Today’s edition of quick hits.
* Say hello to your next Attorney General: “Democratic Sens. Charles Schumer of New York and Dianne Feinstein of California say they will support Michael Mukasey’s nomination to be attorney general. Both are members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.”
* This has the potential to be very interesting: “Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and more than a dozen other current and former intelligence officials must testify about their conversations with pro-Israel lobbyists, a federal judge ruled Friday in an espionage case. Lawyers for two former American Israel Public Affairs Committee lobbyists facing charges have subpoenaed Rice, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams and several others to testify at their trial next year. Prosecutors had challenged the subpoenas in federal court…. If they ultimately testify in court, the trial in federal court in suburban Alexandria, Va. could offer a behind-the-scenes look at the way U.S. foreign policy is crafted.”
* In only the fifth veto of his presidency, Bush rejected the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) today, because, he said, it included $9 billion in extra spending for water infrastructure projects. The bill, which funds hurricane protection, flood mitigation, and wetlands restoration is expected to become law anyway, because it enjoys veto-proof support in both chambers.
* Reporters finally started asking Rudy Giuliani about his blatantly dishonest radio ad today. “Even if you want to quibble about the statistics, you find me the person who leaves the United States and goes to England for prostate cancer treatment, and I’d like to meet that person,” he told reporters. Allow me to translate: “As long as I really believe in the broader point I hope to make, it’s acceptable for me to lie about the details.”
* Did the White House think no one would notice? “On ABC World News with Charles Gibson last night, ABC National Security Correspondent Jonathan Karl filed a report about the recent decline in American troop casualties in Iraq. In the report, Karl noted that ‘violence in Iraq is down,’ but added that ‘there has been almost no political progress on the national level.’ … After the report aired, the White House sent the piece out in an official White House publication called ‘White House Iraq Update.’ But, as Karl writes today, the White House edited his report before sending it out, making it look ‘like an unqualified declaration of success in Iraq.'”
* Is Iraq poised to get worse? “The U.S. military official in charge of supporting reconciliation efforts in Iraq says that unless the Shiite-led Iraqi government takes concrete steps to embrace the Sunnis, the new, mostly-Sunni ex-insurgent militias supported by the U.S. could return to insurgency.”
* CBS reveals the man who know as “Curveball.” (thanks to DOK for the tip)
* S-CHIP continues to percolate: “Talks seeking a bipartisan compromise on health insurance for low-income children were cut short on Thursday, and the Senate then swiftly passed a bill to provide coverage for 10 million youngsters, fully expecting President Bush to veto it. The 64-to-30 vote, coming one week after the House approved the same bill, moves the legislation to Mr. Bush’s desk. The bill differs slightly from one vetoed on Oct. 3, but it faces the same fate.” Negotiations between lawmakers continue.
* Fox News banned candidates from using network footage in campaign ads. Mitt Romney’s doing it anyway.
* Whether you like Dennis Kucinich or not, this CBS interview was both awful and unfair.
* Speaking of Kucinich, Jimmy Carter wants no part of the UFO discussion.
* TAP is hosting a fascinating discussion about the modern role of the Air Force.
* Jon Soltz has an idea: moving Condoleezza Rice’s office to Baghdad.
* And finally, Speaker Pelosi had a compelling response to Bush’s speech from yesterday: “He is the President of the United States. What does he have to show for his presidency? He is the President of the United States already talking about his library. What is he going to have in the library? A tax cut for the wealthiest people in the country at the expense of the middle class and a war without end that is a total failure? So he has to talk about something and he stoops to a level, in my view, that is beneath the dignity of the office that he holds and I don’t want to go there with him.”
Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.