Meet Bethany Wilkerson

A couple of weeks ago, Graeme Frost and his family joined congressional supporters of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) to endorse the bipartisan expansion of the policy. As has been well documented, some far-right activists went after the Frost family, using bogus information to argue that Graeme doesn’t deserve coverage from the state of Maryland. He does.

But now we have another real-life example to demonstrate the importance of the program. Meet Bethany Wilkerson.

Now, there’s obviously some provocative content in the ad — all of which is accurate, by the way — but there’s a bottom line to this. S-CHIP almost certainly saved this young girl’s life.

And what of the chances that Malkin, Limbaugh, the National Review, and others might decide to smear the Wilkersons? The family doesn’t seem particularly concerned.

For the record, the Bo and Dara Wilkerson say they make $34,000 in combined income from restaurant jobs in St. Petersburg, Fla. They rent their house and the couple owns one car, which Bo calls “a junker.” […]

The Wilkersons said they are fully aware of the possibility that their finances and personal lives may be investigated by opponents of the SCHIP bill.

“We rent a house, we have one car that is a junker. Let them dig away,” Bo Wilkerson said. “I have $67 in my checking account. Does that answer your question?”

He doesn’t sound intimidated.

As for the Frost family, Graeme’s parents, Halsey and Bonnie Frost, spoke with MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann last night. C&L has the video, but here’s some of the transcript:

OLBERMANN: Mrs. Frost, let me start with what matters. How are you and the kids doing through all this?

BONNIE FROST, MOTHER OF GRAEME FROST: We’re doing well. Gemma and Graeme are doing well. They’re in school. But they have a lot of healing left. They have a lot of work to go. So we’re hanging in there.

OLBERMANN: Mr. Frost, just deconstruct this fictional picture of your family that’s been put together by the fringe, the lunatic fringe. You’re a business owner? You work out of a commercial property you own. You live on a street full of half million dollar homes. You pay 20 grand a year for your kids to go to private school.

HALSEY FROST, FATHER OF GRAEME FROST: It would seem to me it would be common sense if you do all the math on that, that we’d be doing really, really well. And that’s far from the case. You know, that’s quite a rosy picture they painted. But the fact is I did have a business. Of course, they did not report properly that I ran from like — Frost Works from 1990 and folded up around ’98, ’99, went as far as incorporating that, actually carrying health insurance. And actually that was probably one of the nails in the coffin in that business. It became cost too much to bear for that.

And half a million dollar homes. This is a house that we bought as a just near about shell and did all the work ourselves. So I would hope that we’re not punished for the sweat equity into that. But I have the ability and the unique skills to be able to do everything that’s required to turn this property around. And this is our home. This is not an investment thing. This is the Frost house.

OLBERMANN: And the kids are in private schools on scholarships mostly.

H. FROST: Yes. It’s like, you know, we do get help from that, from the schools. It’s a must. Without that, we really would be limited — have our options limited.

OLBERMANN: Mrs. Frost, your address posted online, these lies accepted as facts, death threats. Did you know beforehand that people like this existed in America?

B. FROST: I knew people like this existed in America. But I am shocked that it came to this, that they seem to use this as a distraction technique to take away the issue at hand. And that is that millions of children in America are without health insurance and could benefit greatly from the S-CHIP bill, just like my family has. And my main goal was to get that message across, that we just want to help other families like we have been helped. And just thinking that it was turned around in such a nasty, negative way is unbelievable to me.

H. FROST: Yes, definitely an agenda that they seem to need to be filling. Because I guess when you have to attack in such a manner, you’re — obviously it’s a distraction because the facts are very clear. This helps hard working American families. This country needs this now. And I am sorely disappointed in our president for not having his finger on the pulse of what’s going on right now.

Olbermann concluded, “[S]ince the Rush Limbaughs of this world aren’t going to be man enough to apologize to you, and Graeme, we’ll do so on their behalf. We’re sorry the media has gotten this bad.”

All I can say is the reimposition of the Fairness Doctrine might work a lot like Dorothy chucking a bucket of water on somebody.

What a world!

  • ***Since the Rush Limbaughs of this world aren’t going to be man enough….***

    Rush-ya Limbaughsky—less of a man than Ann “The Man” Coulter. I think that just about sums it up….

  • “I have $67 in my checking account.”

    I have even less in my checking account — because I keep my money in interest-bearing accounts and transfer it to checking only when I need it.

  • I have even less in my checking account — because I keep my money in interest-bearing accounts and transfer it to checking only when I need it. #3

    Good for you.

  • And I can only wait to hear the right attack this guy because he hasn’t done that well for himself. If he’s not making enough money to support his family, there must be something wrong with him, huh? Lazy perhaps? Just another bum leeching off the government? Why didn’t he pull himself up by the “bootstraps”?
    Where’s his “rugged individualism”?

    Kind of reminds of something I read awhile ago. Meet Joe Republican:

    Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised.
    All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer’s medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance – now Joe gets it too.

    He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe’s bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.

    In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.

    Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air.

    He walks on the government-provided sidewalk to subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work. It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.

    Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe’s employer pays these standards because Joe’s employer doesn’t want his employees to call the union.

    If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he’ll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn’t think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.

    It is noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe’s deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Joe’s money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.

    Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime. Joe also forgets that his in addition to his federally subsidized student loans, he attended a state funded university.

    Joe is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car safety standards to go along with the tax-payer funded roads.

    He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers’ Home Administration because bankers didn’t want to make rural loans.

    The house didn’t have electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn’t belong and demanded rural electrification.

    He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn’t have to.

    Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn’t mention that the beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: “We don’t need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I’m a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have.”

  • The truth is that there are thousands of kids and families like the Frosts and the Wilkersons – people who are working hard, hoping to one day be able to afford “private” insurance, but who, in the meantime, have been able to avoid tumbling farther down the economic scale to where they are Medicaid-eligible, and into and beyond that into the ranks of the bankrupt and/or homeless, because of the S-CHIP program. If Bush-supporters cannot bring themselves to the point where they see the merit in lifting people up, is it too much to ask that they try to live with not making it easier for them to drown?

    I truly wish I understood why it is that the right is more concerned with where and how children receive health insurance than that they receive it, and thus receive the care they need. And I sure don’t understand how they can fling money around to all kinds of “projects” in order to buy votes, and can spend half a trillion dollars on a “war” and on contractors who pretty much have carte blanche and an open checkbook, but they can’t justify spending the equivalent of what is spent in 40 days in Iraq in order to cover another 4 million kids who are uninsured.

    Yes, I would like to see all parents consider whether they have the means to support the kids they have, but I would also like people to understand that the children should not be punished and made to suffer for the decisions of their parents. They are as innocent in all of this as the embryos and fetuses the right works so hard to bring into the world – and I think if the right thinks the unborn are owed a chance at being born, they have some responsibility to ensure that the quality of life after birth is commensurate with the zeal that went into saving them in the first place.

  • The Wilkerson ad says, “when her parents couldn’t pay for it, the government did,” I’d really like to see that turned around to, “Americans kicked in.” What we’re talking about is how we as a society choose spend our tax dollars. Make it personal. Break it down into how much it costs each of us to support the S-CHIP program if that helps.

    Saying, “the government” paid carries all the baggage that the right associates with “government” as well as an authoritarian, provider/protector feel. The notion of government as a tool we can use for the common good needs to be reestablished.

  • “I have $67 in my checking account.”

    Me too. I only dig up the gold bars out of the backyard when I need them.

  • Olbermann concluded, “[S]ince the Rush Limbaughs of this world aren’t going to be man enough to apologize…”

    Have I mentioned how much I love Olbermann? 😉

    #7 beep: good thought.

    The part of Bethany’s ad that hit me like a ton of bricks, and that made it so effective was comparing the cost of the program to funding the (very unpopular) war.

  • Soem interesting views on this topic from USA Today:

    Fifty-two percent of respondents say they have more confidence in Democrats to deal with the issue, compared with 32% for Bush.

    Slim majorities back two positions at the core of the president’s opposition to the expansion:

    •52% agree with Bush that most benefits should go to children in families earning less than 200% of the federal poverty level — about $41,000 for a family of four. Only 40% say benefits should go to such families earning up to $62,000, as the bill written by Democrats and some Republicans would allow.

    •55% are very or somewhat concerned that the program would create an incentive for families to drop private insurance. Bush and Republican opponents have called that a step toward government-run health care.

    Taken together, the results show that while Bush may be losing the political battle with Democrats, he may be doing better on policy.

  • That video is produced by TrueMajority.org, but I can’t find anyway to contribute to getting it on the air. Their site allows you to send it to “send to your friends” but I want that thing on prime time tv. Or Oprah. Or something.

    Rather than chest-thumping, base-placating, self-affirming bullshit ad buys like “General Betray-Us” and other MoveOn-type stuff, this video is one of the rare cases where I think an advocacy ad might actually be impactful and effective—and not only on this issue, but in framing the debate and the GOP going forward. I’d feel much better parting with cash to get that ad on during “Dancing with the Stars” than donating towards some oblique “$100K for Peace.”

    I just wrote TrueMajority and urged them to mount a campaign. Make it fucking happen, Ben.

  • Some quick facts about the Frosts:

    They refused to show the Baltimore Sun their tax returns
    They own a $165,000+ warehouse – probably worth more but heavily mortgaged
    They own a house worth $450,000+ with a mortgage under $100,000

    The folks are worth more than me but get free healthcare. This blows as I’m picking up part of the tab.

  • Comments are closed.