Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* After the U.S. gave Turkey real-time intelligence in attacking PKK, the Turks are ready to pull back: “Turkey sent hundreds of troops about 1 1/2 miles into northern Iraq early Tuesday in an operation against Kurdish rebels but then withdrew them later in the day, Kurdish officials said. Jamal Abdullah, a spokesman for the regional Kurdistan government, told The Associated Press that the 300 Turkish troops had withdrawn about 15 hours after entering Iraq about 3 a.m. Jabar Yawar, a spokesman for Kurdistan’s Peshmerga security forces in Irbil, Iraq, told the AP that ‘today’s Turkish military operation was a limited one, and the troops withdrew from Iraqi territory.'”

* The torture tape controversy took an interesting turn today, when the judicial branch entered the fray: “Much to the administration’s chagrin, Judge Henry H. Kennedy Jr. has ordered a hearing on the CIA’s destruction of the torture tapes for this Friday at 11 AM. Back in 2005, Kennedy, a Clinton appointee, had ordered the Bush administration to safeguard ‘all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay.'”

* Blackwater caused quite a scandal with shooting Iraqi civilians, but now the private security firm has really done it: Blackwater bodyguards shot the dog of the New York Times’ Baghdad bureau staff.

* Some things will never change: “If you thought Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) was going to let the berries in his state go unresearched and the vistas of alternative uses for salmon unexplored just because he’s under federal investigation for past earmarks (among other things), then you thought wrong.”

* Either al Qaeda captive Abu Zubayda was a key source of valuable intelligence or a mentally-retarded man who told U.S. officials nonsensical intelligence to stop the torture. To this day, the CIA insists it’s the prior, and the FBI insists it’s the latter.

* This is likely to have a major impact: “The Federal Communications Commission, overturning a 32-year-old ban, voted Tuesday to allow broadcasters in the nation’s 20 largest media markets to also own a newspaper. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin was joined by his two Republican colleagues in favor of the proposal, while the commission’s two Democrats voted against it.”

* Quick, someone call a bloggers’ ethics panel: “On the December 17 edition of Fox News’ Hannity & Colmes, co-host Sean Hannity interviewed former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R), but did not disclose during the 13-minute interview that he has reportedly helped raise money for Giuliani’s presidential campaign.”

* Good: “The House has just passed the Veterans Guaranteed Bonus Act of 2007, which will ensure that members of the armed services who are discharged as a result of combat-related wounds receive the full compensation to which they are entitled by the Department of Defense. According to Department of Defense rules, enlistees cannot receive their full enlistment bonus unless they fulfill their entire military obligation. Unfortunately, members of the armed services who are wounded while on active duty are not receiving their full bonuses because their service was prematurely cut short. The Veterans Guaranteed Bonus Act, H.R. 3793, will correct this problem.”

* House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) wrote to Attorney General Michael Mukasey two weeks ago, requesting records from Patrick Fitzgerald’s investigation. Mukasey apparently ignored the letter, prompting Waxman to push a little further today.

* Is Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) still physically up to serving as chairman of the Appropriations Committee? A growing number of Senate Dems are worried he is not.

* It’s been watered down, but a congressional energy bill is on its way to the president.

* For right-wing talk show host Dennis Prager, a politician’s religion should be entirely irrelevant, unless he or she is a Muslim, in which case a politician’s faith is paramount.

* So much for that idea: “Former President George H.W. Bush has shot down his successor Bill Clinton’s idea of a diplomatic mission under a Hillary Clinton presidency that would send him and other notables abroad to assure other nations that ‘America is open for business and cooperation again.’ … In a statement sent to CNN Tuesday afternoon, former President Bush’s chief of staff Jean Becker said that he ‘wholeheartedly supports the President of the United States, including his foreign policy.'”

* Peter Jackson is going to make “The Hobbit” after all.

* A few weeks ago, Karl Rove was looking to cash in on his White House service with a book deal, with “Turd Blossom” seeking $3 million. How’s that working out? Not very well: “The auction for Karl Rove’s memoir drags on a month after the Republican strategist made the rounds of publishers with Washington power lawyer Robert Barnett at his side. ‘It’s very, very slow,’ says an executive at one of the few houses left in the bidding.” In the immortal words of Nelson Muntz: “Ha ha.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

In a statement sent to CNN Tuesday afternoon, former President Bush’s chief of staff Jean Becker said that he ‘wholeheartedly supports the President of the United States, including his foreign policy.’”

Yeah, why wouldn’t Bush 41 support his idiot son’s foreign policy? Just because it’s the exact opposite of what 41 recommended, that’s no reason not to support it!

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003671351

Poppy, you’re living up to expectations. Your clan’s penchant for “loyalty” to criminals is duly noted, yet again.

  • Perhaps the thought of “Daddy” having to fix Junior’s soiled diaper is just too much for that “beautiful mind” CRONE to contemplate….

  • I wonder if Schumer and Feinstein are still pleased with their vote for Mukasey. I can’t tell if they are stupid or so full of ego that they go beyond stupidity. Mukasey certainly is proving himself to be Bush’s man, not the country’s.

  • Blackwater screwed the pooch. — burro, @3

    You figure? Before, or after they shot it?

    Don’t tell Huckabee. He’s against that sort of thing.

  • “In a statement sent to CNN Tuesday afternoon, former President Bush’s chief of staff Jean Becker said that he ‘wholeheartedly supports the President of the United States, including his foreign policy.’”

    Oh, well. Can’t say they didn’t offer.

  • As I understand it, neither of the detainees who were the subjects of the torture tapes were at Gitmo, but at a black site location. At the time of the order, no one knew of the existence of these secret prisons; I’m guessing the argument for finding the CIA in violation of that order is that if the court had known, it would have made the order broad enough to cover all locations where detainees were being held.

    You know that an unfavorable ruling from the Court will send it to the next level; a favorable one will be a real blow, even if it comes by way of a technicality. There will be no moral victories in this.
    ****
    The FCC ruling is a travesty. It’s bad enough that Rupert Murdoch is extending his reach like kudzu, but it seems like the only benefit in allowing ownership consolidation of media outlets is monetary – the public will not be better informed or have more choices.
    ****
    No one wants to pay top dollar to read Rove’s memoirs – apparently no one wants to buy Ann Coulter’s already-published book, either. Guess we can expect her to rise from the crypt to utter some especially ugly invective, so brace yourselves. Garlic necklaces and crucifixes for everyone!

  • CalD@9
    Better still. LIKELY caucus goers have Edwards slightly in first, followed by Obama and Hil in THIRD.

    Not sure if Edwards had much to do with it. Bill’s mudslinging at Obama clearly wiped on his wife making Edwards the “class act” in the last news cycle.

    So Bill says Obama has the presidential chops of a pool boy and says he’s going to gallivant around the Middle East as soon as HRCptui takes the oath. Oops. He didn’t clear that with daddy-Bush. Is Clinton going senile?

  • CalD@9–Thanks for the great news!

    Re the FEC decision. Can that be overturned, assuming a Democrat gets in the White House? I’d really like to see media consolidation tackled by the next administration. I can’t help wonder what other surprises the Bush gang is going to hit us with as we head towards election time.

  • CalD – I’ve been hoping all along that Edwards could move to the top while Clinton and Obama were busy going at it, despite the media’s best efforts to frame this as a 2-person race.

    I know Edwards isn’t perfect – no one is – but I do think we need someone with real steel in his spine, and this last year has made that abundantly clear. I’m just so over these namby-pamby, mealy-mouthed, conciliatory politicians who seem to have forgotten who is it they are supposed to be working for.

    While I do not think Obama is ready for the top spot now, I do think he’s smart and has a lot going for him, and I think an Edwards-Obama ticket would truly galvanize the people, and the election results would be a real mandate for change. Put Chris Dodd in as majority leader, and replace Pelosi in the House, and I think we would blow the doors off the Congress – in a positive and beneficial way.

    Fingers crossed.

  • I saw a piece over on MSNBC News that suggests the U.S. is “angered” over the Turkish incursion into Iraq, and reports that top military officers were not aware of the attack until the planes had already crossed the border. That doesn’t square too well (surprise!) with the suggestion that the U.S. fed pre-strike intel to Turkey. What did they suppose the Turks were going to do with that information, after their legislative body had approved strikes into Iraq? See it here ( http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22307173/ ) if you’re interested.

    Lying is getting to be a disease in official America, and now it is apparently automatic, even when it must be known that the truth is easily available. Who does the administration and its toadies and lickspittles think they are fooling? That 26 to 30 percent who still think the sun shines out of Bush’s asshole? Why bother? You could tell them that Bush stumbled in the White House kitchen and fell into the cookie dough, and the impression left by his face is a dead ringer for Jesus – they’d line up to buy a picture of it. They can safely be told the unvarnished truth, since they will ignore it in favour of their fantasy.

  • the key there is “likely” voters — this has always been Edwards’ hidden strength: he didn’t let his 2004 infrastructure wither, so he has dedicated, experienced supporters who are more reliable than those of the other candidates.

    a real general election test for Edwards will be whether, for the first time in a long time, someone can actually get a class warfare theme to work. he is being very blatent about class warfare in his new Iowa spots; traditionally (for, among other things, reasons touched on but not fleshed out in “Whats the Matter with Kansas”) this has not been a general election winner.

    maybe Bush has finally made the inequities sufficiently stark that a red-meat fighter for the middle class is a welcome thing.

  • i should add, however, that this, a caucus entry poll is very bad for Edwards for the reasons indicated at the link: if the entry poll results get reported before the official results, Edwards may not get the benefit of the “second choice” moves (and as another article noted recently, Edwards rural numbers also may come in slowly, another chance for the ADD-afflicted media to misreport to Edwards’ disadvantage.

  • Thanks CalD for a real morale lifter here in Iowa. I’m one of those not so vocal Edwards supporters and I’ll be there Jan. 3 supporting him, even if they have to wheel me in. I’ve been so disgusted at the media basically ignoring Edwards for so long that I’m hoping for an upset here to put HRC in her place at the bottom of the heap. Both Obama and HRC are big ‘hold my nose’ options for me, so I’m probably atypical responding to polls when I place my bets on Edwards first (I doubt he’ll not reach viability in my precinct) and cite Dodd as my second choice. And believe me, Dodd has been looking better and better for quite some time now. I just wish he had a better chance of winning the nomination, but I think he’d be superb as a replacement for Harry Reid as Majority leader!

    My dream outcome of the caucuses is that HRC repeats a Dean-like crash and burn here. (Sorry Howard, I went for Kucinich first and Edwards second in 2004, but I still heart ya!) A guy can hope, can’t he?

    Oh yeah, and it was the Holiday card I got from John and Elizabeth that cinched it for me! /snark It was a nice touch for a long time supporter to receive it nonetheless.

    btw many thx to CalD, Anne, and Zeitgeist for expanding on this morale booster.

  • I know it may sound petty to say that Blackwater is now really in trouble for shooting a dog, after killing God knows how many Iraqi civilians, but it’s the case that humans can block out the death of other humans on the basis of “I don’t know them.” But everybody knows the friendly neighborhood dog or cat, and everyone knows viscerally that an animal is truly innocent; there is no way anyone can say that some way, somehow, the animal did anything to “deserve it,” no matter the convoluted irrational reasoning it takes to put a human in the “they deserved it somehow” category.

    I’m fine with Blackwater getting whacked for killing a dog if that’s what it takes to get those Confederate Traitors (Blackwater – proof of what happens when you give hillbillies guns, pick ’em up trucks and corn likker without the country sheriff around) into whatever prison they belong in “without parole.”

  • Just to continue this point, in movies, if you want to show the bad guy is really bad, no matter if you have shown him shooting every other human in the movie at close range with a large-caliber pistol with the results in slow motion, have him do something bad to an animal. Conversely, if you want to sanctify the hero, have them sacrifice their safety for an animal. Think of the first “Alien” – Ridley is running for the escape capsule and she realizes her cat, Jonesy, hasn’t been saved. She risks everything to rescue Jonesy, which makes us all just go YEAH!!! when she blasts The Alien out the airlock. And then she takes care of Jonesy for the interstellar sleep before taking care of herself – the epitome of being a Good Person.

    But then, given that any animal is superior to any human (when was the last time an animal lied to you, stole from you, tried to knife you in the back at an important moment, messed you around with your friends, did anything bad, evil or immoral to you?), it really is true – as Gandhi said – that you can tell the level of civilization of a society by the way it treats its animals.

  • when was the last time an animal lied to you

    Tom, you’ve never owned a cat. But overall I’m with Gandhi on the subject.

  • Comments are closed.