Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* CNN: “President Bush on Wednesday told CNN he would personally ‘facilitate’ peace negotiations between the Palestinians and Israelis but dismissed the idea that he would travel to the region to engage in talks.” The president prefers a kind of hands-off, long-distance style of engagement. That ought to work, right?

* Some of the White House’s previous Middle East envoys ended up opposing the president’s policy. We’ll see if the new one sticks to the script: “Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice tapped a former NATO commander on Wednesday to serve as a special envoy for Middle East security, moving quickly to maintain momentum coming out of this week’s international conference that launched new Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. She said James Jones, a retired Marine Corps general, was ‘the person we need to take up this vital mission.'”

* Romney is so totally busted: “I just got off the phone with another Nevada Republican who confirmed that Mansoor Ijaz’s account of Mitt Romney saying he’d nix Muslims in his cabinet is accurate. This is the first person I’ve spoken to who directly confirmed Ijaz’s account of that particular event…. ‘I can tell you that what was reported by Mansoor is accurate,’ this person said to me. The man, a real estate broker and volunteer in local Republican politics, declined to allow his name to be used.” For those keeping score at home, that’s three separate Nevada Republicans who corroborate Ijaz’s account.

* WaPo on the latest poll from the Pew Research Center: “A new poll released yesterday underscored the changing political environment, finding the public more positive about the military effort in Iraq than at any point in 14 months as a surge of optimism follows the rapid decline in violence. Yet Bush remains as unpopular as ever in the survey by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, and the public remains just as committed to bringing U.S. troops home.” There’s been a major upswing in the public’s attitudes about progress in the war, but it’s had no effect on the number of Americans who want to withdraw.

* We’ve certainly lost sight of what used to be the “center” of American politics — Nixon’s universal healthcare plan, embraced by Republicans, was to the left of what most Dems would propose now.

* I know it’s a hackocracy in the Bush administration, but I don’t understand why this guy is still employed: “When John Tanner, chief of the Civil Rights Division’s voting section, appeared before a Congressional panel last month, he was upbraided by Democrats for his ‘ineffectiveness.’ Little did they know that as the section, probably the most politicized in the Justice Department under the Bush Administration, has done less and less to protect African-American voters from discrimination, Tanner has been seeing the country on the taxpayers’ dime. He even managed to make taxpayer-funded trips to Hawaii in three consecutive years, two of them a week long. One Department lawyer who accompanied Tanner on his first trip took the earliest available flight back after having completed all necessary work in just two business days. But Tanner insisted on staying a full week, despite the lack of apparent Department business. It’s a crime for government officials to use public funds for personal travel.”

* E&P: “Journalists covering the war in Iraq contend stories about ordinary Iraqis are not getting the play that the U.S. military and insurgents are, according to a study released Wednesday. It reveals: ‘Overall, journalists working in Iraq give their own coverage a mixed but generally positive assessment. A majority (58%) regard press coverage in Iraq as ‘good,’ the second-highest mark. Another 16% rate the coverage as excellent. But nearly a quarter (23%) rate the coverage as only fair. Another 2% grade the coverage as poor.’ Most also say reporting has not been overly negative, adding that the situation there is actually worse than most Americans believe.”

* More on permanent U.S. bases in Iraq: “President Bush might not require Congressional approval for the upcoming U.S.-Iraq security agreement. But al-Dabbagh said the Maliki government will need to secure a blessing for the deal from the Iraqi parliament. And even though the deal will cover a U.S. military presence for years to come, Dabbagh doesn’t expect any parliamentary turbulence — let alone refusal.”

* The exodus from the White House continues apace: “President Bush’s top economic advisor Al Hubbard will resign at the end of the year and be replaced by his deputy, the White House announced Wednesday. The resignation of Hubbard, who served as the director of the National Economic Council, comes amid growing concerns about the state of the U.S. economy that could pose political perils for Bush and congressional Democrats. House Democrats are mulling an economic summit next week as a way to seize a political advantage on a potential recession, which they hope would be blamed on Bush.”

* Ten leading researchers in the field of adolescent sexual and reproductive health have implored congressional leaders to reconsider continuing federal investments in abstinence-only funding. If common sense still means anything, lawmakers will listen.

* And finally, don’t forget that the latest debate for Republican presidential candidates is tonight at 8pm eastern. All of the questions will come via YouTube, though CNN has carefully screened the submissions, because CNN senior vice president David Bohrman said the public isn’t reliable enough to choose substantive questions. As an example, he complained that before the Dems’ YouTube debate, the “second-most-viewed video question was: Will you a convene a national meeting on UFOs?” If I remember correctly, didn’t Tim Russert ask a couple of UFO questions during a recent NBC debate?

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

The country has moved far to the right on economic issues, and considerably to the left on social issues. I leave it to people smarter than me to pronounce on whether or not we’re net better off, though my instinct is that the second trend was inevitable while the first trend was not–and that it represents a failure of political organizing and advocacy on the left.

That said, if we can’t make the case for a more effective public sector after the Bush years, we won’t ever do it.

  • As an example, he complained that before the Dems’ YouTube debate, the “second-most-viewed video question was: Will you a convene a national meeting on UFOs?” If I remember correctly, didn’t Tim Russert asked a couple of UFO questions during a recent NBC debate?

    That’s a silly objection to the public’s ability to pose good questions- if all he’s saying is that a bunch of people tuned in on YouTube to watch some UFO fan pose a UFO question to candidates, that says nothing about what representative questions from the public are like. It could just mean that people like the novelty of seeing that question asked– not that a significant number of people who pose questions through YouTube would ask questions like that.

  • “President Bush might not require Congressional approval…

    This sounds like a rather heavily-spun statement to me, and this is the second time I’ve seen it repeated here. What does itmean? Since when is it even up to Bush to choose whether to “require” Congressional approval? Am I wrong or am I missing something? If not, why has this been repeated without comment?

  • * And finally, don’t forget that the latest debate for Republican presidential candidates is tonight at 8pm eastern. All of the questions will come via YouTube, though CNN has carefully screened the submissions, because CNN senior vice president David Bohrman said the public isn’t reliable enough to choose substantive questions. As an example, he complained that before the Dems’ YouTube debate, the “second-most-viewed video question was: Will you a convene a national meeting on UFOs?” If I remember correctly, didn’t Tim Russert ask a couple of UFO questions during a recent NBC debate?

    Because the public can’t reliably select substantive questions? I can’t wait to see what substantive questions CNN chooses.

  • “Habakkuk describe with precision and accurate detail of the Bush Administration in chapter 2 verse 5

    “Moreover, wine and wealth are treacherous; the proud man [the Chaldean Invader] is restless and cannot stay at home”

    His appetite is large like that of sheol and [his greed] is like death and cannot be satisfied; he gather to himself all nations, and collect all people as if he owned them.”

    Last Day Watchers I want you to know that some of the greatest scholars in the history of bible study have given the Amplified Bible as the best translation to this verse.

    Some of the most esteem editors that have contributed to the Amplified Bible translation are to name a few

    Frederic William Bush, PH.D,………Fuller Theological Seminary
    R.K. Harrison, PH.D,………..Gord-Conwell Theological Seminary
    H.R. Minn PH.D,…………………………………University of Auckland
    Sylvio Scorza PH.D, TH.D,……………………..Northwestern College
    Bruce Waltke, TH.D, PH.D,……………………………….Regent College
    Kyle M. Yates, PH.D,……………………………………Baylor University

    They all agree with the Amplified Bible translation of Habakkuk verse 5

    Last Day Watchers notice how this verse can only apply to President George W. Bush, it describe not only his alcoholic nature and his treacherous Bush family wealth which has been well chronicled by socialite writers

    However Habakkuk farther identifies him as a proud and arrogant Iraq Invader [Chaldean Invader]!

    Last Day Watchers look how Habakkuk describe how “weighted” down this arrogant proud man would become because of his illegal invasion.

    Habakkuk chapter 2 verse 6 The Basic in Basic English translation

    “A Curse on him that goes on taking that what is not his, IS WEIGHTED DOWN with the property of debtors”

    This is a excerpt from the May 15th Prophecy, which has been the only source of information that has been 100% accurate on what is happing in the Middle East, do a Google search of the May 15th Prophecy and you will see for yourself

    Here more about the President

    “The 9th verse make clear that this can only be President George w. Bush who Habakkuk already describe in the 5th verse as the “Iraq Invader”

    The 9th verse tell why “the proud and arrogant Iraqi Invader” invades!, quoted from President Bush himself when he said “To fight them over there so that we don’t have to fight them here”
    (note to the wise think 9-11 when you read this verse)

    Habakkuk chapter 2 verse 9

    “Woe to him that coveteth an evil covetousness to his house, that he may set his nest on high, THAT HE MAY BE DELIVERED FROM THE POWER OF EVIL.”

    The New Berkeley Version in Modern English translate the 9th verse

    “Woe to him who acquires an evil gain for his house, in order to set his seat on high, TO BE OUT OF THE REACH OF CALAMITY”

    The Original Hebrew in Modern English (Helen Spurell) translate the 9th verse

    “That he may erect his house in grandeur, IN ORDER TO BE DELIVERED FROM CALMITY”

    The English Standard verse translate the 9th verse

    “Woe to him who gets evil gain for his house, to set his nest on high, TO BE SAFE FROM HARM!”

    And this translation of the 9th verse say it all from The Bible: An American translation (J.M. Powis Smith and Edgar Goodspeed)

    “Woe to him who acquire unjust gain for his household, setting his nest on high, THAT HE MAY BE DELIVERED FROM THE POWER OF DISASTER”

    As you see Last Day Watchers and every single translation agree; that the lying pawn of Satan not only invaded to “fight them over there so we don’t have the fight them here”

    But also a personal power grab for “unjust gains for his household”

    Remember the video I showed you of the decision to invade Iraq was made before 9-11? (See:The Stomping Beast and The Prospering Lie)

    Now you see why the May 15th Prophecy call the President a pawn of Satan and Habakkuk goes even farther in the 10th verse

    President Bush once said he somehow felt the spiritual hand on his Presidency, and that he was destine for some grand destiny.

    He was right because here is that that destiny.

    Habakkuk chapter 2 verse 10

    “Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many people, and hast sinned against thy soul”

    The New English Bible translate the 9th verse this way

    “Your schemes to overthrow mighty nations will bring dishonor to your house, and put your own life in jeopardy”

    As the May 15th Prophecy pointed out that President Bush is a vile man and dishonor shall be his reward.”

  • CNN: “President Bush on Wednesday told CNN he would personally ‘facilitate’ peace negotiations between the Palestinians and Israelis but dismissed the idea that he would travel to the region to engage in talks.”

    Maybe he’ll just invite them all down to Crawford for a pig roast. (He probably is that ignorant.)

  • I think Rice’s plan for the Middle East has about as much chance as Sonny Purdue’s prayerathon for rain in Georgia had. I guess it’s happening now so that she can claim she tried her very best to solve the problems. Not her fault if the area gets more unstable. She tried.

  • “President Bush on Wednesday told CNN he would personally ‘facilitate’ peace negotiations between the Palestinians and Israelis but dismissed the idea that he would travel to the region to engage in talks.”

    Even Shruby is getting tired of himself. He knows what an incompetent nimrod he would be in this situation and he doesn’t want it tossed back at him anymore. The biggest benefit of all this Middle East peace talk is that it will make it harder to start a war with Iran while saying that peace in the Middle East is important. If that’s really what the latest priority will ostensibly be, (peace), then it’s just no fun over there anymore. You can’t wear a flight suit to peace negotiations. And without that pseudo armor on, Shruby’s just a tiny little prick. And maybe he’s starting to get an inkling of that.

  • ***yeah leon***WTF. We don’t care at this site. We already knew all this without it having to be referenced somewhere else in the book of Gotcha. Bush…evil…bad…wrong…and Pelosi too busy policy making for accountability. The Bible is not a “good” book anymore, and God is powerless to change it, no matter what.

    Willing to bet tonight’s “debate” will consist of reinforcing republican talking points..”based on how great this republican decade has been will you as a president candidate be able to continue making America great?”…along those lines. I wonder why anyone would want to ask these people anything besides …”how soon will it be before we don’t have to hear from you again?”

    Americans just haven’t heard yet that the “splurge” is not what changed the violence level in Iraq. The truth information just hasn’t made the rounds yet but it will. Suppression will not stand man.

    Hukabee needs to go back to being a Baptist minister because the presidency needs a president not a Bible preacher.

  • The former governor of Texas is a genuine coward. That’s why he won’t go to the Middle East.

    And he’s all the other stuff burro said, too.

  • “There’s been a major upswing in the public’s attitudes about progress in the war, but it’s had no effect on the number of Americans who want to withdraw.”

    Only 54% want the troops to come home. Presumably, 46% approve of this war, after more than 4 1/2 years of this absolutely pointless madness, violence and waste of nearly a trillion dollars, and sure to double or more in the coming decades. And all for what? And winning or losing what?

    Half the American people are thinking of this disaster as nothing more than a football game, and shouting “USA! USA! USA!,” while holding up the index finger (not the bird finger) and shoving it into the cameras. We’re number one. That’s all that matters.

    What in God’s name has happened to us?

    This country is sick, and I mean sick.

  • CNN has carefully screened the submissions, because CNN senior vice president David Bohrman said the public isn’t reliable enough to choose substantive questions.
    “If you would have taken the most-viewed questions last time, […]

    And a guy who can’t speak English properly IS reliable enough to decide??? How come? And how did he manage to become a senior VP at CNN, if he mangles English grammar so? Sheesh.. English is my second language and even I know better than that…

  • “The president prefers a kind of hands-off, long-distance style of engagement”

    Well, whenever he tries personal hands-on management, the results suck eggs, so why not give the hands-off route a spin?

    Even better, maybe he could resign, and let someone else give it a try.

  • Has everybody seen CB’s earlier post on Giuliani? This guy shouldn’t be the president of an elementary school PTA, much less the president of an entire nation.

  • One shocking thing about the big peace photo-op in Annapolis was this comment that that NPR and the WaPo reported: “Negotiations are supposed to begin on Dec. 12, with the aim of completing them by the end of Bush’s term.”

    So we’re going to have Middle East peace in our time? That’s just over two Friedman Units. I don’t know how an incompetent Secretary of State and a “disengaged, hands off” president feel they will accomplish this, but I’ll bet serious dollars that this peace-talks-lite effort gets thrown on the big dustheap of history that Bush has been building behind the White House of all his failures and empty promises gone unfulfilled.

  • Hey Habbakuk: please go back to rolling in the sawdust and dodging rattlesnakes. You’re a fucking moron whether you’re a left-wing or a right-wing fucking moron.

  • Government is blind just like the rest of the free world that thinks palestinians want peace they willfully freely elected a terrorist group determined to wipe out Israel as their leaders wake up there will be no peace until the antichrist steps up out of Europe also known as the revived Roman Empire and establishes it period and then of course it will be a false peace now I know all the unbelievers will gawk but that is ok my words will come back to haunt you in the near future when it happens and it will happen I have it on great authority until then then.

  • A recession they HOPE will be blamed on Bush?

    Depends… does Hilary win in 2008?
    Every pundit and every corporate media outlet (ummm, that’s like… ALL of ’em, right?) will surely look back on the ballooning deficits of Bush and the outsourcing of our entire manufacturing base and put Madame President’s role in perspective. Or not.

  • Comments are closed.