter and who may not, abrogates a fundamental responsibility. I am committed to: Securing our borders and enforcing immigration laws. Amnesty is not an option and the toleration of “sanctuary cities” must end. Reviewing our immigration laws and policies to ensure they advance our national interests. Uniting Americans by welcoming legal immigrants willing to learn English, assimilate into our communities, and become productive citizens.

    Education

    A well-educated citizenry is vital to our security, our economy, and our democracy. Despite the tens of billions of dollars spent on education by Washington each year, and the hundreds of federal education programs now in place, our children are still falling behind, particularly in subjects crucial to the global economy in which we live. At a time when America is behind other developed countries in education excellence, the federal role in education is too intrusive and too bureaucratic, and has become part of the problem. State and local governments are closest to the parents, the kids, and the schools, and best situated to implement changes and innovations that best educate children. I am committed to: Giving parents more choices in education and schools less bureaucracy. Reviewing federal programs for cost-effectiveness, reducing federal mandates, returning education money to the states, and empowering parents by promoting voucher programs, charter schools, and other innovations that enhance education excellence through competition and choice. Encouraging students and teachers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math—fields that are crucial to our security, competitiveness, and prosperity. Promoting transparency to assess performance, promote accountability, and share innovations in education at all levels.

    Appointing Judges Faithful To Our Constitution

    Activist judges across the country seem intent on legislating from the bench to promote a culture of abortion, redefine marriage, and undermine families—in effect re-shaping the values of our entire society without the consent of the people. We need judges who recognize their role in our democracy is to interpret, not make, the law. I am committed to: Appointing strict constructionist judges who will interpret the law, not impose their views on us by legislating from the bench.

    Energy Security

    The energy challenges our nation faces today are real and significant. Our dependence on foreign sources of oil threatens our national security and puts our economic prosperity at risk. America must rise to the challenge and take the steps necessary to become more energy independent before this becomes a crisis. No one solution will solve the energy challenges we face; all ideas must be on the table. Greater energy security will enhance our ability to pursue our foreign policy and national security objectives. Increasing our energy independence and investing in alternative energy sources will also produce a healthier environment.
    And while we don’t know for certain how or why climate change is occurring, it makes sense to take reasonable steps to reduce CO2 emissions without harming our economy. Overall, I am committed to: A balanced approach to energy security that increases domestic supplies, reduces demand for oil and gas, and promotes alternative fuels and other diverse energy sources. Investing in renewable and alternative fuels to promote greater energy independence and a cleaner environment. An energy policy that invests in the advanced technologies of tomorrow and places more emphasis on conservation and energy efficiency.
    Conducting research and development into technologies that improve the environment, especially the reduction of CO2 emissions.

    Second Amendment

    I strongly support the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms. Gun control is touted as a major crime-control measure. But some of the places with the strictest gun-control laws also have high violent-crime rates. Disarming law-abiding citizens does not prevent crime. The answer to violent crime is smart, effective, and aggressive law enforcement. The real effect of these gun-control measures is to place onerous restrictions on law-abiding citizens who use firearms for such legal activities as self-defense, sport-shooting, hunting, and collecting. I am committed to: Strictly enforcing existing laws and severely punishing violent criminals. Protecting the rights individual Americans enjoy under the Second Amendment”

    http://www.Fred08.com

  • I agree that he may be sick; he does not look well. Second, the possibility that he doesn’t want the job and doesn’t like meeting voters is as good an endorsement as any, frankly.

    But mainly, don’t we often accuse the MSM of generating a bogus meme, and lazily sticking to it? e.g. Fred is lazy. Well, he may well be, I don’t know. He certainly does seem unusually out to lunch on issues, world events, etc. But to be honest, it doesn’t seem fair to say that because he’s not sitting in some diner in New Hampshire with 14 people and then flying to some Pig Fair in Iowa for half an hour and then back to New Hampshire, etc. like all the other candidates that therefore he’s not serious. If I were running for Republican nomination, appearing on FOX would seem pretty ideal strategy to reach the most people. The whole point of going to the pancake flip in Podunk is to get on the nightly news for 6 seconds smiling with some regular folks or delivering one sound bite. I’m sure he’s a jerk and all, but I’d rather pick him apart for his policies (if he has any)…

  • Keith “short:”

    “Let them eat cake.”

    this message-translation brought to you by Fred08.com—the Earl Scheib “I’ll-paint-any-car-any-color-for-only-$29.95!” of American politics.

    Take the Fox-churian Candidate and go home, Keith-ee; he’s finished. The Left won’t buy his antics, social conservatives rate him on the hate-o-meter as being a close second to the devil—and in a dead heat with us Dems—, and a market-based economy has no use for a blithering, wilted schmuck who keeps walking off the job.

    UnAware Fred—Unaware, UnAppreciated, UnWilling, UnWanted, and UnElectable!

    BWA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Keith, you are confusing a staff-written issues page on Thompson’s website for the candidate himself having actual knowledge of and fluency speaking about those same issues.

    I can only speak for myself when I say that I am looking for someone with a thirst for knowledge and information, and who can process it in the context of the people affected, both here and in a global sense. I want someone who, frankly, does sometimes have a hard time sleeping because he or she is worrying over an issue – much as some of us find ourselves worried about where things are going and how problems are going to be solved. I want someone who understands that country is more important than party and power. I want someone who is engaged and aware of what is going on around him – or her. I want someone who is not afraid to listen and respond to those who do not agree. I want someone who understands that it is far more likely that this country can be taken down from within than from without, and that preventing the demise of democracy requires a sort of territorial vigilance where our rights and freedoms are concerned. I want someone who understands that “do as we say, not as we do” is no way to run a foreign policy, or spread democracy, or engender worldwide respect.

    I don’t see Fred Thompson as a person who can give me even one-tenth of what I am looking for, so the sooner he ends this charade, the better.

  • But mainly, don’t we often accuse the MSM of generating a bogus meme, and lazily sticking to it? e.g. Fred is lazy.

    People don’t think this is what is going on here because it doesn’t look like it. Just because “we often accuse” the MSM of that doesn’t mean that every detail of every AP wire story is false. There were loads of reports of Bush taking vacations during his time in office so far. It doesn’t make him look good. And the media is obviously pro-conservative. But it would take such big efforts to even have a chance of “covering up” every vacation he takes, he’s apparently uninterested in doing that, and anyone who handles him or can pull strings with the media is apparently uninterested in sweeping it under the rug. That’s a lot different, though, from Fox News Channel or Chris Mathews repeating it over and over again every time he takes a vacation, which isn’t what they do, but is what they do with a lot of other totally vacuous sound-bites and memes that probably come from the same table.

  • Former Senator Fred Thompson is the only candidate that gets it. He makes decisions based on principles. Principles don’t change. You have to stand for something and not change who you are based on the polls. That is what Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani have done and all of the Democrats do it. Give me a leader that will stand by his principles anyday versus someone that stands for everything.

    I know many Republicans and conservatives that will stay home if Rudy Giuliani is the candidate. He does not represent our values as conservatives, and never will. Millionaire Mitt Romney is a Republican-in-name-only (RINO ) that simply has everything else and nothing to do. “I guess I’ll just try to buy the presidency”. The White House isn’t for sale! Conservatives will simply stay home and the Democrats will pick up additional seats in the House and probably get the 60 seats in the Senate they need to completely destroy our Country. Nice picture huh?

    However, I think Fred can bring America back together, if that’s even possible. America needs a rebirth of patriotism and honor. Republicans also need a rebirth. President Reagan was our last rebirth and he can never be duplicated. Fred Thompson will bring his own down-to-earth common sense to this country. If a conservative runs as a conservative, he will win!

    Think of it this way: Eight years of another Clinton White House? Now if that is not a sufficient enough reason to pull together as a nation, and fight this socialist liberal takeover of our government, what is?

    Folks, we are in for the fight of our lives, just as our young men and women are fighting for our freedoms in Iraq and Afghanistan, we must fight for our nation right here and now! I truly believe Fred Thompson is the one man who can pull this nation back together! Rudy Giuliani will just tear us apart.

  • Comments are closed.