Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Good news from the House floor: “The House approved the first increase in federal automobile fuel efficiency requirements in three decades Thursday as part of an energy bill that also repeals billions of dollars oil company tax breaks and encourages use of renewable fuels. The bill, passed by a vote of 235-181, faces a certain filibuster in the Senate and a veto threat from the White House…. ‘We will send our energy dollars to the Midwest, not the Middle East,’ countered House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, referring to the bill’s emphasis on promoting renewable energy sources, especially ethanol, which would see a sevenfold increase by 2022 to 36 billion gallons a year.”

* Bad news from a congressional conference committee: “Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) on Thursday postponed a vote on contempt resolutions against former White House adviser Karl Rove and Chief of Staff Josh Bolten after Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) objected to language in the measures. Committee rules allow for a one-week delay, so the vote will likely take place next Thursday. Committee approval of the resolution would trigger a full Senate vote on the resolutions early next year.”

* Bush unveiled his mortgage-rate-freeze plan today, as part of the administration’s effort to respond to the mortgage crisis. Among those who won’t get any help from the policy at all are low-income borrowers, those who’ve missed a mortgage payment, and/or those whose homes cost less than their mortgage. In other words, if you’re not wealthy, you’re screwed.

* Very good point: “The Administration’s most persistent spin of the new Iran NIE is that it vindicates their position because it shows that Iran did in fact have an active nuclear weapons program in 2003. That’s quite some vindication. What it really means is that faced with two neighbors in the spring of 2003 who both harbored nuclear ambitions, we invaded the country without an active WMD program while ignoring the one that did. I’m not suggesting we should have invaded Iran instead, but by the Administration’s own reckoning, we should have.”

* I’ve respected and admired plenty of political leaders over the years, but it’s never even occurred to me to be as shamelessly sycophantic as Hugh Hewitt: “Mitt Romney’s ‘Faith in America’ speech was simply magnificent, and anyone who denies it is not to be trusted as an analyst. On every level it was a masterpiece.” Watch out for that drool there, Hugh.

* Joe Klein’s reputation has taken a tumble in the blogosphere lately, and these comments on MSNBC this morning, about Bush and the NIE, will only make matters worse: “The Bush reaction to this — he didn’t try to block it. He didn’t try to postpone it. He didn’t spend weeks, he didn’t ask the intelligence community ‘give me a couple of weeks, let’s see if we can figure out some kind of negotiating initiative or some way to respond to this.’ He didn’t try to spin it to our advantage. This is an amazing moment of candor by the United States.” Sweet Jeebus, that’s wrong.

* CNN was slated to run a speculative documentary called, “We Were Warned — Iran Goes Nuclear” in less than a week. It was set to feature “a what-if scenario as former government officials — playing fictional cabinet members — debate how to deal with the Iranian threat.” Today, CNN announced it will not run the special. Good move.

* Did Bush send Kim Jung-Il a personal note? It seems unlikely, but that’s what North Korea claims.

* Glenn Beck doesn’t believe the media should ask politicians about their religious beliefs — unless they’re Muslims, in which case it’s an important issue.

* Fred Thompson’s take on the NIE doesn’t make a lot of sense.

* The Philadelphia council of the Boy Scouts of America wanted the city to give it valuable real estate for almost nothing and wanted the city to overlook its discriminatory policies towards gays. The city gave the Boy Scouts a choice: give up the sweetheart real-estate deal, or give up on discrimination. The Scouts decided discrimination was more important. How very odd.

* It’s inside pool, but in case anyone was curious, “By an overwhelming 2-1 margin, Republican Senators voted Thursday to install Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.) as their next Conference chairman.”

* The Washington Post’s conservative editorial line-up was remarkably one-sided yesterday, and then just as bad today. And yet, you’ll still hear some complain that it’s a liberal paper.

* And finally, the president unveiled a toll-free hotline for homeowners with questions in the midst of the mortgage crisis. The only problem: he gave out the wrong phone number. Just to set the record straight, the correct number is 1-888-995-HOPE.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

1-888-995-HOPE – as in I hope I’m not homeless this Christmas

  • Iran didn’t suspend because of White House pressure. They did so because AQ Khan got exposed and they knew they’d be exposed as a recipient of his tech specs.

    ever notice that bush is careful to say that attacking iran is permissible if they possess the knowledge (as opposed to active development)? That’s because he learned Iran had the knowledge in 2003. So he’s keeping the attack option completely open.

  • You’d think Hugh Hewitt would’ve mentioned that just a month ago he said candidates should answer questions about religion by saying, and I quote: “I don’t think discussions of personal theology contribute to the idea of a strong and united America… I am going to decline to answer that question because I think it falls into the category of questions that tend to divide Americans over issues of faith….”

    http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/4aa09e8d-0d1d-417b-b734-35c3df2efc1c

    BTW, in Hewitt’s judgment, “anyone who denies [that the speech was ‘simply magnificent’] is not to be trusted as an analyst,” which means we can start ignoring Kevin Drum, who called it “deeply offensive.”

    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2007_12/012651.php

  • And finally, the president unveiled a toll-free hotline for homeowners with questions in the midst of the mortgage crisis. The only problem: he gave out the wrong phone number. Just to set the record straight, the correct number is 1-888-995-HOPE.

    Hang on all you homeowners who voted for Bush…
    Who don’t believe in government assistance…
    Or government regulation of the mortgage industry…
    But who do believe in self-reliance and having a backbone…
    Hang on just a bit longer…
    My tax dollars are coming to your rescue!

  • I like how Joke Klein equates Bush with the United States when he says “This is an amazing moment of candor by the United States.”

  • Bush unveiled his mortgage-rate-freeze plan today, as part of the administration’s effort to respond to the mortgage crisis. Among those who won’t get any help from the policy at all are low-income borrowers, those who’ve missed a mortgage payment, and/or those whose homes cost less than their mortgage. In other words, if you’re not wealthy, you’re screwed.

    Make the haves more and more different from the have-nots, and make the haves more and more powerful. The formula continues.

  • ‘We will send our energy dollars to the Midwest, not the Middle East,’ countered House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, referring to the bill’s emphasis on promoting renewable energy sources, especially ethanol, which would see a sevenfold increase by 2022 to 36 billion gallons a year.”

    Oh, goodie, the “biofuel revolution.” This is one of the most foolish and costly boondoggles in history, and these politicians are just merrily proceeding as if they’re real visionaries.

    Fools or tools? I can’t figure out which. Probably both.

  • The formula continues unabated, and the Republican voter will continue not to notice.

    The Washington Post’s conservative editorial line-up was remarkably one-sided yesterday, and then just as bad today. And yet, you’ll still hear some complain that it’s a liberal paper.

    Ha! Yeah right. Maybe a long time ago it was a liberal paper. Then somebody decided he wanted to see conservative propaganda trumpeted in huge headlines on the front pages of the newpapers at New York newspaper stands.

  • A great prank would be if some people stole a bunch of those stupid NY Post newspapers- like an issue that has a caricature drawing of Hillary Clinton as the only picture on the front page– and throw threw them in the East River.

    What an insult to New York and to America that stupid paper is!

  • Did Morgan Spurlock find Osama bin Laden?

    Rumors are flying that filmmaker Morgan Spurlock (“Super Size Me”) may have found Osama bin Laden while filming his documentary in search of the al-Qaida leader.

    The speculation first began at the Berlin International Film Festival in February, where Spurlock showed a select group of potential buyers 15 minutes of footage from his new documentary, “Where in the World Is Osama bin Laden?” The film follows Spurlock through the Middle East in his search for the elusive leader of al-Qaida. According to Slashfilm.com, The Weinstein Co. quickly snapped up the picture after seeing the clips.

  • Anyone else blacklisted from the Carpetbagger Report last night?

    I was posting some youtube clips of an Alex Jones interview with Naomi Wolf (The End of America: A Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot) when I received a very strange message from the Carpetbagger Report:

    Your Internet Protocol address is listed on a blacklist of addresses involved in malicious or illegal activity. See the listing below for more details on specific blacklists and removal procedures.

    Anyone else experience this “technical difficulty” last night to Wednesday’s Mini-Report?

    Here is the post that I was basically making last night:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUMGOeBlRZc (Naomi Wolf radio interview on the Alex Jones show, part I)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ8DH-MaB2s (Naomi Wolf radio interview on the Alex Jones show, part II)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1rNdXlHwf8 (Naomi Wolf radio interview on the Alex Jones show, part III)

  • Steve, you missed my favorite part (I mean that sarcastically, of course) of the mortgage rate freeze: If you can afford the bump in payment, you don’t qualify for the freeze.

    I assume the bank that decided you could afford the ARM in the first place determines if you can afford the higher payment.

  • Two questions:

    Why doesn’t CNN just die?

    Also, what the heck does a party’s conference chairperson in the Senate do?

  • Hang on all you homeowners who voted for Bush…[…]
    My tax dollars are coming to your rescue! — ROTFL @4

    Not so fast! You’ll only be supporting the rich ones and, thankfully, there are fewer of them than those CB describes in his bullet-point:
    Among those who won’t get any help from the policy at all are low-income borrowers, those who’ve missed a mortgage payment, and/or those whose homes cost less than their mortgage.

  • Romney’s speech was the verbal equivalent of spewing poo, and anyone who thinnks otherwise doesn’t deserve to be treated seriously as an analyst. On every level it was shite.

  • I noticed that there a lot of Reich Wingers out there trying to “debunk” Naomi Wolf’s The End of America and the 10 steps she identified for closing down a democratic society and imposing fascism.

    If you weren’t aware we’re on number 8 or 9. 10 is suspend the Constitution.

    Maybe Popular Mechanics could run a piece debunking the book and we could all breathe easier.

  • Anyone else blacklisted from the Carpetbagger Report last night?

    Oh, right, I neglected to do an item about this.

    Last night, a software app called “Bad Behavior,” which a lot of sites use, had some kind of database issue. I run the program, and several dozen regulars were told they had been “blacklisted.”

    Of course, I didn’t know that until this morning. The “Bad Behavior” program offered an update, we uploaded it, and the problem was solved. Sorry for everyone who was inconvenienced.

    P.S. — If it makes anyone feel better, “Bad Behavior” blocked me from getting into my own site this morning, which is why my first post was slightly later than usual.

  • JKap @12
    All shills for Ron Paul got beaned. Don’t let CB tell you differently. ; )

    May I also point out the Boy Scouts technically ban atheists, Wiccans, Buddhists, Hindus, shintoists, and agnostics.

    I would’ve bet my eyeteeth Lamar Alexander wouldn’t get the job. Last I checked, he was SANE. Let’s see if my memory serves. This could be the beginning of the end of our country’s long, dark nightmare.

  • That Bad Behavior program not only knows its stuff — JKap, it sent me the photos, and all I can say is you should probably hide out for a while. 🙂

  • Our technologically savvy House passed The Securing Adolescents From Exploitation-Online Act, a bill, according to CNET, “saying that anyone offering an open Wi-Fi connection to the public must report illegal images including ‘obscene’ cartoons and drawings—or face fines of up to $300,000,” was passed in the House yesterday. The vote was —409 to 2. Only Ron Paul and Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) opposing the bill.

    Okay, if you have inadequate security on your home Wi-Fi router, or if you turned it off, then you’re offering an open Wi-Fi connection. Next, how is Starbuck’s, or any other place offering open Wi-Fi connections to determine what goes over them short of having someone monitor every data packet that goes through their router?

    These are the same people upon whom we are reliant for legislative remedies for energy independence and global warming. Buena suerte.

  • Anyone who saw “Hardball” this evening knows that Chris Matthews’ latest crush is on Mitt Romney. Matthews was positively swooning, and I think it will take a day or two to wear off, so don’t watch him until he recovers. I pretty much gathered that this speech of Romney’s was second only to the Gettysburg Address.

    From the excerpts I heard and read of Romney’s speech, I conclude that non believers and agnostics took a real pasting today ( I don’t use the term “atheist” because it’s such an inflammatory term in our society, and is usually interpreted as someone who adamantly insists there is nothing “out there,” and I have never met such a person. I know many, many people who don’t believe in “God,” or gods, but are certainly willing to consider any evidence to support such beliefs). Everything was God, God, God, as Romney pandered to 97% of us (or 87%, depending on which poll you believe).
    Disappointing that he couldn’t be all inclusive, but good politics, I guess. Gotta hate those non believers. Worse than gays, mind you.

    He drew enormous applause for stating that Americans believe our liberties are granted by God, and not by government. I have never understood this. It’s clearly wrong – our liberties are always defined by the societies in which we live, all around the world. They differ wildly, even in this country. God doesn’t make up handgun rules – we do. And the Constitution clearly states in the Preamble that it is the work of “We the people,” not God. So what does it mean, actually? Is it just a pleasant throwaway line? Something to please God’s ego? Or does it mean that God whispers in the ears of our legislators, telling them what to do? Seriously, what does it mean, that God is the grantor of our liberties?

  • Well, Congress in its infinite wisdom and desire to take meaningless stands now gives us the SAFE Online Act, which not only does nothing it will promptly tie up the courts, who can put it on the pile with the Communications Decency Act and COPA. It helps if you understand things better than Ted “the Tubes” Stevens before you try and regulate them.

  • hark – Romney got all that applause because I’m sure the audience was nothing but Romney fans; why Chris Matthews has such a huge man-crush on him is beyond me, but it’s bordering on the creepy.

    I think as the speech gets dissected over the next couple of days, there’s going to be a double-take effect; a lot of people who thought he said a lot of inspiring things are going to have a moment where they realize that what he said was less inspiring than it was frightening, and in many ways, very, very offensive to a lot of people.

    That Romney would elevate his pandering to this level is as good a reason as any why he should not be elected to the presidency. Ever.

  • Well, I guess Romeny is in favor of abortion then, since the Supreme Court has interpreted the 9th Amendment as giving a woman an absolute right to an abortion in the Roe v. Wade ruling, and according to Romney, we get out laws from God.

    How could Romney disagree with God?

  • Re #1:

    1-888-995-HOPE – as in I hope I’m not homeless this Christmas

    No, I think that’s actually “you have a hope in hell if you think this is actually going to help you

  • ‘We will send our energy dollars to the Midwest, not the Middle East,’

    I live in the Midwest (well, Omaha, either in the Midwest or the Great Plains, matters who you ask), I’m the first generation in my family to not be raised on a farm, and many of my relatives are farmers, but I still have some serious reservations about this energy bill, and it’s desire to increase in ethanol production.

    First off, the new increase of ethanol production means corn will be grown at a greater rate than other crops, such as beans and wheat. Also, you can have the problem of less corn going towards food production. What this means is higher prices at the supermarket.

    Secondly, corn requires a lot of water for irrigation. Nebraska is starting to gradually come out of a 7 year drought, but if water demand goes up, then you’ll have the same problems repeat.

    Thirdly, corn also requires a lot of nitrogen, particularly from fertilizer. Increases in both water requirements and fertilizer use means more contamination of the groundwater supply, the main source of drinking water.

    Fourth, since corn is a nitrogen-hungry crop, it depletes the amount of nitrogen in the soil. Farmers will rotate the crops that they plant, replacing corn with beans or another crop that can help replete the lost nutrients in the soil. If you keep planting corn year after year to mean ethanol demands, you will turn much of your land, literally, into a pile of sand.

    So ethanol may not be the best option.

  • Agreed with 2Manchu. There are a lot of dry farmland places that will be drilling their aquifers as if they are drilling for oil as they chase the cash of corn-based biofuels. While some farmers, chemical companies and very likely the genetic engineering monster that is Monsanto will make a lot of cash off of this for the time being, the question remains is it better that we take food off of the world’s table to stick in the tank of an SUV instead?

    So Arlen Specter is objecting to contempt citations for the deserving Karl Rove and Josh Bolten? And he has the audacity to complain about being called Bush’s puppet — peckerhead.

  • What does ‘corn is a bad option’ have to do with ‘ethanol is a bad option’.

    It’s a dumb argument, that fails in the face of facts; such as Brazil is energy independent because of ethanol.

  • Hey, CB, would it be possible or cool to put links to your daily or weekly items on the sidebar?

    It’d be nice to be able to jump through the daily reports or the roundups or week in god items; and keep them near the top even with other details going on. Pretty please?

  • Crissa,

    Since most of the ethanol that this bill wants to increase will come from corn in the immediate future, that’s the reason why I have serious reservations.

    I know that much promise is being made about cellulosic-based fuels, and the energy bill does seem to offer some incentives and mandates that will attempt to increase “advanced” bio-fuels over the next ten years or so.

    But I also know the corporate mentality, and the big agri-businesses are going to go for the quick buck, regardless of mandates that are years away. This means that they are going to push for more corn-based production, and this will lead to the problems that I pointed out above.

    I have nothing against ethanol, if they can produce it from cellulosic material. It does seem to hold a lot of promise, along with other renewable energy technologies, both in weening our nation off fossil fuels, providing new markets for investment, and having less of a detrimental impact on the environment. I just hope it doesn’t create a Frankenstein’s monster in the process.

    And I hope I’m wrong, at least for my state. Conservative as it is, it’s still the place that I call home.

  • Good. Let ’em filibuster the new mileage standards. One more issue that will bring more seats to the Democrats. We’ve waited 30 years what’s one more.

  • Bailing out any homeowners is really just bailing out the banks and investors, and it probably won’t save anyone from losing their home anyway, just postpone it.

    And anyway I don’t give a crap if someone bought something they shouldn’t have and then has to give it back.

    Sure, I have sympathy for the fact that lenders rampantly exploited naive borrowers. I hope those folks sue their lenders and win, and I hope the government will prosecute, too. But there were a lot of borrowers complicit in making those bad loans happen, too.

    Either way, I’m angry when I keep hearing what a tragedy it will be when millions of people “lose their home” if we don’t all chip in. It’s a bummer if they have to give back their home, but it’s not a tragedy. They’re not going to be homeless just because they have to rent. I rent an apartment, am I “homeless?” Of course not. I can’t afford to buy a house either, but I don’t see the government in any hurry to have everyone chip in on my rent, either. It’s a bunch of pathos to make it seem like those tax dollars will be going to a good cause, and not just filling in the giant bubble-shaped hole in the banks’ profit statement.

    There should be NO bailouts of any kind. Banks and lenders must find a way to work with borrowers on their own or accept the defaults and losses, and must not be allowed to dump their losses on the rest of us. I’d like to see all those free-market conservatives walk the walk and insist on allowing the market to correct.

    The government does need to take a role in responding to the “mortgage crisis” though, even now that the horse is pretty much out of the barn. I think all states should become non-recourse states, like California. Non-recourse means the bank can’t come after you for any more money after you give the house back to them. Defaulted borrowers still have to pay income tax on the amount of debt forgiven, so walking away from the loan isn’t completely free. But the non-recourse law primarily punishes lenders who make bad loans, and I suppose, incurious investors who buy bad loans. There should be stricter laws preventing lenders from pressuring appraisers, and there should be more resources to investigate complaints promptly and punish fraud swiftly. It would also be nice if the regulators would enforce existing laws. Probably a few corporate officers need to go to prison.

  • “especially ethanol” —– NO , thats not the answer. If ‘all’ the corn grown in the US were used for this purpose , it still wouldn’t meet our needs for fuel. Further , emissions aren’t much better when using methanol instead of gas — AND — there doesn’t seem to be any thought being given to exactly what effect using vaste quantities of our corn (and/or sugar) would have on the availability and price of this basic food staple.

    Hydrogen is the answer !! Zero emissions — unlimited quantities available. The automakers already have the technology to make this work but until now, processing and storing hydrogen at a reasonable cost has been a problem.There have been a lot of recent gains made in ‘economically’ collecting and processing hydrogen and there have also been some interesting improvements on storage issues. Example: http://www.sciencedaily.com has a lot of articles on this subject from groups like those from some clever people at Virginia Tech (among others). One of the most impressive is a ‘manufacture as you drive’ scenario where you buy a very safe solid fuel cell about the size of a loaf of bread that gets converted into hydrogen ‘on-demand’ while driving down the street.

  • There should be NO bailouts of any kind. Banks and lenders must find a way to work with borrowers on their own or accept the defaults and losses, and must not be allowed to dump their losses on the rest of us. I’d like to see all those free-market conservatives walk the walk and insist on allowing the market to correct.

    Katie, the reason to for this bailout isn’t to do favours to lenders & banks, it’s to avoid the whole economy tanking*, something everyone has an interest in … of course, the proposal Bush has made is the -worst- of the possible ways to do this.

    *as in Banks make losses, banks stop making loans, businesses cant expand & stop hiring, more unemployment = less consumption = more losses and hello, recession.

  • Comments are closed.