Army captains: ‘Our best option is to leave Iraq immediately’

About a month ago, the NYT published an op-ed from seven infantrymen and noncommissioned officers with the 82nd Airborne Division. The piece, “The War as We Saw It,” was a sweeping condemnation of everything we’ve heard from war supporters. As these seven troops explained, U.S. forces are an unwelcome occupying force, the U.S. mission is built on bogus assumptions, and “recent press coverage portraying the conflict as increasingly manageable” is grossly exaggerated.

Today, on the fifth anniversary of the congressional authorization of military force in Iraq, the WaPo runs a powerful op-ed of its own from 12 former Army captains who served in Iraq — and who believe it’s time to leave.

Five years on, the Iraq war is as undermanned and under-resourced as it was from the start. And, five years on, Iraq is in shambles.

As Army captains who served in Baghdad and beyond, we’ve seen the corruption and the sectarian division. We understand what it’s like to be stretched too thin. And we know when it’s time to get out.

And that would be, according to the 12 former Army captains, now.

These “phony troops” just keep popping up, don’t they? It must be a real challenge for the conservative smear machine to keep up.

The 12 explain that even seemingly-stabilized areas of Iraq are not what they appear — U.S. forces “just push insurgents to another spot on the map and often strengthen the insurgents’ cause by harassing locals to a point of swayed allegiances.” Iraqi security forces are practically hopeless, with debilitating corruption and police who are controlled by militias.

This is Operation Iraqi Freedom and the reality we experienced. This is what we tried to communicate up the chain of command. This is either what did not get passed on to our civilian leadership or what our civilian leaders chose to ignore. While our generals pursue a strategy dependent on peace breaking out, the Iraqis prepare for their war — and our servicemen and women, and their families, continue to suffer.

There is one way we might be able to succeed in Iraq. To continue an operation of this intensity and duration, we would have to abandon our volunteer military for compulsory service. Short of that, our best option is to leave Iraq immediately. A scaled withdrawal will not prevent a civil war, and it will spend more blood and treasure on a losing proposition.

America, it has been five years. It’s time to make a choice.

Philip Carter, a former officer himself who had a good post on this, emphasized just how right the 12 are.

[U]nvarnished truth like this has been in short supply over the past five years. These young officers worked hard to unf**k the situation they’re talking about; they poured a lot of sweat and blood into the effort, and were committed to it. My guess is that they probably saw some of their own troops wounded or killed in the process. At the end of the day, they’re stuck wrestling with the same question that I am: “was it worth it?” Given the state of Iraq today, and all the frustrations of the mission, I’m not surprised by their conclusion. Many military professionals I talk with quietly tell me the same thing, while continuing to evince a public persona of confidence and “can do” attitude. These officers have had enough of that dualism.

If only the White House felt the same way.

As for these officers, they are obviously deserving of our gratitude, not only for their service, but for having the courage to speak out now. I shudder to think what conservatives might say about their efforts and patriotism, but we can only hope the right shows some respect and restraint. It would be a nice change of pace.

And yet, there was Tony Snow on The Daily Show last night, continuing to lie about Iraq even though he’s no longer paid to do so. I couldn’t stomach it and don’t know if Jon Stewart pushed back (I left the room).

  • Hannah,

    Jon did, but Jon was polite about letting Snowjob know that he didn’t think Snowjob was right.

    CB,
    The answer is no. Expect incoming fire ASAP

  • What do these 12 former Army captains want to do? Leave the “cause of freedom” behind in Iraq?

    Maybe because a totalitarian police state imposed by foreign occupiers to perpetuate neocolonialism/imperialism does not constitute the “cause of freedom.”

  • “what our civilian leaders chose to ignore”

    Now that would be a long list of things. And yet impeachment is off the table, because our “leaders” choose to ignore the crimes we’ve all witnessed.

    Impeach. Now. Or let the bar be lowered for all future generations of Americans.

  • “These “phony troops” just keep popping up, don’t they?”

    Yes they do. Someone should look into whether their kids are getting S-CHIP medical insurance.

  • A comment from the WaPo editorial:

    What many Iraqis may not understand is that we made their country a battleground against terrorists so that we would not have to fight them here.

    For that, we say “Thanks.”
    10/16/2007 11:26:07 AM

    How about that? No need to worry if it gets really bad, because this retarded, selfish, psychopathic talking point will never, ever die.

  • This is also a problem for the Dems. The front-running presidential candidates haven’t committed to immediate withdrawal, but an extended presence of unknown duration.

    A scaled withdrawal will not prevent a civil war, and it will spend more blood and treasure on a losing proposition.

    But the best line is this: “America, it has been five years. It’s time to make a choice.”

    There are no certainties here, but a decision one way or the other is sorely needed.

  • I shudder to think what conservatives might say about their efforts and patriotism, but we can only hope the right shows some respect and restraint. It would be a nice change of pace.

    Sorry CB… not a chance Iraq hell.

  • It’s a big problem for all of us. Regardless of realities in Iraq, no matter how dire and exposed they may be, because of our maniacal leadership and its significant base of zealots, we are stuck in Iraq for many years. If the nominee(s) say they will pull out rapidly and Bush believes them, the chances that he will start war(s) with Iran, Pakistan, Syria,… increase dramatically. If the new president yanks us out without campaigning on that policy and things get worse and become uncontained, that president, actually all of us, face extreme political, cultural, even physical dangers within our own country without even factoring in the external ones.

    This administration is like one of the bogus papacies of long ago. Its very existence makes the road back to legitimacy long and difficult.

  • I recently learned about the petrodollar and how it replaced the gold standard in the early seventies. It’s probably the best theory I’ve heard for explaing our middle east policies. Here’s an informative post on that subject.

    Here’s the gist in a nutshell. After Vietnam we were in debt. Foreigners tried to cash in their US dollars in exchange for the gold that backed it. There wasn’t enough gold, so Nixon took us off the gold standard. Around the same time we cut a deal with Saudi Arabia to make the US dollar the standard world wide oil currency. Nations needed dollars to buy oil creating a demand for dollars which maintained their value. We get what amounts to free oil just by printing dollars. In 2000 Saddam traded his dollars for Euros and started selling oil for Euros. When America took over Iraq, Iraq went back to selling oil for dollars. Now Iran wants to sell oil for a basket of currencies that doesn’t include the dollar. It just cut a deal with Japan to sell oil for yen for example. Time to topple Iran? I seriously hope not- but this petrodollar concept has opened my eyes. Ron Paul wants to return to the gold standard for a reason. Moving from gold to oil as a currency backing has done tremendous damage to this country because what happens with the oil is beyond our control. We’re in bed with bad actors and we can’t attack every oil producer. Russia is not on board with us trying. The bottom line is that the dollar will continue to fall against other currencies. This will raise the price of all the cheap crap we import, and may help us rebuild manufacturing and exports in this country but only time will tell- but moving part of your 401K into some kind of International index might not be a bad idea right about now.

  • re casey @ 10…

    Most interesting… if HRC did indeed say she’d bring the troops home immediately and meant to say it, and sticks to it, I’ll eat my hat. Thanks.

  • The “Iraq Lie” is the only thing keeping the Bushylvanians in power now. Take away the credibility of the Iraq expidition; take away the cacophony of endless rhetoric being employed to smear Truth itself—and the entire house of cards will come down on these incredulously-filthy monsters like the WTC did on FDNY.

    What happens to the smear machine, once enough people realize that it’s all lie? That’s the thing that the rightwingers fear the most—because it means an end to their Glorious Deevolution of Truth. It means their “base” suddenly finds itself unable to contain the onslaught. It means millions of Foxnoise addicts suddenly sobering up, and saying “Nicht Neocon….”

  • “…but we can only hope the right shows some respect and restraint. It would be a nice change of pace.” Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah.
    Bush is in this for the history books and will never leave Iraq unless he is “forced” to leave.
    His backers refuse to recognize the effect on the Troops or on Iraq as they continue to make a profit from the occupation. The more chaos and destruction that ensues the more profit they make. Yet here we have to stand back and watch as a small group of men continue to destroy our nation, our military and our freedoms….The republicans…they are the true occupiers, the true enemy of democracy. I’m done playing nice with the Coulters, Malkins, Rushes, Hannities,O’’Reileys, Grahams, Liebermans, McConnells etc., etc., etc.
    There is no discussion with the politics of hate. It’s time to stand them off. Expel them from our government and from our national voice. They are in the minority though they are convinced they are in the majority by their representatives in the media.

    Don’t elect them, don’t support them, and reject their voice in the media at every opportunity. If present day conservatives are for it, it must be bad simply because it’s “them” that want it…the politics of hate, ambush and smear.

  • I think it’s worth pointing out that of the seven NCOs who spoke out, in August actually, one was shot in the head (and survived) before the piece was published, and two have since died in a vehicular ‘accident’ in Iraq. The news of that was effectively buried along with the bodies.

    I wondered in August what price those brave guys would pay for their candor. Now I know. Again I have to wonder what it will be for these Captains. And I hope some media and pundit types will keep tabs on them so we find out.

  • Haik @ 14 – followed your links and then some. Fascinating stuff – thanks! Always thought this was about the oil. Now concrete evidence pointing that way. Sure is the most logical explanation for all that has happened since 2000 when Saddam converted to euros, including the pre-9/11 planning for the Iraq invasion, Cheney’s secret “energy” meetings in that same period, the switch back to $$s 2 months after the invasion and now all the chatter about Iran b/c of the oil currancy. How much does the switch to other currencies cut into Big Oil’s profits in this country?

  • “It must be a real challenge for the conservative smear machine to keep up.”

    i’m sure malkin, limbaugh, et al, are more than up to the task!

  • SEE:Jim Holts review:It’s the Oil!. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/101207H.shtml.

    We liberals can argue on forever about the morality of the Bush-Push in the Middle East and we are on rightous ground. But we, or somebody on our side must answer Jim Holts theory. Countries, including ours seldom make life or death decisions, (of the country), based upon virtue. Just as a country has no friends, only interests, imperialists convinced of Jim Holts scenerio have the high geo-political economic, if not virtuous ground. Progressives don’t stand a chance! We need to think of an alternative to the present path of oil dependance. I am not talking of the recycle a little more, grow your own food and other idealistic but almost totally inadequate ideas. Remember; imperialists distastefull as they are to our kind of thinking have learned through surviving in the economic jungle what is practical and what is idealistic claptrap. Until our movement can develope some powerful arguments for a more human centered way of our national survival we are going to be “studying the reality that those in power are creating”. AWe will always be one step behind those in power tugging on their shirtails and whimpering, “but its not fair or moral”, or whatever idealistic but impractical notions we are currently in love with.. Of course it’s not fair! I’ll bet that’s the last thing prey animals think as their predators carry them off for dinner!
    Reads Jim Holts review and let’s try to be part of a plan that looks beyond the present humanist fiasco! http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/101207H.shtml.
    DC
    I am not a troll, but this is what the trolls are probably thinking. Those that think, of course!

  • Comments are closed.