Nearly two years ago, then-White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan promised the press corps that a “thorough report” would be released “very soon” documenting contacts betwen the White House and disgraced GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Not surprisingly, that never actually happened. The Bush gang thought they could just stall, reporters would eventually stop asking, and the scandal would eventually go away. Sure enough, that wasn’t a bad strategy, at least as far as cover-ups go.
Of course, the questions never actually went away, they just hibernated thanks to a Republican Congress that had a philosophical objection to oversight. Roll Call reports today that the questions are making a comeback.
House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is demanding hundreds of pages of documents from the White House that he says indicate the depths of contacts between Bush administration officials and disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
In an Oct. 31 letter to White House counsel Fred Fielding, Waxman said the White House has released to the committee 3,700 pages of documents detailing Abramoff’s contacts with the White House, but has refused to release about 600 pages that, according to the White House, “contain internal deliberations among White House employees, or that otherwise implicate Executive Branch prerogatives.”
Waxman said the committee’s investigation thus far indicates that “some senior White House officials had regular contact with Mr. Abramoff,” and his letter demands production of the documents by Nov. 6.
Waxman has told the White House it basically has two choices: claim executive privilege or fork over the docs.
As Paul Kiel noted, Waxman added a sardonic little quip in his correspondence with the White House counsel’s office: “Given the prior statements by White House officials, it is surprising that there would be this volume of documents of internal deliberations involving Mr. Abramoff.”
Kiel added a helpful primer, for those rusty on the details and most recent revelations.
The scandal [escalated] when Waxman released a report last year about Abramoff’s significant contacts with the White House forced the resignation of Karl Rove’s aide Susan Ralston (who also, coincidentally, used to be Abramoff’s personal assistant). Our favorite revelation remains an email where one of Abramoff’s associates calls then-White House political director Ken Mehlman a “rock star” for being such a helpful ally.
Waxman also reveals in the letter that Mehlman’s successor at the White House Matt Schlapp cooperated with the investigation and did nothing to play down Abramoff’s access to those at the top:
“Mr. Schlapp estimated that he had ‘monthly’ contact with Jack Abramoff on subjects that often involved official government business. He also told the Committee that Mr. Abramoff and his associates ‘had many friends in the administration’; that Mr. Abramoff was regarded as a ‘point of information’ because of ‘his knowledge and his experience and his judgment on issues surrounding politics and policy and how the town works’; and that Mr. Abramoff’s lobbying team was ‘viewed by many as a very respected lobbying team.'”
Waxman expects a response within a week. If recent history is any guide, he won’t get one.
It’s funny how Bush scandals never really go away, isn’t it?