When MSNBC added Tucker Carlson to its prime-time lineup two years ago, the network appeared anxious to capitalize on Fox News’ success as a Republican network. If cable-news viewers were flocking to a conservative, partisan network, MSNBC seemed to believe, then the answer was to keep up by putting more conservatives on the air.
The result Fox News-lite — featuring a lineup with conservative Carlson, conservative Joe Scarborough, and the politically baffling Chris Matthews, who, within a single program, is capable of criticizing Bush’s Iraq policy, telling viewers that Bush is a modern-day Abraham Lincoln, and hinting at a man-crush on John McCain and Rudy Giuliani. (At one point, MSNBC even gave lunatic Michael Savage a show.)
Viewers didn’t exactly flock to this lineup. There’s already a Republican news network; no one needed a pale imitation. But with Keith Olbermann’s ratings continuing to blossom, MSNBC seems to have come to a realization: maybe there’s an audience for those who aren’t sympathetic to the Republican agenda.
Riding a ratings wave from “Countdown With Keith Olbermann,” a program that takes strong issue with the Bush administration, MSNBC is increasingly seeking to showcase its nighttime lineup as a welcome haven for viewers of a similar mind.
Lest there be any doubt that the cable channel believes there is ratings gold in shows that criticize the administration with the same vigor with which Fox News’s hosts often champion it, two NBC executives acknowledged yesterday that they were talking to Rosie O’Donnell about a prime-time show on MSNBC. […]
Under one option, Ms. O’Donnell would take the 9 p.m. slot each weeknight on MSNBC, pitting her against “Larry King Live” on CNN and “Hannity & Colmes” on Fox News.
But even without Ms. O’Donnell, MSNBC already presents a three-hour block of nighttime talk — Chris Matthews’s “Hardball” at 7, Mr. Olbermann at 8, and “Live With Dan Abrams” at 9 — in which the White House takes a regular beating.
And what about self-described “right-winger” Tucker Carlson? An NBC executive told the NYT he’s “in real danger of being canceled.”
So, are we looking at an intentional strategy on MSNBC’s part to move to the left? I kind of doubt it.
“It happened naturally,” Phil Griffin, a senior vice president of NBC News who is the executive in charge of MSNBC, said Friday, referring specifically to the channel’s passion and point of view from 7 to 10 p.m. “There isn’t a dogma we’re putting through. There is a ‘Go for it.'”
And by “it,” I think Griffin means “higher ratings.” Olbermann has soared over the last year or so, and I believe Countdown is the only show on MSNBC’s primetime lineup that beats CNN, and is at near parity with Fox News in the “money demo.” It’s not complicated — if Olbermann is offering reality-based coverage of current events, and his audience keeps growing, maybe that should be a big hint to the network’s program executives.
As for Rosie O’Donnell, it’s hard to know whether this is an MSNBC trial-balloon, but if the network is soliciting opinions, I’d say she isn’t necessarily the best choice for progressive voices. A variety of other names — David Shuster, Rachel Maddow, and Cliff Schecter — come to mind, and each have more stature when it comes to on-air news analysis.
We’ll see how all of this plays out, but I’d like to think this represents some progress on the part of the network. In 2003, Phil Donohue had the highest-rated program on MSNBC, but was cancelled, ostensibly for poor ratings. If the network is prepared to finally air a reality-based prime-time lineup, I think it’ll be pleased with the results.