Coming soon, to a shredder near you

About a year ago, Wonkette published an interesting picture: an industrial shredder from the Mid-Atlantic Shredding Services was delivered by truck to the Cheney compound at the Naval Observatory. (The company, apparently, was “contracted by the Secret Service for our Executive Branch’s record-not-keeping needs.”)

Part of the problem with this, of course, is that Cheney already treats government materials with an almost-comical degree of secrecy. Man-size safes, used elsewhere in government for classified secrets, store the workaday business in Cheney’s office. The VP has even created his own classified designation for all of his documents — materials are stamped “Treated As: Top Secret/SCI” — including mundane papers like talking points for reporters.

Given this, the question quickly became obvious: if Cheney is keeping secrets classified and in man-size safes, why does he also need industrial shredders brought in by truck to his residence?

Apparently, that was only part of the problem. It’s not just Cheney — the administration’s shredding needs are downright exorbitant.

Federal spending on paper shredding has increased more than 600 percent since George W. Bush took office. This chart, generated by usaspending.gov, the U.S. government’s brand spanking new database of federal expenditures, shows spending on “contracts for paper shredding services” going back to 2000. Click here for the full, heartbreaking breakdown.

In 2000, the feds spent $452,807 to make unpleasant truths go away; by 2006, the “Cheney Effect” had bumped that number up to $2.9 million. And by halfway through 2007, the feds almost matched that number, with $2.7 million and counting. Pretty much says it all.

I’m sure there’s an innocent explanation for all of this. I just don’t know what it is.

Now, I have not yet entered the small but lucrative niche of chartblogging, but here’s the rundown on the expenses by year. I think you’ll notice the trend.

2000: $452,807
2001: $456,235
2002: $756,086
2003: $1,033,910
2004: $2,329,466
2005: $2,874,185
2006: $2,902,855
2007: $2,274,143

Now, I know what you’re thinking: “But look at 2007! Finally, the shredding expenses have gone down! Maybe this is a sign of progress?”

No such luck. The $2,274,143 only covers the first half of 2007 — meaning the Bush administration is poised to spend far more on shredding this year than in any previous year. This is the year, of course, that Dems took back Congress and started issuing subpoenas.

Great.

Maybe this is why Bushies don’t have a shred of integrity.

  • Don’t forget Cheney’s creation of his own classification that the OVP is not an ‘agency’ and thus not subject to various oversite-reporting-retention laws and policies. Thus nothing in OVP need be retained and can be shredded.

  • When you drill down through it, the bulk of that shredding is done at the Treasury.

    I work in Accounting and I wish we could get that level of detail!

  • OT I just went over to Firedoglake’s newly designed site and The first thing on top I see is an ad selling television dishes. The second thing I see upper right is the freedomswatch.org ad hawking their hawkish website. Can you spell “sellout”?

  • I’m sure Harry and Nancy will make some noise about it but then do absolutely nothing of consequence. They sold us out, just like Jay Rockefeller, who is still sitting on the report he wailed about.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/14/opinion/14fri1.html?ref=opinion

    USE AND MISUSE OF INTELLIGENCE Americans were stunned when the White House released a new intelligence assessment that said that Iran had halted its covert nuclear weapons program in 2003. Beyond those startling facts were questions about whether Mr. Bush knew of this assessment when he was warning about World War III if Iran were allowed to get a nuclear weapon.

    And that was a reminder of another time when Mr. Bush misled the nation about Iraqi weapons programs that had long disappeared. The Senate Intelligence Committee was supposed to have an investigation years ago into what Mr. Bush and other officials knew about the intelligence on Iraq’s weapons when they used it to stampede the country into war.

    For more than two years, the Republican chairman of the committee, Senator Pat Roberts, made sure that a report would never be finished. It has now been in the hands of his replacement, Democrat Jay Rockefeller, for nearly a year, and there is still no report. That means Americans still don’t know whether Mr. Bush deliberately hyped and distorted the intelligence on Iraq or was also misinformed.

    Americans need to know what Mr. Bush knew on both Iraq and Iran, and when he knew it. Anything less is unacceptable.

    Jay Rockefeller, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid apparently think all these crimes are acceptable. And because they suck so bad, Cheney will feel free to shred the evidence.

  • The only thing I want shredded would only become inedible hamburger. I wouldn’t even feed it to my dog, fearing she will suddenly become a right wing republican.

  • How convenient. At least now they won’t have to go back and fish this stuff out of the National Archives when they are out of office.

  • Look Spot. See Dick run. Run Dick, run.
    See Dick shred. Shred Dick, shred.
    See congress watch Dick shred. Hurry Dick, hurry. Shred Dick, shred.
    Congress is very sad. Dick is very happy.
    Here comes Nancy. Run Nancy, run.
    There goes Nancy. Nancy sees Dick shred. Nancy sees congress cry.
    There goes Nancy.
    Watch Dick laugh. Laugh Dick, laugh.
    See Dick wave at Nancy. See Nancy wave at Dick.
    Sleep spot, sleep.
    Shred Dick, shred.

    Wave Nancy, wave.

  • So when the WH disappeared 10 million emails there was much talk about the Preservation of Presidential Records Act, however, I have not seen or heard much about the penalties for destroying Presidential Records.

    Does it involve jail time? A really big fine? Loss of pension? Or just an asterisk in history?

    Remember that phony charge that when the Clintons left the WH all the Ws were missing off the keyboards? At this rate, they’ll be nothing left to show the Bushies were there except the Ws and the EPIC MESS left for Other People to clean up.

  • YOU AXXHOLES REALLY BELIVE THIS SXIT WRITTEN HERE?

    YOU ALL NEED TO GET SOME REAL LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • What’s an “axxhole”? And what is “sxit”?

    You know, you can swear here. We are all adults.

    Well, age-wise, we’re adults.

  • Now, I have not yet entered the small but lucrative niche of chartblogging, but here’s the rundown on the expenses by year. I think you’ll notice the trend.

    2000: $452,807
    2001: $456,235
    2002: $756,086
    2003: $1,033,910
    2004: $2,329,466
    2005: $2,874,185
    2006: $2,902,855
    2007: $2,274,143

    Well, you know, CB, you forgot to calculate the role that inflation played in the cost increases.

    Oh, and the fact that this administration’s criminal activity increased tenfold every year.

  • What’s an “axxhole”? — 2Manchu, @12

    Do you really need to ax? It’s what the ctitter got in an argument with his neighbour. That was the exit hole for his brains, which leaked out through it.

  • So what’s a visitor to Chimpy’s Presidential Library to view? I guess just a big pile of confetti.

    I expect Perino to spin the shredding as the administration’s effort to save taxpayer funds on file cabinets.

  • I there is an simple explanation. Copier scanned pdf files have taken the place of fax transmissions. Now you scan whatever, including graphics and color, your copier send them to your email in a pdf file, you can forward it to 100 people in a minute, no matter their country.

    The issue is that instead of being limited with a fax, you can it to anyone even remotely interested. If you are like me, you print, scan, and shred.

    My paper consumption has increased 5 fold in the past three years.

    But hey, it’s Cheney and no ever went broke betting against Cheney’s innocence.

  • This is an interesting posting. I do however, have a bone to pick with document destruction companies who say that you need a
    shredder to protect your documents.First, idendity theft is actually on the decline. So, to be specific fishing and other types of scams, as well as straight out credit card number theft of other kinds of person-to-person scams are on a severe
    decline. Whats really a concern is companies who aren’t keeping an eye on their databases.
    Second, why do you need a shredder? Why not just buy a pair of scissors? Its a lot cheeper from a personal finance
    standpoint, and it can be a fun family exercise.
    Just my personal pet peeve.
    Best,

  • Buyaviagra.net – viagra is used to treat impotence in men. Viagra increases the body’s ability to achieve and maintain an erection during sexual stimulation. Viagra does not protect you from getting sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV. Boost your Sexual night with long lasting sex with VIAGRA. http://www.buyaviagra.net

  • Comments are closed.