Bush visits California, takes a shot at Louisiana

It’s only natural, I suppose, to compare the federal response to Hurricane Katrina and the wildfires in Southern California. The natural disasters aren’t exactly analogous, but they both featured the need for mass evacuations, and a massive government response. (Well, that and the need to use a football stadium as a refuge for the evacuated.)

Obviously, the response to Katrina was pathetic, and the response to the wildfires has been competent, though as Dan Froomkin noted yesterday, “[D]espite all the forceful pronouncements from the White House, it’s not clear that Bush deserves much, if any, of the credit. And there’s no indication that his visit will expiate the Katrina legacy, arguably the second most defining aspect of his presidency.”

But that apparently hasn’t stopped Bush from taking a cheap shot.

Was there a little dig for the Democrats in Louisiana in President Bush’s words of commendation for Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger at the scene of wildfire recovery today?

“There is no hill he’s not willing to charge, no problem he’s not willing to solve,” Bush said of the California governor. “It makes a significant difference when you have somebody in the statehouse willing to take the lead.”

Unlike, say, Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco, who was faulted perhaps as much as the Federal Emergency Management Agency was for inadequate preparation and response for Hurricane Katrina’s assault on New Orleans and the Gulf Coast?

You think?

It had all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, with Bush effectively re-litigating the Katrina fiasco, and blaming Blanco for not “taking the lead.” Two years later, and the president is still trying pass the buck.

For her part, Blanco said in a press statement that it took federal forces nearly a week to arrive in Louisiana after the storm. “I was the only game in town, leading for nearly a week without the president’s help,” Blanco said. “Of all the lessons learned from Katrina now being put into place in California, I would hope the one he would remember is that politics has no place in any disaster.”

So much for that idea.

Not quite done, Bush added:

“It turns out when the president shows up, so do a lot of other brass,” said Bush, welcoming the director of the National Guard bureau and another military leader. “All of us who represent the federal government” are here to help, Bush said. “That’s exactly what we’ll be doing, and exactly what we’ll continue to do.”

“We’ve got a four-star general here today. He runs Northcomm,” Bush said. “He’s here to help you.”

People who need it can get help with “home reprayer – repair,” said the president, handing out the FEMA phone number and Web-site for victims of the wildfires.

“Arnold Schwarzenegger is right. These fires are going to go out… but there are still going to be needs and concerns,” Bush said. “We’re not going to forget you in Washington, D.C.”

Funny, Louisiana residents heard the same promise. How’d that work out?

And Louisiana just elected a GOP Governor to rid themselves of a bunch of inept and corrupt democrats. Sometimes the people closest to the situation know what’s best. After all the good people of Tennessee didn’t vote for Algore for president, I wonder why?

  • To borrow a phrase from Reagan, the scariest thing a person in America today can hear is “I’m George W. Bush, and I’m here to help.” Take it from this New Orleanian.

  • Drew P, you beat me to it!

    It was one of Reagan’s favorite one-liners: “We’re from the Government, and we’re here to help.” Along with “Government isn’t the answer to the problem; government IS the problem.”

    But George W. Bush is different. He’s a compassionate conservative!

  • It still remains to be seen exactly how much help the fire victims will actually recieve from the feds. The situations are not exactly the same and the victims our TV show us seem to be a pretty affluent and high profile group of people with good insurance. I wonder how much of the promissed federal help will be distributed to those less fortunate and uninsured renters and people of a lower socioeconomic status. As we have all learned, Bush sometimes knows how to say the right thing but he seldom delivers what he promises. He talks about the compassionate conservative but he vetoes health care for poor children.

  • What else can be said about Shrub’s trip to California that Stephen Colbert didn’t already say at the infamous White House Press Association Dinner …

    “I stand by this man. I stand by this man because he stands for things. Not only for things, he stands on things. Things like aircraft carriers and rubble and recently flooded city squares. And that sends a strong message: that no matter what happens to America, she will always rebound — with the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world.”

  • Since this is the second big disaster after Katrina (Rita and fire), I should hope state governments are better prepared.

    One thing that all of us learned from Katrina is not to expect government assistance. Everyone I know – in Georgia and California and many in NYC – have small stockpiles of food, water and one of those wind up radio/lights with a cell phone recharger. I also keep stuff in my car for emergencies. Prior to Katrina, I didn’t have any of that. Now I know I need it.

  • It’s only natural, I suppose, to compare the federal response to Hurricane Katrina and the wildfires in Southern California. The natural disasters aren’t exactly analogous, but they both featured the need for mass evacuations, and a massive government response. (Well, that and the need to use a football stadium as a refuge for the evacuated.)

    They are such different disasters, with the San Diego fire so much “easier” to deal with than Katrina — from the perspective all levels of government.


  • Jeff Farias: And Louisiana just elected a GOP Governor to rid themselves of a bunch of inept and corrupt democrats. Sometimes the people closest to the situation know what’s best. After all the good people of Tennessee didn’t vote for Algore for president, I wonder why?

    So… what you’re saying is that you think President Bush’s politicizing a national tragedy (2 years later) as though he was actively campaigning against Kathleen Blanco, is okay?

    Is there anything Bush could say that you might consider inappropriate or childish? Or is anything and everything acceptable as long as the target is one of them “corrupt democrats”?

    How would you feel if (setting aside for the moment, your belief that Republicans = good, and Democrats = bad):

    Say there was another terrorist attack on U.S. soil. Hillary shows up for her “photo op” and decides to take a shot at the Republican response to 9/11… not years later, not months later, but at the height of the tragedy when everyone should be working together to pick up the pieces and go forward.

    Can you even imagine the average Democrat stooping that low; let alone, the outrage and non-stop condemnation and media coverage this was get?

  • No, the difference is that we would be outraged if Clinton, Edwards, Gore or Obama took such a cheap shot! It would simply never happen because this kind of thing is repulsive to most progressives.

  • Hey all,

    For the hell of it I googled myself and found out some troll has been using my name to post idiotic right wing talking points on a number of left leaning websites.
    I host a liberal talk radio show In Phoenix AZ on 1480 KPHX
    http://www.1480 kphx.com
    my website is http://www.jefffarias.com

    If anyone is monitoring this site please block the troll who calls himself jeff farias.

    If you see fit please let me know who is doing this so I can try to stop it.
    Thank you.

  • Comments are closed.