Wednesday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* After the GOP invested far more time and effort than it wanted to, Republicans won two special election House races yesterday. State Rep. Bob Latta (R) held off a challenge in Ohio’s 5th congressional district, defeating Robin Weirauch (D), 57% to 43%. State Del. Rob Wittman (R) defeated Iraq war veteran Philip Forgit (D) in Virginia’s 1st congressional district, 61% to 37%.

* Hoping to put a positive spin on two (largely expected) defeats, DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) said, “National Republicans, right wing special interest groups, and 527’s, like Freedom’s Watch, are alive and well in Republican House races. They poured more than $500,000 in to save Bob Latta in a 39% Democratic performing district. Tom Cole and the NRCC spending 20 percent of their cash on hand to retain one of the most Republican districts in the country — priceless.”

* A new CNN/WMUR poll in New Hampshire shows the Democratic race in the first primary state just about tied. According to the results, released this morning, Hillary Clinton now leads Barack Obama, 31% to 30%. Since the CNN/WMUR poll in November, Clinton has lost five points, and Obama has gained eight.

* The same poll found Mike Huckabee Mitt Romney hanging onto his sizable lead in New Hampshire, leading the GOP pack with 32% support, followed by Rudy Giuliani and John McCain who are tied with 19% each. Mike Huckabee is surging everywhere, except the Granite State, where he remains in single digits — 9%. (Fred Thompson’s support has dropped to just 1% in the state.)

* Romney got some very good news on the endorsement front yesterday when the National Review, arguably the most important publication of the conservative movement, threw its backing to the former Massachusetts governor.

* John Edwards raised a few eyebrows yesterday when he told an Iowa audience that he has been aggressive about ending the war in Iraq “from the very beginning.” A campaign spokesman later said that Edwards was referring to the beginning of his presidential campaign.

* Mike Huckabee had all kinds of interesting things to say in the early 1990s. In the latest example, Huckabee told the AP in 1992, “The U.S. should not kill Saddam Hussein or anyone else.” I imagine if a Democrat had said that, Republicans might have a few things to say about it.

* The Des Moines Register’s David Yepsen is all worked up about out-of-state students participating in Iowa’s caucuses. I’m not sure why — the Iowa Secretary of State actively instructs students how to do it. Wouldn’t Yepsen want more people participating in the process, especially young people?

* Apparently, Fred Thompson has decided to become too folksy. Asked about his national security policy yesterday in South Carolina, the former senator said, “The good guys win and the bad guys lose — how ’bout that?” Asked about his economic policy, he said, “Free people, free markets, doin’ free things together.” Asked if even more tax cuts would lead to lost revenue, Thompson responded, “It ain’t lost, it’s in my pocket.” Asked how he came to arrive at his views on healthcare policy, he said, “I had a conversation with my little mama back in Franklin, Tennessee.” I guess it’s easier than offering substance.

* MSNBC last night noted a poll I hadn’t seen before. Republicans were asked which of the Democratic candidates would make the best president. Obama was first with 23%, followed by Edwards at 18%, and Richardson at 14%. When the inverse was asked of Dems about the Republican field, Giuliani and McCain were tied at 24%, followed by Romney at 12%, and Huckabee at 11%.

* And finally, I was taken aback when I saw that ABC News had John Stossel interview Ron Paul. I mean, really, were none of Paul’s immediate family members available?

” The same poll found Mike Huckabee …”

Don’t you mean Romney??

  • CB, I think you meant Mitt Romney in the first reference:

    The same poll found Mike Huckabee hanging onto his sizable lead in New Hampshire, leading the GOP pack with 32% support. . . Mike Huckabee is surging everywhere, except the Granite State, where he remains in single digits — 9%

  • Fred Thompson simplified (like it’s possible): “Good guys, free love, money in my pocket and my mind on my mama and my mama on my mind.” or FT = Billy Carter + the GOP.

    Republicant’s like Obama and Dems like Giuliani?? Damn, the first evidence that Republicant’s might be smarter than Dems…Granted, we Dems don’t have much to choose from.

  • Huckabee wanted Sadaam brought to trial and not murdered in the streets or his bedroom.

    If we want to have a real political debate in this country then the press (and all of us) must be accountable for speaking truthfully.

  • Which Republican would make the best president? That’s like asking which form of cancer would be the most fun to get.

    But that poll definitely highlights how one Democrat would motivate the Republicans. It doesn’t matter that Hillary is from the far right wing of the Democratic field, they think she’s Satan.

  • I’d actually be curious to see which of the unpalatable Republicans would be least unacceptable to the readership here.

    For me, Il Douche is the worst of all Republican candidates–but maybe it takes a New Yorker to understand just how horrible he would be.

    Romney’s personally more horrifying, in that I’m not actually sure he’s human… but where Rudy IMO actually would be worse than Bush, Romney strikes me as a somewhat more competent Bush. (Fainter praise might not be possible.)

    My next tier up would be Huckabee, McCain and Thompson, all of whom are about even for me. Huck’s theocratic tendencies are worrisome, and like Bush I could easily him embarrassing the country on the world stage, but he was a decently competent governor and at least has the intellectual honesty to note the Bible as something more than an enabling document of hate and sadism. McCain is a war fetishist and his pandering has been despicable, but I admire his strong stand on torture and (to a lesser extent) on immigration, and I probably retain enough regard for him from the more pleasant 2000 incarnation that I wouldn’t be totally horrified to see him win. TV’s Fred is a dimwit, but he clearly lacks the energy to be as actively awful as Bush has been, and I like that he’s at least consistent on federalism–leaving issues like gay marriage, reproductive rights and end-of-life to the states rather than trying to impose Christianist Shar’ia on us all.

    Oh, and Paul is probably between Romney and the other three, closer to the three–in some sense, Paul’s active opposition to stupid foreign wars makes him much better than any other Republican (and not a few Democrats), but if you take that seriously, you also must take seriously his intention to demolish the government, which would be a disaster.

  • The same poll found Mike Huckabee hanging onto his sizable lead in New Hampshire, leading the GOP pack with 32% support, followed by Rudy Giuliani and John McCain who are tied with 19% each. Mike Huckabee is surging everywhere, except the Granite State, where he remains in single digits — 9%.

    I think you mean his sizeable lead in Iowa?

  • Dajafi, I would prefer Romney to any of the other Republicans. To me he’s little more than an empty-suit opportunist. Giuliani is evil, Thompson is terminally stupid, McCain is scary, Huckabee is nuts.

    I don’t think that going back to the gold standard makes much sense, but other than that I’m not going to say anything bad about Ron Paul. 🙂

  • Oops. Oddly, none of those other comments initially showed up when I was typing mine. Sorry for the redundancy.

  • “Granted, we Dems don’t have much to choose from.”

    huh? i think dems have a great choice. it’s the republicans who have nothing but losers running.

  • MSNBC last night noted a poll I hadn’t seen before. Republicans were asked which of the Democratic candidates would make the best president. Obama was first with 23%, followed by Edwards at 18%, and Richardson at 14%.

    And I bet if we went on some site like Amazon.com and looked for holiday gift recommendations for, for instance, a woman friend and a male friend, we’d very easily find someone who would tell us to give the woman exfoliating toe-cream so she can feel all kinky, and the man a map of the world, or Encyclopedia Brittanica.

  • “Granted, we Dems don’t have much to choose from.”

    huh? i think dems have a great choice. it’s the republicans who have nothing but losers running.

    Sorry just bill, I meant to say “Granted, we Dems don’t have much to choose from amongst the Republican candidates”.

    Remember, the question was asking who Dems prefer in the Republican field…

  • Comments are closed.