FEMA holds a press conference with itself

Following the Hurricane Katrina debacle, FEMA has been the subject of close scrutiny this week, as the agency scrambles to help respond to the wildfires in Southern California. Naturally, that includes effective public-relations efforts, and feeding news outlets evidence that FEMA knows what it’s doing.

So, on Tuesday, Vice Adm. Harvey E. Johnson, FEMA’s deputy administrator, held a press briefing in DC, which was covered live on MSNBC, Fox News, and other outlets. Johnson, to borrow a phrase, did a heckuva job.

Johnson stood behind a lectern and began with an overview before saying he would take a few questions. The first questions were about the “commodities” being shipped to Southern California and how officials are dealing with people who refuse to evacuate. He responded eloquently.

He was apparently quite familiar with the reporters — in one case, he appears to say “Mike” and points to a reporter — and was asked an oddly in-house question about “what it means to have an emergency declaration as opposed to a major disaster declaration” signed by the president. He once again explained smoothly.

After FEMA press secretary Aaron Walker interrupted to say, “Last question,” someone asked Johnson whether he was satisfied with FEMA’s response to the emergency. Johnson hailed the agency’s triumphant performance: “…I think what you’re really seeing here is the benefit of experience, the benefit of good leadership and the benefit of good partnership, none of which were present in Katrina.”

There were no tough questions, no skepticism, and nothing that strayed from the FEMA line. Just softball after softball. Why were the assembled reporters so pathetic?

Because they weren’t reporters at all. FEMA hosted a press conference with questions from FEMA staffers pretending to be reporters.

The agency gave reporters 15 minutes’ notice before the press briefing, making it almost impossible for most reporters to get FEMA’s DC offices (which are nowhere near downtown or Capitol Hill). But the agency didn’t want to hold a press conference on national television without questions, so FEMA employees stood in and gave Johnson the chance to “wax on and on about FEMA’s greatness.”

Of course, that could be because the questions were asked by FEMA staffers playing reporters. We’re told the questions were asked by Cindy Taylor, FEMA’s deputy director of external affairs, and by “Mike” Widomski, the deputy director of public affairs. Director of External Affairs John “Pat” Philbin asked a question, and another came, we understand, from someone who sounds like press aide Ali Kirin.

Asked about this, Widomski said: “We had been getting mobbed with phone calls from reporters, and this was thrown together at the last minute.”

The administration pays pundits to toe the Bush line, and it sends out fake-news segments for local TV stations to air, so I suppose it stands to reason that it would host press conferences with administration employees pretending to be reporters.

Halloween should be easy for these guys this year.

Just put white garbage bags over your body and paint on eyes and mouth…

Sock puppets!

  • Just when I thought BushCo couldn’t sink any lower, something like this comes along. This is a new nadir…a Potemkin press conference.

  • Remember back in the ’90s how all the wingnuts believed that FEMA would be transporting UN troops in black helicopters to impose the New World Order? Good times! I guess we don’t have to worry about that anymore.

  • After the success of a certain fake-news show, this was an obvious next step, the fake news conference. Kudos to FEMA. Look for them to be nominated for an Emmy next year.

  • I realize FEMA is desperate for some positive PR, but this is beyond pathetic. They should have just stuck with how much better they responded to these fires compared with Katrina. The media was happy to play along with that one, completely ignoring that California wildfires are a semi regular event and there is existing infrastructure to deal with them. Certainly FEMA has a vital supporting role to play in these fires. This was not the case with Katrina, where no infrastructure exists anywhere to handle anything close to that level of disaster.
    Comparing the 2 is apples to oranges. FEMA should have stuck with patting itself on back for doing so well in a false analogy.

  • “this was thrown together at the last minute”

    Oh please. They couldn’t plan better than that? Bullshit. This was planned to go down this way. What it shows is that Bush’s cronies at FEMA didn’t want to get the “Brownie” treatment.

    Every week these people find a new low to stoop to, and the lapdog media just sucks it up and lets it slide off, because only the dirty fucking hippies get outraged.

  • Send this story to your conservative relatives as an example of the “liberal press” at work. It’ll blow what minds they might still have.

  • How embarrassing it must be to be so afraid of the already docile, conservative media that they have to stage a phony presser. If these guys are pooping their pants at having to face Fox news reporters they must have to live their lives wearing Depends.

  • Instead of a puppet show, the non-Ministry of Truth approach would’ve been to say, “Sorry no reporters could make it, but here are some of the questions I’ve been asked already.” And then give a canned speech.

    There’s no excuse for a pretend news conference.


  • We could be encouraged by the fact that it did go without a hitch

    If only they were as good at scripting the disasters.

  • Apparently FEMA wasn’t capable of setting up a conference call that could actually transmit sound from the caller’s end to the FEMA office.

    That’s not fishy, is it?

    [Reporters] were given an 800 number to call in, though it was a “listen only” line, the notice said — no questions.

  • “…this was thrown together at the last minute.”

    I am not buying this. The national broadcast media was there (at the last minute) but the Washnington news media were not?

  • There were no tough questions, no skepticism, and nothing that strayed from the FEMA line. Just softball after softball. Why were the assembled reporters so pathetic?

    So, it was just like every other press conference in the last six years?

  • “…I think what you’re really seeing here is the benefit of experience, the benefit of good leadership and the benefit of good partnership, none of which were present in Katrina.”

    So is that a rip on Brownie, or is it a rip on the local NOLA leadership? Or both?

  • This is rich:

    Bush tours areas ravaged by fire
    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-na-bush26oct26,1,2140772.story?coll=la-headlines-california

    “He invoked the contrast with Katrina most directly when he heaped praise on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for his leadership. Bush’s plaudits for a fellow Republican appeared to be an indirect dig at Louisiana’s Democratic Gov. Kathleen Blanco.”

    “‘It makes a significant difference when you have someone in the statehouse who’s willing to lead,’ Bush said.”

  • Is the national press picking up this story? There’s no justification for this embarrassment and it will be held up for a long time to come. Demonstrating once again that FEMA still isn’t credible.

  • Schwartzenegger has a little problem of not having the C-30 aircraft outfitted with large tanks for fire retardant which was promised 4 years ago by the state. Sort of like Rudi’s un replaced radio problem.

  • “…this was thrown together at the last minute.”

    Given that we’re talking about the nation’s disaster planning agency, surely I’m not the only one who finds this lack of organizational ability troubling. . .

  • How can you tell the difference between ‘real’ reporters and shills to begin with? Jeff Gannon anyone.

    Will the MSM call FEMA on this one, or will it just pass unnoticed?

  • I think FEMA did one heck of a job (NOT !!)

    Truly, truly pathetic. Fire them all, and start with Dumbo.

    oh, wait… he already got his notice.

    Mefa.

  • Comments are closed.